A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for a Lower Pole Renal Stone Less Than 2 cm

SLAP Trial: Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Mechanical Percussion Therapy Post ESWL for Renal Calculi

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomised control trial. Included patients were males and females greater than 18 years of age with single or multiple ipsilateral renal calculi of total ≤10 mm on plain X-ray and noncontrast CT KUB. ESWL was performed at a single centre, at supine position under general anaesthesia with maximum 3000 shocks at a rate of 100 shocks per minute. Patients were discharged and randomised to either the control arm or MPI therapy. MPI therapy was self-directed in a home setting for 10 minutes a day, three times per week. Both arms had standard follow-up at 12 weeks with a plain X-ray KUB. Patients in the control group were offered cross over to the MPI arm after 12 weeks if residual stone fragments were detected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software via Chi squared and Fisher's exact tests. Ethical approval was obtained via the Prince Charles Hospital HREC Committee, HREC/2022/QPCH/84961.

Results

70 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent ESWL, and 5 were withdrawn. 33 patients were randomised to the MPI group and 32 to the control group. MPI significantly increased the stone clearance rate anywhere in the kidney (87.9% in the MPI group versus 59.4% in the control group, p=0.089), as well as the clearance rate in the lower pole (91.7% in the MPI group versus 63.2% in the control group, p=0.022). Delayed percussion did not improve the clearance rate over primary percussion (p=0.835).

Conclusion

This study has shown that MPI can be effectively performed in a home setting without the need for medical supervision and results in improved stone clearance rates post ESWL. The main limitations to the study were the use of X-ray over CT during the follow-up and variability in MPI compliance and administration. Further research is warranted into standardising home MPI protocols. This trial is registered with ANZCTR387061.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management

BACKGROUND

The stone burden based management strategy reported in the guidelines published by different associations is well known for a long time. Staghorn calculi, representing the largest burden and most complex stones, is one of the most challenging cases to practicing urologists in clinical practice. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) has released a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis.

PURPOSE

To develop a series of recommendations for the contemporary management management of staghorn calculi and to provide a clinical framework for urologists treating patients with these complex stones.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for articles published in English between 01/01/1976 and 31/12/2022 in the PubMed, OVID, Embase and Medline database is performed. A series of recommendations are developed and individually graded following the review of literature and panel discussion.

RESULTS

The definition, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative treatment strategies and procedural advice, early postoperative management, follow up and prevention of stone recurrence are summarized in the present document.

CONCLUSION

A series of recommendations regarding the management of staghorn calculi, along with related commentary and supporting documentation offered in the present guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the practicing urologists in the management of staghorn calculi.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Postural therapy

Postural therapy is a postural procedure to fight against the gravity phenomenon responsible for the non-elimination of lower calyceal stones. It allows improving or accelerating their expulsion and it increases the stone-free rate. This procedure associates forced diuresis, postural inversion, and lumbar percussion. It allows a 50% improvement and an acceleration of fragment elimination. Despite its positive impact, postural therapy remains under-used. These are the first practical recommendations on postural therapy. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022] and whether they were adaptable to the French context.

Effect of external physical vibration lithecbole in obese patients with lower pole stones <15 mm after ESWL: a single-centre, randomized, open label clinical trial

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) in obese patients with <15 mm lower pole stones following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Methods

Two hundred and ninety-nine obese patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 and lower pole stones smaller than 15 mm were prospectively randomized into two groups. While ESWL was the only option in the control group, patients in the treatment group accepted EPVL after receiving ESWL. Imaging tests were used to compare the stone expulsion status on day 1 and the stone-free rates (SFR) on the first, second, and fourth weekends.

Results

All 299 obese patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 152 patients assigned to the treatment group and 147 assigned to the control group. EPVL was effective in facilitating the expulsion of stone fragments. The treatment group's stone expulsion rate on the first day following EPVL was significantly greater than the control group's (66.4% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.009). Stone clearance rates in the treatment and control groups were 63.2 and 55.1% at 1 week (p = 0.041), 84.9 and 70.7% at 2 weeks (p = 0.011), and 90.8 and 79.6% at 4 weeks (p = 0.017), respectively. The complications (hematuria, lumbago, and fever) between the groups did not show any significance (p > 0.05). Patients in the treatment group received an average of 5.2 sessions.

