Safety and efficacy of intratesticular injection of vital dyes for lymphatic preservation during varicocelectomy

Outcome following the surgical management of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The ideal surgical approach for the management of varicocele in children and adolescents remains controversial. Several techniques are available including artery- or lymphatic-sparing with optical magnification (via open inguinal or sub-inguinal approach), laparoscopic, antegrade and retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy.

Objectives

We aimed to appraise the clinical outcomes of these techniques in children and adolescents.

Data Sources and Methods

A systematic review was conducted (1997-2023). Meta-analysis or proportional meta-analysis for non-comparative studies (Freeman-Tukey transformation) using the random effects model was conducted. Results are expressed as overall proportion % and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

We identified 1910 studies; 632 duplicates were removed, 1278 were screened, 203 were reviewed and 56 were included, with 12 reporting on 2 different techniques (total of 68 data sets). Optical magnification via inguinal approach (498 cases): recurrence 2.5% (0.6-5.6), hydrocele 1.6% (0.47-3.4), testicular atrophy 1% (0.3-2.0), complications 1.1% (0.2-2.6); optical magnification via sub-inguinal approach (592 cases): recurrence 2.1% (0.7-4.4), hydrocele 1.26% (0.5-2.3), testicular atrophy 0.5% (0.1-1.3), complications 4% (1.0-8.8). Laparoscopic with mass-ligation/division (1943 cases): recurrence 2.9% (1.5-4.6), hydrocele 11.4% (8.3-14.9); complications 1.5% (0.6-2.9); laparoscopic with lymphatic-sparing (974 cases): recurrence 2.4% (1.5-3.5), hydrocele 1.2% (0.45-3.36), complications 1.2% (0.05-3.9); laparoscopic with artery-sparing (228 cases): recurrence 6.6% (2.3-12.9), hydrocele 6.5% (2.6-12.0). Antegrade embolization/sclerotherapy (403 cases): recurrence 7.6% (5.2-10.4), hydrocele 0.8% (0.17-1.9), technical failure 0.6% (0.1-1.6), complications 4.0% (2.3-6.1); retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy (509 cases): recurrence 6.9% (4.6-9.5), hydrocele 0.8% (0.05-2.5), technical failure 10.2% (4.6-17.6), and complications 4.8% (1.0-11.2).

Conclusion

The recurrence rate varies between 2.1% and 7.6% and is higher with the embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. Post-operative hydrocele rate varies between 0.8% and 11.4% and is higher with the laparoscopic mass-ligation/division technique. Testicular atrophy has not been reported with the laparoscopic and embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. The retrograde embolization technique is associated with 10% technical failure (inability to complete the procedure). The laparoscopic lymphatic-sparing technique is characterized by the lowest recurrence rate, incidence of hydrocele and other complications, and no reports of testicular atrophy.

Management of adolescent varicocele

Varicocele is defined as an abnormal dilation and tortuosity of the internal spermatic veins found within the pampiniform plexus. It is a common finding in adolescents and adult men alike, however its diagnosis in the adolescent population poses different dilemmas in regard to indications for treatment than in adults. Failed Paternity is a clear-cut indication for repair in adult men attempting to father children. In adolescents, the physicians, family and patients must consider potential for future fertility problems which may or may not actually become of concern. Assessing the degree of negative effect of the varicocele on an adolescent's testicular health can also be difficult as teenagers typically are not asked to provide semen for analysis and thus surrogate markers for testicular health such as testicular size differentials must be used. Treatment options for the adolescent varicocele are similar to options in adult populations. While risks and benefits of various techniques can be considered, the gold standard for varicocele repair in adolescents has not been clearly defined. We aim to discuss diagnosis of varicocele, considerations for initiating treatment of varicocele in the adolescent, and techniques for management.

Adolescent varicocele: Efficacy of indication-to-treat protocol and proposal of a grading system for postoperative hydroceles

BACKGROUND

Varicocele is a common urologic anomaly in adolescent males; however, evidence-based treatment guidelines do not exist. Hydroceles are known to be a common complication after surgical therapy, with a wide variation in the reported incidence between 1 and 40%.

AIM

This study aimed to introduce a standardized indication-to-treat protocol and prove its efficacy by analyzing the outcome of patients. Secondly, it aimed to better define postoperative hydroceles because the wide variation of reported incidence is attributed to a lack of definition.

