Feasibility and outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy

Surgical and functional outcomes of repeat robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy compared with repeat open partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who have undergone repeat open partial nephrectomy (reOPN) or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (reRAPN).

METHODS

Until May 2022, 3310 patients with renal tumors underwent nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) at affiliated institutions. Of these, 22 and 17 patients who underwent reOPN and reRAPN, respectively, were included in this study.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, recurrent tumor size at repeat NSS, interval from recurrence to initial NSS, and nephrometry score. ReRAPN had a shorter operative time (median: 138.0 vs. 214.0 min; p = 0.0023) and less estimated blood loss (median: 50.0 vs. 255.0 mL; p = 0.0261) than reOPN. The incidence of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 was higher in the reOPN group than in the reRAPN group (31.8 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.0467). The mean decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups. The trifecta achievement rates in the reRAPN (64.7%) and reOPN (27.3%) groups were significantly different (p = 0.0194). On multivariate analysis, age and surgical method were significant predictors of trifecta achievement after partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in postoperative renal functional outcomes between reOPN and reRAPN. ReRAPN is superior to reOPN in terms of surgical burden. Therefore, ReRAPN is an important minimally invasive surgery for recurrent renal cell carcinoma.

Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma after Prior Partial Nephrectomy

Background

Repeat partial nephrectomy (PN) for tumors recurring in the ipsilateral kidney is associated with surgical complexity and a higher rate of complications.

Objective

To evaluate the local oncologic efficacy of thermal ablation (TA) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the ipsilateral kidney following PN.

Design setting participation

We included patients who underwent ablation for renal tumors in the ipsilateral kidney after PN between January 2005 and December 2019. Demographics, tumor size, procedural details, complications, pathology, local oncologic outcomes, and survival outcomes are described.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The procedural, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes are described. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results and limitations

A total of 66 patients (46 male and 20 female) with a median age of 62 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 52-69) met our inclusion criteria. In these patients, 74 TA procedures were performed for 86 lesions (median tumor size 1.9 cm, IQR 1.6-2.5). Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation accounted for 60 (81%) and 14 (19%) procedures, respectively. Three patients (3.7%) had Clavien-Dindo grade III complications. Of 65 lesion biopsies, 62 (95.5%) were diagnostic. The most common subtype was clear cell RCC (n = 37). The median imaging follow-up duration was 60 mo (IQR 43-88). Recurrence in the ablation zone occurred for four lesions (4.6%) at a median of 6.9 mo (IQR 6.4-10.7). The rates of overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival were 93.1%, 94.4%, and 65.6% at 5 yr, and 71.6%, 94.4%, and 60.1% at 10 yr, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective design and the lack of a control group.

Conclusions

TA is effective for the treatment of RCC in the ipsilateral kidney following PN.

Patient summary

Heat treatment to remove tumor tissue is an effective option for small kidney masses recurring after partial kidney removal for cancer. Long-term follow-up data revealed that this treatment resulted in low recurrence and complication rates.

Comparative analysis of salvage partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy after the failure of initial partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the oncologic outcomes and renal function discrepancy of salvage partial nephrectomy (sPN) and salvage radical nephrectomy (sRN) after an initial failed PN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data from multiple centers between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed in this study. Patients who received sPN or sRN after an initial failed PN were identified. Comparative analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed and the RENAL score, tumor size, and pathological T stage at salvage surgery were used to match the 2 groups. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank tests. Renal function after salvage surgery was assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients who underwent salvage surgery were evaluated, of whom 60 were considered for PSM analysis after matching. At a median follow-up of 27.0 months, LRFS and RFS showed no significant difference between sPN and sRN, either before (LRFS, HR = 0.673 [95% CI: 0.171-2.644], P = 0.610; RFS, HR = 0.744 [95% CI: 0.271-1.344], P = 0.595) or after matching (LRFS, HR = 1.080 [95% CI: 0.067-17.30], P = 0.957; RFS, HR = 1.199 [95% CI: 0.241-5.983], P = 0.822). During long-term follow-up, sPN preserved renal function (after matching, eGFR, 71.4 vs. 54.0, P < 0.001) and prevented eGFR loss (after matching: 6.6% vs. 25.6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Salvage partial nephrectomy offers a better alternative than sRN for recurrence after initial PN, as sPN preserves renal function better while maintaining parallel tumor control and acceptable complication rates.

How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached?

Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard treatment for small renal mass (SRM). Nephron-sparing surgery has evolved from an open to a minimally invasive technique. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is the latest technique in this field and is reported to be safe and feasible, showing oncologically and functionally superior or compatible results compared with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for SRM. This is not limited to only SRM but also applies to large and complex renal masses and other challenging situations. RAPN showed good oncological and functional outcomes for ≥clinical T2 renal tumors, complex renal masses (PADUA score ≥10, RENAL score ≥10), hilar renal tumors, and multiple renal tumors. In addition, the outcomes of RAPN in these challenging cases were not inferior to those in conventional cases. RAPN could also be applied to a number of challenging cases in which the open technique was considered first. RAPN showed good results in patients with a solitary kidney, horseshoe kidney, and in repeat surgeries. Furthermore, RAPN could be safely performed on obese, elderly, and pediatric patients. Finally, this review evaluates efficiency and utility of RAPN based on the results of challenging cases of renal masses and to project the future of RAPN.

Oncological and Peri-Operative Outcomes of Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma for Patients with Hereditary RCC Diseases-An Analysis of European Multi-Centre Prospective EuRECA Registry

This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and renal function preservation of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for small renal masses (SRMs) in inherited RCC syndromes. Patients with inherited T1N0M0 RCCs (<7 cm) undergoing PCA from 2015 to 2021 were identified from the European Registry for Renal Cryoablation (EuRECA). The primary outcome was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The secondary outcomes included technical success, peri-operative outcomes, and other oncological outcomes estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Simple proportions, chi-squared tests, and t-tests were used to analyse the peri-operative outcomes. A total of 68 sessions of PCA were performed in 53 patients with RCC and 85 tumours were followed-up for a mean duration of 30.4 months (SD ± 22.0). The overall technical success rate was 99%. The major post-operative complication rate was 1.7%. In total, 7.4% (2/27) of patients had >25% reduction in renal function. All oncological events were observed in VHL patients. Estimated 5-year LRFS, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 96.0% (95% CI 75-99%), 96.4% (95% CI 77-99%), 90.9% (95% CI 51-99%), and 90.9% (95% CI 51-99%), respectively. PCA of RCCs for patients with hereditary RCC SRMs appears to be safe, offers low complication rates, preserves renal function, and achieves good oncological outcomes.

