Lung Cancer in Nepal

Highlights from ecancer Choosing Wisely Nepal 2022: critical appraisal skills for evidence-based practice, 24th-25th September 2022, Kathmandu, Nepal

The ecancer Kathmandu 2022 workshop on the 24th-25th September 2022 was the first ecancer conference organised in Nepal, a Southeast Asian nation sandwiched between India and China. It was focused on critical appraisal skills for evidence-based practice and was organised in partnership with the Karnali Academy of Health Sciences and the Civil Service Hospital from Nepal, and the Queen's Global Oncology Program from Canada. The workshop emphasised the need for critical thinking in understanding clinical research, and also motivated the delegates to undertake meaningful clinical research relevant to the local setting. The sessions highlighted the features of a good clinical research, identify pitfalls in the reporting of clinical trials, implementation of the research into locally relevant practice and development of local clinical guidelines. Furthermore, the faculty also discussed how to write a good scientific paper, the do's and don'ts of a systematic review and meta-analysis, the role of peer-review and how to do one properly and what do editors look for in evaluating papers submitted for publication. The audience learned the importance of finding a good mentor and fostering local and international collaboration. The local faculty also highlighted their own personal journeys and how mentorship and global collaboration played an important role in their own academic career. The enthusiastic panel discussion was a highlight of the programme where the delegates learned about several important topics from the faculties, such as work-life balance, the role of mentorship in building careers and building networks.

Clinical Efficacy of Single-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Three-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy versus three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Methods

From February 2020 to February 2021, 200 lung cancer patients treated in our institution assessed for eligibility were enrolled and randomly assigned (1 : 1) to either the experimental group (single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy) or the control group (three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy). The outcomes were the eligible patients' surgical indices, pain stress indexes, and postoperative complications.

Results

The experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of incision length, postoperative drainage time, extubation time, time to get out of bed, time to analgesics administration, and postoperative pain score (P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the experimental group reduced the intraoperative bleeding (161.98 ± 10.65 versus 179.65 ± 14.20, P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (7.98 ± 0.56 versus 10.46 ± 1.23, P < 0.001). The operative time of the single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy was longer than that of the three-port thoracoscopic lobectomy (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy and the number of lymph node dissections (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain stress indices and complication rates of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy can improve the perioperative indices of lung cancer patients, reduce their pain stress response, and accelerate postoperative recovery. However, its operation is difficult and time-consuming, requiring experienced surgeons for improved surgical outcomes in practice.

Challenges in the Use of Targeted Therapies in NSCLC

Precision oncology has fundamentally changed how we diagnose and treat cancer. In recent years, there has been a significant change in the management of patients with oncogene-addicted advanced-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Increasing amounts of identifiable oncogene drivers have led to the development of molecularly targeted drugs. Undoubtedly, the future of thoracic oncology is shifting toward increased molecular testing and the use of targeted therapies. For the most part, these novel drugs have proven to be safe and effective. As with all great innovations, targeted therapies pose unique challenges. Drug toxicities, resistance, access, and costs are some of the expected obstacles that will need to be addressed. This review highlights some of the major challenges in the use of targeted therapies in NSCLC and provides guidance for the future strategies.