Dorsal Onlay Urethroplasty for Membranous Urethral Strictures: Urinary and Erectile Functional Outcomes

Substitution Urethroplasty With Buccal Mucosal Graft in the Management of Stricture of Vesicourethral Anastomosis or Membranous Urethra: Single-institution Long-term Experience With Perineal Approach and Endourethroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To present long-term experience with buccal mucosa posterior urethroplasty (BMPU) for refractory posterior urethral stenosis (PUS) or vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) either by perineal approach (PA) or by endourethroplasty (EUP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of 38 consecutive patients operated on between 1999 and 2022. BMPU consisted of the transfer of onlay or tubular buccal mucosa grafts into dilated and/or incised strictures through an open or endourological approach. If VUAS or PUS recurred with short stenosis within the first 12 months after surgery, it was transected by a cold-knife direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU), referred to as an "auxiliary" DVIU. The primary outcome was 3-year stricture recurrence-free survival (SRFS).

RESULTS

BMPU by perineal approach and EUP were performed in 27 (71%) and 11 (29%) patients, respectively. The 3-year SRFS was 65% for the whole cohort, with rates of 63% for the perineal approach and 73% for endourological approach. With permitted auxiliary DVIU, 3-year SRFS for the whole cohort was 81%. De novo incontinence occurred in 2 out of 18 preoperatively continent patients. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the single-center study and a small, heterogenous cohort of patients.

CONCLUSION

We present 2 techniques of substitution urethroplasty with BMG in the management of PUS and VUAS with a low rate of recurrence or de novo incontinence. A novel endourological approach (EUP) is a promising minimally invasive alternative to the perineal approach.

Outcomes of Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Bulbomembranous Urethral Strictures Post-transurethral Resection of the Prostate

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (VOBMGU) in bulbomembranous urethral strictures after transurethral resection of the prostate.

METHODS

After approval of the institutional ethical committee, we retrospectively examined the database of patients diagnosed with post-TURP urethral stricture (PTS) and treated by VOBMGU from January 2020 to January 2022. The patients were evaluated by retrograde urethrogram and voiding cystourethrogram. Follow-up evaluation included assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms, physical examination, uroflowmetry (Q-max and International Prostate Symptom Score) 3, 6, and 12months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients underwent VOBMGU for bulbomembranous PTS were included. The median age of the patients was 63.5 (11.25). The median stricture length was 3.5 (1.5) cm. During follow-up, the mean Q-max significantly increased to 21.1 ± 5.5 mL/s (P < .0001), 20.1 ± 5.4 mL/s (P < .001), and 19.1 ± 5.3 mL/s (P < .003) at 3, 6, and 12months, respectively. IPSS significantly decreased to 8.93 ± 6.37 at the 12-month follow-up mark (P < .0001). Three patients developed stricture recurrence and two patients developed postoperative urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSION

VOBMGU in cases of bulbomembranous urethral PTS offered excellent functional outcomes with low stricture recurrence and minimal risk of incontinence. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results.

Double-face urethroplasty in patients with obliterative bulbar strictures post-transurethral resection of the prostate mid-term outcomes in high-volume referral center

Objective

Incidences of post-transurethral resection of the prostate (post-TURP) strictures are between 2.2% and 9.8%. Stricture commonly occurs within the first 6 months. Our objective was to assess the outcomes of patients with obliterative strictures post-TURP that underwent a double-face urethroplasty.

Methods

This is a single-center prospective study of 17 patients with obliterative proximal bulbar stricture post-TURP who underwent double-face graft urethroplasty by two surgeons between January 2014 and January 2020. We defined post-TURP obliterative strictures as those patients who presented with complete or almost complete obstruction of the urethral lumen and who have had a history of acute urine retention. We have excluded patients with bladder neck contracture. Primary outcome was treatment success, defined as the no need for further treatments. Secondary outcome was post-urethroplasty continent rate.

Results

Seventeen patients were included in the study with median age of 66 (interquartile range 40-77) years; median time of follow-up was 24 (interquartile range 12-84) months; median stricture length was 4 (interquartile range 2-6) cm. Of the 17 patients, 15 (88.2%) were successful. All patients were continent after urethroplasty.

Conclusion

With mid-term follow-up, treatment of obliterative proximal bulbar strictures with double-face buccal mucosa graft is a safe and effective procedure. Obliterative proximal bulbar strictures merit double-face urethroplasty with high-rate success and functional outcomes.