Operative and oncological outcomes of salvage robotic radical and partial nephrectomy: a multicenter experience

We aim to describe the perioperative and oncological outcomes for salvage robotic partial nephrectomy (sRPN) and salvage robotic radical nephrectomy (sRRN). Using a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database, we compared baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes, including pathological stage, tumor histology, operative time, ischemia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and mortality. We identified a total of 58 patients who had undergone robotic salvage surgery for a recurrent renal mass, of which 22 (38%) had sRRN and 36 (62%) had sRPN. Ischemia time for sRPN was 14 min. The median EBL was 100 mL in both groups (p = 0.581). One intraoperative complication occurred during sRRN, while three occurred during sRPN cases (p = 1.000). The median LOS was 2 days for sRRN and 1 day for sRPN (p = 0.039). Postoperatively, one major complication occurred after sRRN and two after sRPN (p = 1.000). The recurrence reported after sRRN was 5% and 3% after sRPN. Among the patients who underwent sRRN, the two most prevalent stages were pT1a (27%) and pT3a (27%). Similarly, the two most prevalent stages in sRPN patients were pT1a (69%) and pT3a (6%). sRRN and sRPN have similar operative and perioperative outcomes. sRPN is a safe and feasible procedure when performed by experienced surgeons. Future studies on large cohorts are essential to better characterize the importance and benefit of salvage partial nephrectomies.

The road to systemic therapy in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease: Are we there yet?

Pathogenic germline mutations in VHL gene cause von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome associated with high penetrance of benign and malignant neoplasms, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), central nervous system haemangioblastomas (CNS-HB), retinal angiomas, phaeochromocytomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNET). Management of VHL disease involves lifelong radiological and biochemical surveillance, often leading to repeat surgical intervention causing significant morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy that prevents or reduces the need for surgical intervention could improve clinical outcomes and quality of life for affected individuals. Belzutifan is a second-generation small molecule hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor recently approved by US and UK regulators for the treatment of VHL (disease)-associated ccRCC, CNS-HB and pNET. While this is a welcome step forward, it is vital that we consider in what circumstances these drugs are recommended and how they fit into the overall management of VHL disease. In this personal view article, we reflect on the history of the use of systemic therapy in localised VHL disease and consider open questions relating to the use of HIF-2α inhibitors, including the need to involve medical oncologists in the multidisciplinary team moving forward. Indeed, VHL disease is the perfect paradigm for similar settings in the future.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Renal Tumors

Renal cell carcinomas accounts for 2% of all the cancers globally. Most of the renal tumors are detected incidentally. Ultrasound remains the main screening modality to evaluate the renal masses. A multi -phase contrast enhanced computer tomography is must for characterizing the renal lesions. Imaging plays an important role in staging, treatment planning and follow up of renal cancers. In this review , we discuss the imaging guidelines for the management of renal tumors.

Safety and Oncologic Outcomes of Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrences in the Ipsilateral Kidney Following Partial Nephrectomy

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the safety and oncological outcomes of cryoablation performed on residual/recurring renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the ipsilateral kidney following partial nephrectomy (PN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data dealing with patients', RCC, procedure (including the length of the hospital stay), and follow-up (technical efficacy [TE], local tumor progression-free survival [LTPFS], disease-free survival [DFS], metastasis-free survival [MFS], cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival [OS]) were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 2008 and November 2020, 21 consecutive patients (17 [81%] men; 4 [19%] women; median age 68 years; range 43-82) underwent cryoablation due to residual/recurring RCC in the PN site (15 patients) or de-novo RCC (6 patients) in the ipsilateral kidney. Median tumor size was 2.2 cm (mean 2.3 cm; range 0.8-4; interquartile range [IQR] 1.9-3). There were two (2/21; 10%) minor self-limiting hemorrhagic complications, both occurring in the group of patients with RCC in the PN site. Median hospital stay was 2 days (mean 2.1; range 1-5; IQR 2-2). TE was 100% (21/21 patients), and 10-year estimates of LTPFS, MFS and DFS were 74.1% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 56.8-96.7%), 36.4% (95% CI 14.2-93.8%), and 43.5% (95% CI 21.9-86.4%), respectively. CSS and OS were 100% at the last available follow-up (median 56 months; mean 67.4; range: 12-147; IQR:34-95).

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation in patients with residual/recurring RCC following PN is safe and results in high 10-year estimates of LTPFS.

A case of von Hippel-Lindau disease with renal cell carcinoma treated by partial nephrectomy with pre- and post-surgical axitinib therapy

von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease with benign and malignant tumors occurring in various organs including the kidneys. In patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lesions in both kidneys, it is difficult to determine the treatment strategy. We report a case of VHL disease with RCC treated via partial nephrectomy after 6 months of axitinib therapy. Then, the patient continued to receive low-dose axitinib therapy without any signs of tumor progression for 3 years after surgery. Axitinib combined with surgery might be a treatment option for patients with VHL disease harboring bilateral RCC.

Reoperative Partial Nephrectomy-Does Previous Surgical Footprint Impact Outcomes?

PURPOSE

Historically, open techniques have been favored over minimally invasive approaches for complex surgeries. We aimed to identify differences in perioperative outcomes, surgical footprints, and complication rates in patients undergoing either open or robotic reoperative partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing reoperative partial nephrectomy was performed. Patients were assigned to cohorts based on current and prior surgical approaches: open after open, open after minimally invasive surgery, robotic after open, and robotic after minimally invasive surgery cohorts. Perioperative outcomes were compared among cohorts. Factors contributing to complications were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients underwent reoperative partial nephrectomy, including 103 in the open after open, 10 in the open after minimally invasive surgery, 47 in the robotic after open, and 32 in the robotic after minimally invasive surgery cohorts. The overall and major complication (grade ≥3) rates were 65% and 19%, respectively. The number of blood transfusions, overall complications, and major complications were significantly lower in robotic compared to open surgical cohorts. On multivariate analysis, the robotic approach was protective against major complications (OR 0.3, p=0.02) and estimated blood loss was predictive (OR 1.03, p=0.004). Prior surgical approach was not predictive for major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperative partial nephrectomy is feasible using both open and robotic approaches. While the robotic approach was independently associated with fewer major complications, prior approach was not, implying that prior surgical approaches are less important to perioperative outcomes and in contributing to the overall surgical footprint.

