Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Chemotherapy in NSCLC Harboring ERBB2 Mutations

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring HER2 mutations: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia

INTRODUCTION

HER2 mutations are reported to occur in 2%-5% of all cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment still remain unclear.

METHODS

Using the large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, the clinico-genomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 15,251 patients with NSCLC enrolled in the LC-SCRUM-Asia database, tumor HER2 mutations were detected in 402 patients (2.6 %). The most common subtype of HER2 mutations was exon 20 in-frame insertions (79 %), followed in frequency by mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain other than Exon20ins (10 %) and mutations in extracellular domains (7 %). NSCLCs harboring HER2 mutations showed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) as compared with NSCLCs harboring EGFR mutations or ALK fusions (median: 4.22 vs. 2.54 and 2.52 mutation per megabase, respectively). Of the 402 patients, 268 patients had received platinum-based chemotherapy with ICIs (Chemo-ICI, n = 95) or without ICI (Chemo-alone, n = 173) as 1st line treatment. The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the Chemo-ICI group as compared with the Chemo-alone group (median 8.5 vs. 6.3 months; HR [95 %CI]: 0.66 [0.50-0.88]; P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified use of ICIs in addition to platinum-based chemotherapy as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS. There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the patients of the Chemo-ICI and Chemo-alone groups (median 31.1 vs. 23.3 months; HR [95 %CI]: 0.80 [0.57-1.12], P = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy in 1st line treatment may improve the PFS in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC. The relatively high TMB might be involved in the prolongation of the PFS in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with ICIs.

Optimal systemic treatment and real-world clinical application of ctDNA in patients with metastatic HER2-mutant lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

No definitive answers currently exist regarding optimal first-line therapy for HER2-mutant NSCLC. Access to rapid tissue sequencing is a major barrier to precision drug development in the first-line setting. ctDNA analysis has the potential to overcome these obstacles and guide treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC who underwent prospective clinical ctDNA sequencing and received systemic therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) from January 2016 to September 2022. HER2 mutations were identified by next-generation sequencing through MSK-IMPACT, MSK-ACCESS or Resolution ctDx LungTM assay. Primary endpoints were time to the next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included in the primary analysis. Chemoimmunotherapy (33/63, 52.4 %) was the predominant first-line treatment with a median TTNT of 5.1 months (95 %CI 4.1 - 6.1) whereas 55.0 % (22/40) of patients who received second-line T-DXd obtained a median TTNT of 9.2 m (95 % CI, 0-22.2). Plasma ctDNA was tested before first-line therapy in 40 patients with a median OS of 28.0 months (95 % CI 21-34), in whom 31 patients (78.0 %) had detectable ctDNA. HER2 mutations were detected on ctDNA with a median turnaround time of 13 days, occasionally co-occurred with EGFR and MET alterations and were tracked longitudinally correlating with treatment response. Patients with detectable baseline ctDNA had significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR), 5.25; 95 % CI, 1.2-23.9; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Chemoimmunotherapy remains a major treatment option for metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC. ctDNA can rapidly detect HER2 and co-mutations, and it has the potential to guide and monitor optimal first-line therapy. As a negative prognostic biomarker, detectable ctDNA at baseline would need to be taken into account for patient selection in future studies.

Clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with uncommon driver gene alterations

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon driver alterations in genes such as ERBB2, BRAF, RET, and MET. This study retrospectively assessed ICI-combination therapy outcomes in this molecular subset of NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed with driver alterations in genes including ERBB2, BRAF, RET or MET, and received ICI combined with chemotherapy (ICI + chemo) and/or targeted therapy (ICI + chemo/TT) as first-line (1L) or second- or third-line (≥ 2L) treatment at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2024.

RESULTS

Of the 181 patients included in the study, 131 patients received 1L-ICI + chemo (ERBB2, n = 64; BRAF, n = 34; RET, n = 23; and MET, n = 10), and 50 patients received ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT (ERBB2, n = 16; BRAF, n = 7; RET, n = 14; MET, n = 13). The full cohort had an overall response rate (ORR) of 45.9% and disease control rate of 84.0%. Among patients who received 1L-ICI + chemo, ORR ranged between 51.6% and 60.0%, with the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) of 8.2 and 21.0 months for those with ERBB2-altered tumors, 10.0 and 15.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 12.1 months and OS not reached for RET-altered tumors, and 6.2 and 28.0 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. Additionally, ORR ranged between 14.3% and 30.8% for ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT; mPFS and mOS were 5.4 and 16.2 months for patients with ERBB2-altered tumors, 2.7 and 5.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 6.2 and 14.3 months for RET-altered tumors, and 5.7 and 11.5 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ICI-based combination therapies, regardless of treatment line, were effective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver alterations in ERBB2, BRAF, RET, or MET. This suggests their potential as alternative treatment options in this patient population.