Complications after Prostate Cancer Treatment: Pathophysiology and Repair of Post-Radiation Urethral Stricture Disease

Radiation therapy (RT) in the management of pelvic cancers remains a clinical challenge to urologists given the sequelae of urethral stricture disease secondary to fibrosis and vascular insults. The objective of this review is to understand the physiology of radiation-induced stricture disease and to educate urologists in clinical practice regarding future prospective options clinicians have to deal with this condition. The management of post-radiation urethral stricture consists of conservative, endoscopic, and primary reconstructive options. Endoscopic approaches remain an option, but with limited long-term success. Despite concerns with graft take, reconstructive options such as urethroplasties in this population with buccal grafts have shown long-term success rates ranging from 70 to 100%. Robotic reconstruction is augmenting previous options with faster recovery times. Radiation-induced stricture disease is challenging with multiple interventions available, but with successful outcomes demonstrated in various cohorts including urethroplasties with buccal grafts and robotic reconstruction.

Simplified posterior urethroplasty utilizing laparoscopic instrumentation

Background

Posterior urethral stricture disease presents challenges for even the most skilled reconstructive urologists. Regardless of the surgical technique used, these are complex operations that occur in hard-to-access locations. We describe the use of a novel combination of laparoscopic instrumentation to simplify posterior urethral reconstruction.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing a posterior urethral stricture repair utilizing a combination of the RD-180^® suture device and the Securestrap^®. These procedures were performed by a single surgeon at our institution. Patients with greater than or equal to 4 months of follow up were included in the analysis.

Results

From October 2016 to October 2020, 20 patients underwent posterior urethral stricture repair using these laparoscopic instruments. Median age was 70 years (28–90 years). Median follow up was 12 months (5–50 months). Mean stricture length was 3 cm (1.5–16 cm). Median operative time was 150 minutes (120–180 minutes). No peripheral neuropathies or positional injuries were noted. With failure defined as inability to pass a 16-Fr scope, success rate was 95% (19/20 patients).

Conclusions

The combination of the RD-180^® and the Securestrap^® has become essential to our posterior urethral stricture repair armamentarium. Further data and longer follow up is needed to confirm these reliable outcomes.

Multi-Institutional Study of Dorsal Onlay Urethroplasty of the Membranous Urethra after Endoscopic Prostate Procedures: Operative Results, Continence, Erectile Function and Patient Reported Outcomes

(1) Background: To critically evaluate dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (DOBMGU) for posterior urethral stenosis repair following transurethral resection and other endoscopic prostate procedures. (2) Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with membranous or bulbomembranous urethral stenosis for whom treatment with DOBMGU was conducted after receipt of prostate endoscopic procedures. Baseline data, peri-operative care, post-operative care and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were procedural failure and development of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The secondary outcomes were changes in voiding, sexual function and patient satisfaction. (3) Results: A total of 107 men with a mean age of 69 ± 9.5 years and stenosis length of 3.5 ± 1.8 cm were included. Prior endoscopic procedures among participants were 47 patients (44%) with monopolar TURP, 33 (30.8%) with bipolar TURP, 16 (15%) with Greenlight laser, 9 (8.4%) with Holmium laser enucleation and 2 (1.9%) with bladder neck incision. At a mean follow-up time of 59.3 ± 45.1 months, stenosis recurred in 10 patients (9.35%). Multivariate analysis confirmed that postoperative complications (OR 12.5; p = 0.009), history of radiation (OR 8.3; p = 0.016) and ≥2 dilatations before urethroplasty (OR 8.3; p = 0.032) were independent predictors of recurrence. Only one patient (0.9%) developed de novo SUI. Patients experienced significant improvement in PVR (128 to 60 cc; p = 0.001), Uroflow (6.2 to 16.8 cc/s; p = 0.001), SHIM (11.5 to 11.7; p = 0.028), IPSS (20 to 7.7; p < 0.001) and QoL (4.4 to 1.7; p < 0.001), and 87 cases (81.3%) reported a GRA of + 2 or better. (4) Conclusions: DOBMGU is an effective and safe option for patients with posterior urethral stenosis following TURP and other prostate endoscopic procedures. This non-transecting approach minimizes external urinary sphincter manipulation, thus limiting postoperative risk of SUI or erectile dysfunction.