Iatrogenic ureteric stricture post image guided renal cryoablation in a patient with von hippel-lindau syndrome

A 53-year-old lady is known to have Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome with a long history of previous renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in both kidneys. She was treated by partial nephrectomy for a right peripheral RCC and subsequently image guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of a left central RCC. She developed another de novo RCC adjacent to the right pelvic-ureteric junction (PUJ) 4 years after the initial RFA. Due to the close proximity to the PUJ and visibility of an ice ball with cryoablation (CRYO), the consensus from the MDT was that CRYO would be safer than RFA and she subsequently underwent percutaneous image guided CRYO to treat the small de novo RCC. Unfortunately, during the 1-month imaging follow up, she developed moderate hydronephrosis and a ureteric stricture needing long-term ureteric stent management. This case highlights the risk of ureteric injury caused by the thermal effect of the ice ball during image guided renal CRYO. Therefore, it is vital that all interventional radiologists adopt various manoeuvres to protect the ureter from the ice ball during CRYO in order to avoid the development of latent ureteric stricture.

A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer

The diagnosis, evaluation and management of patients with renal cell carcinoma has transformed in the 21st century. Utilizing biological discoveries and technological advances, the field has moved from blunt surgical and largely ineffective medical treatments, to nuanced and fine-tuned approaches based on biology, extent of disease and patient preferences. In this review we will summarize the last 25 years of progress in kidney cancer.

Percutaneous Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Local Recurrence Following Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis (REPART Study-UroCCR 71)

BACKGROUND

Data comparing percutaneous ablation (PCA) and surgical resection (SR) for an isolated local recurrence (LR) following partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the outcomes between PCA and SR for an isolated LR following PN for RCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent PN for RCC and developed an LR between 2013 and 2019 were included. An LR was defined as the appearance of a mass in contact with the resection bed or the development of a tumor in the same region of the homolateral kidney as the original site.

INTERVENTION

PCA or SR.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

To achieve balance in baseline characteristics, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity to receive treatment. Oncological outcomes, complications, and renal function were evaluated between groups using logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 81 patients with an isolated LR were included (PCA: 42; SR: 39). The median follow-up was 23 mo. After adjustment, excellent balance was achieved for the majority of propensity score variables. In IPTW analysis, PCA was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio=0.22; p=0.006) and a smaller change in eGFR (beta=-16.18; p=0.001). There were no significant differences in the risk of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]=0.72; p=0.61), new LR (HR=1.51; p=0.59), and distant metastasis (HR=0.19; p=0.09). Limitations include the sample size and unmeasured confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PCA provides comparable oncological outcomes to repeat surgery with fewer complications and better renal function preservation for the management of an LR after PN.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This report shows that percutaneous ablation can be used for treating a local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy, without significantly compromising cancer control.

Open partial nephrectomy: current review

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is increasingly considered the gold standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) where technically feasible. The advantage of nephron-sparing surgery lies in preservation of parenchyma and hence renal function. However, this advantage is counterbalanced with increased surgical risk. In recent years with the popularization of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (laparoscopic and robotic), the contemporary role of open PN (OPN) has changed. OPN has several advantages, particularly in complex patients such as those with a solitary kidney, multi-focal tumors, and significant surgical history, as well as providing improved application of renoprotective measures. As such, it is a technique that remains relevant in current urology practice. In this article we discuss the evidence, indications, operative considerations and surgical technique, along with the role of OPN in contemporary nephron-sparing surgery.

Repeat ablative therapy in hereditary or multifocal renal cancer: Functional and oncological outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To report managing renal tumors in patients at greater risk of repeated interventions (genetic predisposition, multifocal tumors) with thermoablative treatments (AT). A known significant challenge in these patients is the balance between nephron preservation and oncologic outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study was based on data from patients treated with one or more AT for hereditary or multifocal renal tumors between 2007 and 2017. All medical records were systematically reviewed, and 10 patients meeting inclusion criteria were selected. Six patients had confirmed von Hippel-Lindau disease, 1 Bird-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, 1 chromosome 3 translocation, and 2 had a presumed genetic predisposition.

RESULTS

Median age at cancer diagnosis was 39.5 years (±8.9). Fifty-seven tumors, including 41 de novo tumors that appeared during follow-up, were treated with 32 AT sessions (cryotherapy or radiofrequency) with an average tumor size of 13.5 mm (±9) and a median RENAL score of 6 [5; 7]. One patient underwent concomitant partial nephrectomy for a 55 mm lesion which was close to the bowel. Treatment was unsuccessful in 2 cases, subsequently managed successfully by retreatment with AT. Median delay of appearance of de novo tumor after the first AT was 18 months [6 ; 24]. One patient had metastatic progression. Overall and cancer specific survival was 90% and 100%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (±4.9). The mean decrease in Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiological Collaboration equation-estimated glomerular filtration rate at the end of follow-up was 5.5 ml/min/1.73 m² (±24).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that AT allows to meet the oncological objectives whilst preserving renal function in patients with renal cancer at greater risk of repeated treatments.

Inherited kidney cancer syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe current paradigms for genetic testing, screening, and treatment of patients with inherited kidney cancer syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We describe various new aspects of hereditary kidney cancer. Recent data now support that hereditary kidney cancer may account for 5-8% of kidney cancers diagnosed. Methods of testing have evolved including the introduction of multigene next-generation sequencing panels. We continue to learn more about the natural history and management of classic hereditary cancer syndromes. New emerging conditions with lower kidney cancer penetrance have been recognized adding the growing list of syndromes associated with kidney cancer development. The surgical management strategies of enucleation remain however systemic therapy options are being explored both for localized and advanced settings.

SUMMARY

Genetic predisposition to kidney cancer is likely more common than once thought. Knowledge of clinical manifestation and genetic testing strategies are needed to properly identify and treat patient and their families.

Clinical outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy compared to initial partial nephrectomy of a solitary kidney

BACKGROUND

When local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurs after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) on the ipsilateral side, some surgeons hesitate to perform reoperative surgery because of possible difficulties. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat partial nephrectomy (RePN) compared with those of initial partial nephrectomy (iPN) for RCC of a solitary kidney.

METHODS

Until September 2017, 1671 patients with renal tumors underwent NSS. Of these, 79 patients who underwent NSS for sporadic RCC of a solitary kidney were included. Parameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Pearson Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent RePN and 68 underwent iPN. The RePN group had a relatively smaller tumor size (p = 0.0432), longer operative time (p = 0.0432), and higher estimated blood loss (p = 0.0002) than the iPN group. No significant differences in the other clinical factors were found between the groups. The rates of perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade II were 18.2% and 17.6% in the RePN group and iPN group, respectively. The mean decreasing rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate was not different between the groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. No significant differences were found in hemodialysis-free survival (p = 0.7392) and intrarenal recurrence-free survival (p = 0.4924) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes of RePN were not significantly different compared with those of iPN for patients with sporadic RCC of a solitary kidney. RePN is technically feasible with acceptable complication and local recurrence rates with better postoperative kidney function.

