Neuregulin 1 Fusion–Positive NSCLC

Neuregulin-1 and ALS19 (ERBB4): at the crossroads of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cancer

BACKGROUND

Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) is implicated in both cancer and neurologic diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); however, to date, there has been little cross-field discussion between neurology and oncology in regard to these genes and their functions.

MAIN BODY

Approximately 0.15-0.5% of cancers harbor NRG1 fusions that upregulate NRG1 activity and hence that of the cognate ERBB3/ERBB4 (HER3/HER4) receptors; abrogating this activity with small molecule inhibitors/antibodies shows preliminary tissue-agnostic anti-cancer activity. Notably, ERBB/HER pharmacologic suppression is devoid of neurologic toxicity. Even so, in ALS, attenuated ERBB4/HER4 receptor activity (due to loss-of-function germline mutations or other mechanisms in sporadic disease) is implicated; indeed, ERBB4/HER4 is designated ALS19. Further, secreted-type NRG1 isoforms may be upregulated (perhaps via a feedback loop) and could contribute to ALS pathogenesis through aberrant glial cell stimulation via enhanced activity of other (e.g., ERBB1-3/HER1-3) receptors and downstream pathways. Hence, pan-ERBB inhibitors, already in use for cancer, may be agents worthy of testing in ALS.

CONCLUSION

Common signaling cascades between cancer and ALS may represent novel therapeutic targets for both diseases.

Rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer

Oncogenes that occur in ≤5% of non-small-cell lung cancers have been defined as 'rare'; nonetheless, this frequency can correspond to a substantial number of patients diagnosed annually. Within rare oncogenes, less commonly identified alterations (such as HRAS, NRAS, RIT1, ARAF, RAF1 and MAP2K1 mutations, or ERBB family, LTK and RASGRF1 fusions) can share certain structural or oncogenic features with more commonly recognized alterations (such as KRAS, BRAF, MET and ERBB family mutations, or ALK, RET and ROS1 fusions). Over the past 5 years, a surge in the identification of rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers has challenged the boundaries of traditional clinical grade diagnostic assays and profiling algorithms. In tandem, the number of approved targeted therapies for patients with rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer has risen dramatically. Rational drug design has iteratively improved the quality of small-molecule therapeutic agents and introduced a wave of antibody-based therapeutics, expanding the list of actionable de novo and resistance alterations in lung cancer. Getting additional molecularly tailored therapeutics approved for rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers in a larger range of countries will require ongoing stakeholder cooperation. Patient advocates, health-care agencies, investigators and companies with an interest in diagnostics, therapeutics and real-world evidence have already taken steps to surmount the challenges associated with research into low-frequency drivers.

Construction and prognostic value of enhanced CT image omics model for noninvasive prediction of HRG in bladder cancer based on logistic regression and support vector machine algorithm

Background

Urothelial Carcinoma of the bladder (BLCA) is the most prevalent cancer of the urinary system. In cancer patients, HRG fusion is linked to a poor prognosis. The prediction of HRG expression by imaging omics in BLCA has not yet been fully investigated.

Methods

HRG expression in BLCA and healthy adjoining tissues was primarily identified utilizing data sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Landmark analysis, the relationship between HRG expression, clinicopathological parameters, and overall survival (OS) was investigated. Additionally, gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was conducted and CIBERSORTx was used to investigate the relationship between HRG expression and immune cell infiltration. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) provided CT images that were used for prognostic analysis, radiomic feature extraction, and construction of the model, respectively. The HRG expression levels were predicted using the constructed and evaluated LR and SMV models.

Results

HRG expression was shown to be substantially lower in BLCA tumors as opposed to that observed in normal tissues (p < 0.05). HRG expression had a close positive relationship with Eosinophils and a close negative relationship with B cells naive. The findings of the Landmark analysis illustrated that higher HRG was associated with improved patient survival at an early stage (P=0.048). The predictive performance of the two models, based on logistic regression analysis and support vector machine, was outstanding in the training and validation sets, yielding AUCs of 0.722 and 0.708, respectively, in the SVM model, and 0.727 and 0.662, respectively, in the LR.The models have good predictive efficiency.