A retrospective study of first-line therapy and subsequent pyrotinib treatment in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with HER2 mutations

OBJECTIVES

HER2 is an infrequently mutated driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, there has been no comprehensive large-scale clinical study to establish the optimal first-line treatment strategy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with HER2-Mutant. Besides that, the effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, in the context of NSCLC are still undergoing investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we conducted a retrospective data collection of HER2-Mutated advanced LUAD who received first-line treatment and pyrotinib between May 2014 and June 2023. Patients treated with chemotherapy, chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy + bevacizumab and pyrotinib in first-line treatment. Furthermore, we collected data on the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in these patients after disease progression. The main endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In the final analysis, 89 patients were included in the first-line cohort and 30 patients were included in the pyrotinib cohort. In the first-line treatment cohort, chemotherapy + ICIs, chemotherapy + bevacizumab, and pyrotinib exhibited notable survival benefits compared to chemotherapy (median PFS: 9.87 vs. 7.77 vs. 7.10 vs. 5.40 months, p-value < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with a first-line treatment PFS of less than 6 months may potentially benefit from subsequent treatment with pyrotinib (median PFS: 7.467 vs. 3.000, p-value = 0.0490).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first-line treatment of HER2-Mutant LUAD, regimens involving combinations like chemotherapy + ICIs, chemotherapy + bevacizumab, and pyrotinib may confer enhanced survival advantages compared to chemotherapy. Nevertheless, no significant distinctions were observed among these three treatment strategies, underscoring the imperative to identify biomarkers for the discerning selection of suitable therapeutic modalities. Moreover, patients with suboptimal response to first-line treatment may potentially derive more benefit from pyrotinib.

HER2-Altered Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Journey from Current Approaches to Emerging Strategies

For patients diagnosed with advanced HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the current standard of care is represented by a platinum-pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, eventually in combination with immunotherapy. Different pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been evaluated in limited phase II trials, yielding generally unsatisfactory outcomes, although certain genotypes demonstrated some clinical benefit. Conversely, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2, particularly trastuzumab-deruxtecan, have shown promising results against HER2-mutant disease, including a great intracranial activity in patients with brain metastasis. Based on the results obtained from DESTINY-Lung01 and DESTINY-Lung02 trials, trastuzumab deruxtecan received regulatory approval as the first targeted therapy for pre-treated, HER2-mutant, advanced NSCLC patients. More recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted the accelerated approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for advanced, pre-treated HER2-positive solid tumours with no other treatment options. In this scenario, emerging evidence is increasingly pointing towards the exploration of combination regimens with synergistic effects in the advanced disease. In this review, we provide a detailed summary of current approaches and emerging strategies in the management of HER2-altered NSCLC, also focusing on unmet needs, including the treatment of patients with brain metastases.

Progress of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy in immune treatment for HER2-positive tumors

BACKGROUND

Patients with HER2-positive cancers often face a poor prognosis, and treatment regimens containing anti-HER2 have become the first-line treatment options for breast and gastric cancers. However, these approaches are faced with significant challenges in terms of drug resistance. Hence, it is crucial to explore precise treatment strategies aimed at improving survival outcomes.

ADVANCEMENTS IN TREATMENT

Over the past few years, there has been rapid advancement in the realm of tumor therapy, particularly with the swift progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. They exert anti-tumor effects by disrupting immune-suppressive factors within the tumor microenvironment. However, monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has several limitations. Consequently, numerous studies have explored combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies and demonstrated highly promising avenues of development.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to review the clinical trials investigating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy for HER2-positive tumors. Additionally, it provides a summary of ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these combined treatments, with the intention of furnishing valuable insights for the clinical management of HER2-positive cancer.

CONCLUSION

Combinatorial immunotherapeutic strategies involving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors hold considerable promise in the treatment of HER2-positive tumors. Continued research efforts and clinical trials are warranted to elucidate optimal treatment regimens that maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects.

