Efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency verified by epithelial phenotypes integrated with clinical evaluation

Comparative analysis of long-term results of three epithelial cell transplantation procedures for treating limbal stem cell deficiency

This study compared the long-term outcome of different epithelial transplantation techniques to treat limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). We conducted a retrospective 15-year comparative systematic cohort study of patients with LSCD who underwent either cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET), simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), or cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET). We reviewed the demographic data, etiology, LSCD severity, best-corrected visual acuity, surgical outcomes, and complications. A total of 103 eyes of 94 patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 16.4 years) with LSCD were enrolled. The most common cause of LSCD was chemical injury (42.7 %). The median follow-up time was 75 months. The success rates of CLET, SLET, and COMET were 45.5 %, 77.8 %, and 57.8 %, respectively. The 7-year survival rates after CLET, SLET, and COMET were 50.0 %, 72.2 %, and 53.2 %, respectively. Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) had a significantly lower survival rate than other causes (p < 0.001), but SLET had a significantly higher survival rate than CLET (p = 0.018) and COMET (p = 0.047). Visual improvement of more than four Snellen lines was achieved in 53.1 % of successful cases and 28.2 % of failed cases. SJS, Schirmer I test <5 mm, and the presence of postoperative recurrent epithelial defects were significant risk factors for a failed surgery. All epithelial transplantation techniques had favorable long-term surgical outcomes. More than half of the patients achieved a stable ocular surface and visual acuity improvement up to 7 years postoperatively. SLET tends to have a better surgical outcome than CLET and COMET, especially in patients with SJS.

Induction of human ESC-derived and adult primary multipotent limbal stem cells into retinal pigment epithelial cells and corneal stromal stem cells

Human embryonic stem cell (hESC)- and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) therapies are promising alternatives for the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases caused by RPE degeneration. The generation of autologous RPE cells from human adult donors, which has the advantage of avoiding immune rejection and teratoma formation, is an alternative cell resource to gain mechanistic insight into and test potential therapies for RPE degenerative diseases. Here, we found that limbal stem cells (LSCs) from hESCs and adult primary human limbus have the potential to produce RPE cells and corneal stromal stem cells (CSSCs). We showed that hESC-LSC-derived RPE cells (LSC-RPE) expressed RPE markers, had a phagocytic function, and synthesized tropical factors. Furthermore, during differentiation from LSCs to RPE cells, cells became pigmented, accompanied by a decrease in the level of LSC marker KRT15 and an increase in the level of RPE marker MITF. The Wnt signaling pathway plays a role in LSC-RPE fate transition, promotes MITF expression in the nucleus, and encourages RPE fate transition. In addition, we also showed that primary LSCs (pLSCs) from adult human limbus similar to hESC-LSC could generate RPE cells, which was supported by the co-expression of LSC and RPE cell markers (KRT15/OTX2, KRT15/MITF), suggesting the transition from pLSC to RPE cells, and typical polygonal morphology, melanization, RPE cell marker genes expression (TYR, RPE65), tight junction formation by ZO-1 expression, and the most crucial phagocytotic function. On the other hand, both hESC-LSCs and pLSCs also differentiated into CSSCs (LSC-CSSCs) that expressed stem cell markers (PAX6, NESTIN), presented MSC features, including surface marker expression and trilineage differentiation capability, like those in human CSSCs. Furthermore, the capability of pLSC-CSSC to differentiate into cells expressing keratocyte marker genes (ALDH3A1, PTGDS, PDK4) indicated the potential to induce keratocytes. These results suggest that the adult pLSC is an alternative cell resource, and its application provides a novel potential therapeutic avenue for preventing RPE dysfunction-related retinal degenerative diseases and corneal scarring.

Outcomes of Combined Penetrating Keratoplasty and Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis on Simultaneous Versus Sequential Surgery

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published studies on limbal stem cell transplantation (LSCT) combined with penetrating keratoplasty (PK) performed either simultaneously or sequentially.

