Outcome Analysis of Asymptomatic Lower Pole Stones in Children

Urolithiasis in children; The importance of stone localization in treatment and follow-up

To evaluate the demographic, etiologic, treatment, and follow-up differences in stones according to their location within the kidney. This retrospective study comprised 337 patients with urolithiasis between 2015 and 2019. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to stone location as lower pole stones (LPS) and upper-middle pole stones (UMPS). The patient's data were recorded at 3-month intervals for one year. One hundred and eighty-three (54.3%) female and 154 (45.7%) men were included in the study. One hundred and twenty-nine (38.3%) of the stones were in the LPS and 208 (61.7%) in the UMPS. UMPS was more common in patients aged > 12 months (p < 0.01). At least one metabolic risk factor was present in 93 (72.1%) patients with LPS and 164 (78.4%) with UMPS. The most common urinary metabolic risk factors were hyperoxaluria (31.8%) in patients with LPS and hypocitraturia (34.1%) in patients with UMPS. ROC analysis results showed that cut-off values of 5.5 mm for LPS and 6.1 mm for UMPS did not provide improve with medical treatment. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the improvement rates were higher in the UMPS group than in the LPS group (p < 0.05). During the follow-up, recurrence was detected in 43 patients: 29% of patients with LPS and 5.8% of patients with UMPS (p < 0.01). Patients with small stones can be followed up. Surgical treatment may be considered for small stones in the LPS. In addition, the risk of recurrence is higher in patients with LPS, and close follow-up is required.

Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel

BACKGROUND

Prompt diagnosis and treatment of paediatric urolithiasis are required to avoid long term sequelae of renal damage.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature regarding the diagnostic imaging modalities and treatment approaches for paediatric urolithiasis.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1980-January 2019. 76 full-text articles were included.

RESULTS

Ultrasound and Kidney-Ureter-Bladder radiography are the baseline diagnostic examinations. Non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) is the second line choice with high sensitivity (97-100%) and specificity (96-100%). Magnetic Resonance Urography accounts only for 2% of pediatric stone imaging studies. Expectant management for single, asymptomatic lower pole renal stones is an acceptable initial approach, especially in patients with non-struvite, non-cystine stones<7 mm. Limited studies exist on medical expulsive therapy as off-label treatment. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is the first-line treatment with overall stone free rates (SFRs) of 70-90%, retreatment rates 4-50% and complication rates up to 15%. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy is effective with SFRs of 81-98%, re-treatment rates of 6.3-10% and complication rates of 1.9-23%. Flexible ureteroscopy has shown SFRs of 76-100%, retreatment rates of 0-19% and complication rates of 0-28%. SFRs after first and second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) are 70.1-97.3% and 84.6-97.5%, respectively with an overall complication rate of 20%. Open surgery is seldom used, while laparoscopy is effective for stones refractory to SWL and PNL. Limited data exist for robot-assisted management.

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial assessment of paediatric urolithiasis, US is recommended as first imaging modality, while non-contrast CT is the second option. SWL is recommended as first line treatment for renal stones <20 mm and for ureteral stones<10 mm. Ureteroscopy is a feasible alternative both for ureteral stones not amenable to SWL as well as for renal stones <20 mm (using flexible). PNL is recommended for renal stones >20 mm.

Risk factors for recurrent urolithiasis in children

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors associated with recurrent kidney stones in a paediatric cohort in a Belgian tertiary centre.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Medical records of children with the first episode of urolithiasis between 1998 and 2016, followed at Ghent University Hospital initially and at least one-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, past medical history, presenting symptoms, the results of laboratory investigations and the applied management strategy were analysed. The significant variables from the univariate analysis were integrated into a backward conditional multivariate model.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven children were included in the analysis, of which 33 (34%) presented with at least one episode of stone recurrence. In the univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI) > 85th percentile and asymptomatic stones at initial presentation were associated with 1.8 and 0.1 times lower risk of recurrent stones, respectively (p = 0.020, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.368-8.749 and p = 0.017, 95% CI:0.014-0.921). In contrast, immobilization resulted in a 10-times higher risk (p = 0.002, 95% CI:1.968-50.005) and the need for technical intervention was associated with a 3.2- times higher risk (p = 0.017, 95% CI:1.297-8.084) of developing recurrent stones. On multivariate analysis only BMI >85th percentile was associated with a 15 times lower risk of stone recurrence (p = 0.030, 95% CI:0.006-0.739).

DISCUSSION

A possible explanation of reduced risk in patients with a BMI > 85th percentile may lie in a different metabolic profile. Immobilization as a risk factor can be explained by calcium metabolism, which is influenced by immobilization due to fractures, paralysis or motor disability because it causes resorption of the skeleton resulting in elevated blood calcium levels. This study showed that patients who presented without symptoms when the stones first occurred were less likely to have recurring kidney stones compared with patients with symptoms at initial presentation. When technical intervention was needed, we believe this is partly due to a larger stone burden, however we could not find an evidence-based explanation. The institutional protocol, which allowed to create a database with a limited number of patients, was lost to follow-up. Despite the retrospective setting some data were missing. There might also be a bias because the patients were followed-up at a tertiary centre. Possibly, our conclusions cannot be generalized toward the entire paediatric population.

CONCLUSION

Of all the factors investigated in our cohort, BMI >85 th percentile and asymptomatic stones are associated with a lower risk of stone recurrence. Conversely, immobilized patients and those who require technical intervention at initial presentation may benefit from an intense follow-up after the first episode of urolithiasis.

Systematic radiologic detection of kidney stones in Canadian children: a new era of asymptomatic stones?

INTRODUCTION

Asymptomatic, or incidental, pediatric kidney stones detected on abdominal imaging pose a clinical challenge as their significance and expected outcome are not well described.

