Two-Step Fowler-Stephens Orchiopexy for Intra-Abdominal Testes: A 28-Year Single Institution Experience

Staged laparoscopic orchiopexy of intra-abdominal testis: Spermatic vessels division versus traction? A multicentric comparative study

BACKGROUND

Staged laparoscopic management of intra-abdominal testes using pedicular section is recognized as gold standard technique, successful in 85 % of cases for scrotal testicular position with less than 10 % testicular atrophy. Recently, Shehata proposed a new technique without pedicular division for these testes, using spermatic vessels traction, but did not provide a comparative study of the two techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the laparoscopic spermatic pedicular traction (Shehata technique, ST) for the treatment of intra-abdominal testis, as an alternative to gold standard pedicular section (2-stage Fowler-Stephens, FS).

STUDY DESIGN

Intra-abdominal testes of 129 patients in two tertiary pediatric urology centers were managed laparoscopically (2011-2019) either by 2-stage FS orchidopexy or ST according to the surgeon preference. Testicular position and size were statistically compared.

RESULTS

A total of 147 testes were pulled down by 80 ST and 67 FS, including 18 bilateral cases. Median (IQR) age at surgery was 24.2 (15.6-46.4) months (ST) and 18.3 (13.1-38.2) months (FS) (p = 0.094). Scrotal pulling-down of the testis was performed after a median (IQR) period of 2.3 (1.6-3.4) months (ST) and 6.1 (4.7-8.3) months (FS), respectively (p < 0.005). Although ST had collapsed in 17 cases (21.3 %), only one (1.3 %) redo procedure was required. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 22 (12-40) and 19 (8.75-37) months (p = 0.59), the testis was in the scrotum in 85 % and 81 % of ST and FS cases, respectively (p = 0.51). Testicular atrophy occurred in 10 % of ST and 13.4 % of FS (p = 0.61). Multivariate analysis using the propensity score analysis did not identify any difference between the two techniques.

DISCUSSION

Our results seem to confirm that FS and ST achieve the same results regarding final testicular position and testicular atrophy rate, with a long-term follow-up. Our study supports pediatric surgeons to favor laparoscopic spermatic pedicular traction (ST) which preserves the testicular vascularization and may ensure better spermatogenesis after puberty. More details on the size and position of the testicle at the beginning of the first laparoscopy seem however essential to assess more accurately the outcomes of each surgical technique. Our outcomes will also be re-evaluated when our patients have reached puberty, from an exocrine and endocrine points of view.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed similar results after laparoscopic traction or section of spermatic vessels for intra-abdominal testis in a long-term follow-up, providing more evidence for the use of ST as a valuable alternative to FS.

Management of the undescended testis in children: An American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Management of undescended testes (UDT) has evolved over the last decade. While urologic societies in the United States and Europe have established some guidelines for care, management by North American pediatric surgeons remains variable. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the published evidence regarding the treatment of (UDT) in children.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review, and report salient articles. Five principal questions were asked regarding imaging standards, medical treatment, surgical technique, timing of operation, and outcomes. A literature search was performed from 2005 to 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 825 articles were identified in the initial search, and 260 were included in the final review.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative imaging and hormonal therapy are generally not recommended except in specific circumstances. Testicular growth and potential for fertility improves when orchiopexy is performed before one year of age. For a palpable testis, a single incision approach is preferred over a two-incision orchiopexy. Laparoscopic orchiopexy is associated with a slightly lower testicular atrophy rate but a higher rate of long-term testicular retraction. One and two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy have similar rates of testicular atrophy and retraction. There is a higher relative risk of testicular cancer in UDT which may be lessened by pre-pubertal orchiopexy.

Open Versus Laparoscopic Gubernaculum-Sparing Second-Stage Fowler-Stephens Orchiopexy for Intra-Abdominal Testis: A Long-Term Study

Background:

The benefits of performing open versus laparoscopic gubernaculum-sparing second-stage Fowler–Stephens orchiopexy (FSO) remain unclear. We compared the two techniques to answer this question.

