Time for Improvement in Semen Parameters After Varicocelectomy

Don't wait any longer, conceive in time: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on semen parameters after varicocelectomy

BACKGROUND

Varicocelectomy was considered to be beneficial to patients with varicocele-related infertility. However, there are only a few researchers who have explored the relationship between better timing and postoperative semen improvement in patients.

METHODS

We conducted this meta-analysis by enrolling published prospective studies to find out the best waiting time after varicocelectomy to wait for better improvement of semen quality. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies. The included studies were then analyzed comprehensively using STATA software and standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive analysis showed that after varicocelectomy, follow-up results within 3 months or longer showed a significant improvement in semen parameters compared to the preoperative period. Notably, no further improvement in semen parameters was observed when the follow-up period reached six months or longer (semen volume: WMD: - 0.07 (- 0.29, 0.16); sperm concentration: WMD: - 1.33 (- 2.33, - 4.99); sperm motility: WMD: 2.31 (- 0.55, 5.18); sperm morphology: WMD: 1.29 (- 0.66, 3.24); sperm total motile count: WMD: 3.95 (- 6.28, 14.19)).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months after varicocelectomy may be the optimal time for semen parameters compared to six months or even longer, which means it is also the preferable time for conception. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed in the future to validate our conclusion.

Does Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index Continuously Decrease Over Time After Varicocelectomy in Varicocele-Induced Infertility? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Varicocele (VC) is the most frequent and reversible cause of male infertility. One of the preferred management strategies to alleviate this problem is varicocelectomy. However, there are no researchers who have explored the relationship between better timing and postoperative sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) improvement in patients. We conducted this meta-analysis by enrolling published studies to find out the best waiting time after varicocelectomy to wait for better improvement of sperm DFI. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The data from the pooled analysis were presented as mean difference (MD) along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2. Four studies were included after screening relevant literature. Statistical analysis revealed that after varicocelectomy, follow-up results within 3 months showed a significant improvement in sperm DFI compared with the preoperative period (MD: -3.66, 95% CI = [-5.17, -2.14], p < .00001), and follow-up results with 6 months showed a significant improvement in sperm DFI compared with the postoperative 3 months as well (MD: -1.51, 95% CI = [-2.73, -0.29], p = .02). Notably, no further improvement in sperm DFI was observed when the follow-up period reached 12 months (MD: -1.59, 95% CI = [-3.22, 0.05], p = .06). Six months after varicocelectomy may be the optimal time for sperm DFI compared with 12 months or even longer, which means it is also the preferable time for conception. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed in the future to validate our conclusion.

The Evolving Landscape of Male Varicocele Pathophysiology in the Era of Multi-Omics: A Narrative Review of the Current Literature

Male-factor infertility is implicated in over half of the millions of cases of infertility worldwide, and varicoceles are the most common correctable cause of male-factor infertility. The pathophysiologic mechanism for varicoceles is complex and next-generation technologies offer promising insights into the molecular underpinnings of this condition. In this narrative review, we highlight historical and contemporary paradigms associated with varicoceles, with an emphasis on the biological underpinnings of this disease. Specifically, we review the literature describing the underlying causes of varicoceles, discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms causing pathological changes in some (but not all) men, and highlight key articles regarding the next-generation analyses (e.g., transcriptome, epigenome, proteome, and microbiome) being applied to better understand the condition and its treatment. These data demonstrate an ongoing evolution of the knowledge of varicoceles and the potential for improved personalized care in the future for men with this condition.

Does Varicocele Repair Improve Conventional Semen Parameters? A Meta-Analytic Study of Before-After Data

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to study the impact of varicocele repair in the largest cohort of infertile males with clinical varicocele by including all available studies, with no language restrictions, comparing intra-person conventional semen parameters before and after the repair of varicoceles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA-P and MOOSE guidelines. A systematic search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Eligible studies were selected according to the PICOS model (Population: infertile male patients with clinical varicocele; Intervention: varicocele repair; Comparison: intra-person before-after varicocele repair; Outcome: conventional semen parameters; Study type: randomized controlled trials [RCTs], observational and case-control studies).

RESULTS

Out of 1,632 screened abstracts, 351 articles (23 RCTs, 292 observational, and 36 case-control studies) were included in the quantitative analysis. The before-and-after analysis showed significant improvements in all semen parameters after varicocele repair (except sperm vitality); semen volume: standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.203, 95% CI: 0.129-0.278; p<0.001; I²=83.62%, Egger's p=0.3329; sperm concentration: SMD 1.590, 95% CI: 1.474-1.706; p<0.001; I²=97.86%, Egger's p<0.0001; total sperm count: SMD 1.824, 95% CI: 1.526-2.121; p<0.001; I²=97.88%, Egger's p=0.0063; total motile sperm count: SMD 1.643, 95% CI: 1.318-1.968; p<0.001; I²=98.65%, Egger's p=0.0003; progressive sperm motility: SMD 1.845, 95% CI: 1.537%-2.153%; p<0.001; I²=98.97%, Egger's p<0.0001; total sperm motility: SMD 1.613, 95% CI 1.467%-1.759%; p<0.001; l2=97.98%, Egger's p<0.001; sperm morphology: SMD 1.066, 95% CI 0.992%-1.211%; p<0.001; I²=97.87%, Egger's p=0.1864.

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis is the largest to date using paired analysis on varicocele patients. In the current meta-analysis, almost all conventional semen parameters improved significantly following varicocele repair in infertile patients with clinical varicocele.