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in patients with previous ipsilateral renal stone surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in renal stone cases with previous renal surgeries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 190 consecutive patients with renal stones, who were candidates for transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups. In group A, 163 patients without a history of renal surgery underwent standard laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, whereas in group B laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was performed in 27 patients with a history of kidney stone surgery including percutaneous nephrolithotomy or open stone surgery. All intraoperative data including the operating time and complications such as bleeding requiring transfusion were recorded. Postoperative data such as length of hospitalization, hemoglobin level alteration, and other complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the preoperative data such as stone size, stone site, age, sex, and stone side between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate between the two groups (p = 0.4). There was no significant difference between the two study groups regarding the operating time, hospital stay, stone-free rate, complications, and transfusion rate.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy can be used as a safe and feasible treatment modality in the setting of previous renal surgery. The complications and stone-free rate of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in patients with history of renal surgery are acceptable.

Systematic review of ablative therapy for the treatment of renal allograft neoplasms

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no guidelines on the treatment of solid neoplasms in the transplanted kidney. Historically, allograft nephrectomy has been considered the only reasonable option. More recently, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and ablative therapy (AT) have been proposed as alternative procedures in selected cases.

AIM

To review outcomes of AT for the treatment of renal allograft tumours.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 Checklist. PubMed was searched in March 2019 without time restrictions for all papers reporting on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and irreversible electroporation (IRE) of solid tumours of the kidney allograft. Only original manuscripts describing actual cases and edited in English were considered. All relevant articles were accessed in full text. Additional searches included all pertinent references. Selected studies were also assessed for methodological quality using a tool based on a modification of the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Data on recipient characteristics, transplant characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment protocols, and treatment outcomes were extracted and analysed. Given the nature and the quality of the studies available (mostly retrospective case reports and small retrospective uncontrolled case series), a descriptive summary was provided.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight relevant studies were selected describing a total of 100 AT procedures in 92 patients. Recipient age at diagnosis ranged from 21 to 71 years whereas time from transplant to diagnosis ranged from 0.1 to 312 mo. Most of the neoplasms were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during imaging carried out for screening purposes or for other clinical reasons. Preferred diagnostic modality was Doppler-ultrasound scan followed by computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging. Main tumour types were: papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clear cell RCC. Maximal tumour diameter ranged from 5 to 55 mm. The vast majority of neoplasms were T1a N0 M0 with only 2 lesions staged T1b N0 M0. Neoplasms were managed by RFA (n = 78), CA (n = 15), MWA (n = 3), HIFU (n = 3), and IRE (n = 1). Overall, 3 episodes of primary treatment failure were reported. A single case of recurrence was identified. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 81 mo. No cancer-related deaths were observed. Complication rate was extremely low (mostly < 10%). Graft function remained stable in the majority of recipients. Due to the limited sample size, no clear benefit of a single procedure over the other ones could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

AT for renal allograft neoplasms represents a promising alternative to radical nephrectomy and NSS in carefully selected patients. Properly designed clinical trials are needed to validate this therapeutic approach.

A comparison of outcomes for standard and multiplex partial nephrectomy in a solitary kidney: The National Cancer Institute experience

OBJECTIVES

To study the short and intermediate surgical, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes of multiplex partial nephrectomy (mPN) and standard partial nephrectomy (sPN) in the setting of a solitary kidney.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing solitary kidney partial nephrectomy at our institution was performed. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: mPN-where 3 or more renal tumors were resected and sPN-where 1 or 2 tumors were resected. Perioperative, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients with a solitary kidney underwent a total of 121 surgical procedures; 43 (35.5%) were sPN and 78 (64.4%) were mPN. The total and major (Clavien Grade III and IV) complication rates between sPN and mPN were similar (57.1% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.2; 31.0% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.3). At 12 months post-op, the percentage of patients with eGFR > 45 was similar in each group (sPN 87.0%, mPN 73.7%; P = 0.2), and long-term hemodialysis rates were 4.7% and 6.4%, respectively. Completion nephrectomy was performed in 2.3% of sPN and 2.6% of mPN. At a median follow-up of 40.1 months, the metastasis rate was 8.6% in the sPN group and 4.1% in the mPN group (P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy in the setting of a solitary kidney can effectively preserve renal function. The renal functional and oncologic outcomes were similar in sPN and mPN, with low hemodialysis rates and complication rates within the expected range of these operations. Three or more tumors in a solitary kidney should not be a contraindication for nephron sparing surgery.

Systematic Review of the Management of Local Kidney Cancer Relapse

CONTEXT

Management of locally recurrent renal cancer is complex.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review we analyse the available literature on the management of local renal cancer recurrence.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinical Trials, and Scopus) of English literature from 2000 to 2017 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The search identified 1838 articles. Of those, 36 were included in the evidence synthesis. The majority of the studies identified were retrospective and not controlled. Local recurrence after thermal ablation (TA) may be managed with repeat TA. Alternatively, salvage nephrectomy is possible. However, a higher rate of complications should be expected than after primary nephrectomy. Salvage nephrectomy and TA represent treatment options for local recurrence after partial nephrectomy. Local retroperitoneal recurrence after radical nephrectomy is ideally treated with surgical resection, for which minimally invasive approaches might be applicable to select patients. For large recurrences, addition of intraoperative radiation may improve local control. Local tumour destruction appears to be more beneficial than systemic therapy alone for local recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of local renal cancer relapse varies according to the clinical course and prior treatments. The available data are mainly limited to noncontrolled retrospective series. After nephron-sparing treatment, TA represents an effective treatment with low morbidity. For local recurrence after radical nephrectomy, the low-level evidence available suggests superiority of surgical excision relative to systemic therapy or best supportive care. As a consequence, surgery should be prioritised when feasible and applicable.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In renal cell cancer, the occurrence and management of local recurrence depend on the initial treatment. This cancer is a disease with a highly variable clinical course. After initial organ-sparing treatment, thermal ablation offers good cancer control and low rates of complications. For recurrence after radical nephrectomy, surgical excision seems to provide the best long-term cancer control and it is superior to medical therapy alone.

Renal Cell Carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau Disease-From Tumor Genetics to Novel Therapeutic Strategies

von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by mutations in the VHL tumor-suppressor gene, leading to the dysregulation of many hypoxia-induced genes. Affected individuals are at increased risk of developing recurrent and bilateral kidney cysts and dysplastic lesions which may progress to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Following the eponymous VHL gene inactivation, ccRCCs evolve through additional genetic alterations, resulting in both intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity. Genomic studies have identified frequent mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT-mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activation. Currently, local therapeutic options include nephron-sparing surgery and alternative ablative procedures. For advanced metastatic disease, systemic treatment, including inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor pathways and mTOR pathways, as well as immunotherapy are available. Multimodal therapy, targeting multiple signaling pathways and/or enhancing the immune response, is currently being investigated. A deeper understanding of the fundamental biology of ccRCC development and progression, as well as the development of novel and targeted therapies will be accelerated by new preclinical models, which will greatly inform the search for clinical biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment.