[Advances in the targeted treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) paradigmatically shows the potential of personalized and therefore precise cancer treatment. For around one third of the patients, predominantly suffering from adenocarcinoma, targetable driver mutations could be characterized in the meantime. Targeted therapies, mostly with kinase inhibitors, achieve impressive advances in the prolongation of overall survival often over many years and excellent quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted treatment is also increasingly evaluated as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in early inoperable stages of NSCLC. An absolute prerequisite for the use of personalized treatment is upfront broad molecular diagnostics before the decision on first line treatment. The limitations of personalized treatment are the so far unavoidable development of resistance mutations and increasing clonal heterogeneity during the course of the treatment. Approaches to further improve treatment results comprise the development of next-generation inhibitors, the combination of targeted substances, also with chemotherapy and the use of new immunoconjugates.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immunotherapy is an emerging antitumor therapy that can improve the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only about 20% of NSCLC patients can benefit from this treatment. At present, whether patients with driving gene-positive NSCLC can benefit from immunotherapy is one of the hot issues. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC and concluded the efficacy of altered subtypes.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Results

In all, 86 studies involving 4524 patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORRs in clinical trials treated with monoimmunotherapy of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS alteration were 6%, 0%, and 23%, respectively. In retrospective studies, the pooled ORRs of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, MET, HER2, RET, and ROS1 alteration were 8%, 3%, 28%, 24%, 23%, 14%, 7%, and 8%, respectively. Among them, the pooled ORRs of KRAS non-G12C mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, MET-exon 14 skipping, and MET-amplification were 33% 40%, 20%, 34%, 17%, and 60%, respectively. In addition, the pooled mPFS rates of EGFR, KRAS, MET, HER2, and RET alteration were 2.77, 3.24, 2.48, 2.31, and 2.68 months, while the pooled mOS rates of EGFR and KRAS alteration were 9.98 and 12.29 months, respectively. In prospective data concerning EGFR mutation, the pooled ORR and mPFS treated with chemo-immunotherapy (IC) reached 38% and 6.20 months, while 58% and 8.48 months with chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (ICA). Moreover, the pooled mPFS and mOS of monoimmunotherapy was 2.33 months and 12.43 months.

Conclusions

EGFR-, ALK-, HER2-, RET-, and ROS1-altered NSCLC patients have poor reactivity to monoimmunotherapy but the efficacy of immune-based combined therapy is significantly improved. KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, and MET amplification have better responses to immunotherapy, and more prospective studies are needed for further research.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harboring Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) mutations represent a distinct subset with unique therapeutic challenges. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been transformative in lung cancer treatment, the efficacy of ICIs in HER2-mutated NSCLC remains to be established.

METHODS

We systematically searched for real-world studies investigating the use of ICIs in treating HER2-mutated NSCLC, sourced from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted for further analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 260 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Pooled data revealed an ORR of 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.34), a DCR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.55-0.81), and a median PFS (mPFS) of 5.36 months (95% CI 3.50-7.21). Notably, in the subgroup receiving combined immune and chemotherapy, the ORR increased to 0.37 (95% CI 0.26-0.49), the DCR to 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), and the mPFS to 7.10 months (95% CI 5.21-8.99).

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs demonstrate promising anti-tumor activity and safety in patients with HER2-mutated NSCLC. Furthermore, the combined regimen of ICIs and chemotherapy may provide a significant therapeutic option for this patient population.

Management of HER2 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer - The past, present, and future

HER2 mutations, which account for 2-4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), are distinct molecular alterations identified via next generation sequencing (NGS). Previously, treatment outcomes in HER2-mutant metastatic NSCLC were dismal, showing limited clinical benefit with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy. In contrast to HER2-altered breast and gastric cancer, HER2-mutant NSCLC does not benefit from HER2 targeting agents such as trastuzumab or TDM1. HER2 mutations are also inherently different from HER2 overexpression and amplification. Currently, trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2 targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC) is the first and only approved treatment option for patients with HER2-mutant metastatic NSCLC after failure with standard treatment. In this review, we summarized the biology of HER2 and detection of HER2 overexpression, amplification and mutations, as well as general landscape of landmark and ongoing clinical trials encompassing from chemotherapy to targeted agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), ADCs and investigational agents.