Methods:

We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic first-stage FSO and open versus laparoscopic gubernaculum-sparing second-stage FSO at our institution between September 2004 and June 2020 (all patients underwent surgery by a single surgeon). We evaluated both procedures based on the incidence of testicular atrophy, testicular ascent, and other complications.

Results:

The age at initial surgery was 45.7 ± 28.2 months (median, 39). One hundred nine cases were treated with open second-stage gubernaculum-sparing FSO (OFSO), and 96 cases were treated with laparoscopic second-stage gubernaculum-sparing FSO (LFSO). The mean follow-up period was 59.8 months (median, 54; standard deviation, +35). The overall testicular atrophy rate was 1.5%. Atrophy was observed in 2 and 1 patient in the OFSO and LFSO groups, respectively (1.8% versus 1.0%, P > .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of testicular ascent between both groups (2.8% versus 3.1%). Five and four complications were noted in the OFSO and LFSO groups, respectively (P > .05).

Conclusions:

Second-stage gubernaculum-sparing FSO achieved high testicular survival rates and satisfactory testicular positions. Neither the open nor laparoscopic approach appeared superior, because the overall testicular survival rates and incidence of testicular ascent and other complications were equivalent between both groups.

A comparative study between two techniques of laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testis

Introduction:

Several techniques have been described for laparoscopic orchidopexy in patients with intra-abdominal testes. We aimed to report our experience with the staged laparoscopic traction orchiopexy (Shehata technique) and to compare it to the Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy (FSLO).

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at two pediatric surgery departments from 2017 to 2020. Fifty-six patients underwent laparoscopic exploration and the testis was intra-abdominal in 41 of them. Patients with vanished testis or those who underwent open orchidopexy or vessel-intact laparoscopic orchidopexy were excluded. Those who underwent FSLO (n = 18), or Shehata laparoscopic orchidopexy (n = 11) were compared.

Results:

Preoperative data were comparable between both the groups. FSLO had a significantly shorter first-stage operative time (34.61 ± 6.43 vs. 58 ± 9.39 min, P < 0.001), with no difference in the second stage. There was no difference in the initial position of the testes between both the techniques. The testis dropped from the fixation position in three patients in the Shehata group (27.27%), and consequently, the cord did not increase in length by the second stage, and these testes barely reached the scrotum. At 12 months’ follow-up, the testes’ size, position, and consistency were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion:

Staged laparoscopic traction orchidopexy is feasible for the management of intra-abdominal testes, especially in the low-lying testes.

Staged Fowler Stephens, Who Requires a Third Procedure?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy is a well-described surgical approach for most pediatric urologists tackling the high intra-abdominal testis. Testicular ascent is a well-reported outcome of the surgery and a problem that could be fixed with a repeat procedure. The purpose of this review is to determine the rate of subsequent testicular ascent and repeat surgery after a two-stage Fowler-Stephens using best available evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS/RESULT

We selected 16 studies that pertained to our topic. 0-13% of testicles were deemed to be in an inappropriate position on follow-up (6-37 months). The definition of appropriate postoperative position varied between studies and rates of repeat procedures were sparsely available. Available data reports a repeat orchiopexy rate of 2.6-7.5% after two-stage Fowler-Stephens. Two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy is a highly successful surgical technique to manage high intra-abdominal testes. Rates of testicular ascent are difficult to ascertain due to varying definitions and small sample sizes. While repeat procedures are typically indicated, the actual rate of repeat orchiopexy is rarely reported and long-term outcomes following a third procedure is sparse.

A prediction model for risk factors of testicular atrophy after orchiopexy in children with undescended testis