METHODS

An extensive search was conducted in the MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases. Prospective and retrospective trials and case series reporting on the outcomes of LSCT with PK were included. Primary outcomes were the stability of the ocular surface and the rejection and/or failure of the corneal graft.

RESULTS

A total of 209 eyes from 13 studies were included in the simultaneous group and 489 eyes from 33 studies in the sequential group. Ocular surface stability was 88% [95% confidence interval (CI), 79%-96%] for sequential cases and 64% (95% CI, 43%-82%) for simultaneous cases ( P = 0.001). The graft failure rate was 15% (95% CI, 6%-26%) for sequential cases and 44% (95% CI, 31%-58%) for simultaneous cases ( P < 0.001). For cases performed sequentially, subgroup analysis revealed a stable ocular surface in 97% (95% CI, 91%-100%) of autograft cases and 63% (95% CI, 45%-80%) of allograft cases ( P < 0.001). The graft failure rate in sequential cases was 7% (95% CI, 0%-18%) for autografts and 34% (95% CI, 18%-52%) for allografts ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential LSCT followed by PK demonstrated superior results in terms of ocular surface stability and graft retention compared with simultaneous LSCT and PK. Limbal stem cells of autologous origin fare better than allogeneic ones in sequential cases.

Clinical efficacy of a new surgical technique of oral mucosal epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders

BACKGROUND

Severe ocular surface disorders are one of the major blinding diseases, and a paucity of original tissue obscures successful reconstruction. We developed a new surgical technique of direct oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (OMET) to reconstruct severely damaged ocular surfaces in 2011. This study elaborates on the clinical efficacy of OMET.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with severe ocular surface disorders who underwent OMET from 2011 to 2021 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine was conducted. Patients who were followed up for at least 3 months postoperatively and had sufficient pre or postoperative records were included. Surgical efficacy was evaluated by comparing the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal transparency, neovascularization grade, and symblepharon grade. Additionally, postoperative ocular surface impression cytology was used to study the morphology of the newborn epithelial cells.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (49 eyes; mean age: 42.55 ± 12.40 years, range:12-66 years) were enrolled in the study. The etiology included chemical burns (30 eyes), thermal burns (16 eyes), explosive injuries (1 eye), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (1 eye), and multiple pterygiums (1 eye). The mean follow-up period was 25.97 ± 22.99 months. Postoperatively, 29 eyes (59.18%) showed improved corneal transparency, 26 eyes (53.06%) had improved BCVA, 47 eyes (95.92%) had a stable epithelium until the final follow-up, 44 eyes (89.80%) had a reduced neovascularization grade. Of the 20 eyes with preoperative symblepharon, 15 (75%) were completely resolved, and five (25%) were partially resolved. Impression cytological studies showed no postoperative conjunctival invasion onto the corneal surface.

CONCLUSIONS

OMET is a safe and effective surgical technique for reconstruction in severe ocular surface disorder by maintaining a stable epithelium and reducing the neovascularization and symblepharon grade.

Genetic analysis of allogenic donor cells after successful allo-limbal epithelial transplantation in simple and cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation procedures

This non-comparative cohort study investigated long-term donor cell survival after allogenic simple/cultivated limbal epithelial transplantations (allo-SLET/allo-CLET, respectively) by genetic analysis. Transplanted corneal epithelial cells, which underwent impression cytology and/or corneal-button biopsy, were examined for personal identities of autosomal short-tandem repeats; the percentages of donor cells were calculated based on matching recipient or donor buccal-DNA references. Twelve patients were included; 4 underwent allo-CLET, 8 underwent allo-SLET. Eight patients (67%) had total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Genetic analysis was performed postoperatively (mean, 55.3 months). Donor cells were detected in 4 of 12 patients (25%), all of whom underwent allo-SLET; 1 patient had a donor genotype and 3 patients had a mixed donor/recipient genotype. The longest time of donor cell detection was 30 months. Seven patients (58%) used systemic immunosuppressives at the time of genetic analysis (mean use, 22.5 months). Allogenic donor cells survived in both procedures for the long term postoperatively, which encourages the long-term use of systemic immunosuppressives. Donor cells may not be the only factor in graft survival, in that most successful cases had a recipient profile. Their presence for a specific time may promote niches for the patients' own cells to repopulate, especially for partial LSCD.