Poor Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Exon 20 Insertion

BACKGROUND

EGFR and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion (Ex20ins) account for a small fraction of patients with EGFR mutations. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for these patients was still controversial.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled lung cancer patients harboring either EGFR or ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations. All the patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICIs, or platinum-based chemotherapy. The demographic features and clinical outcome of each patient were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

When treated with immunochemotherapy, patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations (n = 31) had poor PFS compared with those without EGFR mutations (n = 141, 5.0 mon and 11.2 mon, p < 0.001). When compared with those with EGFR classic mutations who received immunotherapy as the salvage therapy (n = 24), these patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations had similar PFS (5.0 mon and 4.1 mon, p = 0.625), ORR (37.5% vs. 48.4%), and DCR (70.8% vs. 77.4%). In the patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins mutations, the PFS of those treated with chemotherapy (n = 54) and those treated with immunochemotherapy (n = 31) was 6.5 mon vs. 5.0 mon (p = 0.066). In the EGFR Ex20ins subgroup, the PFS of addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy (n = 20) and chemotherapy alone (n = 16) was 8.8 mon and 5.2 mon, respectively (p = 0.082) or immunochemotherapy (n = 15, 8.8 mon and 5.0 mon, p = 0.097). Similarly, in the ERBB2 subgroup, the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy achieved a numerically longer PFS over chemotherapy alone (9.1 mon and 4.5 mon, p = 0.253), but there was no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICIs had limited efficiency compared to platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with EGFR/ERBB2 Ex20ins. Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab may be a potential scheme for these patients.

Histo-Molecular Factors of Response to Combined Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

BACKGROUND

Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) is the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the impact of routinely available histo-molecular biomarkers on its efficacy has not yet been fully assessed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical activity of CIT according to oncogenic drivers, STK11 and TP53 mutations, and MET overexpression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving CIT for advanced NSCLC with available comprehensive molecular profile were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), adjusted on main confounding factors, and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate.

RESULTS

Among the 195 patients included between September 2018 and October 2021, 88 (41%) had a KRAS mutation, 16 (8.2%) an EGFR mutation or an ALK, ROS1, or RET rearrangement, 11 (5.6%) a BRAF mutation, 6 (3.1%) a MET exon 14 mutation or MET amplification, and 5 (2.6%) a HER2 mutation. Seventy-seven patients (39.5%) had none of these alterations. The median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI 5.3-7.3). Per subgroup, the median PFS was 7.1 months (5.4-8.9) for KRAS, 5.5 months (2.5-15.3) for EGFR/ALK/ROS1/RET, 12.9 months (2.6-not reached [NR]) for BRAF, 1.5 months (0.6-NR) for MET, 3.9 months (2.6-NR) for HER2, and 5.6 months (4.7-7.8) for patients without any oncogenic alteration. No difference in PFS was observed between the KRAS, BRAF, EGFR/ALK/ROS1/RET, and no-driver subgroups. STK11 mutations were associated with poor PFS (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.01-2.51]) whereas TP53 mutations had no impact. MET overexpression was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.35-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the efficacy of combining pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy differs according to the histo-molecular biomarkers, which may help to identify patients liable to benefit from CIT.

Immunotherapy as a later-line option for HER2-altered advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: taxane might be a favorable partner

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of different types of taxanes, including nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel and docetaxel, and further compare the effectiveness of taxane-based chemotherapy, taxane-based chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors or taxane-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in HER2-altered non-small-cell lung cancer in the second- or third-line setting. Materials & methods: A total of 52 patients were included in the study. Progression-free survival was compared between subgroups. Results: A clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival was observed among patients in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with the docetaxel group. Taxane-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors achieved longer progression-free survival than taxane-based chemotherapy. There was no difference between taxane-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors and taxane-based chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel appears to be a reasonable alternative to docetaxel. Chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors might yield more survival benefits than chemotherapy alone.

Exploration on the first-line treatment of ERBB2-altered advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although the treatment of ERBB2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been studied for many years, there are no comprehensive studies to evaluate the benefits of various therapies as first-line treatment. Through the development of immunotherapy, more and more different combination treatments were applicated in clinical practice, therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with ERBB2-altered NSCLC who had undergone at least one-line systemic anticancer treatment to evaluate the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy alone (Chemo), anti-ERBB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (Chemo + Immuno), chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (Chemo + Antiangio) and chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy (Chemo + Immuno + Antiangio). The clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), one-year and three-year survival rate.