BACKGROUND

There have been limited studies with small sample sizes about risk factors of testicular atrophy. Thus, we aimed to investigate the risk factors for testicular atrophy after orchiopexy in male children with undescended testes and develop a prediction model based on clinical variables.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of data on children who underwent orchiopexy for undescended testes from 2013 to 2017. The variables assessed included age, laterality, testicular location, preoperative testicular volume ratio, deferens and epididymis anomaly, hormonal treatment, comorbidities, type of surgical procedure, operating time, and complications as the outcome of testicular atrophy. A nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of testicular atrophy. We also validated our model based on a prospective cohort of patients who underwent orchiopexy from January 2018 to December 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 1,608 patients undergoing orchiopexy were included in the training cohort. The median age was 2.8 years (range, 0.5-11.3 years). After follow-up for 12 to 18 months (median, 14 months), 228 (14.2%) cases of atrophic testes were recorded. The independent predictors of testicular atrophy were preoperative testicular volume ratio [odds ratio (OR) 0.001, P=0.001], testicular location (OR 1.903, P=0.001), deferens and epididymis anomaly (OR 6.470, P=0.001), and two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy (OR 2.613, P=0.04). Successful validation was achieved, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. The sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model were 78.1% and 77.5%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.851.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with undescended testes, excluding those with chromosomal abnormalities and testicular nubbin, the incidence of testicular atrophy after orchiopexy is higher in patients with a lower testicular volume ratio, higher testicular location, deferens and epididymis anomaly, and in two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy. Therefore, this prediction model provides useful evidence for surgeons to choose an appropriate surgical procedure for undescended testes and predict the probability of testicular atrophy.

[German guideline on undescended testis-what is relevant in daily routine?]

With an incidence of 0.7-3% in male infants, undescended testicles is one of the most common congenital anomalies. In the first 6 months of life, the testicles may spontaneously descend in up to 70% of individuals. If the testicle is not in a scrotal position afterwards, fertility can gradually be reduced and the risk of a testicular tumor increases. Therefore, the current German guideline for undescended testis recommends that therapy should be take place between 6 and 12 months of life. After extensive information on the advantages and disadvantages, hormone therapy with the aim of a descensus or in those with bilateral anomaly with the aim of improving the germ cell pool can be offered. After the first year of life, hormone therapy is obsolete. Otherwise, surgical intervention is the treatment of choice. In the case of gliding or deep inguinal testis via scrotal or inguinal access, in the case of nonpalpable and sonographically undetectable testis, laparoscopy is carried out for diagnosis and simultaneous therapy. In the first postoperative year, adequate follow-up should be done to detect a re-ascensus and/or insufficient growth. Regular self-examinations from the age of 15 serve for the early detection of a testicular tumor that occurs only very rarely (approximately 0.003%).

Retrospective analysis of testicular outcomes following laparoscopic two-stage Fowler Stephens orchidopexy

AIM OF THE STUDY

Few large series report outcomes for laparoscopic two-stage Fowler Stephens orchidopexy (LFSO). The aims were to evaluate testicular outcomes and to identify factors predictive of successful outcome.

METHOD

A retrospective case series of children undergoing laparoscopic surgery for impalpable testes between May 1996 and March 2018 was reviewed. Data were collected from case and operative records. The primary outcomes of interest were testicular atrophy or re-ascent. Regression analysis was conducted to identify factors predictive of successful outcome. Data was expressed as median (IQR).

RESULTS

Of 279 patients (300 testes) undergoing laparoscopy for impalpable testis, 114 patients (128 testes) underwent LFSO. Eighty-five patients (96 testes) had adequate follow-up available (53 left; 43 right). Age at first stage was 19 (IQR 13-36) months. Fifteen children had relevant co-morbidities. Time between procedures was 7 (IQR 6-8) months. Longest follow-up available was 12.5 months (IQR 6.8-19.8). Atrophy occurred in 8 testes (8.3%), and ascent occurred in 6 (6.3%). No factors were significantly predictive of success, although a trend towards atrophy was seen amongst testes undergoing gubernacular division compared with a gubernaculum-sparing technique (p = 0.06; OR 3; 95% CI 0.97-9.3).

CONCLUSION

A successful outcome was seen amongst 82 of 96 testes (85%) undergoing LFSO, similar to previous reports. No factors were identified that significantly predicted outcome. Number of adverse outcomes was limited (hence possibility of type II error), and therefore preservation of the gubernaculum may reduce risk of testicular atrophy.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Evaluation of two-staged Fowler-Stephens laparoscopic orchidopexy (FSLO) for intra-abdominal testes (IAT)

INTRODUCTION

The best operative intervention for intrabdominal testis (IAT) has not been standardized as yet. The question of whether to bring down an IAT with a single-staged vessel-intact laparoscopic orchidopexy (VILO) or a two-staged laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy (FSLO) is still undergoing debate, with both the procedures being popular. The present study has been designed to evaluate the factors predicting the success or failure of two-staged FSLO for (IAT).