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to estimate the incidence of nephrolithiasis in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal ultrasound (US) or computerized tomography (CT), for all indications, in a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Our secondary objective was to determine the clinical outcome of these radiographically detected stones.

METHODS

All abdominal US or CT radiology reports for patients younger than 18 years between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were retrieved. Reports were automatically flagged using textual analysis if they contained one of the 32 keywords potentially indicating nephrolithiasis. Flagged reports, as well as 10% of unflagged reports, were reviewed to confirm the radiologist impression of presence or absence of stones. Patient and stone-related clinical data were extracted.

RESULTS

Two thousand four hundred forty-nine (5%) of 53 235 imaging reports cited at least one of the keywords. Manual review of flagged reports identified 498 studies having a radiologist impression of stones (244 unique patients). Stone incidence in children undergoing abdominal imaging more than doubled between 2011 and 2016. Medical record review found that 140 patients (57%) were symptomatic, while the other 104 patients (43%) were asymptomatic. Spontaneous resolution was greater (57% vs 34%) in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients. Asymptomatic patients were younger with a median age of 0.6 compared to 12.3 years. Asymptomatic and symptomatic stones were followed up for similar lengths of time (2.3 vs 2.0 years, p > 0.05) and had a similar number of follow-up USs (3.9 vs 4.6 studies, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of radiologically identified stones in children undergoing abdominal imaging at our center increased over time. Asymptomatic stones follow a benign course with minimal need for intervention; however, they were detected almost as frequently as symptomatic stones. Asymptomatic stones may represent increased healthcare resource utilization due to similar follow-up compared to symptomatic stones. Further research regarding the optimal imaging intervals and long-term follow-up for asymptomatic stones is warranted.

Evaluating Natural History and Follow Up Strategies for Non-obstructive Urolithiasis in Pediatric Population

Objective: While small non-obstructive stones in the adult population are usually observed with minimal follow-up, the same guidelines for management in the pediatric population have not been well-studied. We evaluate the clinical outcomes of small non-obstructing kidney stones in the pediatric population to better define the natural history of the disease. Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, patients with a diagnosis of kidney stones from January 2011 to March 2017 were identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes. Patients with ureteral stones, obstruction, or stones >5 mm in size were excluded. Patients with no follow-up after initial imaging were also excluded. Patients with a history of stones or prior stone interventions were included in our population. Frequency of follow-up ultrasounds while on observation were noted and any ER visits, stone passage episodes, infections, and surgical interventions were documented. Results: Over the 6-year study period, 106 patients with non-obstructing kidney stones were identified. The average age at diagnosis was 12.5 years and the average stone size was 3.6 mm. Average follow-up was 17 months. About half of the patients had spontaneous passage of stones (54/106) at an average time of 13 months after diagnosis. Stone location did not correlate with spontaneous passage rates. Only 6/106 (5.7%) patients required stone surgery with ureteroscopy and/or PCNL at an average time of 12 months after initial diagnosis. The indication for surgery in all 6 cases was pain. 17/106 (16%) patients developed febrile UTIs and a total of 43 ER visits for stone-related issues were noted, but no patients required urgent intervention for an infected obstructing stone. Median interval for follow-up was every 6 months with renal ultrasounds, which then was prolonged to annual follow up in most cases. Conclusions: The observation of pediatric patients with small non-obstructing stones is safe with no episodes of acute obstructive pyelonephritis occurring in these patients. The sole indication for intervention in our patient population was pain, which suggests that routine follow-up ultrasounds may not be necessary for the follow-up of pediatric non-obstructive renal stones ≤5 mm in size.

Stone growth patterns and risk for surgery among children presenting with hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia and cystinuria as underlying metabolic causes of urolithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia and cystinuria are the most common underlying metabolic stone abnormalities in children. The present study compared stone growth patterns, stone burden, and the risk of stone-related surgery among these underlying metabolic conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 356 children with renal stones, followed from 2000 to 2015, was studied. Differences among metabolic groups were determined using Kruskal-Wallis test; the Scheffé-test was used for multiple comparisons to determine differences among single groups. Independent sample t-test was used when adequate, given the sample size, and Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. Stone growth rates were calculated as differences in diameter divided by time elapsed between U/Ss (mm/year). Logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of initial stone size on the likelihood of surgery.

RESULTS

Median stone size at presentation was significantly different among groups, with cystinuria being the group with the largest proportion of stones >10 mm, while patients with stones <5 mm were likely to have a normal metabolic workup (P < 0.05). Stones with a higher growth rate were found in the operative group, while slower growing stones were mostly managed conservatively (3.4 mm/year vs 0.8 mm/year, respectively; P = 0.014). However, stone growth rates were not significantly different among metabolic groups. On the other hand, the rate of new stone formation in cystinuric patients at their first follow-up was 30.4%, which was significantly higher than in patients with hypercalciuria (16.3%) or with a normal metabolic workup (17.2%; P < 0.05). Compared with stones <5 mm, stones measuring 5-10 mm were more than four times more likely to result in surgery, whereas the likelihood of surgery for 10-20 mm or >20 mm stones was almost 16 or 34 times, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It is believed that this is the first study to evaluate stone growth patterns, stone burden and surgical risk among children with hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia and cystinuria. Cystinuric patients presented with larger stones at the time of diagnosis, higher new stone formation rates, and were at higher risk of surgery. While no significant difference of growth rate was found among metabolic groups, stones with a higher growth rate were significantly more likely to result in surgical treatment than slower growing stones. Initial stone size, location of largest stone, previous urinary tract infection, and patient's metabolic type significantly influenced the likelihood of a surgical intervention. Better understanding of the natural history ultimately helps surgeons and clinicians defining prognosis, treatment, and prevention plans for pediatric urolithiasis.