Multiplex Partial Nephrectomy, Repeat Partial Nephrectomy, and Salvage Partial Nephrectomy Remain the Primary Treatment in Multifocal and Hereditary Kidney Cancer

The standard of care treatment for solitary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors 4 cm or less is partial nephrectomy (PNx). However, multifocal kidney cancer presents unique challenges for treating physicians. Historically, total nephrectomy and hemodialysis with possible renal transplant later was the primary therapeutic strategy for these patients. Later, as nephron sparing surgical approaches improved, PNx became the standard of care for patients presenting with multifocal and hereditary RCC. Surgeries to remove multiple renal tumors simultaneously produce different perioperative outcomes and increased risk of complications. Due to these differences in technique and outcomes, the term multiplex partial nephrectomy (MxPNx) has been coined to designate these differences. Here, we discuss the role that MxPNx continues to play in multifocal RCC.

Renal functional outcomes after robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy: the National Cancer Institute experience with robotic partial nephrectomy for 3 or more tumors in a single kidney

OBJECTIVE

To identify renal function outcomes after robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy (RMxPNx), we reviewed our institutional database at the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. To our knowledge, we present the largest series of RMxPNx renal function outcomes to date. Robotic partial nephrectomy has been employed for oncologic control and to prevent dialysis dependence in hereditary multifocal renal cell carcinoma conditions. We have termed robotic surgery on a single kidney with three or more lesions a RMxPNx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution (NIH/NCI) that underwent RMxPNx from 2007 to 2013. Demographic and operative data were compiled with statistical analysis with T test performed to determine renal function outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients underwent RMxPNx. Mean number of tumors removed was 8.63 (range 3-52). Mean preoperative creatinine and eGFR were 1.02 ± 0.26 mg/dL and 85.4 ± 21.5 mL/min, respectively. Postoperatively, creatinine increased from baseline by 0.45 mg/dL (p < 0.001). Similarly, a mean decrease in eGFR by 24.6 mL/min was observed (p < 0.001). At 3-month follow-up, the creatinine increase from baseline was 0.05 mg/dL (p = 0.10) and mean decrease in eGFR was 3.01 mL/min (p = 0.21). When stratifying based on preoperative CKD stages I-III, similar results were observed.

CONCLUSION

Robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible approach to patients with multifocal renal masses. These complex surgeries have a demonstrated learning curve, but this minimally invasive approach for nephron-sparing surgery allows patients to preserve renal function where they would otherwise require open surgery or a radical nephrectomy.

Repeat Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Characteristics, Complications, and Renal Functional Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Multifocal and hereditary kidney cancers often require repeated ipsilateral nephron sparing procedures with higher blood loss and complication rates compared to first time renal surgery. Consequently, many surgeons avoid minimally invasive techniques in the setting. We present the characteristics, complications, and short-term renal functional outcomes of patients who underwent a repeat robotic partial nephrectomy (rRPNx).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomies between January 2007 and December 2013. Selection criteria for the rRPNx cohort included patients who had undergone at least two ipsilateral renal surgeries, with the second procedure being an rRPNx. All other patients comprised the initial robotic partial nephrectomy (iRPNx) group.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy during the study period were identified. rRPNx constituted 26 (21%) of the total cases. Age of the rRPNx cohort was similar (p = 0.56), but number of tumors resected was two-fold greater in the rRPNx group (p = 0.44). Neither surgery time nor renal clamp time was significantly longer in either group (p = 0.18 and p = 0.65, respectively). Importantly, estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly larger than in the iRPNx group (p = 0.01). Both groups had similar intravenous pain medication administration durations (p = 0.32), but postsurgical length of stay was greater for the rRPNx patients (p = 0.011). There were no significant differences in clavian complication rates (p = 0.17-0.39), with the exception of urine leak which occurred more frequently in the rRPNx group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in percent change in serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.89 and p = 0.67, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

rRPNx is safe and feasible in select patients. EBL, postoperative lengths of stay, and urine leak were the only factors significantly associated with rRPNx compared to iRPNx. Patient 3-month follow-up revealed excellent and comparable outcomes between the two groups.

Salvage Percutaneous Cryoablation for Locally Recurrent Renal-Cell Carcinoma After Primary Cryoablation

BACKGROUND

The management of locally recurrent renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) following cryoablation remains a clinical dilemma. There is limited data regarding the management of locally recurrent disease in the setting of patients who have failed initial percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). We evaluate and report our experience with salvage PCA for local recurrence following renal cryoablation failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed our experience with patients who underwent salvage PCA for local biopsy proven RCC recurrence following primary cryoablation procedures. Complications and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. Recurrence-free survival after primary and repeat cryoablation was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

A total 250 patients underwent primary cryoablation for RCC and 20 (8%) patients were identified who underwent repeat PCA for 21 locally recurrent tumors. The mean tumor size was 2.4 cm. Biopsy revealed clear cell in 14 patients, three papillary and four chromophobe RCC. All repeat cryoablation procedures were completed successfully, with no treatment failures on postprocedure imaging. There were no complications or deaths. With the median follow-up of 30 months (range 7-63), 3 (15%) patients experienced local recurrence. One patient had an enhancing lesion at 13 months following repeat PCA and underwent a third PCA. Two patients had recurrence at 6 and 35 months respectively and underwent successful laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Local recurrence-free, metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival rates were 85%, 100%, and 100% respectively. Limitations include retrospective design and small number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat PCA after primary cryoablation failure is feasible, has a low complication rate, and acceptable short-term oncologic outcomes. Further studies with durable follow-up are required.