METHODS

43 boys with 49 non-palpable testes underwent diagnostic laparoscopy out of which 35 underwent two-staged FSLO. Size of the testis was measured with a graduated probe in both stages. Independent variables such as age, height, testis-to-internal ring distance (T-IR), neo internal ring-to-midscrotal distance (NIR-MS), and mobility-to-contralateral ring (MCIR) were analysed. Postoperatively 34 IATs were followed up clinically as well as ultrasonologically after 6 months, to see for the size, position, and vascularity. Based on this, the patients were divided into two groups, Group A (successful) and Group B (Failed).

RESULTS

24 IATs had a successful outcome (Group A) and 11 were failure (Group B). The overall success rate of the study was 68.6%. The difference in mean age of patients in both groups was insignificant (p = 0.89) (Fig. 1), and similarly, the difference in mean height was insignificant (p = 0.61). The difference in mean T-IR in both the groups was insignificant (1.85 versus 2.77 cm; p = 0.09) and mean NIR-MS was 5.41 cm in Group A and 5.10 cm in Group B, and the difference again was insignificant (p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of FSLO was 68.6%. None of the above-described independent variables have any effect on the outcome of two-staged FSLO. While VILO remains the treatment of choice for IAT located at or near the ring, but IAT higher than this, two-staged FSLO gives a better chance for achieving intra-scrotal orchidopexy.

The Nonpalpable Testis: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE

While the nonpalpable testis represents a small portion of all cryptorchid testes, it remains a clinical challenge for pediatric urologists. Controversy exists surrounding the best evaluation and management of this entity. In this review we update what is known about the nonpalpable testis, including the etiology, preoperative evaluation and best surgical management as well as novel techniques and ongoing controversies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed® and MEDLINE® from January 2000 to January 2017 using relevant key terms. Of 367 articles 115 were considered for inclusion based on a priori design. Using a narrative review format, an update on the evaluation and management of the nonpalpable testis including novel concepts and techniques was synthesized.

RESULTS

The nonpalpable testis should be evaluated by physical examination only. Imaging is not indicated for routine cases. The optimal surgical approach and technique remain debatable but several novel techniques have been described. Due to the rarity of the nonpalpable testis, randomized controlled trials and other quality comparisons are difficult. Therefore, management remains controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation and management of the nonpalpable testis remain difficult, and some aspects are still debated. Future research should focus on multi-institutional collaborative trials to determine the optimal operative management.

Staged Fowler-Stephens and Single-stage Laparoscopic Orchiopexy for Intra-abdominal Testes: Is There a Difference? A Single Institution Experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare single-stage laparoscopic orchiopexy (SSLO) and staged Fowler-Stephens (SFS) procedures in the management of intra-abdominal undescended testes, and to analyze postoperative atrophy and malpositioning as end points.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified laparoscopic orchiopexy patients with intra-abdominal testes between November 2006 and November 2014. Of 167 patients who had laparoscopic orchiopexy, 73 (85 testes) were identified as having laparoscopic orchiopexy. Baseline characteristics, as well as testicular scrotal position and size at follow-up, were recorded. Regression analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients who underwent SFS and SSLO.

RESULTS

Of the 85 laparoscopic orchiopexies, 35 underwent SFS and 50 had SSLO. Patient demographics were comparable in both groups. The median age at surgery was 12 months (5-151 months), and the average follow-up was 17.3 months. On follow-up, there were 0 recorded cases of SFS patients with abnormally positioned testes postoperatively, whereas there were 10 (20.0%) SSLO patients who had abnormally positioned testes (odds ratio: 0.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.44). Differences in atrophy rates were not significant.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that there may be no difference between the 2 approaches in terms of postoperative atrophy. However, the SFS appears to be more successful in securing a favorable scrotal position. Atrophy does not seem to be associated with other patient factors. Prospective, randomized studies are indicated to further explore outcome differences between the 2 approaches.