Conclusion

EPVL is an efficient and secure procedure that facilitates lower pole stone discharge in obese patients following ESWL treatment. To support the aforementioned conclusions, additional large-scale multi-center prospective studies are required.

Therapeutic effects of flexible ureteroscopy alone and in combination with external physical vibration on upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Upper urinary tract calculus is a common disease of the urinary system.

AIM

To compare the therapeutic effects of flexible ureteroscopy alone and in combination with external physical vibration on upper urinary tract calculi.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 146 patients were randomly divided into control and experimental groups (n = 73). The control group received flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy, and the experimental group underwent the same but combined with external physical vibration. The rate of finding stones in the urine on the day after treatment, clearance rate, components of stones, levels of renal function indices blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr), and incidence of complications were compared. The stone-free rate during 1-year follow-up was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The rate of finding stones in the urine on the day after treatment was higher in the experimental group (100%) than that in the control group (29.73%) (p < 0.05). The clearance rates on the day, at 1 week, and at 2 weeks after treatment in the experimental group were 71.23%, 87.67%, and 95.89%, respectively, which surpassed those of the control group at corresponding time points (p < 0.05). BUN and Scr levels decreased after treatment in both groups, especially in the experimental group (p < 0.05). The stone-free rate during 1-year follow-up in the experimental group (n = 71 (97.26%)) exceeded that of the control group (n = 61 (83.56%)) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

External physical vibration combined with flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy significantly increased the rate of finding stones in the urine the day after treatment, the clearance rate of upper urinary tract calculi, and the ameliorated renal function and reduced the stone re-formation rate.

Use of extracorporeal physical vibration lithecbole through greater sciatic foramen for treatment of distal ureteral calculi

Introduction To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preforming extracorporeal physical vibration lithecbole(EVPL)through greater sciatic foramen(GSF)for distal ureteral calculi(DUC) treatment. Materials and methods All patients with a diagnosis of DUC (6 - 10 mm in diameter) were enrolled in this study from October 2018 to May 2020. Patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving EPVL through GSF (Group A, n = 58), or abdominal (Group B, n = 60), or combined with oral use of tamsulosin at 0.4 mg daily (Group C, n = 63). Results There was no significant difference observed in terms of demographic characteristics or size of stones among the three groups (p >0.05). Compared with the group B and C, patients of the group A displayed a significantly higher score of comfort but with significantly decreased number of renal colic attacks or analgesics required (p < 0.01). The stone-free rate also significantly increased after one and two weeks of treatment (p < 0.01), despite such a significant difference among these groups vanished after four weeks of treatment. Conclusion Extracorporeal physical vibrational lithecbole in the prone position use the greater sciatic foramen as the path is the safe and effective approach to treat the distal ureter calculi.

Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction: The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for urolithiasis. Methods: Publicized literature was systematically searched from EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science up to February 2020. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was chosen in risk ratio (RR) calculation according to heterogeneity. Quality of evidence was estimated under the guidance of Cochrane handbook. Stone expulsion rate, stone-free rates (SFRs), and complication rates were set as end points. Results: Six randomized controlled trials, including 853 patients, were eligible for analysis. EPVL significantly increased SFR within 3 weeks (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.29, P = 0.001) and above 3 weeks (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.37, P = 0.02) after SWL. EPVL also improved SFR within 3 weeks (RR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.35-2.49, P < 0.0001) and above 3 weeks (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.33-1.77, P < 0.00001) after RIRS. Besides, EPVL can significantly increase SFRs for stones in renal pelvis, lower calix, and multiple locations (all P-value <0.05). Although the overall complication rate was not significantly higher in EPVL + RIRS group, it was found to be 1.38 times higher in EPVL+SWL group (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06-1.79, P = 0.02), especially the incidence of flank pain (RR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.02-9.46, P = 0.05). Conclusions: EPVL is effective and safe with high SFRs (especially in renal pelvis, lower calix, and multiple locations) after SWL or RIRS and lower overall complication rate after RIRS in patients with urolithiasis. However, the overall complication rate (especially the incidence of flank pain) was higher after EPVL + SWL.

Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Physical therapy, including percussion, inversion, vibration and combinations, was clinically performed to improve the stone free rate (SFR) following lithotripsy procedures. However, physical therapy is not widely accepted in clinical practice owing to lack of high level evidence support and a standard protocol. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of physical therapy in improving SFR following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Methods

Systematic review of literature from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and Embase was performed in March 2019. The efficacy and safety of physical therapy after ESWL and RIRS were assessed by meta-analysis of SFR and complication rate.

Results

A total of 8 prospective studies with 1065 patients were enrolled. When compared to non-intervention, physical therapy provided a higher SFR (OR:3.38, 95% CI: 2.45–4.66, p < 0.0001) at all time points (week 1, week 2 and month 1), while there was no significant difference in complications such as hematuria, lumbago, dizziness and urinary tract infection (OR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.62–1.13; p = 0.237). In subgroup analysis of different stone locations, lower calyx stone (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 2.21–5.55; p < 0.0001), upper ureter and renal pelvic stones (OR:2.79; 95%CI:1.62–4.81; p = 0.0002) had a higher SFR after physical therapy, while there was no significant improvement in SFR in upper and middle calyx stones. In subgroup analysis of different techniques, EPVL (external physical vibration lithecbole, OR:3.47; 95%CI:2.24–5.37; p < 0.0001) and PDI (percussion, diuresis and inversion, OR:3.24; 95%CI:2.01–5.21; p < 0.0001) were both effective in improving SFR when compared to non-intervention.

Conclusions

Physical therapy is effective in improving the SFR after ESWL and RIRS, especially for lower calyx stones, upper ureter and renal pelvic stones, while without significant side effects. External physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) might provide a relative uniformed and repeatable protocol for clinical practice of physical therapy.

Trial registration

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019130228.

When is the best time to perform external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): a multi-center study based on randomized controlled trials

To determine the best time to perform EPVL treatment by evaluating the efficacy and safety of active stone extraction in treating residual fragments at different time points after RIRS. All participants had renal or upper ureteral stones preoperatively and still had residual stones after receiving RIRS. They were prospectively randomized into four groups: patients in group A received EPVL 3 days after RIRS; patients in group B received EPVL 7 days after RIRS; patients in group C received EPVL 14 days after RIRS; patients in group D did not receive EPVL after RIRS. Follow-up examinations were performed on all participants. The results, including stone size and location, stone-free rate (SFR) and complications, were compared among the groups. There were 176 patients in total. The SFR in groups A, B, C and D were 62.22%, 40.91%, 14.28% and 11.11%, respectively, 7 days after RIRS. At 14 days after RIRS, the SFR was 80%, 59.09%, 42.86% and 26.67% in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. At 28 days after RIRS, the SFR was 91.11%, 84.09%, 76.19% and 51.11% in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. Group A had the highest SFR from 7 to 28 days, and group C had a higher SFR at 28 days after RIRS than group D (P < 0.05). The side effects were less in groups A and B than in group D 28 days after RIRS (P < 0.05). We recommended that the best time to perform EPVL is 3 days after RIRS, because it could achieve a high SFR at any point in time and reduced complications.

Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones

This article reviews new advances in ultrasound technology for urinary stone disease. Recent research to facilitate the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis, including use of the twinkling signal and posterior acoustic shadow, have helped to improve the use of ultrasound examination for detecting and sizing renal stones. New therapeutic applications of ultrasound technology for stone disease have emerged, including ultrasonic propulsion to reposition stones and burst wave lithotripsy to fragment stones noninvasively. The safety, efficacy, and evolution of these technologies in phantom, animal, and human studies are reviewed herein. New developments in these rapidly growing areas of ultrasound research are also highlighted.

