Force of Stream After Sling Therapy: Safety and Efficacy of Rapid Discharge Care Pathway Based on Subjective Patient Report

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Commonly Used Trial of Void Parameters

IMPORTANCE

Understanding the diagnostic accuracy of postoperative trial of void (TOV) parameters is important for decision making related to postoperative catheterization.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of common postoperative TOV parameters.

DESIGN

The study population comprised a prospective cohort undergoing outpatient urogynecologic procedures at a tertiary referral center from September 2018 to June 2021. Participants recorded their postvoid residual volume (PVR), voided volume, and subjective force of stream (sFOS) for all postoperative voids until meeting criteria to stop. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of TOV parameters in predicting postoperative urinary retention, defined as PVR ≥1/2 voided volume on the first 2 postoperative voids. Sample size was set at 183 to detect a 20% difference (α = 0.05, β = 0.2, up to 20% with missing data) in sensitivity between TOV parameters. Diagnostic accuracies were compared with McNemar's test for paired proportions, with Youden's index calculated to determine optimal thresholds.

RESULTS

The 160 participants had a mean age of 52.1 ± 11.4 years and a mean body mass index of 28.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Mean preoperative PVR was 25.8 ± 29.9 mL. Most participants had surgery that included a midurethral sling (137/160, 85.6%). Thirty-four (34/160, 21.3%) participants met criteria for postoperative urinary retention. The optimal recovery room TOV thresholds to predict postoperative urinary retention were PVR ≥87 mL (sensitivity 96.8%, specificity 60.0%), voided volume ≤ 150 mL (sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 72.3%), and sFOS ≤60% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 50.8%). Voided volume ≤ 150 mL had greater diagnostic accuracy than PVR ≥100 mL (156.2 vs 151.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, PVR ≥87 mL, voided volume ≤ 150 mL, and sFOS ≤60% had optimal diagnostic accuracy for postoperative urinary retention.

Active Compared With Passive Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To compare active with passive voiding trials on the rate of passing a trial of void and discharge rates with catheter in women who have undergone midurethral sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through February 24, 2023.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Our population included women undergoing midurethral sling, with or without anterior or posterior repair, for treatment of SUI. Our two primary outcomes were rate of passing voiding trial and rate of discharge with a catheter. Our secondary outcome was the rate of delayed postoperative urinary retention, when a patient initially passes a trial of void but then subsequently presents in retention.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Abstracts were doubly screened; full-text articles were doubly screened; and accepted articles were doubly extracted. In single-arm studies evaluating either passive or active voiding trial, random-effects meta-analyses of pooled proportions were used to assess outcomes. Of 3,033 abstracts screened, 238 full-text articles were assessed, and 26 met inclusion criteria. Ten studies including 1,370 patients reported active trial of void. Sixteen studies including 3,643 patients reported passive trial of void. We included five randomized controlled trials, five comparative retrospective studies, five prospective single group studies, and 11 retrospective single group studies. Five of the studies included patients with a concomitant anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. On proportional meta-analysis, the active trial of void group was less likely to pass the voiding trial (81.0%, 95% CI, 0.76-0.87% vs 89.0%, 95% CI, 0.84-0.9%3, P =.029) with high heterogeneity ( I2 =93.0%). Furthermore, there were more discharges with catheter in active trial of void compared with passive trial of void (19.0%, 95% CI, 0.14-0.24% vs 7.0%, 95% CI, 0.05-0.10%, P <.01). The rates of delayed postoperative urinary retention were low and not different between groups (0.6%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02% vs 0.2%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.01%, P =.366) with low heterogeneity ( I2 =0%). Sling revisions were statistically lower in the active trial of void group (0.5%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.01% vs 1.5%, 95% CI, 0.01-0.02%, P =.035) with low heterogeneity ( I2 =10.4%).

CONCLUSION

Passive trial of void had higher passing rates and lower discharge with catheter than active trial of void. Rates of most complications were low and similar between both groups, although passive trial of void had higher sling revisions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022341318.

