Febrile urinary tract infections after ureteroneocystostomy and subureteral injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid for vesicoureteral reflux--do choice of procedure and success matter?

Endoscopic injection of bulking agents in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a narrative review of the literature

In the last 20 years, endoscopic injection (EI) has affirmed as a valid alternative to open surgery for management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study aimed to investigate and discuss some debated aspects such as indications, bulking agents and comparison, techniques of injection and comparison, predictive factors of success, use in specific situations. EI is minimally invasive, well accepted by patients and families, with short learning curve and low-morbidity profile. It provides reflux resolution rates approaching those of open reimplantation, ranging from 69 to 100%. Obviously, the success rate may be influenced by several factors. Recently, it is adopted as first-line therapy also in high grade reflux or complex anatomy such as duplex, bladder diverticula, ectopic ureters. The two most used materials for injection are Deflux and Vantris. The first is absorbable, easier to inject, has lower risk of obstruction, but can lose efficacy over time. The second is non-absorbable, more difficult to inject, has higher risk of obstruction, but it is potentially more durable. The two main techniques are STING and HIT. To date, the ideal material and technique of injection has not yet clearly established, but the choice remains dependent on surgeon's preference and experience.

Do Volume of Injection and Learning Curve Influence the Results of Endoscopic Correction of Vesicoureteric Reflux Using Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid? A Single Surgeon Experience

Background: Available reports regarding the technical factors for successful endoscopic treatment (ET) of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer are inconclusive. We studied single-surgeon data to evaluate the association of injected volume and surgeon experience with success after ET for VUR. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight children (87 ureters) with grades 2-4 primary VUR were included. Success was defined as complete resolution of reflux on follow-up imaging. Volume of injection between success and failed groups was analyzed; volume of injection was further studied using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Patients were then divided into two groups: group 1 (early experience) and group 2 (later experience). Both groups were compared for age, grade of reflux, volume of injection, and success. Results: Overall success of one injection was 76%. The mean volume of injection was significantly larger in successful ureters than failed ureters (P = .008). On ROC analysis, the volume of 0.75 mL (area under curve 0.747, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.89) had a good discriminative ability to predict success of the injection procedure. Furthermore, a volume cutoff of 0.8 mL demonstrated significant influence on success (success 14/25 ureters for <0.8 mL and 36/42 ureters for 0.8 mL or more volume of injection, P = .0097), whereas no difference in success was observed with a cutoff volume of 0.9 mL (P = .2480). When the patients were divided into two groups based on surgeon experience, group 2 demonstrated better success than group 1 (84% versus 65%, P = .04). Both groups were comparable for age (P = .09), grade of reflux (0.46) and the median volume of injection was similar (0.8 mL) in both the groups. Conclusions: We found that a minimal volume of 0.75 mL dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection may be required to achieve success of ET in moderate grade primary VUR. Success also improved with increasing surgeon experience.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Parental Satisfaction After Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid (Dx/HA) Injection for Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux

Purpose: Endoscopic dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) injection is a common treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) with excellent reported short-term clinical success rates. Long-term outcomes are less well-defined. We assessed long-term outcomes and parental satisfaction after Dx/HA injection for primary VUR with >5-year follow-up. Materials and Methods: Families of all patients who underwent Dx/HA injection for primary VUR at our institution between 2008 and 2012 were contacted for telephone interview. Data collected by phone included parental satisfaction and presence and severity of UTIs pre-operatively and post-operatively. Patient demographics, radiographic VUR data, need for secondary surgery, and surgical indications were obtained through chart review. Results: Five hundred and seventy-five patients underwent Dx/HA injection for primary VUR between 2008 and 2012. Ninety-nine (17.2%) of these patients' parents were successfully contacted and interviewed. Median follow-up time from surgery to survey was 8.4 (IQR 6.8-9.6) years. Secondary surgery was performed in 13/99 (13.1%), most commonly repeat Dx/HA injection. Seven patients (7.1%) underwent secondary Dx/HA injection for persistent VUR without UTIs at a median of 0.35 (IQR 0.33-0.77) years post-operatively. Five patients (5.1%) underwent Dx/HA injection (n = 3) or ureteral reimplantation (n = 2) for VUR with febrile UTIs (fUTIs) at a median of 2.2 (IQR 1.3-5.1) years. One patient had ureteral reimplantation for symptomatic obstruction 2.8 years after initial surgery. Only 3/99 (3.0%) required open or laparoscopic surgery after Dx/HA injection. Eighty-three families (84.7%) reported ≥1 fUTIs pre-operatively. Of these, only 9/83 (10.8%) reported fUTIs post-operatively, for an overall clinical success rate of 89.2%. Clinical success was 93.1% in patients whose pre-operative fUTIs were treated outpatient and 80.0% in those hospitalized at least once for fUTI treatment pre-operatively. Ninety-four percent of parents were highly satisfied, 2.4% partially satisfied, and 3.5% dissatisfied. Conclusions: Endoscopic injection with Dx/HA for primary VUR appears to have good long-term clinical success rates and high parental satisfaction, mirroring our previously reported short-term results. Post-operative ureteral obstruction is rare but may occur years post-operatively, justifying initial sonographic surveillance, and repeat imaging in symptomatic patients.