RESULTS

We enroll 36 patients harboring ERBB2 mutation and 29 with ERBB2 amplification. The overall ORR was 30.8%, DCR was 69.2% and mPFS was 5.7 months. Chemo + Immuno and Chemo + Antiangio both achieved longer mPFS than TKI (7.8 vs 3.6 months, HR: 0.24, 95 %CI: 0.09-0.64, P = 0.002; 5.9 vs 3.6 months, HR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.15-0.88, P = 0.019; respectively), while there was no significant difference in mPFS between Chemo + Immuno or Chemo + Antiangio and Chemo (both P > 0.05), the mPFS of the first two was longer. For ERBB2-mutant patients, the mPFS was 5.9 months, and Chemo + Immuno and Chemo + Antiangio both achieved longer mPFS than TKI (12.9 vs 2.9 months, HR: 0.15, 95 %CI: 0.03-0.68, P = 0.005; 7.1 vs 2.9 months, HR: 0.50, 95 %CI: 0.29-0.88, P = 0.009, respectively). In the same therapies, patients with ERBB2 mutation or ERBB2 amplification showed no statistical significance in PFS (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first-line treatment of ERBB2-altered NSCLC, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy may have greater survival benefits than ERBB2-target therapy, but the efficacy may not be better than that of chemotherapy.

Molecular correlation of response to pyrotinib in advanced NSCLC with HER2 mutation: biomarker analysis from two phase II trials

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with HER2 mutation has entered into the era of targeted therapy. However, both anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed moderate objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS). The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular features of responders to pyrotinib in advanced NSCLC with HER2 mutation.

METHODS

Patients from our two previous phase II trials were pooled analyzed. Their circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, and the correlation with the efficacy of pyrotinib was investigated.

RESULTS

This pooled analysis included 75 patients, and 50 of them with baseline plasma samples were finally enrolled with a median age of 57 years old. The overall ORR and median PFS were 28% and 7.0 months respectively. Biomarker analysis showed that 5 patients were ctDNA nonshedding. Patients with TP53 wild type were significantly associated with higher disease control rate (97.1%vs. 68.8%, p = 0.010), PFS (median 8.4 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS, median 26.7 vs. 10.4 months, p < 0.001) than those with mutations. ctDNA of nonshedding and clearance exhibited significantly longer PFS (median: 10.2 vs. 9.8 vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.036) and a trend of longer OS (median: 35.3 vs. 18.1 vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.357) than those not.

CONCLUSION

Patients with TP53 wild type, ctDNA nonshedding, or clearance showed superior efficacy of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-mutated advanced NSCLC, which might be helpful to guide the utility of pyrotinib in clinical setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The patients were from two registered clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02535507, NCT02834936).

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor resistance in cancer treatment: Current progress and future directions

Cancer treatment has been advanced with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exemplified by anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) drugs. Patients have reaped substantial benefit from ICIs in many cancer types. However, few patients benefit from ICIs whereas the vast majority undergoing these treatments do not obtain survival benefit. Even for patients with initial responses, they may encounter drug resistance in their subsequent treatments, which limits the efficacy of ICIs. Therefore, a deepening understanding of drug resistance is critically important for the explorations of approaches to reverse drug resistance and to boost ICI efficacy. In the present review, different mechanisms of ICI resistance have been summarized according to the tumor intrinsic, tumor microenvironment (TME) and host classifications. We further elaborated corresponding strategies to battle against such resistance accordingly, which include targeting defects in antigen presentation, dysregulated interferon-γ (IFN-γ) signaling, neoantigen depletion, upregulation of other T cell checkpoints as well as immunosuppression and exclusion mediated by TME. Moreover, regarding the host, several additional approaches that interfere with diet and gut microbiome have also been described in reversing ICI resistance. Additionally, we provide an overall glimpse into the ongoing clinical trials that utilize these mechanisms to overcome ICI resistance. Finally, we summarize the challenges and opportunities that needs to be addressed in the investigation of ICI resistance mechanisms, with the aim to benefit more patients with cancer.

Targeting HER2 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: Therapeutic breakthrough and challenges

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations, chemotherapy remains the standard treatment over a decade, due to the minor efficacy of traditional pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and HER2-targeted monoclonal antibodies. In recent years, novel selective HER2 TKIs have been developed for pretreated HER2-mutant patients. In particular, pyrotinib has shown moderate efficacy as well as a manageable safety profile, and it is now being further evaluated as monotherapy or combined with other existing therapies; by contrast, while poziotinib has demonstrated promising preliminary results, the high rates of toxicity has hampered subsequent studies. Most notably, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) has led to a significant breakthrough, with the most encouraging efficacy data (response rate of 55 %, median progression-free survival of 8.2 months and median overall survival of 17.8 months) among all the anti-HER2 agents. This is certainly remarkable progress, and T-DXd is undoubtedly the key drug for the treatment of this disease. Future developments regarding T-DXd are favourable, including shifting from monotherapy to combination strategies, improving structural design to optimise antitumour activity and minimise toxicity, identifying the potential resistance mechanisms and developing therapeutic strategies to overcome them. Several other challenges need to be addressed, such as the intracranial activity of anti-HER2 agents and the optimal sequencing of therapies. Here, we summarise recent therapeutic advances in targeting HER2 alterations in NSCLC and highlight the future perspectives of these patient populations.

