Long-Term Outcome of Cadaveric Renal Transplant After Treatment of Symptomatic Lymphocele

Lymphocele Complication After Kidney Transplant: Current Literature Review and Management Algorithm

Kidney transplant is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. It reduces mortality and improves the quality of life. However, kidney transplant presents medical and surgical complications, and one of the most common is the posttransplant lymphocele. Lymphocele complication has an incidence of up to 20% and presents with variable clinical symptoms, which are directly associated with the size and compression effect on the adjacent organs. There are reported risk factors that favor the appearance of lymphocele. Despite known factors, there are more relevant factors (male sex, deceased donor, and corticosteroids) to carry out a stricter follow-up. The treatment of lymphoceles can vary according to the severity of the symptoms, characteristics of the collection, and the patient's clinical status. Despite the high recurrence, percutaneous intervention is the initial approach in this condition. If percutaneous aspiration, drainage, and sclerotherapy are unsuccessful, then open or laparoscopic fenestration can be performed; laparoscopy is the standard of treatment since it is highly effective and has few adverse effects.

Symptomatic scrotal-inguino-retroperitoneal lymphocele in a kidney transplant patient-to drain but how to drain?

Scrotal-inguino-retroperitoneal (SIR) lymphocele is a rare complication following kidney transplant. This entity is characterized by a tract originating in the retroperitoneal space, through the inguinal canal and scrotum following lymph hydrodissection. Systematic review investigating SIR lymphocele yielded cases with open fenestration of the sac into the peritoneum as treatment. We described a case report of a male in his 60s with a functioning kidney transplant and SIR lymphocele, which was successfully managed in the short term with percutaneous drainage of the collection. However, the collection recurred and computed tomography scan showed a multiloculated collection that prompted surgical management. Intraoperatively, the encapsulated fluid-filled tract was excised and a drain was placed, which was removed 48 h later. The patient wore a hernia belt for 6 weeks as support. He had no recurrence of his lymphocele following serial reviews for 9 months now.

Treatment of symptomatic postoperative pelvic lymphoceles: A systematic review

PURPOSE

A broad range of therapeutic options exists for symptomatic postoperative lymphoceles. However, no consensus exists on what is the optimal therapy. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of currently available radiologic interventions in terms of number of successful interventions, number of recurrences, and number of complications.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted with a pre-defined search strategy for PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception until September 2019. Quality assessment was performed using the 'Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions' tool. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² and χ² test and a meta-analysis was considered for studies reporting on multiple interventions.

RESULTS

37 eligible studies including 732 lymphoceles were identified. Proportions of successful interventions for percutaneous fine needle aspiration, percutaneous catheter drainage, percutaneous catheter drainage with delayed or instantaneous addition of sclerotherapy, and embolization were as follows: 0.341 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.185-0.542), 0.612 (95% CI: 0.490-0.722), 0.890 (95% CI: 0.781-0.948), 0.872 (95% CI: 0.710-0.949), 0.922 (95% CI: 0.731-0.981). Random-effects meta-analysis of seven studies revealed a pooled relative risk for percutaneous catheter drainage with delayed addition of sclerotherapy of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.17-2.10) when compared to percutaneous catheter drainage alone. The risk of bias in this study was severe.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrates that the success rates of percutaneous catheter drainage with sclerotherapy are more favorable when compared to percutaneous catheter drainage alone in the treatment of postoperative pelvic lymphoceles. Overall, percutaneous catheter drainage with delayed addition of sclerotherapy, and embolization showed the best outcomes.

Recipient and renal allograft survival following living related-donor transplantation: a single center experience

Background

Despite improvements in surgical techniques of renal transplantation, still surgical complications remain a big challenge that might affect the post-transplant recipient and graft outcome. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively assess the surgical complications following living related kidney transplants in our center from 1990 to 2012 and determine their impact on long term recipient and graft survival.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all live related-donor kidney transplants performed at our tertiary referral center between June 1990 and December 2012. Data regarding recipient demographics, details of surgical techniques, any reported complications and cumulative recipient and graft survival was analyzed.

Results

One hundred and four patients were included in the study whom we had access to their complete hospital records and they didn’t miss follow up. There were 41 surgical complications reported in 37 recipients, prevalence of 35.5%. Vascular and urologic complications were reported in 17(16.3%) and 11 (10.5%) recipients respectively. Lymphocele was post-operatively diagnosed in nine (8.7%) recipients. Recipient survival at 1 year and 5-year were 100% and 97% respectively. Graft survival at 1 year and at 5 years were 96% and 85.5% respectively. Surgical complications mentioned, other than renal artery thrombosis, had no statistically significant impact on the graft and recipient survival.

Conclusion

Although surgical complications post-transplantation are not rare, the resulting morbidity can be minimized by prompt management of complications. In general, the existence of surgical complications did not impact recipient or graft survival.