Conclusion

HRG expression levels can have a significant impact on BLCA patients' prognoses. The radiomic characteristics can successfully predict the pre-surgical HRG expression levels, based on CT- Image omics.

Therapeutic advances in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a focus on targeted therapies

Mortality from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing worldwide and effective new treatments are urgently needed. The current treatment of metastatic PDAC in fit patients is based on two chemotherapy combinations (FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) which were validated more than 8 years ago. Although almost all treatments targeting specific molecular alterations have failed so far when administered to unselected patients, encouraging results were observed in the small subpopulations of patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations, and somatic gene fusions (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase, Neuregulin 1, which are enriched in KRAS wild-type PDAC), KRAS G12C mutations, or microsatellite instability. While targeted tumor metabolism therapies and immunotherapy have been disappointing, they are still under investigation in combination with other drugs. Optimizing pharmacokinetics and adapting available chemotherapies based on molecular signatures are other promising avenues of research. This review evaluates the current expectations and limits of available treatments and analyses the existing trials. A permanent search for actionable vulnerabilities in PDAC tumor cells and microenvironments will probably result in a more personalized therapeutic approach, keeping in mind that supportive care must also play a major role if real clinical efficacy is to be achieved in these patients.

Oncogenic Neuregulin 1 gene (NRG1) fusions in cancer: A potential new therapeutic opportunities

It is widely established that chromosomal rearrangements induce oncogenesis in solid tumors. However, discovering chromosomal rearrangements that are targetable and actionable remains a difficulty. Targeting gene fusion or chromosomal rearrangement seems to be a powerful strategy to address malignancies characterized by gene rearrangement. Oncogenic NRG1 fusions are relatively rare drivers that infrequently occur across most tumor types. NRG1 fusions exhibit unique biological properties and are difficult to identify owing to their large intronic regions. NRG1 fusions can be detected using a variety of techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, or next-generation sequencing (NGS), with NGS-based RNA sequencing being the most sensitive. Previous studies have shown that NRG1 fusion protein induces tumorigenesis, and numerous therapies targeting the ErbB signaling pathway, such as ErbB kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, have initially demonstrated encouraging anticancer efficacy in malignant tumors carrying NRG1 fusions. In this review, we present the characteristics and prevalence of NRG1 fusions in solid tumors. Additionally, we discuss the laboratory approaches for diagnosing NRG1 gene fusions. More importantly, we outline promising strategies for treating malignancies with NRG1 fusion.

Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer Patients With Oncogenic Driver Molecular Alterations

Lung cancer has traditionally been classified by histology. However, a greater understanding of disease biology and the identification of oncogenic driver alterations has dramatically altered the therapeutic landscape. Consequently, the new classification paradigm of non-small-cell lung cancer is further characterized by molecularly defined subsets actionable with targeted therapies and the treatment landscape is becoming increasingly complex. This review encompasses the current standards of care for targeted therapies in lung cancer with driver molecular alterations. Targeted therapies for EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R mutations, and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are well established. However, there is an expanding list of approved targeted therapies including for BRAF V600E, EGFR exon 20 insertion, and KRAS G12C mutations, MET exon 14 alterations, and NTRK and RET rearrangements. In addition, there are numerous other oncogenic drivers, such as HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations, for which there are emerging efficacy data for targeted therapies. The importance of diagnostic molecular testing, intracranial efficacy of novel therapies, the optimal sequencing of therapies, role for targeted therapies in early-stage disease, and future directions for precision oncology approaches to understand tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance are also discussed.

NRG1 and NRG2 fusion positive solid tumor malignancies: a paradigm of ligand-fusion oncogenesis

Neuregulins (NRGs) are a family of six related physiological ligands all containing a receptor-binding epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain that mediate their binding to cellular receptors. Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) is the main physiological ligand to HER3. NRG1 fusion (NRG1+) was first reported in a breast cancer cell line and NRG2 fusions have recently been identified in solid tumors. It is postulated that NRG1 fusions, through mostly transmembrane fusion partners, result in NRG1 being concentrated in proximity to HER3, leading to its constitutive activation and oncogenesis. Recently, a monoclonal antibody that disrupts the binding of NRG1 to HER3 and HER3/HER2 heterodimerization has resulted in NRG1+ tumor shrinkage, suggesting that 'ligand-fusion' may be a novel mechanism of oncogenesis.