METHODS

Our standardized treatment protocol included an initial assessment with clinical grading of varicoceles, ultrasound evaluation of testicular volume, and calculation of the atrophy index. Indications for surgical treatment were testicular volume asymmetry >20%, discomfort and pain, or bilateral varicocele. The Palomo procedure (laparoscopically since 2005) was the standard procedure. Postoperative hydroceles were graded according to clinical findings and symptoms: Grade I, sonographic chance finding without clinical correlate; Grade II, palpable but clinically insignificant; Grade III, symptomatic. All patients treated according to the defined protocol were prospectively monitored between January 2001 and December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients with left varicocele were referred to our institution; 70 fulfilled the indication criteria for surgical treatment. Twenty-eight of these patients were treated for volume asymmetry, 26 of these showed catch-up growth. Forty-two patients were treated for discomfort and pain; the symptoms subsided in all of them. Postoperative hydroceles were detected in 36 patients (51%). In 29 patients this was a sonographic chance finding (Grade I). Three patients showed a palpable but clinically insignificant postoperative hydrocele (Grade II) and four patients (5.7%) showed symptomatic hydrocele (Grade III) where treatment was recommended.

DISCUSSION

The treatment protocol allowed judicious indication for surgery and postoperative outcomes similar to previous reports. The high rate of catch-up growth in operated cases represents a proxy for successful treatment in cases where more precise parameters, like semen quality or paternity rate, were not yet detectable. The introduced grading system for postoperative hydroceles provs to be a valid and appropriate instrument, and promises to be a standardized method for comparing outcomes in future studies.

CONCLUSION

The indication-to-treat protocol proved to be easily applicable, highly efficient, and have outcomes comparable to international literature. The necessity for a standardized grading of postoperative hydroceles was underscored in the data.

Two decades of experience with laparoscopic varicocele repair in children: Standardizing the technique

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists about the indications and the gold standard approach for varicocele treatment in pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE

The authors report their 23 years of experience in laparoscopic varicocele repair in the pediatric population.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated the data of 345 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic left varicocelectomy from January 1993 to December 2015. Average patient age was 12.5 years (range 8-17). Seven out of 345 patients (2%) had a recurrent varicocele, and five out of 345 patients (1.4%) had a varicocele on a single testis. In 335/345 patients (97.1%) we performed a Palomo procedure, and in 10/345 patients (2.9%) an artery-sparing Palomo procedure. After 2010, in 105/345 patients (30.4%) we performed a lymphatic sparing procedure using isosulfan blue injection preoperatively.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed in laparoscopy (Figure), without conversions or intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 17 min (range 14-45) for the Palomo procedure and 26 min (range 18-50) for artery-sparing Palomo. In 45/345 patients (13%) we performed additional procedures. We recorded 4/345 (1.3%) recurrences/persistences in patients undergoing Palomo, while we recorded 1/10 (10%) recurrence/persistence after artery-sparing Palomo. On 230 Palomo procedures performed in the pre-isosulfan blue era, we recorded 25 cases of hydrocele (10.8%), 13 of these were treated with transcrotal puncture and 12 required surgical operation. The last 105 patients undergoing isosulfan blue injection had no postoperative hydrocele. We also reported 10 other complications (I grade Clavien-Dindo) such as umbilical granuloma or instrumental problems.

DISCUSSION

Analyzing the international literature of the last 25 years, most papers focused on the minimally invasive treatment of pediatric varicocele. There are several reasons to perform laparoscopic repair of pediatric varicocele. First of all, it is technically easy to perform, the average operative time is very short, and it has excellent outcome in regard to varicocele persistence/recurrence. In addition it has a very low complication rate, and in particular adopting the intradartoic/intratesticular isosulfan blue injection before surgery we recorded no postoperative hydrocele.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our 23 years of experience with varicocele repair, we clearly believe that laparoscopic Palomo lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy should be considered the standard of care for the treatment of pediatric patients with varicocele. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is technically easy and quick to perform, painless, and scarless, with a recurrence rate of about 1%. The use of a preoperative injection of isosulfan blue completely eliminates postoperative hydrocele formation.

The role of testicular artery in laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of artery preserving versus artery non-preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy.

METHODS

All publications up until October 2015 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) that compared the difference in two operative approaches in laparoscopic varicocelectomy were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of four RCTs and ten CSs involving 503 cases with artery preserving and 911 cases with artery non-preserving met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that artery preserving had higher recurrence rate [risk ratio (RR) = 2.91, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.83-4.61; P = 0.000], lower incidence of hydrocele formation (RR = 0.18; 95 % CI 0.08-0.42; P = 0.000), and prolonged operating time [standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.27; 95 % CI 0.17-2.37; P = 0.023], compared with artery non-preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The results were similar in postoperative catch-up growth (RR = 1.00; 95 % CI 0.86-1.17; P = 0.985) and testicular atrophy (RR = 0.36; 95 % CI 0.09-1.54; P = 0.169). Besides, no significant difference was found in sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology between two groups, as well as on postoperative pregnancy rate (RR = 0.95; 95 % CI 0.65-1.40; P = 0.809).