Analysis of Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Patients with Identified Lymphoceles

The collection of lymphatic fluids (lymphoceles) is a frequent adverse event following renal transplantation. A variety of surgical and medical factors has been linked to this entity, but reliable data on risk factors and long-term outcomes are lacking. This retrospective single-center study included 867 adult transplant recipients who received a kidney transplantation from 2006 to 2015. We evaluated for patient and graft survival, rejection episodes, or detectable donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in patients with identified lymphoceles in comparison to controls. We identified 305/867 (35.2%) patients with lymphocele formation, of whom 72/867 (8.3%) needed intervention. Multivariate analysis identified rejection episode as an independent risk factor (OR 1.61, CI 95% 1.17–2.21, p = 0.003) for lymphocele formation, while delayed graft function was independently associated with symptomatic lymphoceles (OR 1.9, CI 95% 1.16–3.12, p = 0.011). Interestingly, there was no difference in detectable dnDSA between groups with a similar graft and patient survival in all groups after 10 years. Lymphoceles frequently occur after transplantation and were found to be independently associated with rejection episodes, while symptomatic lymphoceles were associated with delayed graft function in our cohort. As both are inflammatory processes, they might play a causative role in the formation of lymphoceles. However, development or intervention of lymphoceles did not lead to impaired graft survival in the long-term.

Consensus on definition and severity grading of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation varies considerably in the literature. This is partly because a universally accepted definition has not been established. This study aimed to propose an acceptable definition and severity grading system for lymphatic complications based on their management strategy.

METHODS

Relevant literature published in MEDLINE and Web of Science was searched systematically. A consensus for definition and a severity grading was then sought between 20 high-volume transplant centres.

RESULTS

Lymphorrhoea/lymphocele was defined in 32 of 87 included studies. Sixty-three articles explained how lymphatic complications were managed, but none graded their severity. The proposed definition of lymphorrhoea was leakage of more than 50 ml fluid (not urine, blood or pus) per day from the drain, or the drain site after removal of the drain, for more than 1 week after kidney transplantation. The proposed definition of lymphocele was a fluid collection of any size near to the transplanted kidney, after urinoma, haematoma and abscess have been excluded. Grade A lymphatic complications have a minor and/or non-invasive impact on the clinical management of the patient; grade B complications require non-surgical intervention; and grade C complications require invasive surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

A clear definition and severity grading for lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation was agreed. The proposed definitions should allow better comparisons between studies.

A case of continuous negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal infected lymphocele after kidney transplantation

Lymphocele is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Although superinfection is a rare event, it generates a difficult management problem; generally, open surgical drainage is the preferred method of treatment but it may lead to complicated postoperative course and prolonged healing time. Negative pressure wound therapy showed promising outcomes in various surgical disciplines and settings. We present a case of an abdominal infected lymphocele after kidney transplantation managed with open surgery and negative pressure wound therapy.

Does ultrasonic energy for surgical dissection reduce the incidence of renal transplant lymphocele?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in post-renal transplant lymphocele rate based on the surgical dissection technique for control of lymphatics by examining the historical case group under the direction of a single, university-based surgeon in a retrospective, cohort study.

PATIENTS

Five hundred thirty-two consecutive renal transplant patients from January 1994 to December 2009.

FINDINGS

Of the 532 cases studied, 259 (48.7%) had suture ligation and 273 (51.3%) employed ultrasonic dissection (UD) for control of lymphatics during renal transplantation. There was no difference found in the rate of lymphocele formation, requiring either percutaneous or surgical drainage, when surgical ties (8.9%) were compared to UD (9.2%; P=.999). Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for developing a lymphocele was independent of surgical dissection technique. Within the logistic analysis, the prediction for lymphocele was increased 3.29 times for pediatric patients (P=.002) and increased 2.97 times for those who received a living donor graft (P=.001), and there was a trend for those with a history of more than one renal transplant of 2.01 times (P=.079).

SUMMARY

Surgical dissection technique was not a factor in the development of post-renal transplant lymphocele. Younger age, living donor transplant, and repeat transplant status were found to be predictive variables for symptomatic lymphoceles requiring drainage, which may be considered when patients present for posttransplant evaluations for laboratory alterations.

Management of primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Management of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation is highly variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the different approaches of lymphocele management among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for case studies published between 1954 and 2010. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic lymphoceles developing in recipients of deceased or living donor kidneys with specified intervention and outcome. Primary outcome was the rate of recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, hospital stay, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Fifty-two retrospective case series with 1113 cases of primary lymphocele were selected for review. No randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies were located. Primary treatment modalities included were as follows: aspiration (n=218), sclerotherapy (n=155), drainage (n=219), laparoscopic surgery (n=333), and open surgery (n=188). Of the 218 cases of lymphocele managed with aspiration alone, 141 recurred with a recurrence rate of 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-67). Among those who received laparoscopic and open surgery, the recurrence rates were 8% (95% CI: 6-12) and 16% (95% CI: 10-24), respectively. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 12% (95% CI: 8-16).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic fenestration of a symptomatic lymphocele is associated with the lowest risk of lymphocele recurrence. However, the evidence base to support a recommendation for laparoscopic surgery as first line treatment is weak and highlights the need for a multicenter prospective cohort study to examine the benefits of incorporating initial simple aspiration into the management of lymphocele after kidney transplantation.

