Influence de l’anesthésie locorégionale sur la récupération musculaire après ligamentoplastie du genou

Femoral nerve block at time of ACL reconstruction causes lasting quadriceps strength deficits and may increase short-term risk of re-injury

PURPOSE

To determine whether femoral nerve blockade (FNB) at the time of primary ACL reconstruction is associated with meeting isokinetic extension strength return to sport criteria near completion of physical therapy and whether FNB affects 1-year or 2-year risk of ipsilateral ACL graft rupture or contralateral native ACL injury.

METHODS

Three-hundred and sixty patients (n = 244 with FNB, n = 116 no FNB) underwent primary ACL reconstruction. All patients completed rehabilitation and underwent functional strength testing towards the end of knee rehabilitation (mean 5.6 months post-surgery). Association between FNB and isokinetic extension strength limb symmetry index (LSI) (goal LSI ≥ 90% for return to sport) as well as risk of recurrent ACL injury within first or second year after surgery was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury within 2 years occurred in 11.2% of patients with FNB and 5.7% without FNB (p = 0.01). Patients with FNB had higher incidence of ipsilateral graft rupture within the first year after surgery but no difference in graft rupture during the second. Two-year risk of contralateral ACL injury was similar in both groups. At the time of initial testing, patients who received FNB had lower fast isokinetic extension LSI versus patients without FNB and were less likely achieve a goal ≥ 90% LSI; slow extension LSI was unaffected.

CONCLUSION

Use of FNB at the time of primary ACL reconstruction can negatively affect achievement of isokinetic extension strength return to sport criteria. FNB increases risk of graft rupture within the first year after surgery but does not affect re-injury risk during the second. FNB may not be appropriate for use in patients already at high risk of ACL re-injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Effect of Femoral Nerve Block on Quadriceps Strength in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess the isokinetic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of femoral nerve block (FNB) compared with traditional multimodal anesthesia for FNB in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar was conducted according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Effects of FNB on quadriceps function were evaluated by isokinetic testing, functional scoring systems, range of motion, and patient self-report questionnaires. Heterogeneous reporting of outcomes precluded a formal meta-analysis. The methodologic merit of all studies included was evaluated by the Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Six studies were identified with outcome measures reported between 7 days and 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months, 2 of 4 studies that reported isokinetic testing found significantly greater deficits among patients who received a nerve block; one of the remaining studies showed a deficit at 6 weeks but not 6 months. Limited data showed no significant differences in functional or patient-reported outcomes at 6 months after reconstruction, and data regarding the impact of FNB on return to sport were inconclusive. The mean Coleman Methodology Score for the included studies was 53, indicating poor overall methodologic quality of the available literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited data available suggest that FNB causes a measurable deficit in quadriceps isokinetic strength during the early postoperative period but has no effect on functional outcomes or return to sport at 6 months after ACL reconstruction. However, current clinical evidence is not sufficient to draw any valid or definitive conclusions regarding the effect of FNB on postoperative outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systemic review of Level I through IV studies.