Sixth BHD Symposium and First International Upstate Kidney Cancer Symposium: latest scientific and clinical discoveries

The Sixth BHD Symposium and First International Upstate Kidney Cancer Symposium concluded in September 2015, in Syracuse, NY, USA. The program highlighted recent findings in a variety of areas, including drug development, therapeutics and surgical management of patients with BHD and multi-focal renal tumors, as well as multidisciplinary approaches for patients with localized, locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Surgical Management of Local Recurrences of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Surgical resection either in the form of radical nephrectomy or in the form of partial nephrectomy represents the mainstay options in the treatment of kidney cancer. In most instances, resecting the tumor bearing kidney or the tumor itself provides durable cancer specific survival rates. However, recurrences may rarely develop in the renal fossa or remnant kidney. Despite its rarity, locally recurrent RCC is a challenging condition in terms of the possible management options and relatively poor prognosis. If technically feasible, wide surgical excision and ensuring negative surgical margins are the most effective treatment options. Repeat surgeries (completion nephrectomy, excision of locally recurrent tumor, or repeat partial nephrectomy) may often be complicated, and perioperative morbidity is a major concern. Open approach has been extensively applied in this context and 5-year cancer specific survival rates have been reported to be around 50%. The roles of minimally invasive surgical options (laparoscopic and robotic approach) and nonsurgical alternatives (cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation) have yet to be described. In selected patients, surgical resection may have to be complemented with (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy or medical treatment.

Outlining the limits of partial nephrectomy

Amongst nephron-sparing modalities, partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard of care in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Despite the increasing utilization of PN, particularly propagated by robot-assisted, minimally invasive approaches for small renal masses (SRMs), the limits of PN appear to be also evolving. In this review, we sought to address the tumour stage beyond which PN may be oncologically perilous. While the evidence supports PN in the treatment of tumours < pT2a, PN may have a role in advanced or metastatic RCC. Other scenarios wherein PN has limited utility are also explored, including anatomical or surgical factors that dictate the difficulty of the case, such as prior renal surgery. Lastly, we discuss the emerging role of molecular biomarkers, specifically epigenetics, to aid in the risk stratification of SRMs and to select tumours optimally suited for PN.

Oncological and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage renal surgery following failed primary intervention for RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for suspected RCC during 2004-2012. We identified 839 patients, 13 of whom required salvage renal surgery. Demographic data was collected for all patients. Intraoperative and postoperative data included ischemic duration, blood loss and perioperative complications. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included abdominal CT or magnetic resonance imaging, chest CT and routine laboratory work. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation.

RESULTS

The majority (85%) of the patients were male, with an average age of 64 years. Ten patients underwent salvage partial nephrectomy while 3 underwent salvage radical nephrectomy. Cryotherapy was the predominant primary failed treatment modality, with 31% of patients undergoing primary open surgery. Pre-operatively, three patients were projected to require permanent post-operative dialysis. In the remaining 10 patients, mean pre- and postoperative serum creatinine and eGFR levels were 1.35 mg/dL and 53.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 1.43 mg/dL and 46.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Mean warm ischemia time in 10 patients was 17.4 min and for all patients, the mean blood loss was 647 mL. The predominant pathological stage was pT1a (8/13; 62%). Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases. The mean follow-up was 32.9 months (3.5-88 months).

CONCLUSION

While salvage renal surgery can be challenging, it is feasible and has adequate surgical, functional and oncological outcomes.

Nephron-sparing surgery for multifocal and hereditary renal tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the controversy surrounding the benefits of nephron-sparing surgery, multiple absolute indications for nephron-sparing surgery still exist, including the classic indications of hereditary and bilateral kidney tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple genetic mutations have been identified which lead to hereditary kidney cancer conditions. These are briefly reviewed because the surgical management of hereditary kidney tumors depends on the genetic and histologic subtypes involved. Clear understanding of these hereditary conditions is crucial for proper surgical management of these tumors.

SUMMARY

Complex partial nephrectomy for multiple renal tumors, or multiplex partial nephrectomy, requires not only exceptional surgical skills but expertise of numerous nonsurgical methodologies, such as hands-on intraoperative ultrasonography and interpretation of multiple imaging modalities. In addition, multidisciplinary management is crucial for optimal outcomes in patient care. This review evaluates the most advanced surgical techniques and perioperative management required to successfully care for these challenging cases.

Open mini-flank partial nephrectomy: an essential contemporary operation

Secondary to the widespread use of the modern imaging techniques of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, 70% of renal tumors today are detected incidentally with a median tumor size of less than 4 cm. Twenty years ago, all renal tumors, regardless of size were treated with radical nephrectomy (RN). Elective partial nephrectomy (PN) has emerged as the treatment of choice for small renal tumors. The basis of this paradigm shift is three major factors: (1) cancer specific survival is equivalent for T1 tumors (7 cm or less) whether treated by PN or RN; (2) approximately 45% of renal tumors have indolent or benign pathology; and (3) PN prevents or delays the onset of chronic kidney disease, a condition associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although PN can be technically demanding and associated with potential complications of bleeding, infection, and urinary fistula, the patient derived benefits of this operation far outweigh the risks. We have developed a "mini-flank" open surgical approach that is highly effective and, coupled with rapid recovery postoperative care pathways associated with a 2-day length of hospital stay.

Nephron sparing surgery for De Novo kidney graft tumor: results from a multicenter national study

Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) results in the transplanted population remain unknown because they are only presented in small series or case reports. Our objective was to study renal sparing surgery for kidney graft renal cell carcinomas (RCC) in a multicenter cohort. Data were collected from 32 French transplantation centers. Cases of renal graft de novo tumors treated as RCC since the beginning of their transplantation activity were included. Seventy-nine allograft kidney de novo tumors were diagnosed. Forty-three patients (54.4%) underwent renal sparing surgery. Mean age of grafted kidneys at the time of diagnosis was 47.5 years old (26.1-72.6). The mean time between transplantation and tumor diagnosis was 142.6 months (12.2-300). Fifteen tumors were clear cell carcinomas (34.9%), and 25 (58.1%) were papillary carcinomas. Respectively, 10 (24.4%), 24 (58.3%) and 8 (19.5%) tumors were Fuhrman grade 1, 2 and 3. Nine patients had postoperative complications (20.9%) including four requiring surgery (Clavien IIIb). At the last follow-up, 41 patients had a functional kidney graft, without dialysis and no long-term complications. NSS is safe and appropriate for all small tumors of transplanted kidneys with good long-term functional and oncological outcomes, which prevent patients from returning to dialysis.

Hereditary renal cell carcinoma: genetics, clinical features, and surgical considerations

OBJECTIVES

Hereditary renal cancer syndromes have been described and have illuminated novel methods to treat sporadic renal cell carcinoma. In this work, we aimed to review the genetic basis, molecular pathology and clinical manifestations of hereditary syndromes, as well as outline principles of surgical management and use of targeted therapy.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of selected peer-reviewed publications regarding hereditary renal cancer syndromes, their genetic basis, and recommendations for surgical management.

RESULTS

The major syndromes contributing to hereditary renal cell carcinoma are discussed along with relevant literature guiding their management. The evolving surgical and molecular treatments are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of genetic basis of hereditary carcinomas provides opportunity for targeted therapy of metastatic sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Appropriate and timely surgical management of hereditary renal cancers decreases the possibility of development of metastatic disease, and allows for preservation of renal function despite the need for repeat surgical interventions.

Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic renal intervention after prior open ipsilateral retroperitoneal surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treating patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) after previous retroperitoneal surgery (renal or adrenal) is technically challenging. We present our initial experience with laparoscopic renal interventions (LRI) after previous open retroperitoneal surgery in patients needing ipsilateral renal intervention. We report on feasibility, functional and oncologic outcomes of LRI after previous open retroperitoneal surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of patients undergoing attempted laparoscopic or robot-assisted renal intervention after at least one previous open ipsilateral retroperitoneal surgery. We identified 34 patients who underwent 39 staged attempted LRI after 48 previous open ipsilateral renal or adrenal surgeries. The LRI included 20 minimally invasive partial nephrectomies (MIPN), 11 laparoscopic radiofrequency ablations (LRFA), and 8 laparoscopic nephrectomies (LTN). Demographic, perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcome data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to identify risks for conversion to open surgery.

RESULTS

No attempted nephron-sparing procedure resulted in kidney loss. Overall conversion rate of the cohort was 28% and was highest in the MIPN group (40%). On univariate analysis, only multiple tumors that were treated significantly increased chances of open conversion (P<0.01). Subset analysis demonstrated similar rates of blood loss, operative times, and conversion rates in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy having previous open partial nephrectomy compared with previous open adrenal surgery only. There was no significant difference in preservation of renal function between MIPN and LRFA, with more than 85% of preoperative renal function preserved. Mean follow-up of 11.9 months (range 1-97.5 mos) metastasis-free survival and overall survival was 94.1% and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LRI after previous open ipsilateral retroperitoneal surgery is feasible. Repeated partial nephrectomy has the highest conversion risks among the laparoscopic renal interventions and appears to be independent of previous renal or adrenal procedure. Attempting repeated LRI for multiple tumors is a significant risk factor for open conversion. Renal functional and oncologic outcomes are encouraging at early follow-up.

Renal cancer in von Hippel-Lindau disease and related syndromes

Sporadic and hereditary forms of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease and the familial paraganglioma syndromes are closely related in terms of their clinical, molecular, and genetic aspects. Most RCCs occur sporadically and the heritable fraction of RCC is estimated to be just 2-4%. An understanding of the molecular genetic basis, the disease-specific and gene-specific biology and the clinical characteristics of these cancer syndromes is of utmost importance for effective genetic diagnosis and appropriate treatment. In addition, such insight will improve our understanding of sporadic RCCs. To date, 10 different heritable RCC syndromes have been described. VHL syndrome is the oldest known hereditary RCC syndrome. Similar to VHL disease, phaeochromocytoma is a major manifestation of the paraganglioma syndromes types 1, 3 and 4 in which RCCs have been reported. These syndromes are therefore regarded as VHL-related disorders and are included in this Review. Multifocal tumours, bilateral occurrence, a young age at diagnosis and/or family history are clinical red flags suggestive of hereditary disease and should trigger referral for genetic and molecular analysis. The identification of an underlying genetic alteration enables gene-specific risk assessment and opens up the possibility of a tailored follow-up strategy and specific surveillance protocols as the basis of effective preventive medicine. The important goals of preventive medicine are to increase the life expectancy of affected patients and to improve their quality of life. The study of seemingly rare hereditary syndromes and their susceptibility genes has consistently revealed clues regarding the aetiology and pathogenesis of these diseases, and can aid diagnosis and the development of therapeutics for patients affected by much more common sporadic counterparts.

Nephron sparing surgery in von Hippel-Lindau associated renal cell carcinoma; clinicopathological long-term follow-up

We evaluated the clinicopathological outcome of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-patients who had mainly undergone nephron sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) when the tumour diameter has reached 4.0 cm. Multiple, bilateral RCC with high recurrence rates and subsequent repeated interventions, followed by increasing risk for end-stage renal failure and metastases is characteristic for VHL. NSS is widely used for VHL-associated RCC at 3.0 cm cut-off. 54 VHL patients underwent NSS, nephrectomy or thermal ablation for RCC. We analysed time to second treatment, overall and cancer specific survival, intra- and post-operative data as well as tumour characteristics. We also examined the effects of delaying removal of RCC to 4.0 cm cut-off. Median follow-up was 67 months. 54 patients underwent 97 kidney treatments. 96 % of first and 67 % of second interventions comprised of NSS. 0 % metastases were observed in the group with largest tumour size ≤4 cm. The probability for second surgery was 21 %, at 5 years and 42 % at 10 years. Median time to second NSS was 149.6 months. The overall and cancer specific survival rate was 96.5 and 100 % at 5-year follow-up, and 82.5 and 90.5 % respectively at 10-year follow-up. Median delay to second NSS at 4.0 cm cut-off versus 3.0 cm was 27.8 months. NSS was both successfully used in first and second surgery and to some extent even in third surgery. By following a strict surveillance protocol it is possible to support a 4.0 cm-threshold strategy for NSS, based on the assumption that delaying time to second NSS prevents patients from premature renal failure.

De novo kidney graft tumors: results from a multicentric retrospective national study

De novo tumors in renal allografts are rare and their prevalence is underestimated. We therefore analyzed renal cell carcinomas arising in renal allografts through a retrospective French renal transplant cohort. We performed a retrospective, multicentric survey by sending questionnaires to all French kidney transplantation centers. All graft tumors diagnosed after transplantation were considered as de novo tumors. Thirty-two centers participated in this study. Seventy-nine tumors were identified among 41 806 recipients (Incidence 0.19%). Patients were 54 men and 25 women with a mean age of 47 years old at the time of diagnosis. Mean tumor size was 27.8 mm. Seventy-four (93.6%), 53 (67%) and 44 tumors (55.6%) were organ confined (T1-2), low grade (G1-2) and papillary carcinomas, respectively. Four patients died of renal cell carcinomas (5%). The mean time lapse between transplantation and RCC diagnosis was 131.7 months. Thirty-five patients underwent conservative surgery by partial nephrectomy (n = 35, 44.3%) or radiofrequency (n = 5; 6.3%). The estimated 5 years cancer specific survival rate was 94%. Most of these tumors were small and incidental. Most tumors were papillary carcinoma, low stage and low grade carcinomas. Conservative treatment has been preferred each time it was feasible in order to avoid a return to dialysis.