NRG1 and NRG2 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): seven years between lights and shadows

INTRODUCTION

Fusions in neuregulin 1 (NRG1) and neuregulin 2 (NRG2) genes are molecular features of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These rearrangements enhance ectopic expression of the NRG/ErbB receptor-ligand and induce the triggering of downstream pathways. Evidence suggests the involvement of the NRG1/ErbB3 axis deregulation in the progression and treatment resistance of NSCLC cancer (NSCLC) and that NRG1 fusions are prognostic/predictive markers for targeted therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Biological and prognostic/predictive value of NRG1 and NRG2 fusions in NSCLC and their related cellular pathways are described and discussed. Publications in English language, peer-reviewed, high-quality international journals were identified on PubMed, as well as scientific official sites were used to update the international clinical trials progress.

EXPERT OPINION

NRG1 and NRG2 fusions should be considered as novel markers for biological therapy targeting ErbB2/ErbB3. There is evidence for the involvement of the NRG1/ErbB3 axis deregulation in cancer stem cell phenotype, tumor progression, and resistance to NSCLC therapy. Neuregulin fusions are very complex, hence many question marks must be tackled before translating these molecular lesions into clinical practice. Biology, and aggressiveness of the NRG1 and NRG2 fusions warrant further investigations.

Identification of Novel CDH1-NRG2α and F11R-NRG2α Fusions in NSCLC Plus Additional Novel NRG2α Fusions in Other Solid Tumors by Whole Transcriptome Sequencing

Introduction

A novel CD74-NRG2α fusion has recently been identified in NSCLC. We surveyed a large tumor database comprehensively profiled by whole transcriptome sequencing to investigate the incidence and distribution of NRG2 fusions among various solid tumors.

Methods

Tumor samples submitted for clinical molecular profiling at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) that underwent whole transcriptome sequencing (NovaSeq [Illumina, San Diego, CA]) were retrospectively analyzed for NRG2 fusion events. All NRG2 fusions with sufficient reads (> three junctional reads spanning ≥ seven nucleotides) were identified for manual review, characterization of fusion class, intact functional domains, EGF-like domain isoforms, breakpoints, frame retention, and co-occurring alterations by next-generation sequencing (NextSeq [Illumina, San Diego, CA], 592 genes).

Results

Seven inframe functional (containing the intact EGF-like domain) NRG2α fusions were identified, namely, the following: (1) NSCLC (two of 9600, 0.02%: CDH1-NRG2α [C11, N2], F11R-NRG2α [F1, N4]); (2) endometrial (two of 3060, 0.065%: CPM-NRG2α [C2, N2], OPA3-NRG2α [O1, N2]); (3) ovarian (one of 5030, 0.02%: SPON1-NRG2α [S6, N2]); (4) prostate (one of 1600, 0.063%: PLPP1-NRG2α [P1, N2]); and (5) carcinoma of unknown origin (one of 1400, 0.07%: CYSTM1-NRG2α [C2, N2]). No NRG2β fusions were identified. Both NSCLC samples contained the reciprocal NRG2 fusions (NRG2-CDH1, NRG2-F11R). Almost all inframe NRG2α fusions have no (N = 6, 85.7%) or low (N = 1, 14.3%) programmed death-ligand 1 expression. No additional known driver mutations were identified in these seven NRG2α fusion-positive tumor samples.

Conclusions

Similar to NRG1 fusions, NRG2α fusions are recurrent and rare ligand-fusions in NSCLC and other multiple tumor types, especially gynecologic malignancies.