A Review of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) can cause significant corneal vascularization and scarring and often results in serious visual morbidity. An early and accurate diagnosis can help prevent the same with a timely and appropriate intervention. This review aims to provide an understanding of the different diagnostic tools and presents an algorithmic approach to the management based on a comprehensive clinical examination. Although the diagnosis of LSCD usually relies on the clinical findings, they can be subjective and non-specific. In such cases, using an investigative modality offers an objective method of confirming the diagnosis. Several diagnostic tools have been described in literature, each having its own advantages and limitations. Impression cytology and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) aid in the diagnosis of LSCD by detecting the presence of goblet cells. With immunohistochemistry, impression cytology can help in confirming the corneal or conjunctival source of epithelium. Both IVCM and anterior segment optical coherence tomography can help supplement the diagnosis of LSCD by characterizing the corneal and limbal epithelial changes. Once the diagnosis is established, one of various surgical techniques can be adopted for the treatment of LSCD. These surgeries aim to provide a new source of corneal epithelial stem cells and help in restoring the stability of the ocular surface. The choice of procedure depends on several factors including the involvement of the ocular adnexa, presence of systemic co-morbidities, status of the fellow eye and the comfort level of the surgeon. In LSCD with wet ocular surfaces, autologous and allogeneic limbal stem cell transplantation is preferred in unilateral and bilateral cases, respectively. Another approach in bilateral LSCD with wet ocular surfaces is the use of an autologous stem cell source of a different epithelial lineage, like oral or nasal mucosa. In eyes with bilateral LSCD with significant adnexal issues, a keratoprosthesis is the only viable option. This review provides an overview on the diagnosis and treatment of LSCD, which will help the clinician choose the best option amongst all the therapeutic modalities currently available and gives a clinical perspective on customizing the treatment for each individual case.

Longitudinal Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness and Reflectivity following Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation: An Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Study

PURPOSE

To describe the changes in corneal epithelial thickness and reflectivity following simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).

METHODS

This was a prospective imaging study of 31 eyes of 29 patients who had undergone autologous or allogeneic SLET for limbal stem cell deficiency and had stable, avascular surfaces postoperatively. ASOCT scans of all four quadrants were taken preoperatively and at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative time points in the eyes undergoing SLET. Baseline scans were also taken from the normal eye in unilateral cases. The following parameters were obtained from the scans: (i) epithelial thickness (ET), (ii) stromal thickness, (iii) total corneal thickness, (iv) epithelial reflectivity (ER), (v) stromal reflectivity, and (vi) epithelial/stromal (ES) reflectivity ratio.

RESULTS

Chemical injury (24 eyes, 77.4%) was the most common indication for surgery. There was a significant improvement in the ET (184.8 ± 117.1 vs 60.3 ± 10 µm, p < .0001) and ER (144.5 ± 26.4 vs 120.9 ± 28.9, p < .0001) within the initial postoperative period following SLET, which remained stable at the end of 1 year follow-up. There was no difference in the ET of the post-SLET and normal eyes after the 3-month timepoint and this normalization was maintained until the end of the first year. A significant normalization was also noted in the ES reflectivity ratio at the end of 1 year (2.1 ± 0.8 vs 1 ± 0.2, p < .001). A significant correlation was found between the final visual acuity and the total corneal thickness (r = 0.942, p = .005).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant improvement in the epithelial thickness and reflectivity of the cornea in eyes undergoing SLET. ASOCT provides a reliable objective measure of these changes and can be used to monitor the outcomes in these eyes postoperatively.