Consensus and Diversity in the Management of Varicocele for Male Infertility: Results of a Global Practice Survey and Comparison with Guidelines and Recommendations

PURPOSE

Varicocele is a common problem among infertile men. Varicocele repair (VR) is frequently performed to improve semen parameters and the chances of pregnancy. However, there is a lack of consensus about the diagnosis, indications for VR and its outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore global practice patterns on the management of varicocele in the context of male infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty practicing urologists/andrologists from 23 countries contributed 382 multiple-choice-questions pertaining to varicocele management. These were condensed into an online questionnaire that was forwarded to clinicians involved in male infertility management through direct invitation. The results were analyzed for disagreement and agreement in practice patterns and, compared with the latest guidelines of international professional societies (American Urological Association [AUA], American Society for Reproductive Medicine [ASRM], and European Association of Urology [EAU]), and with evidence emerging from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Additionally, an expert opinion on each topic was provided based on the consensus of 16 experts in the field.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 574 clinicians from 59 countries. The majority of respondents were urologists/uro-andrologists. A wide diversity of opinion was seen in every aspect of varicocele diagnosis, indications for repair, choice of technique, management of sub-clinical varicocele and the role of VR in azoospermia. A significant proportion of the responses were at odds with the recommendations of AUA, ASRM, and EAU. A large number of clinical situations were identified where no guidelines are available.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the largest global survey performed to date on the clinical management of varicocele for male infertility. It demonstrates: 1) a wide disagreement in the approach to varicocele management, 2) large gaps in the clinical practice guidelines from professional societies, and 3) the need for further studies on several aspects of varicocele management in infertile men.

Microsurgical varicocelectomy effects on sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm parameters in infertile male patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of more recent evidence

Background: Varicocele is known to have impacts in infertility cases and sperm quality. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and sperm parameters. Methods: Open full English text articles from January 2017 to October 2021 were searched from online database including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Results: Systematic search resulted in 277 potential papers. After throughout paper analysis, 5 studies were included in this review. From all five analyzed studies, microsurgical varicocelectomy was statistically proven to reduce DNA fragmentation index by 5.46% (mean difference -5.46; 95% CI: -4.79, -6.13; p < 0.00001). Moreover, the procedure also significantly improved other sperm parameters (sperm concentration +8.23%, sperm motility +7.17%, sperm progressive motility +2.77%, sperm morphology +0.64%). Conclusion: Microsurgical varicocelectomy significantly improves spermatogenesis as reflected by biomarkers of infertile men including semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF).

Sperm concentration and semen volume increase after smoking cessation in infertile men

Smoking has negative reproductive consequences. This study investigated the effect of smoking cessation on the main semen parameters. We included 90 participants who applied to our infertility clinic and smoked at least 20 cigarettes a day for at least 1 year. Of the 90 participants, 48 were in the study group and 42 were in the control group. Semen analysis was performed before and at least 3 months after quitting smoking in the study group. Semen analysis was repeated at baseline and at least 3 months later in the control group. Semen parameters such as volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, morphology, and motility were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria. Patient characteristics as well as the duration of the smoking period, the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the time elapsed since smoking cessation were recorded. The mean age of the participants was 34.69 ± 5.3 years, and the duration of infertility was 34.12 ± 12.1 months (n = 90). The number of cigarettes smoked per day was 30.14 ± 6.69, and the smoking time was 8.31 ± 3.53 years. The average time to quit smoking was 104.2 ± 11.51 days (n = 48). A significant increase in semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count was observed 3 months after smoking cessation (2.48 ± 0.79 ml vs. 2.90 ± 0.77 ml, p = 0.002; 18.45 × 10⁶/ml ± 8.56 vs. 22.64 × 10⁶/ml ± 11.69, p = 0.001; 45.04 ± 24.38 × 10⁶ vs. 65.1 ± 34.9 × 10⁶, p < 0.001, respectively). This study showed that smoking cessation had a positive effect on sperm concentration, semen volume, and total sperm count. Although smoking cessation contributed positively to sperm motility and morphology, the difference was not statistically significant.

Male factor infertility: A contemporary overview of investigation, diagnosis and management

Infertility, defined as the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 1 year of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse, is a public health issue of global concern. It affects up to 12% of couples worldwide. While traditionally, research and treatment have focused on female causes of infertility, male factors contribute to up to 70% of cases and therefore deserve appropriate recognition. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to detail the diagnostic work-up, investigations and management of male factor infertility. We discuss much-debated pathologies, such as varicocele, and novel investigations, including sperm DNA fragmentation and reactive oxygen species.

Level of evidence: Not applicable

Effect of varicocelectomy on detailed sperm morphology parameters: An observational retrospective clinical cohort study

Although many studies suggest that varicocelectomy leads to improvement in semen parameters and morphology, its clinical efficacy remains controversial. The detailed morphological parameters described in the World Health Organization guidelines are important in terms of showing the effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy on morphological changes.An observational, retrospective clinical cohort study was conducted with patients followed up from January 2018 to August 2021. This study included the data of 79 patients who met the criterion of undergoing at least 2 detailed morphological evaluations before and after surgery. All operations were performed by the same surgical team using the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy technique.The mean age of the patients was 30.25 years. Of the patients, 63 underwent left-sided varicocelectomy and 16 underwent bilateral surgery. The sperm analysis revealed statistically significant increases in sperm volume (P = .006), sperm concentration (P = .003), total sperm count (P = .001), progressive sperm motility (P < .001), and normal morphology (P < .001). In the detailed morphological evaluation, except for the elongated head anomaly (P = .037), no other statistically significant changes were found in relation to sperm head, tail, and neck anomalies after surgery.This study makes an important contribution to the literature, being the first to use the subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy technique in detailed morphological semen evaluation. We consider that detailed morphology examination in the selection and treatment of infertile patients may be useful in evaluating the efficacy of varicocelectomy.