Clinicopathologic Features and Response to Therapy of NRG1 Fusion-Driven Lung Cancers: The eNRGy1 Global Multicenter Registry

PURPOSE

Although NRG1 fusions are oncogenic drivers across multiple tumor types including lung cancers, these are difficult to study because of their rarity. The global eNRGy1 registry was thus established to characterize NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers in the largest and most diverse series to date.

METHODS

From June 2018 to February 2020, a consortium of 22 centers from nine countries in Europe, Asia, and the United States contributed data from patients with pathologically confirmed NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers. Profiling included DNA-based and/or RNA-based next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Anonymized clinical, pathologic, molecular, and response (RECIST v1.1) data were centrally curated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Although the typified never smoking (57%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (57%), and nonmetastatic (71%) phenotype predominated in 110 patients with NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancer, further diversity, including in smoking history (43%) and histology (43% nonmucinous and 6% nonadenocarcinoma), was elucidated. RNA-based testing identified most fusions (74%). Molecularly, six (of 18) novel 5' partners, 20 unique epidermal growth factor domain-inclusive chimeric events, and heterogeneous 5'/3' breakpoints were found. Platinum-doublet and taxane-based (post-platinum-doublet) chemotherapy achieved low objective response rates (ORRs 13% and 14%, respectively) and modest progression-free survival medians (PFS 5.8 and 4.0 months, respectively). Consistent with a low programmed death ligand-1 expressing (28%) and low tumor mutational burden (median: 0.9 mutations/megabase) immunophenotype, the activity of chemoimmunotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy was poor (ORR 0%/PFS 3.3 months and ORR 20%/PFS 3.6 months, respectively). Afatinib achieved an ORR of 25%, not contingent on fusion type, and a 2.8-month median PFS.

CONCLUSION

NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers were molecularly, pathologically, and clinically more heterogeneous than previously recognized. The activity of cytotoxic, immune, and targeted therapies was disappointing. Further research examining NRG1-rearranged tumor biology is needed to develop new therapeutic strategies.

The rapidly evolving landscape of novel targeted therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease often driven by well-characterized driver mutations. Although the best studied are common alterations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) oncogenes, rapid advances in molecular characterization has led to the development of novel therapeutics that inhibit additional oncogenic alterations in advanced NSCLC. The literature search identified 62 eligible phase I/II clinical trials or integrated analyses of assessing novel targeted agents against the following molecular alterations: ROS1-rearranged, BRAF V600E-mutant, NTRK-rearranged, MET-altered, uncommon EGFR-mutant, RET-rearranged, HER2-positive, KRAS G12C-mutant and NRG1-rearranged. This rapidly evolving field has produced many new targeted treatment options and promising outcomes have led to the FDA approval of seven novel agents for use in ROS1-rearranged, BRAF V600E-mutant, NTRK-rearranged, MET exon 14 skipping-mutant or RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC. Research continues at a rapid pace, with a number of phase III trials underway to fully evaluate new promising agents under development for improving outcomes in patients with NSCLC harboring distinct molecular subtypes. This review will provide a comprehensive summary of existing data as well as a user-friendly guide on the current status of novel targeted therapy in oncogene-driven advanced NSCLC.

Fusion proteins in lung cancer: addressing diagnostic problems for deciding therapy

Introduction: Gene fusions are frequent chromosomal aberrations in solid tumors. In Lung cancer (LC) several druggable-fusions involving tyrosine kinase receptor genes have been described, including ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK. In non-small cell lung cancer, testing for targetable fusions has become a part of routine clinical practice, greatly impacting therapeutic choice for patients with these aberrations. Although substantial technologies for gene fusion detection have been implemented over time including; cytogenetic, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Retro-transcription Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR), to Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), nCounter system (Nanostring technology), several critical issues remain. To date, only the companion diagnostic tests FISH and IHC for ALK-rearrangements and NGS for ROS1-rearrangments were approved. Other fusion approved tests are currently unavailable.Areas covered: In this review, we explore current diagnostic problems of gene fusion detection relative to the technologies available, in order to clarify future standardization of analyses which determine therapeutic choices.Expert opinion: The establishment of a gold standard, an effective diagnostic algorithm, and a standardized interpretation for the analysis of each druggable-fusions in lung cancer is essential for adequate therapeutic management.