CONCLUSION

With the advantages of less recurrence, easier operating and less time spending, and comparable results in other respects, artery non-preserving is preferable to artery preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy, although there is a relatively high incidence of hydrocele formation. Considering the limitation of included studies, more large-scaled RCTs are required to confirm the present findings.

Indigo carmine dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy in children

The ideal method for varicocelectomy in children remains controversial. We present our experience with dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LSLV) in children, which overcomes the limitations of previously described techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five consecutive LSLVs were performed over a period of three years on children with a mean age of twelve years. The varicocele grade was three in one case and grade 2 in four cases, respectively. A left subdartos injection of 2 ml of Indigo carmine dye was done using a 25-gauge needle at ten minutes before an operation. A scrotal injection of lymphatic dye was utilized to spare at least one lymphatic and the remaining spermatic vessels were divided.

RESULTS

Lymphatic-sparing was accomplished in all cases. No peri-operative complication was noted. We spared one lymphatic channel in one patient (20%) and two channels in four patients (80%). There were no cases of hydrocele or residual varicocele.

CONCLUSION

Dye-assisted LSLV is easily accomplished with an excellent surgical outcome and sparing one or two lymphatics appears to be sufficient to avoid secondary hydrocele.

Dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children

INTRODUCTION

The ideal method for varicocelectomy in children remains controversial. We present our experience with dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LSLV) in children, which overcomes the limitations of previously described techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive LSLVs were performed on children with a mean age of 15 years over a 4-year period. Varicocele grade was 3 in 21 cases and grade 2 in 4. Indications for intervention were hypotrophy in 12, pain in 11 cases and family preference in 2. A scrotal injection of lymphatic dye was utilized to spare at least one lymphatic and the remaining spermatic vessels were divided.

RESULTS

Lymphatic sparing was accomplished in all cases. Operative time varied from 30 to 140 min (mean 85 ± 26). No perioperative complications were noted. On average follow-up of 13 months a residual varicocele was noted in 2 cases, with no hydrocele and resolution of pain. Mean testicular volume difference diminished from 33% pre to 18% postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This multi-surgeon experience demonstrates that dye-assisted LSLV is easily accomplished with promising results. It appears that preservation of a single spermatic lymphatic vessel is sufficient, although in some cases a second dye injection is required to visualize the lymphatics.

Lymphatic preservation in varicocele in the adolescent: does prior embolization limit spermatic dissection?

OBJECTIVE

One of the complications after complete section of the spermatic pedicle in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic varicocele is the formation of a scrotal lymphocele. This can be avoided by preserving lymphatic vessels using dye, but there is a risk that dissection may be complicated in patients who have previously undergone embolization. The aim of this study was to determine whether prior embolization limits spermatic dissection.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We used lymphography with dye (Patent Blue) prior to surgery in order to mark and preserve the lymph vessels during spermatic section. This was done by laparoscopy with a single umbilical port.

RESULTS

We treated six patients aged 12.5-15 years (mean 13.12 years), two of whom had grade 2 varicoceles and four grade 3. Prior percutaneous embolization with metallic coils had been undertaken in all cases but had not been curative. Post-surgery controls were undertaken for a mean duration of 5 months without any lymphoceles appearing. No testicles were lost, nor did any other complication arise.

CONCLUSION

The presence of embolization material in the spermatic veins and perivascular fibrosis does not complicate surgery, enabling the single port laparoscopic technique to be undertaken.

Management of hydrocele in adolescent patients

Hydrocele is defined as an abnormal collection of serous fluid in the potential space between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis. In the majority of affected adolescents, hydrocele is acquired and is idiopathic in origin. The pathogenesis of idiopathic hydrocele is thought to be an imbalance in the normal process of fluid production and reabsorption. The diagnosis is usually clinical. Taking a thorough history is essential to rule out any fluctuation in size, which is an indication of a patent processus vaginalis. Scrotal ultrasonography is mandatory in nonpalpable testicles to rule out a subtending testicular solid mass requiring inguinal exploration. Otherwise, open hydrocelectomy via a scrotal incision is the standard treatment of idiopathic hydroceles. The second most common cause of hydrocele in adolescents is varicocelectomy. The risk of hydrocele formation is higher with non-artery-sparing procedures or those performed without microsurgical aid, and in surgery requiring cord dissection. If hydrocele occurs after varicocelectomy, initial management should include observation with or without hydrocele aspiration. Large persistent hydroceles are best served by open hydrocelectomy.