Artificial Intelligence Based Machine Learning Models Predict Sperm parameter Upgrading after Varicocele Repair: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

PURPOSE

Varicocele repair is recommended in the presence of a clinical varicocele together with at least one abnormal semen parameter, and male infertility. Unfortunately, up to 50% of men who meet criteria for repair will not see meaningful benefit in outcomes despite successful treatment. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict which men with varicocele will benefit from treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified men with infertility, clinical varicocele, and at least one abnormal semen parameter from two large urology centers in North America (Miami and Toronto) between 2006 and 2020. We collected pre and post-operative clinical and hormonal data following treatment. Clinical upgrading was defined as an increase in sperm concentration that would allow a couple to access previously unavailable reproductive options. The tiers used for upgrading were: 1-5 million/mL (ICSI/IVF), 5-15 million/mL (IUI) and >15 million/mL (natural conception). Thus moving from ICSI/IVF to IUI, or from IUI to natural conception, would be considered an upgrade. AI models were trained and tested using R to predict which patients were likely to upgrade after surgery. The model sorted men into categories that defined how likely they were to upgrade after surgery (likely, equivocal, and unlikely).

RESULTS

Data from 240 men were included from both centers. A total of 45.6% of men experienced an upgrade in sperm concentration following surgery, 48.1% did not change, and 6.3% downgraded. The data from Miami were used to create a random forest model for predicting upgrade in sperm concentration. On external validation using Toronto data, the model accurately predicted upgrade in 87% of men deemed likely to improve, and in 49% and 36% of men who were equivocal and unlikely to improve, respectively. Overall, the personalized prediction for patients in the validation cohort was accurate (AUC 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

A machine learning model performed well in predicting clinically meaningful post-varicocelectomy sperm parameters using pre-operative hormonal, clinical, and semen analysis data. To our knowledge, this is the first prediction model to show the utility of hormonal data, as well as the first to use machine learning models to predict clinically meaningful upgrading. This model will be published online as a clinical calculator that can be used in the preoperative counseling of patients.

Determination of the time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy

This retrospective study aimed to determine the time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. A total of 175 patients over 18 years of age, who underwent microscopic inguinal varicocelectomy in a tertiary centre between 2005 and 2016 and had post-operative follow-up data of at least 12 months, were included in the study. Serial semen analyses in the pre-operative period and at the post-operative third, sixth, ninth and 12th months were retrospectively documented. With respect to their pre-operative total motile sperm counts, the patients were classified into three subgroups as <5 million, 5-9 million and >9 million. In the overall cohort and the group with a total motile sperm count of >9 million, the semen parameters continued to improve up to the post-operative 12th month. No further significant improvement was observed after the post-operative third and sixth months for the patients with pre-operative total motile sperm counts of <5 million and 5-9 million respectively. For the candidates of varicocelectomy, the decision of treatment strategies, such as assisted reproductive technologies and waiting for spontaneous pregnancy can be based on the prediction of the time for improvement in semen parameters.

Efficacy of varicocelectomy in primary infertile patients with isolated teratozoospermia. A retrospective analysis

The present study assessed the results of varicocelectomy in patients with isolated teratozoospermia. Sixty-two infertile men with isolated teratozoospermia were evaluated retrospectively. There were significant improvements between preoperative and postoperative mean percentages of spermatozoa with normal morphology (1.15 ± 1.1% versus 2.3 ± 1.8%, p < .001) and spermatozoa with head abnormalities (92.9 ± 4.5% versus 88.6 ± 7.4%, p < .001). Nineteen (31%) patients had children through natural conception, 4 (6%) patients had children with assisted reproductive techniques and 39 (63%) patients had got no children within a mean follow-up period of 31.3 months. In patients who had children with natural conception, significant improvements were detected in postoperative mean percentages of spermatozoa with normal morphology (p < .001), head abnormalities (p < .001), neck/midpiece abnormalities (p = .003) and tail abnormalities (p = .007). When semen parameters of men who had children via natural conception was compared with the men with no children, we found that the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology was significantly higher (p = .008) and percentage of spermaztozoa with head anomalies was significantly lower (p = .019) in men who had children via natural conception. We believe that varicocelectomy is a beneficial surgical method for the treatment of isolated teratozoospermia and better postoperative rates of spermatozoa having normal morphology and head abnormalities are related with natural conception.

Best time to wait for the improvement of the sperm parameter after varicocelectomy: 3 or 6 months?

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the duration of time required following varicocelectomy to wait for the improvements of semen parameters. Therefore, we characterized the changes with the time in sperm parameters in men after varicocelectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study we included consecutively observed men who underwent varicocelectomy between September 2017 and September 2018 in a referral academic hospital. Clinical data of the patients, as well as their semen parameters, were measured before surgery and at 3 and 6 months afterward.

RESULTS

In this study, a total of 100 men with average age of 29.5 ± 6.2 years were included. Mean sperm concentration and sperm motility significantly improved by 3 (p < 0.05), but not by 6 months following varicocelectomy. The semen volume and sperm with normal morphology were the same before and after surgery (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement of semen parameters when comparing 6 months to 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sperm parameters (concentration and motility) improve by 3 months after varicocelectomy without further improvements. Consequently, physicians should decide quickly after 3-month of varicocelectomy if surgery has been not helpful and then plan other therapies, like assisted reproductive technology (ART) for managing infertility in couples.

