Mneimneh F, Moussalem C, Ghaddar N, Ghali K, Omeis I. Experimental study on the effectiveness of the PCM cooling vest in persons with paraplegia of varying levels.
J Therm Biol 2020;
91:102634. [PMID:
32716876 DOI:
10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102634]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Persons with paraplegia (PA) from thoracic spinal cord injury (T1-T12) are prone to thermal stress during exercise due to impaired thermoregulation. This study evaluates the effectiveness of phase change material (PCM) cooling vests on persons with PA of different levels of injury during exercise in hot exposure. Sixteen participants were recruited and divided to three groups based on injury level; high-thoracic T1-T3, mid-thoracic T4-T8, and low thoracic T9-T12 to perform a 30-min arm-crank exercise at a 30 °C room condition. Two types of PCM vests at melting temperature of 20 °C were tested: i) V1 with PCM covering the trunk of 3.4 kg overall vest mass and ii) V2 with PCM covering chest and upper back of 2.17 kg overall vest mass. High thoracic and low-thoracic groups performed NV and V1 tests; whereas, mid-thoracic group performed NV, V1, and V2 tests. Heart rate, core, and skin temperatures were monitored during 15-min preconditioning, 30-min exercise, and 15-min recovery. In addition, thermal comfort, sensation, skin wettedness, and perceived exertion were recorded during exercise only. The main findings were that the effectiveness of the cooling vest was dependent on injury level and portion of sensate skin of trunk covered by the PCM packets. Rise in core temperature (ΔTcr) was reduced significantly for the low-thoracic group during exercise and recovery (ΔTcr=0.41°C, 0.26°C for NV and V1; respectively, p<0.05). For the mid-thoracic group, both V1 (p = 0.001) and V2 (p = 0.008) were effective in reducing ΔTcr compared to the NV test at the end of the recovery period (0.74°C,0.42°C,0.56°C, for NV, V1 and V2; respectively). For the high-thoracic group, V1 was not effective in reducing core temperature (p>0.05). For the mid-thoracic group, V2 at 36% lower mass significantly improved thermal comfort (p = 0.0004) compared to the NV test and was as effective compared to V1 in reducing core temperature.
Collapse