Bulbomembranous Urethral Strictures Repair After Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Experience From a Latin American Referral Centre

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate stricture recurrence and urinary incontinence (UI) rates in patients who underwent bulbomembranous anastomosis for management of short (≤ 2cm) bulbomembranous urethral stricture (BMS) after benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgical treatment. In addition, we studied if there was any relation between post urethroplasty UI and the method employed for BPH surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted between January 2011 and October 2019. We included all patients who developed BMS after undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate or Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP). We excluded patients with UI after BPH surgical treatment as well as patients who underwent a dorsal or ventral onlay oral graft urethroplasty for longer proximal bulbar strictures, and also patients with associated bladder neck contracture or other strictures locations. We defined failure as the need for any intervention to restore the urethral caliber.

RESULTS

Overall, 77 patients were included in the study with mean age 70 years (sd 8). Median BMS length was 1.5 cm (IQR 1-2). Median follow-up was 53 months (IQR 24 to 82). Of the patients, 74/77 (96.1%) were classified as success and 3/77 (3.9%), as failure. Out of the 6/77 (7.8%) patients who had postoperative UI, 5 of them had been treated for their BPH with OSP (p 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bulbomembranous anastomosis is a suitable reconstructive option for short proximal bulbar urethral strictures after BPH surgical treatment. OSP was associated with postoperative UI more frequently than endoscopic treatments modalities.

A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis

PURPOSE

To critically evaluate a multi-institutional patient cohort undergoing Dorsal-Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty (D-BMGU) for recurrent post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis.

METHODS

Retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with posterior urethral stenosis from 10 institutions between 2010-2019 was performed. Patients with at least 1-year follow-up were assessed. Patient demographics, stenosis characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, and post-operative clinical and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were stenosis recurrence and de-novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were changes in voiding, sexual function, and patient-reported satisfaction.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine men with post-radiation urethral stenosis treated with D-BMGU met inclusion criteria. Median age and stenosis length were 72 years, (IQR 66-75), and 3.0 cm (IQR 2.5-4 cm), respectively. Radiation modalities included: 36 (45.6%) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 13 (16.5%) brachytherapy (BT), 10 (12.7%) combination EBRT/BT, and 20 (25.3%) EBRT/radical prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 13-40), 14 patients (17.7%) had stenosis recurrence. Among 37 preoperatively-continent patients, 3 men (8.1%) developed de-novo SUI following dorsal onlay urethroplasty. Of 29 patients with preoperative SUI all but one remained incontinent post-operatively (96.6%). Following repair, patients experienced significant improvement in PVR (92.5 to 26 cc, p = 0.001) and Uroflow (4.6 to 15.9 cc/s, p = 0.001), and high overall satisfaction, with 91.9% reporting a GRA of + 2 or better).

CONCLUSION

Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique in patients with post-radiation posterior urethral stenosis. This non-transecting approach may confer low rates of de-novo SUI. Further research is needed to compare this technique with excisional urethroplasty.

Intrasphincteric anastomotic urethroplasty allows preservation of continence in men with bulbomembranous urethral strictures following benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery

PURPOSE

Injury to the external sphincter during urethroplasty at or near the membranous urethra can result in incontinence in men whose internal sphincter mechanism has been compromised by previous benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery. We present outcomes of a novel reconstructive procedure, incorporating a recent anatomic discovery revealing a connective tissue sheath between the external sphincter and membranous urethra, which provides a surgical plane allowing for intrasphincteric bulbo-prostatic urethroplasty (ISBPA) with continence preservation.

METHODS

Stricture at or near the membranous urethra after transurethral resection (TURP) or open simple prostatectomy (OSP) was reconstructed with ISBPA. The bulbomembranous junction is approached dorsally with a bulbar artery sparing approach and the external sphincter muscle is carefully reflected, exposing the wall of the membranous urethra. Gentle blunt dissection along this connective tissue plane allows separating the muscle away up to the prostatic apex, where healthy urethra is found for anastomosis.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to August 2019, 40 men (18 after TURP and 22 after OSP) underwent ISBPA at a single institution. Mean age was 67 years (54-82). Mean stricture length was 2.6 cm (1-6) with obliterative stricture identified in 10 (25%). At a mean follow-up of 53 months (10-122), 36 men (90%) are free of stricture recurrence and 34 (85%) were completely dry or using one security pad.

CONCLUSION

This novel intrasphincteric urethroplasty technique for stricture following BPH surgery is feasible and safe, allowing successful reconstruction with continence preservation in most patients. A larger series and reproduction in other centers is needed.