A review of varicocele treatment and fertility outcomes

Varicoceles are reported to be present in a significant proportion of men presenting with subfertility and are more common amongst this group than in the general population. Opinion still remains divided amongst clinicians managing male factor infertility as to whether varicoceles alter the probability of spontaneous conception and/or pregnancy and live birth rates after fertility treatment. The debate as to whether varicoceles should be treated or not has intensified in recent years. This is due to the concerns regarding the impact of varicoceles on not only conventional semen parameters, but also the potential effects that they may have at the cellular level (an increase in circulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting in sperm DNA fragmentation, even when conventional semen parameters are within the normal reference ranges). It has been suggested that treating the varicocele may result in improvements in the semen parameters, the fertilization and pregnancy rates for both spontaneous pregnancy as well as following in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. ICSI can still be used for Assisted Reproduction Treatment (ART) in the presence of suboptimal semen parameters. However, it is an invasive and expensive technique with potential adverse effects on the offspring. As far as we are aware, there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical/cost effectiveness of varicocele treatment versus the immediate use of ICSI on pregnancy rates. Previous modelling exercises are old and do not take into consideration current practices and trends such as rising female age and time to pregnancy. The conflicting advice that patients sometimes receive, challenges our commitment to evidence-based practice. The only way to resolve the controversy is to undertake an appropriately powered randomized trial, assessing clinical- and cost-effectiveness and the time to pregnancy following varicocele treatment and comparing this to a no treatment group.

Varicocele Repair Prior to Assisted Reproductive Technology: Patient Selection and Special Considerations

Clinical varicoceles are one of the most commonly identified physical exam abnormalities in men presenting with infertility. Clinical varicoceles can cause impaired spermatogenesis and surgical correction can improve semen parameters in select men. Increasingly, andrologists are performing varicocele repairs prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to boost male fertility potential. In this review, we evaluated the available literature 1) to determine if varicocelectomy prior to IUI or assisted reproductive technologies proved to improve sperm production or pregnancy outcomes; and 2) to identify who may be the ideal candidate for pre-IUI/ART varicocelectomy. Overall, few studies have explored this topic and little can be concluded about the impact of varicocelectomy prior to IUI. The evidence, however, does support that correcting a clinical varicocele can increase pregnancy outcomes in couples who plan to pursue IVF or ICSI. When selecting patients for varicocelectomy prior to IUI or ART, clinicians should evaluate female age as improvement in semen parameters can take 6 months after varicocelectomy and this duration of time may be deleterious in cases of advanced maternal age when each cycle becomes increasingly important. Overall, the currently limited literature regarding clinical varicoceles correction demonstrates that pregnancy rates can be increased when comparing patients who have undergone varicocelectomy prior to ART with those who had clinical varicocele but did not undergo surgery.

Does varicocelectomy improve semen in men with azoospermia and clinically palpable varicocele?

The effectiveness of varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermia is controversial. The current study assessed the efficacy of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermic men with palpable varicocele and to evaluate predictive parameters of outcome. We reviewed the records of 723 patients who had microsurgical varicocelectomy and diagnostic testicular biopsy between 2012 and 2016 at a tertiary medical centre. Data pertaining to the physical, laboratory (semen analysis and hormonal profile) and histopathology features were examined, exploring the predictors of improvement in semen analysis post-varicocelectomy. In total, 42 patients with mean age 35.71 ± 6.35 years were included. After a mean varicocelectomy follow-up of 6.7 months, motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate could be observed in 11 patients (26.2). Out of all the factors examined, only testicular histopathology significantly predicted post-varicocelectomy outcome, where 8/11 patients exhibited hypospermatogenesis, and 3/11 Sertoli cell-only regained spermatozoa in semen. Microsurgical varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermic men with clinically palpable varicocele can result in sperm appearance in the ejaculate with the highest success expected in hypospermatogenesis.

Zeta and hyaluronic acid assessments, novel sperm selection procedures, in animal model for male infertility

Considering varicocele (VCL)-induced severe, progressive DNA damage, histone-protamine anomalies and low sperm production, in the current study, the experimental VCL was induced and the efficiency of hyaluronic acid (HA)-binding method (HABM) and zeta preparation procedure (ZPP) in selection of appropriate spermatozoa was compared with those spermatozoa from intact animals. Following 2 and 4 months, the histological alterations in testicular tissue, sperm count and viability were assessed to prove the VCL condition. The spermatozoa were undergone simple wash, HABM and ZPP. The chromatin condensation, active caspase-3 expression, DNA fragmentation and apoptosis index were analysed after applying selection techniques and compared with the spermatozoa from intact and VCL-induced animals, which were undergone a simple wash. Observations showed that both HABM and ZPP effectively prepared the spermatozoa with higher chromatin condensation and lower DNA damage. Meanwhile, the ZPP exerted a more preferable effect by preparing the spermatozoa with higher chromatin condensation, and lower caspase-3 expression, and DNA disintegrity versus the HABM, especially after 4 months. In conclusion, ZPP seems to exert much more reliable efficiency in selecting appropriate spermatozoa for ICSI processes, while more studies are needed to find out which one is more useful in the clinical assisted reproductive technique (ART) process.

Recent advances in understanding and managing male infertility

Infertility is a prevalent condition affecting an estimated 70 million people globally. The World Health Organization estimates that 9% of couples worldwide struggle with fertility issues and that male factor contributes to 50% of the issues. Male infertility has a variety of causes, ranging from genetic mutations to lifestyle choices to medical illnesses or medications. Recent studies examining DNA fragmentation, capacitation, and advanced paternal age have shed light on previously unknown topics. The role of conventional male reproductive surgeries aimed at improving or addressing male factor infertility, such as varicocelectomy and testicular sperm extraction, have recently been studied in an attempt to expand their narrow indications. Despite advances in the understanding of male infertility, idiopathic sperm abnormalities still account for about 30% of male infertility. With current and future efforts examining the molecular and genetic factors responsible for spermatogenesis and fertilization, we may be better able to understand etiologies of male factor infertility and thus improve outcomes for our patients.