Methods of postoperative void trial management after urogynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Voiding trials are used to identify women at risk for postoperative urinary retention while performing optimal voiding trial management with minimal burden to the patient and medical service team. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative void trials following urogynecologic surgery to investigate (1) the optimal postoperative void trial methodology and (2) the optimal criteria for assessing void trial.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and relevant reference lists of eligible articles from inception to April 2022. We identified any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English that studied void trials in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. Study selection (title/abstract and full text), data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Extracted study outcomes included the following: the correct passing rate, time to discharge, discharge rate without a catheter after the initial void trial, postoperative urinary tract infection, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Void trial methodology included backfill-assisted and autofill studies (2 RCTs, n = 95). Backfill assistance was more likely to be successful than autofill (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.29, 3.47, P = 0.00); however, no significant difference was found in the time to discharge (WMDs =  - 29.11 min, 95% CI - 57.45, 1.23, P = 0.06). The criteria for passing void trial included subjective assessment of the urinary force of stream and objective assessment of the standard voiding trial (3 RCTs, n = 377). No significant differences were found in the correct passing rate (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93, 1.01, P = 0.14) or void trial failure rate (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.52, 1.18, P = 0.24). Moreover, no significant differences were found in the complication rates or patient satisfaction between the two criteria.

CONCLUSION

Bladder backfilling was associated with a lower rate of catheter discharge after urogynecologic surgery. The subjective assessment of FOS is a reliable and safe method for assessing postoperative voiding because it is less invasive.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022313397.

Postoperative Urinary Retention

ABSTRACT

This clinical consensus statement on the management of postoperative (<6 weeks) urinary retention (POUR) reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's POUR writing group. The writing group used a modified Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed for consensus. After the definition of POUR was established, a total of 37 statements were assessed in the following 6 categories: (1) incidence of POUR, (2) medications, (3) patient factors, (4) surgical factors, (5) urodynamic testing, and (6) voiding trials. Of the 37 original statements, 34 reached consensus and 3 were omitted.

Voided Volume for Assessment of Bladder Emptying After Female Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

To study alternative voiding trial (VT) methods after urogynecologic surgery that may potentially decrease catheterization.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to compare voiding assessment based on a minimum spontaneous voided volume of 150 mL with the standard retrograde fill (RF) approach in women after urogynecologic procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Women undergoing urogynecologic surgery were randomized to RF or spontaneous void (SV) groups. Women in the RF group had their bladders backfilled with 300 mL of saline before catheter removal, those in the SV group did not. To pass the VT, patients in the RF group were required to void 150 mL at one time within 60 minutes, and patients in the SV group had to do the same within 6 hours. The primary outcome was the VT failure rate. We also compared the false pass rate, urinary tract infections, satisfaction, and preference of VT method.

RESULTS

One hundred nine women were enrolled in the study, 54 had SV and 55 underwent RF. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different other than history of prior hysterectomy. There was no significant difference in procedures between the groups. There was no difference in VT failure rate between the groups-SV (7.4%) and RF (12.7%, P = 0.39). The false pass rate was 0 in each group. Urinary tract infection rates were similar between SV (14.8%) and RF (14.5%) groups ( P = 0.34). Patient satisfaction for VT method was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous VT was not superior to retrograde void trial. Therefore, we cannot recommend one method of VT after urogynecologic surgery.CondensationVoiding assessment based on minimum SV of 150 mL is comparable with VT with RF after surgeries for prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Are Formal Voiding Trials Necessary After Posterior Compartment Reconstructive Surgery?

IMPORTANCE

Posterior compartment surgery is considered a risk factor for postoperative urinary retention because of the impact of postoperative pain on the pelvic floor; however, few studies have examined the association between posterior compartment reconstructive surgery and urinary retention.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare rates of urinary retention in patients undergoing vaginal reconstructive surgery, without hysterectomy, in the posterior compartment only versus any apical and/or anterior compartment (with or without posterior compartment).

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent surgery, without hysterectomy, in the posterior compartment only versus any apical and/or anterior compartment (with or without posterior compartment) from January 2015 to November 2020. Our primary outcome was rate of postoperative urinary retention, defined as a failed voiding trial before discharge. Secondary outcome was days of catheterization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess variables associated with a failed voiding trial.

RESULTS

Of 362 patients, 141 (39.0%) underwent surgery in the posterior compartment only and 221 (61.0%) underwent vaginal apical and/or anterior compartment surgical procedures. Rate of retention was significantly lower in the posterior compartment only group (9.9% vs 41.6%, P < 0.001). The median numbers of days of catheterization were significantly fewer in the posterior compartment only group (0 [0,0] vs 0 [0,3], P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, posterior compartment only surgery was associated with passing the voiding trial (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.97-12.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of postoperative urinary retention after surgery in the posterior compartment are low, and these patients may not require formal voiding trials after surgery.