Repair of sphincter urethral strictures preserving urinary continence: surgical technique and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Repair of post-TURP sphincter urethral strictures represents challenging problem, due to the risk of urinary incontinence after the repair. We described a surgical technique we use to repair these strictures preserving urinary continence in patients with incompetent bladder neck.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational, retrospective, study was conducted to include patients with post-TURP urethral strictures in the area of distal sphincter. We included only patients with complete clinical data and follow-up who previously underwent TURP or HOLEP or TUIP, and subsequently developed proximal bulbar urethral strictures close to the membranous urethra and the related distal urethral sphincter. Patients were included, if they were fully continent after TURP or other procedures to treat BPH. The primary outcome of the study was treatment failure, defined as the need for any post-operative instrumentation. Secondary outcome was post-urethroplasty urinary continence. Patients showing stricture recurrence or post-operative incontinence were classified as failure.

RESULTS

Overall, 69 patients were included in the study. Median patient's age was 67 years; median stricture length was 4 cm. Thirty-tree patients (47.8%) underwent previous urethrotomy. Median follow-up was 52 months. Out of 69 patients, 55 (79.7%) were classified as success and 14 (20.3%) as failure. Out of the whole cohort, thus, 11/69 (16%) have a risk of recurrent strictures and 3/69 (4.3%) have incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of modified ventral onlay graft urethroplasty, using particular non-aggressive steps, is a suitable surgical technique for repair of sphincter urethral stricture in patients who underwent BPH transurethral surgery, using different procedures (TURP, HOLEP, TUIP).

MODERN METHODS OF TREATING DISEASES OF THE BULBO-MEMBRANOUS PART OF URETHRA

Strictures of the bulbous-membranous urethra are a common cause of obstructive urination disorder. Modern trends in the development of medicine lead to a wider application of endoscopic method, a more frequent cause of iatrogenic injury of the urethra. At present, conservative, endourologic and reconstructive methods of care are used to treat urethral strictures. There are several conservative, endourological and reconstructive methods for treating patients with urethral stricture. Conservative methods include interventions that do not involve the destruction of urethral stricture or its reconstruction, such as stenting, blind dilatation, and recanalization of the urethra. Performing blind dilatation strictures of the bulbo-membranous urethra is not recommended because of the high risk of false path formation and low efficiency. Endourological operations refer to surgical methods of care and suggest the natural restoration of urethral tissues after the destruction of stricture. Because of the low effectiveness of correction of strictures of the posterior urethra (more than 90 % of relapses in five years), this method is a variant of temporary or palliative care. Currently, two approaches to the reconstruction of the bulbo-membranous urethra are used: anastomotic and replacement operations. Anastomotic surgery involves excision of the affected area and juxtaposition of healthy urethral tissues without tension. Replacement plastic allows to restore patency of the urethra by increasing the diameter of the lumen due to the implantation of various grafts. The article shows that, based on international clinical studies, the most effective method of reconstructing the bulbomembranous urethra is reconstructive surgical methods.

Reconstruction of Membranous Urethral Strictures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to the proximity of the rhabdosphincter and cavernous nerves to the membranous urethra, reconstruction of membranous urethral stricture implies a risk of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. To avoid these complications, endoscopic management of membranous urethral strictures is traditionally favored, and bulboprostatic anastomosis is reserved as the main classical approach for open reconstruction of recalcitrant membranous urethral stricture. The preference for the anastomotic urethroplasty among reconstructive urologists is likely influenced by the familiarity and experience with trauma-related injuries. We review the literature focusing on the anatomy of membranous urethra and on the evolution of treatments for membranous urethral strictures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-traumatic strictures affecting bulbomembranous urethra are typically sequelae of instrumentation, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate cancer treatment, and pelvic irradiation. Being a different entity from trauma-related injuries where urethra is not in continuity, a new understanding of membranous urethral anatomy is necessary for the development of novel reconstruction techniques. Although efficacious and durable to achieve urethral patency, classical bulboprostatic anastomosis carries a risk of de-novo incontinence and impotence. Newer and relatively less invasive reconstructive alternatives include bulbar vessel-sparing intra-sphincteric bulboprostatic anastomosis and buccal mucosa graft augmented membranous urethroplasty techniques. The accumulated experience with these techniques is relatively scarce, but several published series present promising results. These approaches are especially indicated in patients with previous transurethral resection of the prostate in which sparing of rhabdosphincter and the cavernous nerves is important in attempt to preserve continence and potency. Additionally, introduction of buccal mucosa onlay grafts could be especially beneficial in radiation-induced strictures to avoid transection of the sphincter in continent patients, and to preserve the blood supply to the urethra for incontinent patients who will require artificial urinary sphincter placement. The evidence regarding erectile functional outcomes is less solid and this item should be furtherly investigated.