Stereological and morphological analysis of the effects of aging on spermatogenesis in rat testis 1

PURPOSE

To quantify, through stereological and morphometric analysis, spermatogenesis in rats undergoing the natural aging process.

METHODS

Seventy-two male Wistar rats were divided into 6 equal groups according to age at the time of killing: 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. All the rats were subjected orchiectomy and collection of testicular parenchymal fragments for histological and morphometric analysis. The numerical density of spermatids was calculated using a stereological study, and morphometric analysis was conducted to measure the height of the germinal epithelium and the area of the seminiferous tubules.

RESULTS

We found that the 18 and 24 months groups showed a significant reduction in the number of round spermatids. However, the height of the germinal epithelium was not significantly different between the groups. The area of seminiferous tubules was also significantly reduced in the elderly rats compared to that in the young ones.

CONCLUSION

Aging of rats showed a significant reduction in the number of round spermatids and the area of the seminiferous tubules, more pronounced in the rats at 18 and 24 months of life.

Varicocele repair in patients prepared for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: To do or not to do?

PURPOSE

This study sought to evaluate the impact of varicocele repair on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective comparative study was conducted at the Assisted Reproduction Unit, International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Researches, Al-Azhar University. This study included 100 non-azoospermic infertile men with a history of varicocele who were scheduled for intracytoplasmic sperm injection, half of them had already undergone prior subinguinal varicocelectomy at least 12 months prior to ICSI without clinically evident recurrence (treated group 1), and the other half has any grade of an unrepaired clinical varicocele (untreated group 2) at sperm injection. All cases were clinically evaluated and eligible for analysis by using inclusion and exclusion criteria. ICSI outcomes compared between the two groups, including fertilisation rate, embryo development rate and pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

Our study did not show any significant difference between treated and untreated groups regarding the mean values of fertilisation (0.7759 ± 0.2708 vs. 0.7119 ± 0.3057, p = 0.2708), embryo development (0.7759 ± 0.2708 vs. 0.6991 ± 0.3211, p = 0.1990) or different embryo grades. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding pregnancy occurrence rates (p = 0.0928).

CONCLUSION

Infertile men scheduled for ICSI do not seem to benefit from varicocele repair as regard to the outcomes of ICSI.

Time to improvement in semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with severe oligospermia

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine the time and predictive factors of semen quality improvement in men with severe oligospermia after microsurgical varicocelectomy.

METHODS

Men with total motile sperm count (TMSC) <5 million on two semen analyses were identified from May 2015 to August 2017. Postoperative semen analysis was collected at 3-6 months and >6 months. We evaluated preoperative factors for successful semen quality upgrading based on assisted reproductive technology (ART) eligibility: in vitro fertilization [IVF] (<5 million), intrauterine insemination (IUI) (5-9 million), and natural pregnancy (>9 million). We compared men with TMSC <5 million to those with TMSC 5-9 million. Data are reported as means and standard error of the mean (SEM). Pregnancy data was collected by phone interview at >6 months postoperatively RESULTS: A total of 33 men were included. TMSC improved from 1.5±0.2 to 7.3±1.8 million at 3-6 months (p<0.05) and 12.2±3.6 million at >6 months (p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in TMSC between 3-6 months and >6 months. Sixteen (48.5%) men upgraded semen quality into the range of natural pregnancy. Preoperative TMSC from 2-5 million was predictive of upgrading semen quality. Twenty-four couples were contacted by phone; 20 were attempting pregnancy in the postoperative period and five (25%) of them had achieved natural pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with TMSC <5 million can expect the largest improvement in TMSC from 3-6 months postoperatively with minimal improvement thereafter. Preoperative TMSC >2 million was most predictive of semen quality upgrading.

Effect of adjuvant drug therapy after varicocelectomy on fertility outcome in males with varicocele-associated infertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Varicocele is one of the common correctable causes of male infertility. Recent studies have demonstrated varicocelectomy in males with abnormal semen parameters was associated with better fertility outcome, but the effect of adjuvant drug therapy after varicocelectomy on fertility outcome in patients with varicocele-associated infertility remains undefined. Hence, the present meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of adjuvant drug therapy after varicocelectomy. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42018093749). Ten randomised controlled trails containing 533 patients with adjuvant drug therapy after varicocelectomy and 368 patients with no medical treatment after varicocelectomy were included. Our analysis revealed that the improvement in pregnancy rate after adjuvant drug therapy was insignificant. (OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 0.99-2.91), but resulted in significant improvements in sperm concentration (MD = 13.71, 95%CI = 5.80-21.63) and motility (MD = 4.77, 95%CI = 3.98-5.56) at 3 months, sperm DNA integrity (SMD = 3.13, 95%CI = 1.50-4.75) and serum FSH level (MD = -1.02, 95%CI = -1.79 to -0.24). Therefore, compared to no medical treatment, the adjuvant drug therapy, especially the use of antioxidants seems to be associated with better fertility outcome. However, more evidences with high-quality studies are necessary to conform its benefits.

Knowledge gaps in male infertility: a reproductive endocrinology and infertility perspective

Reproductive research has moved forward at a remarkable pace. Some of these advances are the result of a separation between male and female specialties, allowing focused study in specific areas of the field. However, the different training programs between male and female fertility specialists has created an environment in which some discoveries are not put in the greater context of clinical care. At times, interventions have been measured against surrogate markers of outcome that may not impact the most meaningful outcome for patients—the delivery of a healthy neonate. For example, medical and surgical interventions that use changes in semen parameters may have a limited impact on the likelihood of achieving a live birth due to the limitations inherent in the semen analysis for predicting outcomes. Other commonly used tests, such as sperm DNA fragmentation assays provide promising biological plausibility to account for subfertility of some male partners. However, until well defined thresholds for predicting outcomes in different treatment scenarios are available, changes in sperm DNA fragmentation testing is not an adequate outcome for measuring the utility of interventions. The biggest limitation for these tests remains their analysis of bulk semen. Tests allowing interrogation of the reproductive competence of a given sperm, while allowing that sperm to be used in assisted reproductive technology procedures remain elusive. Progress toward reaching this end (whether by hyaluronic acid binding, IMSI, or Ramen spectroscopy) is underway, but much remains to be learned. Achieving testing and capture of individual sperm would better facilitate studies that measure the most meaningful outcome for patients and providers—the delivery of a healthy baby.

Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs. percutaneous embolization in infertile men: Prospective comparison of reproductive and functional outcomes

Background

Varicocele is a condition characterized by dilated, tortuous veins within the pampiniform venous plexus of the scrotal sac. Presence of varicocele is associated with an increased risk of alteration of semen parameters. The objective of this study was to compare the current standard in varicocele treatment procedures: sub-inguinal microscopic ligation to percutaneous embolization in terms of semen parameters improvement, fertility, and morbidity at the university hospital of Toulouse (France). Seventy six patients with clinical varicocele, alteration of semen parameters and infertility, underwent either procedure (microsurgery in 49 case performed by a single surgeon and embolization in 27 cases) and were prospectively analyzed. Outcome measures were: semen parameters, spontaneous pregnancies, pain, side effects, recovery time and overall satisfaction. All patients were contacted in January 2015 in order to determine reproductive events.

Results

Preoperatively, there was no difference in clinical and biological items between the two groups. Postoperatively, on the overall population, there was a significant improvement of sperm concentration at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (p = <0.001, <0.001, 0.012, 0.018) and sperm motility at 6 months (p = 0.002). The sperm concentration was higher at 6 months in the percutaneous embolization group (13.42, vs. 8.1×10⁶/ml; p = 0.043). With a median follow-up of 4 years, 27 pregnancies occurred (spontaneous pregnancy rate of 35.5%).

There was no significant difference between procedures on the sperm quality, pregnancy rate, and the overall satisfaction. Patients undergoing percutaneous embolization reported a faster recovery time (p = 0.002) and less postoperative pain (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Our study shows that percutaneous embolization seems to be an equivalent alternative to sub-inguinal microscopic ligation in term of sperm quality improvement, pregnancy rate, and overall satisfaction with a slight advantage on post-operative morbidity.

[Comparison of subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs percutaneous embolization in infertile men]

INTRODUCTION

Subinguinal microscopic ligation is the current standard of treatment of varicocele, and percutaneous embolization is a new alternative. We aimed to compare these procedures for reproductive and functional aspects.

MATERIAL

A consecutive series of 76 patients with clinical varicocele, alteration of semen parameters and infertility, undergoing either procedure (microsurgery in 49 cases and embolization in 27 cases) was prospectively analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months). Outcome measures were: semen parameters, pregnancies, pain, side effects, recovery time and overall satisfaction. Subsequently, all patients were contacted by telephone in January 2015 (with a median delay of 4 years after the procedure) in order to determine reproductive events.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, both groups were identical for clinical and biological items. We observed an improvement of sperm concentration at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.012, 0.018, respectively) and sperm motility at 6 months (P=0.002). The sperm concentration was higher at 6 months in PE group (P=0.043). With a median follow-up of 4 years after the procedure, 27 pregnancies occurred (spontaneous pregnancy rate of 32%). There was no difference between procedures on the sperm quality, pregnancy rate and the overall satisfaction. Patients undergoing percutaneous embolization reported a faster recovery time (P=0.002) and less postoperative pain (P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Both procedures give equivalent results regarding sperm quality, pregnancy rate and satisfaction even though recovery seems faster and postoperative pain seems lower after percutaneous embolization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Critical appraisal of conventional semen analysis in the context of varicocele

Varicocele is present in approximately 15% of men, and, although it is the most commonly diagnosed cause of male infertility, nearly two-thirds of men with varicoceles remain fertile. It was decided to make use of the current evidence obtained from the previous meta-analyses between 2004 and 2015 as well as available articles covering this field, preferably randomized controlled articles dealing with the topic of semen analysis before and after repair. Two important meta-analyses were discussed as well as other articles dealing with the topic of semen analysis before and after varicocelectomy. The evidence suggests that all semen parameters improve after varicocele repair. Based on the available evidence, it is clear that there is a benefit in treating men with a palpable varicocele. One can expect that all semen parameters will improve within 3 months after repair.

Summary evidence on the effects of varicocele treatment to improve natural fertility in subfertile men

The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence concerning the benefit of varicocele treatment to improve natural fertility in subfertile males. We also analyzed the effect of varicocele treatment on conventional semen parameters and sperm functional tests. An electronic search to collect the data was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE databases until July 2015. Data pooled from a variety of study designs indicate that varicocelectomy improves semen parameters in the majority of the treated men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters regardless of the chosen surgical method. Surgical varicocele repair was beneficial not only for alleviating oxidative stress-associated infertility but also to improve sperm nuclear DNA integrity. However, given the low magnitude of the effect size in sperm DNA integrity, further research is needed to elucidate its clinical significance. Conflicting results on the effect of varicocele treatment on natural fertility seem to be due to heterogeneous study designs and, more importantly, patient selection criteria. When these issues are controlled, current evidence indicates that treatment of subclinical varicocele is not warranted, as it does not seem to improve fertility. On the contrary, fair evidence indicates that varicocele treatment should be offered to infertile patients with palpable varicocele and abnormal semen parameters. This evidence supports the current guidelines issued by the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology, which state that varicocele treatment should be offered to male partners of infertile couples presenting for evaluation with clinical varicocele and semen parameters alterations.