Is a Postvoid Residual Necessary? A Randomized Trial of Two Postoperative Voiding Protocols

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare a backfill-assisted voiding trial (VT) with and without a postvoid residual (PVR) after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

This was a nonblinded randomized controlled trial of women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress incontinence surgery. Participants were randomized immediately after surgery to either a PVR VT or a PVR-free VT. Our primary outcome was the rate of VT failure at discharge. Secondary outcomes included days of catheterization, urinary tract infection (UTI), and prolonged voiding dysfunction. With a power of 80% and an α of 0.05, we needed 126 participants to detect a 25% difference in VT failure (60% in PVR VT vs 35% in PVR-free VT).

RESULTS

Participants were enrolled from March 2017 to October 2017. Of the 150 participants, mean age was 59 years, and 33% underwent vaginal hysterectomy, 48% underwent anterior repair, and 75% underwent midurethral sling. Seventy-five (50%) were randomized to PVR VT and 75 (50%) to PVR-free VT, with no differences in baseline demographic or intraoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. Our primary outcome, VT failure, was not significantly different (53% PVR VT vs 53% PVR-free VT, P = 1.0). There were no significant differences in days of postoperative catheterization (1 [0, 4] in PVR VT vs 1 [0, 4] in PVR-free VT, P = 0.90), UTI (20% PVR VT vs 20% PVR-free VT, P = 1.0), or postoperative voiding dysfunction (4% PVR VT vs 5% PVR-free VT, P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

When performing a backfill-assisted VT, checking a PVR does not affect VT failure, postoperative duration of catheterization, UTI, or voiding dysfunction.

A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Investigating Methods of Postoperative Void Trials Following Benign Gynecologic and Urogynecologic Surgeries

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying postoperative void trials (VTs) following gynecologic and urogynecologic surgery to investigate (1) the optimal postoperative VT methodology and (2) the optimal time after surgery to perform a VT.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

METHOD OF STUDY SELECTION

We systematically searched the aforementioned data sources from inception to November 22, 2019, using a combination of subject headings and keywords for the following 3 concepts: gynecologic surgery (prolapse, benign gynecologic, and incontinence surgery), postoperative period, and voiding. We identified any RCT in English that studied VT methodology or timing in patients undergoing benign gynecologic or urogynecologic surgery. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer. We followed the standard systematic review methodology and used the Jadad scoring system to assess bias. Extracted study outcomes included the following: proportion of patients discharged home with catheter, proportion of VT failure, surgery for retention, retention after initial VT, postoperative calls and visits, time in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time to discharge, time to spontaneous void, duration of catheterization, patient and provider burden, and urinary tract infection (UTI).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We double screened 618 abstracts and clinical trial descriptions, assessed 56 full-text articles, and ultimately included 21 RCTs. The evidence was of low to moderate quality overall. The studies were divided into the following 2 categories: VT methodology (10 studies) and VT timing (11 studies). VT methodology included backfill-assisted (in operating room vs PACU), autofill, and force of stream studies. One RCT compared backfill-assisted with and without postvoid residual volume check. Outcomes were similar for all VT methods, except backfill-assisted decreased time to spontaneous void compared with autofill. In the VT timing category, earlier VT performance correlated with a shorter time to discharge, time to spontaneous void, duration of catheterization, and lower patient burden and UTI rate but had a higher rate of retention after initial VT. There was no difference between earlier vs later VT timing for proportion of discharged home with catheter or rate of VT failure. No studies reported outcomes of provider burden or postoperative calls.

CONCLUSION

In comparing VT methodologies, VT by backfill-assisted (in operating room vs PACU, ± postvoid residual volume), autofill, and force of stream resulted in similar outcomes with no one method being superior. Performing VT at an earlier postoperative time point results in shorter time to discharge and spontaneous void, shorter duration of catheterization, lower patient burden, and lower UTI risk, but it may increase the risk of retention after initial VT.

Voided volume for postoperative voiding assessment following prolapse and urinary incontinence surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to compare the safety and accuracy of voided volume with the standard retrograde fill approach for voiding assessment after pelvic floor surgery.

METHODS

This cohort represents all women in our repository who underwent postoperative voiding assessment following procedures for pelvic floor disorders between September 2011 and June 2014. One surgeon utilized a spontaneous voiding (SV) protocol and allowed any patient who voided 150 ml or more at one time to pass the trial. The other surgeon used a retrograde fill (RF) protocol. This involved instilling the bladder with 300 ml of water or until maximum capacity immediately after the outpatient procedures and on the first postoperative day for hospitalized patients. For this protocol, a voided volume of 200 ml was considered sufficient to pass the trial.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 431 women had a voiding trial with SV, and 318 with RF. The groups were similar with respect to baseline characteristics but more women in the RF group had a sling-only procedure. The failure rates of the RF (22.8%) and SV (20.0%) groups were similar (p = 0.46). Among women who passed the voiding trial, similar percentages of women returned with urinary retention and needed catheter insertion after the RF (1.6%) and SV (0.9%) methods (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous voiding trial based on a minimum voided volume of 150 ml is a safe and reliable alternative to the retrograde fill method after female pelvic floor procedures.