External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial

To observe the efficacy and safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole (EPVL) in patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 271 patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm were prospectively randomized into two groups. One hundred and twenty-seven cases in the treatment group accepted EPVL therapy and 144 cases as control after ESWL. The stone expulsion status and stone-free rates (SFRs) between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th weekends by imaging examinations. All of 271 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which 127 patients were included in the treatment group and 144 in the control group. EPVL was successful in assisting the discharge of stone fragments. The rate of stone expulsion at day 1 in the treatment group was significantly higher than in the control group (79.5% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.006). The SFRs of the 1st weekend (76.3% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.010), the 2nd weekend (88.2% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.017) and the 4th weekend (92.1% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.042) in the treatment group were all significantly higher than that in the control group. However, no statistical significance was found in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, in the treatment group the patients were treated a mean 4.3 sessions of EPVL. EPVL and ESWL are ideal complementary partners in the treatment of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm, satisfying both high SFR and low complication. This method is safe and reproducible in clinical practice, and it also needs large-scale multicenter prospective studies further to prove the above conclusions.

How to accelerate the upper urinary stone discharge after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for < 15 mm upper urinary stones: a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial about external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL)

OBJECTIVE

To asset the efficacy and safety of EPVL plus ESWL compared with ESWL alone for the treatment of simple upper urinary stones (< 15 mm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with upper urinary stones (< 15 mm) were prospectively randomized into two groups. In treatment group, patients were assigned to immediate EPVL after ESWL, while in control group, ESWL alone was offered. All patients were reexamined at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after ESWL. Stone size, stone location, stone-free rate (SFR), and complication rate were compared.

RESULTS

56 males and 20 females in treatment group were compared to 52 male and 25 females in control group (p = 0.404). Median ages were 42.9 ± 1.5 years in treatment group and 42.7 ± 1.3 years in control group (p = 0.943). Median stone size was 10.0 ± 0.4 mm (3-15 mm) in treatment group and 10.4 ± 0.4 mm (4-15 mm) in control group (p = 0.622). The stone clearance rate in treatment and control group at 1 week after ESWL was 51.3% (39/76) and 45.4% (35/77) (p > 0.05), at 2 weeks was 81.6% (62/76) and 64.9% (50/77) (p < 0.05), and at 4 weeks was 90.8% (69/76) and 75.3% (58/77) (p < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EPVL is a noninvasive, effective, and safe adjunctive treatment which increases and accelerates upper urinary stones discharge after ESWL treatment.

Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi Using Extracorporeal Physical Vibrational Lithecbole Combined with Tamsulosin: A New Option to Speed Up Obstruction Relief

INTRODUCTION

The obstruction of the urinary tract by calculi at the narrowest anatomical areas leads to impaired drainage and severe pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new technology, extracorporeal physical vibrational lithecbole (EPVL) combined with tamsulosin, as a treatment for distal ureteral calculi (DUC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2013 and July 2014, 672 patients diagnosed with DUC were randomly divided into three groups; a group receiving EPVL plus 0.4 mg oral tamsulosin daily (PO qd) (experimental group, n = 236), a group receiving 0.4 mg tamsulosin PO qd (n = 222), and a group receiving EPVL only (n = 214) (control groups).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in general characteristics between the three groups. Stone diameters ranged from 0.32 to 1 cm. In the EPVL plus tamsulosin group, 60.1% of patients showed detectable fragment expulsion at 48 hours, and 91.1% were stone free at 7 days. Compared with the two control groups, these rates were significantly higher (EPVL group was 0% and 50.5% and medical expulsive therapy group was 0% and 50.0%, p < 0.05). The stone-free rates were similar in the three groups 2 weeks later (94.5%, 93.6%, and 93.5%; p > 0.05). Patients in the EPVL plus tamsulosin group achieved similar stone-free rates compared with the other two groups, but the speed of the stone expulsion was quicker for both sexes and all age groups (about a week; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This indicates that EPVL plus tamsulosin could be used as an effective, but faster treatment option for patients with DUC, alleviating the symptoms of DUC in a shorter period of time.