Clinical Outcomes of Varicocele Repair in Infertile Men: A Review

Varicoceles are a major cause of impaired spermatogenesis and the most common correctable cause of male infertility. They are found in approximately 40% of men with primary infertility and 80% of men with secondary infertility, although they also occur in 12% of men with normal semen parameters. The presence of a varicocele does not always affect spermatogenesis, as it has been reported that only 20% of men with documented varicoceles suffer fertility problems. However, varicocele repair appears to have beneficial effects in men with impaired semen parameters and palpable varicoceles. Currently, the main procedures employed for varicocele repair are microsurgical subinguinal or inguinal varicocelectomy, laparoscopic varicocelectomy, and radiological percutaneous embolization. Microsurgical varicocelectomy appears to be the optimal treatment in most cases, whereas the other procedures are useful only in specific cases. After treatment, it typically takes 3 to 6 months for patients' semen parameters to improve; thus, other therapies, including assisted reproductive technology, should be considered if infertility persists after this interval, especially in older couples. Controversies still remain regarding how varicoceles in certain subgroups, such as adolescents or men with azoospermia, should be treated. Due to their relatively high prevalence rate among the general population, varicoceles can occur concomitantly with other conditions that cause impaired spermatogenesis. Further studies are necessary in order to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. In this review, we sought to summarize the issues currently associated with varicocele treatment in infertile men.

Effect of varicocelectomy on testis volume and semen parameters in adolescents: a meta-analysis

Varicocele repair in adolescent remains controversial. Our aim is to identify and combine clinical trials results published thus far to ascertain the efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving testis volume and semen parameters compared with nontreatment control. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Web of Science, which included results obtained from meta-analysis, randomized and nonrandomized controlled studies. The study population was adolescents with clinically palpable varicocele with or without the testicular asymmetry or abnormal semen parameters. Cases were allocated to treatment and observation groups, and testis volume or semen parameters were adopted as outcome measures. As a result, seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials studying bilateral testis volume or semen parameters in both treatment and observation groups were identified. Using a random effect model, mean difference of testis volume between the treatment group and the observation group was 2.9 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6, 5.2; P< 0.05) for the varicocele side and 1.5 ml (95% CI: 0.3, 2.7; P< 0.05) for the healthy side. The random effect model analysis demonstrated that the mean difference of semen concentration, total semen motility, and normal morphology between the two groups was 13.7 × 10 6 ml-1 (95% CI: -1.4, 28.8; P = 0.075), 2.5% (95% CI: -3.6, 8.6; P= 0.424), and 2.9% (95% CI: -3.0, 8.7; P= 0.336) respectively. In conclusion, although varicocelectomy significantly improved bilateral testis volume in adolescents with varicocele compared with observation cases, semen parameters did not have any statistically significant difference between two groups. Well-planned, properly conducted RCTs are needed in order to confirm the above-mentioned conclusion further and to explore whether varicocele repair in adolescents could improve subsequently spontaneous pregnancy rates.

Varicocele - a case for early intervention

Testicular varicocele, which is defined as the dilation of the veins draining the testicle, has long been associated with a detrimental effect on testicular function. Despite a lack of high-quality, prospective data, recent evidence has shed light on potential links between varicocele and male infertility and serum testosterone levels. Similarly, varicocele repair has increasingly been shown to have a beneficial impact on pregnancy rates, semen parameters, and on improving serum testosterone in adult men. Numerous studies have assessed the optimal technique for varicocele repair and the bulk of the evidence has shown the microsurgical inguinal/subinguinal approach to have the highest success rates, the lowest overall complication rates, and the lowest recurrence rates. The management of varicocele in adolescents remains a clinical conundrum, but contemporary evidence suggests early deleterious effects of varicocele on testicular function in some patients. Well-designed prospective trials are critical to delineate the true impact and role of varicocele repair on male infertility and hypogonadism in adult and adolescent men.

Varicocele and testicular function

Testicular varicocele, a dilation of the veins of the pampiniform plexus thought to increase testicular temperature via venous congestion, is commonly associated with male infertility. Significant study has clarified the negative impact of varicocele on semen parameters and more recent work has shed light on its detrimental effects on the molecular and ultrastructural features of sperm and the testicular microenvironment, as well as more clearly defined the positive impacts of treatment on couples’ fertility. The relationship between varicocele and testicular endocrine function, while known for some time based on histologic evaluation, has become more apparent in the clinical setting with a growing link between varicocele and hypogonadism. Finally, in the pediatric setting, while future study will clarify the impact of varicocele on fertility and testicular function, recent work supports a parallel effect of varicocele in adolescents and adults, suggesting a re-evaluation of current treatment approaches in light of the progressive nature of the condition and potential increased risk of future disease.

Can We Predict the Outcome of Varicocelectomy Based on the Duration of Venous Reflux?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome of varicocelectomy based on the duration of venous reflux (DVR) of the pampiniform plexus veins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 138 patients with clinically palpable varicoceles were evaluated for DVR with color Doppler ultrasonography from May 2009 to August 2014. The DVR was defined as the DVR of a varicocele in the supine position during the Valsalva maneuver. Patients with bilateral, recurrent, or subclinical varicoceles; hormonal imbalances involving follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, or total testosterone; azoospermia; and intraoperative or postoperative complications were excluded. Of the 138 patients, 76 met the inclusion criteria. All patients were treated with subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy. Restoration of all three semen parameters (concentration, motility, and morphology) to normal values 6 months postoperatively was considered to indicate treatment success. The patients were divided into those with a DVR of <4.5 seconds (Group 1) and ≥4.5 seconds (Group 2).