A Performance Comparison of Commonly Used Assays to Detect RET Fusions

PURPOSE

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib induce deep and durable responses in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive lung and thyroid cancer. RET fusion testing strategies with rapid and reliable results are critical given recent FDA approval. Here, we assess various clinical assays in a large pan-cancer cohort.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumors underwent DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) with reflex to RNA-based NGS if no mitogenic driver or if a RET structural variant of unknown significance (SVUS) were present. Canonical DNA-level RET fusions and RNA-confirmed RET fusions were considered true fusions. Break-apart FISH and IHC performance were assessed in subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 171 of 41,869 patients with DNA NGS harbored RET structural variants, including 139 canonical fusions and 32 SVUS. Twelve of 32 (37.5%) SVUS were transcribed into RNA-level fusions, resulting in 151 oncogenic RET fusions. The most common RET fusion-positive tumor types were lung (65.6%) and thyroid (23.2%). The most common partners were KIF5B (45%), CCDC6 (29.1%), and NCOA4 (13.3%). DNA NGS showed 100% (46/46) sensitivity and 99.6% (4,459/4,479) specificity. FISH showed 91.7% (44/48) sensitivity, with lower sensitivity for NCOA4-RET (66.7%, 8/12). A total of 87.5% (7/8) of RET SVUS negative for RNA-level fusions demonstrated rearrangement by FISH. The sensitivity of IHC varied by fusion partner: KIF5B sensitivity was highest (100%, 31/31), followed by CCDC6 (88.9%, 16/18) and NCOA4 (50%, 6/12). Specificity of RET IHC was 82% (73/89).

CONCLUSIONS

Although DNA sequencing has high sensitivity and specificity, RNA sequencing of RET SVUS is necessary. Both FISH and IHC demonstrated lower sensitivity for NCOA4-RET fusions.

NRG1 fusions in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

NRG1 gene fusions may be clinically actionable, since cancers carrying the fusion transcripts can be sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The NRG1 gene encodes ligands for the HER2(ERBB2)-ERBB3 heterodimeric receptor tyrosine kinase, and the gene fusions are thought to lead to autocrine stimulation of the receptor. The NRG1 fusion expressed in the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-175 serves as a model example of such fusions, showing the proposed autocrine loop and exceptional drug sensitivity. However, its structure has not been properly characterised, its oncogenic activity has not been fully explained, and there is limited data on such fusions in breast cancer.

METHODS

We analysed genomic rearrangements and transcripts of NRG1 in MDA-MB-175 and a panel of 571 breast cancers.

RESULTS

We found that the MDA-MB-175 fusion-originally reported as a DOC4(TENM4)-NRG1 fusion, lacking the cytoplasmic tail of NRG1-is in reality a double fusion, PPP6R3-TENM4-NRG1, producing multiple transcripts, some of which include the cytoplasmic tail. We hypothesise that many NRG1 fusions may be oncogenic not for lacking the cytoplasmic domain but because they do not encode NRG1's nuclear-localised form. The fusion in MDA-MB-175 is the result of a very complex genomic rearrangement, which we partially characterised, that creates additional expressed gene fusions, RSF1-TENM4, TPCN2-RSF1, and MRPL48-GAB2. We searched for NRG1 rearrangements in 571 breast cancers subjected to genome sequencing and transcriptome sequencing and found four cases (0.7%) with fusions, WRN-NRG1, FAM91A1-NRG1, ARHGEF39-NRG1, and ZNF704-NRG1, all splicing into NRG1 at the same exon as in MDA-MB-175. However, the WRN-NRG1 and ARHGEF39-NRG1 fusions were out of frame. We identified rearrangements of NRG1 in many more (8% of) cases that seemed more likely to inactivate than to create activating fusions, or whose outcome could not be predicted because they were complex, or both. This is not surprising because NRG1 can be pro-apoptotic and is inactivated in some breast cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the complexity of rearrangements of NRG1 in breast cancers and confirm that some do not activate but inactivate. Careful interpretation of NRG1 rearrangements will therefore be necessary for appropriate patient management.