Outcomes of patients with surgically treated bilateral renal masses and a minimum of 10 years of followup

PURPOSE

Nephron sparing surgery has been advocated for patients with bilateral renal masses but long-term functional and oncological outcomes are lacking. We report the outcomes of patients with bilateral renal masses and a minimum 10-year followup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with bilateral renal masses evaluated at our institution who were treated with initial surgery at least 10 years ago and underwent interventions on each renal unit were included in the analysis. Collected data included demographics, hereditary diagnosis, number of renal interventions, renal function and mortality status. Overall and renal cell carcinoma specific survival was assessed. Comparisons were made of renal function and overall survival between groups with 2 renal units and a surgically solitary kidney.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients met study inclusion criteria. Median followup in our cohort was 16 years (mean 17, range 10 to 49). The median number of surgical interventions was 3 (range 2 to 10). Of the patients 87 (68%) required repeat interventions on the ipsilateral renal unit at last followup with a median of 6.2 years (range 0.7 to 21) between interventions. Overall and renal cell cancer specific survival was 88% and 97%, respectively. Six patients (4.7%) ultimately underwent bilateral nephrectomy. Although renal function was better preserved in patients with 2 kidneys (70 vs 53 ml/minute/1.73 m(2), p = 0.0002), there was no difference in overall survival between those with bilateral kidneys or a surgically solitary kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

At a minimum 10-year followup after initial surgery, nephron sparing surgery allowed for excellent oncological and functional outcomes. Despite the need for repeat surgical interventions, nephron sparing surgery enabled dialysis to be avoided in more than 95% of patients.

Economic burden of repeat renal surgery on solitary kidney--do the ends justify the means? A cost analysis

PURPOSE

Despite the high morbidity of repeat renal surgery in patients with multifocal recurrent renal carcinoma, in most patients adequate renal function is preserved to obviate the need for dialysis. To our knowledge the economic burden of repeat renal surgery has not been evaluated. We provide a cost analysis for patients requiring repeat renal surgery on a solitary kidney.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients treated at the National Cancer Institute who required repeat renal surgery from 1989 to 2010. Functional, oncological and surgical outcomes were evaluated and the costs of repeat renal surgery were calculated. We then compared costs in a cohort of 33 patients who underwent repeat renal surgery on a solitary kidney and in a hypothetical patient cohort treated with uncomplicated nephrectomy, fistula placement and dialysis. All costs were calculated based on Medicare reimbursement rates derived from CPT codes. Cost analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Despite a high 45% complication rate, 87% of patients maintained renal function that was adequate to avoid dialysis and 96% remained metastasis free at an average followup of 3.12 years (range 0.3 to 16.4). Compared to the hypothetical dialysis cohort, the financial benefit of repeat renal surgery was reached at 0.68 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat renal surgery is a viable alternative for patients with multifocal renal cell carcinoma requiring multiple surgical interventions, especially when left with a solitary kidney. Despite the high complication rate, renal function is preserved in most patients and they have an excellent oncological outcome. The financial benefit of repeat renal surgery is reached at less than 1 year.

Decreasing the indications for radical nephrectomy: a study of multifocal renal cell carcinoma

Multifocal renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been reported in 5-25% of cases worldwide. Although management of patients with multifocal RCC has not been clearly defined, presence of multifocal renal masses in one kidney and a normal contralateral kidney has often been considered a reason for performing radical nephrectomy. This study reviews the world literature to provide an accurate estimate of the prevalence of multifocal RCC and evaluates the oncologic outcomes of multifocal RCC after exclusion of patients with known hereditary and familial renal syndromes. A PubMed search of the literature was performed for articles in the English language using the following terms for the query: "multifocal RCC," "multifocality and RCC," "multicentric RCC," or "bilateral RCC." The references of the published articles were also reviewed for additional publications. Articles that did not specifically exclude patients with familial RCC or known hereditary RCC syndromes were excluded for estimation of multifocality prevalence and oncologic outcomes. After applying our exclusion criteria, nine articles were selected and form the basis of the current analysis. Weighted averages were used to calculate the prevalence of multifocality. Multifocal RCC was found in 6.8% of cases (373 of 5433 patients). Ipsilateral multifocality was found in 6.8% of cases. Bilateral multifocality was found in 11.7% of cases. Of all cases reported in this study, only 10% underwent partial nephrectomy. The rest of the study cohort underwent radical nephrectomy. The review of the literature showed that the use of nephron-sparing techniques in patients with multifocal disease did not compromise oncologic outcomes, despite the need for reoperation in certain cases. In conclusion, multifocal RCC remains a prevalent entity. Most clinicians still prefer to perform radical nephrectomies in these patients despite proven equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to nephron-sparing techniques. Urologists should be aware of these data when proposing treatment options to patients with multifocal RCC.

Percutaneous cryoablation of solitary sporadic renal cell carcinomas

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Percutaneous renal cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with small renal masses, who are poor surgical candidates. Oncological outcomes from previous percutaneous ablation studies are difficult to interpret because of the large number of patients treated with a history of RCC (38% in our experience) and the large number of treated renal masses without a pathology-proven diagnosis. This cryoablation study addresses these issues by evaluating only solitary, sporadic biopsy-proven RCC. Oncological outcomes and complications were also evaluated by tumour T-stage, which allows some degree of comparison with previously published surgical results.

OBJECTIVE

• To evaluate retrospectively our single institution experience with percutaneous cryoablation of solitary, sporadic renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), and to compare the efficacy and safety of this technique for treatment of different T-stage RCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• 116 patients were treated with percutaneous cryoablation for a solitary, sporadic biopsy-proven RCC in a single treatment session between November 2003 and November 2010. • The technical success of the ablation procedure, complications and evidence for local or metastatic tumour recurrence were evaluated for each patient.

RESULTS

• 83 patients (72%) were treated for a stage T1a RCC, 27 patients (23%) for a stage T1b RCC, and six patients (5%) for a stage T2 RCC. • Technical success was achieved in the treatment of 115 of 116 (99%) renal tumours. The single technical failure occurred in the treatment of a 4.3-cm RCC. • Local recurrent tumour was identified in one of 88 patients (1%) with follow-up computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging available for review >3 months from the time of ablation. The median (range) imaging follow-up in these patients was 21 (3-73) months. The local tumour recurrence was identified on CT 11 months after the ablation procedure in a patient treated for a 2.7 cm RCC. • None of the patients developed metastatic RCC. • The major complication rate was 4% for patients with stage T1a tumours, 15% for those with stage T1b tumours, and 33% for those with stage T2 tumours. There were no procedural-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

• Percutaneous renal cryoablation of RCC can be performed with high technical success in patients with tumours up to, and beyond 7 cm in maximum diameter. • The tumour recurrence rate after percutaneous renal cryoablation was low, and recurrence was not related to tumour size in this group of patients. • Statistically significant higher complication rates were seen with treatment of larger (higher T-stage) RCCs.