Diagnosis and management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children with urinary tract infections: a position statement from the International Children's Continence Society

BACKGROUND

We present a consensus view from the International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) on the evaluation and management of bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD) in children with urinary tract infection (UTI). The statement aims to highlight the importance of BBD in the development and recurrence of childhood UTI and its management to reduce its associated morbidity and sequelae.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was done on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until August 15, 2016. Relevant publications concerning BBD and its relationship with UTI among children were reviewed and aggregated for statements of recommendation. Discussion by the ICCS Board and a multi-disciplinary core group of authors resulted in a document available on its website for all ICCS members to review. Insights and feedback were considered with consensus and agreement reached to finalize this position statement.

RESULTS

BBD in children with UTI is summarized. Details regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, and recommendations for general and family practitioners and pediatricians relating to the evaluation and management of this condition are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

This document serves as the position statement from ICCS, based on literature review and expert opinion providing our current understanding of BBD in children with UTI.

Endoscopic injection therapy

Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux, endoscopic injection therapy using Deflux has become a popular alternative to open surgery and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Endoscopic correction with Deflux is minimally invasive, well tolerated, and provides cure rates approaching those of open surgery (i.e., approximately 80% in several studies). However, in recent years a less stringent approach to evaluating urinary tract infections (UTIs) and concerns about long-term efficacy and complications associated with endoscopic injection have limited the use of this therapy. In addition, there is little evidence supporting the efficacy of endoscopic injection therapy in preventing UTIs and vesicoureteral reflux-related renal scarring. In this report, we reviewed the current literature regarding endoscopic injection therapy and provided an updated overview of this topic.

Urinary tract infection in the setting of vesicoureteral reflux

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is the most common underlying etiology responsible for febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) or pyelonephritis in children. Along with the morbidity of pyelonephritis, long-term sequelae of recurrent renal infections include renal scarring, proteinuria, and hypertension. Treatment is directed toward the prevention of recurrent infection through use of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis during a period of observation for spontaneous resolution or by surgical correction. In children, bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) plays a significant role in the occurrence of UTI and the rate of VUR resolution. Effective treatment of BBD leads to higher rates of spontaneous resolution and decreased risk of UTI.

Ureteroneocystostomy in primary vesicoureteral reflux: critical retrospective analysis of factors affecting the postoperative urinary tract infection rates

INTRODUCTION

To determine the parameters affecting the outcome of ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) procedure for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 398 patients who underwent UNC procedure from 2001 to 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Different UNC techniques were used according to laterality of reflux and ureteral orifice configuration. Effects of several parameters on outcome were examined. Disappearance of reflux on control VCUG or absence of any kind of UTI/symptoms in patients without control VCUG was considered as clinical improvement.

RESULTS

Mean age at operation was 59.2 ± 39.8 months and follow-up was 25.6 ± 23.3 months. Grade of VUR was 1-2, 3 and 4-5 in 17, 79, 302 patients, respectively. Male to female ratio was 163/235. UNC was performed bilaterally in 235 patients and intravesical approach was used in 373 patients. The frequency of voiding dysfunction, scar on preoperative DMSA, breakthrough infection and previous surgery was 28.4%, 70.7%, 49.3% and 22.4%, respectively. Twelve patients (8.9%) with postoperative contralateral reflux were excluded from the analysis. Overall clinical improvement rate for UNC was 92%. Gender, age at diagnosis and operation, laterality and grade of reflux, mode of presentation, breakthrough infections (BTI) under antibiotic prophylaxis, presence of voiding dysfunction and renal scar, and operation technique did not affect the surgical outcome. However, the clinical improvement rate was lower in patients with a history of previous endoscopic intervention (83.9% vs. 94%). Postoperative UTI rate was 27.2% and factors affecting the occurrence of postoperative UTI were previous failed endoscopic injection on univariate analysis and gender, preoperative BTI, postoperative VUR state, voiding dysfunction on multivariate analysis. Surgery related complication rate was 2% (8/398). These were all low grade complications (blood transfusion in 1, hematoma under incision in 3 and prolonged hospitalization secondary to UTI in 4 patients). In long term, 12 patients are under nephrologic follow-up because of hypertension in 5, increased serum creatinine in 5, proteinuria in 1 and hematuria in 1 patient and all these patients had preoperative scarred kidneys.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its invasive nature, UNC has a very high success rate with a negligible percent of complications. In our cohort, the only factor that negatively affected the clinical improvement rate was the history of previous antireflux interventions where the predictive factors for postoperative UTI were previous failed endoscopic injection, female gender, preoperative BTI, persistent VUR and voiding dysfunction.

Vesicoureteral reflux--the role of bladder and bowel dysfunction

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a significant risk factor for clinical pyelonephritis and renal scarring. In 2010, the American Urological Association (AUA) reported that bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD), which is common in patients with VUR, increases the risk of breakthrough UTI in children receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, reduces the success rate for endoscopic injection therapy, and increases the risk of postoperative UTI, irrespective of the surgical success rate for VUR. Accordingly, physicians are strongly recommended to investigate BBD in their patients with VUR. Symptoms and signs of BBD include urinary frequency and urgency, prolonged voiding intervals, daytime wetting, perineal and penile pain, holding manoeuvres (posturing to prevent wetting), constipation, and encopresis. Primary assessment tools include the Pediatric Symptom Checklist, urinalysis, urine culture, bladder diary, measurement of the postvoid residual urine volume, Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score, uroflow with electromyography, and Bristol Stool Form Score. The Rome III criteria can also be used for diagnostic assessment of bowel function. Treatment of BBD should be individualized, directed at symptomatic and objective improvement, and can include behavioural modification, biofeedback, selective use of anticholinergics and α-blockers, and bowel management.