Emerging oncogenic fusions other than ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK in NSCLC and the role of fusions as resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy

Recent evidence has shown that gene fusions caused by chromosomal rearrangements are frequent events in the initiation and during progression of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Since the discoveries of ALK and ROS1 fusions in 2007 and the subsequent successes of pharmacological targeting for these fusions, numerous efforts have identified additional oncogenic driver fusions in NSCLCs, especially in lung adenocarcinomas. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in this field focusing on novel oncogenic fusions other than ALK, ROS1, NTRK, and RET fusions, which are summarized in other articles in this thematic issue. These novel gene fusions include neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions, MET fusions, fusion genes involving fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family members, EGFR fusions, and other rare fusions. In addition, evidence has suggested that acquisition of gene fusions by cancer cells can be a molecular mechanism of acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Most of the current data are from analyses of resistance mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with oncogenic EGFR mutations. However, a few recent studies suggest that gene fusions can also be a resistance mechanism to ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancers with oncogenic ALK fusions. Detection, validation, and pharmacological inhibition of these fusion genes are becoming more important in the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Precision medicine in non-small cell lung cancer: Current applications and future directions

Advances in biomarkers, targeted therapies, and immuno-oncology have transformed the clinical management of patients with advanced NSCLC. For oncogene-driven tumors, there are highly effective targeted therapies against EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, TRK, RET, and MET. In addition, investigational therapies for KRAS, NRG1, and HER2 have shown promising results and may become standard-of-care in the near future. In parallel, immune-checkpoint therapy has emerged as an indispensable treatment modality, especially for patients lacking actionable oncogenic drivers. While PD-L1 expression has shown modest predictive utility, biomarkers for immune-checkpoint inhibition in NSCLC have remained elusive and represent an area of active investigation. Given the growing importance of biomarkers, optimal utilization of small tissue biopsies and alternative genotyping methods using circulating cell-free DNA have become increasingly integrated into clinical practice. In this review, we will summarize the current landscape and emerging trends in precision medicine for patients with advanced NSCLC with a special focus on predictive biomarker testing.

New Targets in Lung Cancer (Excluding EGFR, ALK, ROS1)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last two decades, the identification of targetable oncogene drivers has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The extraordinary progresses made in molecular biology prompted the identification of several rare molecularly defined subgroups. In this review, we will focus on the novel and emerging actionable oncogenic drivers in NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, novel oncogene drivers emerged as promising therapeutic targets besides the well-established EGFR mutations, and ALK/ROS1 rearrangements, considerably expanding the list of potential exploitable genetic aberrations. However, the therapeutic algorithm in these patients is far less defined. The identification of uncommon oncogene drivers is reshaping the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to NSCLC. The introduction of novel highly selective inhibitors is expanding the use of targeted therapies to rare and ultra-rare subsets of patients, further increasing the therapeutic armamentarium of advanced NSCLC.

Brain Metastases in Lung Cancers with Emerging Targetable Fusion Drivers

The management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transformed with the discovery of therapeutically tractable oncogenic drivers. In addition to activating driver mutations, gene fusions or rearrangements form a unique sub-class, with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) targeted agents approved as the standard of care in the first-line setting for advanced disease. There are a number of emerging fusion drivers, however, including neurotrophin kinase (NTRK), rearrangement during transfection (RET), and neuregulin 1 (NRG1) for which there are evolving high-impact systemic treatment options. Brain metastases are highly prevalent in NSCLC patients, with molecularly selected populations such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant and ALK-rearranged tumors particularly brain tropic. Accordingly, there exists a substantial body of research pertaining to the understanding of brain metastases in such populations. Little is known, however, on the molecular mechanisms of brain metastases in those with other targetable fusion drivers in NSCLC. This review encompasses key areas including the biological underpinnings of brain metastases in fusion-driven lung cancers, the intracranial efficacy of novel systemic therapies, and future directions required to optimize the control and prevention of brain metastases.