Retroperitoneal lymphocele after anterior spinal surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Case report; Review of Literature.

OBJECTIVE

To present an uncommon complication after anterior lumbar surgery as well as a treatment option and a review of the literature.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A number of complications have been reported after anterior lumbar surgery. Common complications include vascular, ureteral, and neurologic injuries. The development of a retroperitoneal lymphocele has been previously been described, but details regarding evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment options are lacking in the literature.

METHODS

The case of a single patient with a postoperative retroperitoneal lymphocele was identified and retrospectively reviewed. Permission was obtained from the patient to review and publish this information. A review of literature on lymphoceles and anterior lumbar complications was also performed using PubMed and Ovid databases.

RESULTS

A 76-year-old woman underwent anterior interbody fusion from L2-L3-L4-L5, followed by posterior T11-L5 fusion for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis. Six weeks after surgery, she presented with severe abdominal pain, nausea, and emesis. Examination revealed a retroperitoneal lymphocele, which was confirmed after aspiration. The patient was treated with a laparoscopic marsupialization procedure without recurrence. At 12 months, the patient had no further abdominal symptoms, noted improvements in back and leg pain scores, and had stable radiographic findings.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal lymphocele is a rare complication after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The different diagnosis should include infectious abscess, ureteral injury with urinoma, pancreatic injury with pseudocyst formation, and spinal fluid leak with pseudomeningocele. Diagnosis can be guided by serum and cyst fluid analysis. Although treatment options exist, surgical treatment may provide the most reliable results.

Intraperitoneal Tenckhoff catheter for the treatment of recurrent lymphoceles after kidney transplantation: our early experience

Lymphoceles may occur as frequently as 16% of the time after kidney transplantation, becoming clinically evident between 18 and 180 days after surgery. The management of lymphoceles is unclear. Percutaneous needle aspiration and external drainage are associated with high recurrence and complications. Surgical intraperitoneal marsupialization of lymphocele is considered the treatment of choice, but requires hospital admission, general anesthesia, and sometimes extensive surgical dissection. We discuss our experience in the treatment of recurrent symptomatic lymphocele intraperitoneally drained using a Tenckhoff catheter in 7 consecutive patients. Clinical manifestations became evident between 26 and 90 days after transplantation. The diagnosis was obtained with abdominal ultrasound in all cases; mean lymphocele diameter was 14 +/- 6 cm. After percutaneous drainage, performed to differentiate urinoma/lymphocele and to rule out infections, the lymphocele recurred within 1 month. Thereafter, we decided to treat recurrent lymphatic collection using a Tenckhoff catheter. The lymphocele was located during the operative procedure using a sterile 3.5-MHz ultrasound probe. With the patient under local anesthesia, we performed 2 vertical 1-cm incisions to the lymphocele and peritoneum, respectively. The Tenckoff catheter was first positioned into the lymphocele and the tunneled inside the peritoneal cavity. One cuff of the Tenckhoff was fixed to the fascia to avoid possible delocalization. The patients were discharged the same day. The catheter was removed 6 months later with no evidence of lymphocele recurrence.

Early and late urological complications corrected surgically following renal transplantation

The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of urological complications after kidney transplantation operation. Nine-hundred and sixty-five patients received a kidney transplant between 2000 and 2006. In total, 58 (6.01%) developed urological complications, including urinary leakage (n = 15, 1.55%), stenosis (n = 29, 3%), vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) (n = 12, 1.2%), calculi (n = 1, 0.1%) and parenchymal fistulae (n = 1, 0.1%). Urinary leakage cases were treated by ureteroneocystostomy (UNS) via a double-J stent and stenosis cases by UNS. Fenestration was performed in patients developing lymphoceles and unresponsive to percutaneous drainage. VUR treatment was performed by ureteroneocystostomy revision or UNS. Stent usage during ureteric reimplantation was observed to reduce urinary leakage. Surgical complication rates in renal transplantation recipients according to donor type (living versus cadaveric) and the status of stent use (with stent versus without stent) were 5.53% vs. 7.27% (P = 0.064) and 5.24% vs. 20% (P < 0.01) respectively. No recurrence, graft loss or death was seen after these interventions. Comparison of recipients with and without urological complication showed that there was no difference between groups (P > 0.05) with respect to last creatinine level. No graft or patient loss was associated with urological complications. Urological complications that can be surgically corrected should be aggressively treated by experienced surgeons and graft loss avoided.