Evolving Treatment Landscape of HER2-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Beyond

Successful targeting of HER2-activating mutations in DESTINY-Lung02 phase II study has led to the approval of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as second-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the impressive results, several matters need to be addressed, including the clinical activity of T-DXd in patients with disease in the central nervous system as well as the role of T-DXd in the context of HER2 overexpression. Additionally, data regarding novel agents used to target HER2 continue to accumulate. This review highlights the challenges and unanswered questions that have emerged after the approval of T-DXd in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC.

[Assessment of HER2 status of carcinomas of various localizations]

A detailed description of the methodological aspects of the evaluation of HER2-status in carcinomas of such localizations as the mammary gland, pancreas, salivary glands, stomach, colon, endometrium, bladder, lungs is presented. Approaches and criteria for assessing HER2 status from methodological and clinical points of view are analyzed. The data are systematized in tables for use in practical diagnostic work.

Characteristics of the immunogenicity and tumor immune microenvironment in HER2-amplified lung adenocarcinoma

Objective

Besides breast and gastric cancer, HER2 amplification/mutation are also found in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the correlation between HER2 variations and the phenotype of immunogenicity and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in LUAD compared with breast and gastric cancer has yet to be fully elucidated.

Methods

We integrated public databases (discovery set) and internal data (validated set) of 288 patients representing three distinct HER2-altered tumors. Genomic data were used to identify somatic mutations, copy number variations, and calculate tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability score. RNA sequencing was conducted to estimate immune gene signatures and contents of tumor-infiltrating immune cell populations. Finally, IHC was used to determine PD-L1 expression and the tumoral-infiltration of immune cells in 50 HER2-variant tumor specimens with no prior therapeutic regimens.

Results

Compared with HER2-amplified breast and gastric cancers, patients with HER2-amplified LUAD showed higher immunogenicity, mainly manifested in immune checkpoints expression and tissue/blood TMB. Additionally, HER2-amplified LUAD exhibited an inflamed TIME with remarkably increased genes encoding HLAs, T-cell activity and immune cell-type, and accompanied with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In LUAD, patients with HER2 amplification possessed higher tissue TMB than HER2 mutation, whereas no difference was observed in PD-L1 expression. HER2 amplification (primary) was associated with significantly higher PD-L1 expression and TMB than acquired HER2 amplification after resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Conclusion

Patients with HER2-amplified LUAD have better immunogenicity and/or an inflamed TIME among HER2-aberrant tumors. Our study may provide clues for establishing the benefits and uses of ICIs for patients with this disease.

Deciphering the Impact of HER2 Alterations on Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Biological Mechanisms to Therapeutic Approaches

Despite the recent increase in the number of types of treatments, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the major cause of death from cancer worldwide. So, there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic strategies. The HER2 gene codes for tyrosine kinase receptor whose alterations are known to drive carcinogenesis. HER2 alterations, including amplification, mutations, and overexpression, have been mainly described in breast and gastric cancers, but up to 4% of NSCLC harbor actionable HER2 mutations. HER2-targeted therapy for NSCLC with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine has failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival. Nevertheless, recent data from phase II trials have shed light on promising specific therapies for HER2-mutant NSCLC such as trastuzumab deruxtecan. Herein, we aimed to provide an updated review on the biology, epidemiology, molecular testing, and therapeutic strategies for NSCLC with HER2 molecular alterations.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutation-positive disease

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (Ex20ins) and HER2 mutations characterize an oncogene-addicted subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically associated with a never or light smoking history, female sex, and adenocarcinoma histology. Nevertheless, Ex20ins-mutant and HER2-mutant advanced NSCLCs are still difficult to treat for various reasons. First, there is a need for sophisticated diagnostic tools (e.g. next-generation sequencing) that could allow the identification of these relatively rare molecular drivers. Second, highly active targeted drugs that might support a significant change in patients' prognosis when used as first-line therapy are required. In fact, although a few targeted drugs have so far demonstrated antitumour activity for these patients, mainly selective human epidermal receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as poziotinib and mobocertinib (for both molecular alterations), monoclonal antibodies such as amivantamab (for Ex20ins), and antibody-drug conjugates such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (for HER2 mutants), they are mostly confined for clinical use in pretreated patients. Finally, Ex20ins-targeted or HER2-targeted drugs might be difficult to access in different countries or regions worldwide. In the present review, we provide a concise but comprehensive summary of the challenges that lie ahead as we move towards personalized treatment of Ex20ins-mutant and HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC, also suggesting a treatment algorithm that could be followed for patients with these genetic aberrations.