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 29.39 (±6.03) years. No statistically significant relationship was found between the success rate and varicocele grade. The cutoff DVR value was calculated as 4.5 seconds using a receiver operating characteristics curve according to patients who underwent successful treatment. The success rates of Groups 1 and 2 were 40.0% and 88.2%, respectively (P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this analysis indicate that a DVR of ≥4.5 seconds predicts better outcomes of varicocelectomy.

Is Varicocelectomy Useful for Subfertile Men with Isolated Teratozoospermia?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on sperm morphology in subfertile men with isolated teratozoospermia and a clinically palpable varicocele.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of men with isolated teratozoospermia who had undergone microsurgical varicocelectomy. Semen analyses following varicocelectomy were performed at 2- to 3-month intervals. Responders to the varicocelectomy were defined as those who fulfilled the following criteria in semen analysis: (1) an improvement in percentage of normal forms to ≥4% and (2) normal results for all other semen parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients underwent unilateral varicocelectomy (n = 49) or bilateral varicocelectomy (n = 31) (mean age of 36 ± 0.4 years, range 24-44). After a mean postoperative follow-up period of 6.8 months, the mean percentage of normal sperm forms increased from 0.9% to 3.5% (P < .001), and the mean sperm motility improved from 50.5% to 56.6% (P = .004). The number of responders to the surgery was 16 (20%), and their mean percentage of normal forms increased from 1.3% to 9.1%. The mean preoperative and postoperative semen volume and sperm concentration were not different (P > .05). No differences were observed in age, current smoking status, body mass index, or grade of varicocele between responders and nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

Varicocelectomy might be an option for treating subfertile patients with isolated teratozoospermia and a clinically apparent varicocele. However, patients should be advised that the surgery helps in limited patients only because more patients did not benefit from the surgery.

Subsequent impaired fertility (with or without sperm worsening) in men who had fathered children after a left varicocelectomy: A novel population?

Objectives:

The objective of this paper was to assess whether the beneficial effects of a varicocelectomy on fertility are transitory or definitive after a first fathering.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective study which involved seven andrological centers. The files of 2223 patients who underwent subinguinal ligation of a high grade left varicocele for (oligo)±(astheno)±(terato)-spermia and infertility between January 1^st, 2002 and January 1^st 2013 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria for the patients were the following: Sperm count improvement and fathering a child after an uneventful left varicocelectomy; 745 patients were considered. Patients who had undergone three assessments for (in-) fertility: Before surgery, before the first fathering and after the first fathering were included in the study. Each assessment included: Clinical history, physical examination, two sperm analyses, bilateral scrotal Duplex scans, blood hormonal levels [follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), testosterone (T) and prolactin (PRL)].

Results:

Forty patients were finally studied; they all had an improved sperm count and had fathered once after surgery. Fifteen had fathered twice and still had their sperm count increased after the second fathering. Twenty-five patients could not father twice; 13 patients had their sperm count decreased after the first fathering and 12 did not. A decrease in testicular volume and an increase in FSH paralleled the worsening of sperm concentration, motility and morphology after fathering. No other differences could be observed between the groups.

Conclusions:

Our data indicated that the beneficial effects of a varicocelectomy might be transitory in some cases.

Should older patients be offered varicocoele correction to improve their fertility?

We reviewed a large number of patients from 2000 to 2010 that underwent varicocoele correction using the retrograde sclerotization approach. Three hundred and seventy-six of them were included in the study, as they met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at the time of surgery was 32 years (SD: 6.5); 32% of them were 35 years and older. Patients were classified according to the clinical classification (GC) and Sarteschi's Doppler ultrasound classification (GS). The patients showed up at the clinic after an average time of 30 months of referred infertility related (SD: 28.54). Patients underwent pre-operative assessment with physical examination, sperm analysis and Doppler ultrasound, and again the same assessment at least 3 months after surgery. We evaluated the following parameters: sperm concentration (millions/mL, CONC), percentage motility (a+b, MOT) and the percentage of morphologically typical spermatozoa (MOR). Univariate and Multivariate analysis were performed. The research of Pearson's coefficients was performed to test the correlation between sperm parameters and age, SG, CG. Semen specimens were evaluated according to WHO 1999 criteria. Mean CONC varied from 34.5 to 47.0 millions/mL (+12.5; p < 0.001); MOT from 27.2 to 34.5% (+7.3%; p < 0.001); and MOR from 44.0 to 47.6% (+3.6%; p = 0.001). Univariable and multivariable analysis of variance related to age showed no significant difference of parameters improvement. Pearson's correlation coefficient for pre-operative and post-operative sperm MOT related to patients' age was respectively -0.11 (p < 0.001) and -0.18 (p = 0.04). No other significance was found. Usefulness of treating infertile patients affected by varicocoele is confirmed: varicocoele correction leads to significant sperm parameters improvement. There is no evidence of different improvement related to patients' age. The decline in sperm motility related to age of the patients seems to be only age-dependent: the usefulness of treating patients affected by varicocoele is not influenced by their age: treatment should also be offered to older patients.

Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review

Varicocelectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for the treatment of male infertility. Although several different techniques for varicocele repair have been described in the literature, microsurgical varicocelectomy performed through a subinguinal or inguinal incision is recognized as the gold-standard approach for varicocelectomy, due to high success rates with minimal complications. Standard indications for varicocelectomy include palpable varicocele(s), with one or more abnormal semen parameters, and, for the couple trying to conceive, in the setting of normal or correctable female infertility. However, varicocele repair is often recommended and undertaken for reasons other than infertility, including low serum testosterone, testicular pain, testicular hypotrophy and poor sperm DNA quality. This article reviews the technical aspects of microsurgical varicocelectomy, and its indications in adults and adolescents.