Improving Postoperative Efficiency: An Algorithm for Expedited Void Trials After Urogynecologic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relation between voided volume and void trial "success" to create an algorithm that minimizes the need for postvoid residual volume (PVR) assessment in backfill-assisted void trials.

METHODS

This article is an ancillary analysis of deidentified data from a randomized trial evaluating prophylactic antibiotics after urogynecologic surgery. Void trials were routinely performed after surgery; voided volumes, PVR, and void trial outcomes were collected. The void trial regimen was as follows: the bladder was backfilled with 300 mL of normal saline or until the patient reported the urgency to void, the catheter was removed, and the participant was prompted to void immediately. PVR volume was measured either by sonographic bladder scan or catheterization. Voided volumes were categorized in 25-mL increments from 50 to 225 mL. For each voided volume range, the PVR and void trial outcome data were incorporated to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in terms of ability of voided volume alone to predict a passing void trial result. An algorithm was created using the voided volumes that optimize PPV and NPV.

RESULTS

The study population included 255 participants. Voided volumes <100 mL and ≥200 mL were identified as optimal thresholds to predict failure and passage of backfill-assisted void trials, respectively. When patients voided <100 mL, 3% passed their void trial (NPV odds ratio 96.7, 95% confidence interval 88.6-99.5). When patients voided ≥200 mL, 97% passed (PPV odds ratio 97.4, 95% confidence interval 93.5-99.3).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an algorithm for void trials after urogynecologic surgery. After backfilling the bladder if voided volume is ≥200 mL, the void trial is successful and no PVR is needed; if voided volume is between 100 and 199 mL, the void trial is indeterminate and PVR is recommended; and if voided volume is <100 mL, the void trial is unsuccessful and catheterization is needed. Applying this algorithm to our study population would have eliminated the need for PVR in 85% of patients. Calculated PPVs and NPVs depend on the prevalence of voiding dysfunction in the population being studied, and therefore may be unique to our institution.

One normal void and residual following MUS surgery is all that is necessary in most patients

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

There is considerable variation worldwide on how the assessment of voiding function is performed following midurethral sling (MUS) surgery. There is potentially a financial cost, and reduction in efficiency when patient discharge is delayed. Using our current practice of two normal void and residual (V&R) readings before discharge, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the likelihood of an abnormal second V&R test if the first V&R test was normal in order to determine if a policy of discharge after only one satisfactory V&R test is reasonable.

METHODS

Data from 400 patients who had had MUS surgery with or without other procedures were collected. Our unit protocol included two consecutive voids of greater than 200 ml with residuals less than 150 ml before discharge. The patients were divided into the following groups: MUS only, MUS plus anterior colporrhaphy (AR) plus any other procedures (MUS/AR), and MUS with any non-AR procedures (MUS+).

RESULTS

Complete datasets were available for 335 patients. Once inadequate tests (low volume voids <200 ml) had been excluded (28% overall), the likelihood of an abnormal second V&R test if the first test was normal was 7.1% overall, but 3.6% for MUS, 11.5% for MUS/AR and 8.6% for MUS+.

CONCLUSION

The findings in the MUS-only group indicate that it is probably safe to discharge patients after one satisfactory V&R test, as long as safety measures such as 'open access' are available so that patients have unhindered readmission if problems arise.

Use of suprapubic tube to assess voiding function after synthetic midurethral slings

INTRODUCTION

Up to 50% of patients are unable to void immediately after midurethral sling (MUS) procedures. The objective of this study was to present our case series of use of suprapubic tube (SPT) to assess voiding function after MUS procedures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent MUS procedures along with insertion of SPT between January 2007 and August 2010.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients were identified. Among the patients who met criteria for SPT removal within 4 weeks, the mean number of days of SPT use was 6 (4.6) days. One major complication involved a urinoma after SPT removal.

CONCLUSION

The use of SPT after MUS procedures is practical. In our cohort of patients, it took up to 1 week for voiding function to return to normal.

FAST discharge without catheterization after sling therapy

Assessment of voiding function after female sling surgery varies and patients are often discharged with a catheter, which can cause discomfort and complications, including infection. Management protocols using force of stream measurements could reduce catheter use and enable rapid discharge of women from hospital after sling surgery.