Efficacy and safety of immuno-chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring oncogenic mutations: a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

The effect of immuno-chemotherapy on patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring oncogenic mutations remains poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize the efficacy of immuno-chemotherapy and determine the optimal treatment strategy for such patients.

METHODS

We conducted this retrospective cohort study on patients with NSCLC harboring oncogenic driver alterations and treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy at five institutions. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of immuno-chemotherapy for NSCLC with oncogenic mutations in a real-world setting were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 846 patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent NSCLC between April 2017 and April 2021, 43 patients with oncogenic mutations were treated with immuno-chemotherapy. The median age of patients was 68 (range 44-78) years; 42% of patients never smoked, and adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (95%). In patients with KRAS mutations (n = 10) or PD-L1 expression of 50% or greater (n = 10), the disease control rate was 100%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4, 6.3, and 8.9 months in patients harboring mutations in EGFR, KRAS, and other genes, respectively (P = 0.22). Patients with PD-L1 expression of 50% or greater had significantly longer median PFS than patients with PD-L1 expression of less than 50% (16.4 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.001). Two patients experienced grade 3 immuno-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Immuno-chemotherapy has a clinical benefit and is safe for patients with oncogenic mutations. Notably, patients with PD-L1 expression of 50% or more experience greater benefit from immuno-chemotherapy than those with PD-L1 expression of less than 50%.

Associations of HER2 Mutation With Immune-Related Features and Immunotherapy Outcomes in Solid Tumors

Background

HER2 is one of the most extensively studied oncogenes in solid tumors. However, the association between tumor microenvironment (TME) and HER2 mutation remains elusive, and there are no specific therapies for HER2-mutated tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for some tumor subgroups that lack targeted therapies, while their effects are still unclear in HER2-mutated tumors. We examined whether HER2 mutation impacts treatment outcomes of ICIs in solid tumors via its association with anticancer immunity.

Methods

Multi-omics data of solid tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the Asian Cancer Research Group and the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University were used to analyze the association between HER2 mutations and tumor features. Data of patients with multiple microsatellite-stable solid tumors, who were treated by ICIs including antibodies against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) in eight studies, were collected to investigate the effects of HER2 mutations on immunotherapy outcomes.

Results

The mutation rate of HER2 varied in solid tumors of TCGA, with an overall incidence of 3.13%, ranged from 0.39% to 12.2%. Concurrent HER2 mutations and amplifications were rare (0.26%). HER2 mutation was not associated with HER2 protein expression but was positively associated with microsatellite instability, tumor mutation and neoantigen burdens, infiltrating antitumor immune cells, and signal activities of antitumor immunity. Of 321 ICI-treated patients, 18 carried HER2 mutations (5.6%) and showed improved objective response rates compared with those with HER2 wild-type (44.4% vs. 25.7%, p=0.081), especially in the anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 subgroup (62.5% vs. 28.4%, p=0.04). Heterogeneity was observed among tumor types. Patients with HER2 mutations also had superior overall survival than those with HER2 wild-type (HR=0.47, 95%CI: 0.23-0.97, p=0.04), especially in the presence of co-mutations in ABCA1 (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.73, p=0.013), CELSR1 (HR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.77, p=0.016), LRP2 (HR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.74, p=0.014), or PKHD1L1 (HR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.05-0.8, p=0.023).

Conclusions

HER2 mutations may improve the TME to favor immunotherapy. A prospective basket trial is needed to further investigate the impacts of HER2 mutations on immunotherapy outcomes in solid tumors.

HER2-Altered Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Clinicopathologic Features, and Emerging Therapies

Multiple oncogenic molecular alterations have been discovered that serve as potential drug targets in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the pathogenic and pharmacological features of common targets in NSCLC have been widely investigated, those of uncommon targets are still needed to be clarified. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, ERBB2)-altered tumors represent a highly heterogeneous group of diseases, which consists of three distinct situations including mutation, amplification and overexpression. Compared with breast and gastric cancer, previous studies have shown modest and variable results of anti-HER2 treatments in lung cancers with HER2 aberrations, thus effective therapies in these patients represent an unmet medical need. By far, encouraging efforts towards novel treatment strategies have been made to improve the clinical outcomes of these patients. In this review, we describe the biological and clinicopathological characteristics of HER2 alterations and systematically sum up recent studies on emerging therapies for this subset of patients.

First-line immunotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor plus chemotherapy for HER2-altered NSCLC: a retrospective real-world POLISH study

Background:

There have been no comprehensive large-scale studies that have evaluated the benefits of chemotherapy-based regimens in addressing HER2-altered advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a first-line setting. Data on HER2 alteration subtypes and concomitant alterations are also limited. Accordingly, our retrospective, real-world POLISH study assesses the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy alone (C) as well as combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors (C + I) or angiogenesis inhibitors (C + A) for HER2-altered NSCLC; molecular features are also reported.

Methods:

HER2-altered NSCLC patients who received a first-line treatment between November 2015 and September 2021 were screened. Patients treated with C, C + I, or C + A were included in our final efficacy analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between the subgroups. A Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was performed to evaluate concomitant alterations.

Results:

A total of 293 patients were screened, with an identification of HER2 amplification and 37 distinct HER2 mutations, and 210 cases treated with C, C + I, or C + A were ultimately included. C + A achieved longer PFS than C (5.63 vs 4.03 months, hazard ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88, p = 0.006). C + I did not improve median PFS compared to C + A or C (both p > 0.05), despite the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression or tumor mutational burden. KEGG analysis revealed that concomitant upregulation of PI3 K/AKT pathway signaling was common in HER2-altered NSCLC.

Conclusion:

Chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors may yield a greater survival benefit than chemotherapy alone in a first-line setting for HER2-altered NSCLC, whereas an immune-based combination therapy may not be superior to a sole chemotherapy regimen. Activation of PI3 K/AKT signaling may mediate immunosuppression in HER2-altered NSCLC.

Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib and emerging therapeutic strategies in nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to introduce the resistance mechanisms to osimertinib, discuss the therapeutic strategies, and make clinical updates in overcoming resistance to osimertinib.

RECENT FINDINGS

Osimertinib has shown favorable efficacy on second-line and first-line treatments in EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the presence of primary and acquired resistance to osimertinib restricts its clinical benefits. The primary resistance mainly consists of BIM deletion polymorphism and EGFR exon 20 insertions. Meanwhile, the heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance include EGFR-dependent (on-target) and EGFR-independent (off-target) mechanisms. EGFR C797S mutation, MET amplification, HER2 amplification, and small cell lung cancer transformation were identified as frequent resistance mechanisms. Recently, more novel mechanisms, including rare EGFR point mutations and oncogenic fusions, were reported. With the results of completed and on-going clinical trials, the emerging therapeutic strategies of postosimertinib progression are summarized.

SUMMARY

The resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are heterogeneous and gradually perfected. The combination of osimertinib with bypass targeted therapy and other therapeutic approaches emerge as promising strategies.

HER2 Aberrations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Targeted Therapy

While human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) aberrations have long been described in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), they have only recently been effectively targeted. Unlike patients with breast cancer, NSCLC patients can harbor either HER2-activating mutations or HER2 amplification coupled with protein overexpression. The latter has also been the case for patients with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). As preclinical data continue to accumulate, clinical trials evaluating novel agents that target HER2 have produced promising preliminary results. Here, we review existing data on HER2 aberrations in NSCLC. Starting from HER2 biology in normal and disease processes, we summarize discrepancies in HER2 diagnostic assays between breast cancer and NSCLC. Finally, to dissect the therapeutic implications of HER2-activating mutations versus gene amplification and/or protein overexpression, we present data from prospective clinical trials that have employed distinct classes of agents to target HER2 in patients with NSCLC.

Treatment efficacy of HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Despite the remarkable clinical advance of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer, there are limited studies focused on evaluating efficacy of ICIs for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who received ICIs therapy at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai Chest Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between 2016 and 2021. Response was defined with reference to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1.

RESULTS

Among the 26 patients enrolled in our study, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 38.5%, disease control rate (DCR) was 84.6% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.4 months. Majority of patients were treated with immunochemotherapy combination regimens (16/26, 61.5%), with a median PFS of 8.4 months. Among the 9 patients receiving ICIs-based therapy as first-line treatment, 5 patients had partial response (PR) and 4 patients had stable disease (SD), with a median PFS of 9.1 months. Of the entire cohort, 5 patients who received ICIs before epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/HER2-targeting drugs achieved a median PFS of 8.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective study provides clinical evidence that front line of ICIs-based therapy is also worth considering for the treatment to improve survival outcomes of patients with HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma.