Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Impact of Irrigation Pressure

Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Different suction-assisted nephrostomic sheaths have been developed for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Objectives: (1) To examine PCNL techniques performed with different aspiration-assisted sheaths (Clear Petra® sheath, Superperc, SuperminiPCNL, and a miniPCNL patented sheath), with specific regard to effectiveness and safety outcomes in adult and paediatric patients; (2) to extrapolate intrarenal pressure (IRP) data during these procedures. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles up to 8 February 2024 were included. Results: Twenty-five studies were selected, thirteen retrospective and twelve prospective. The use of four different aspirating sheaths for miniPCNL was reported: Clear Petra® sheath, Superperc, SuperminiPCNL, and a miniPCNL patented sheath. Stone free rates (SFRs) across techniques ranged from 71.3% to 100%, and complication rates from 1.5% to 38.9%. Infectious complication rates varied from 0 to 27.8% and bleeding complication rates from 0 to 8.9%. Most complications were low grade ones. The trend among studies comparing aspiration- and non-aspiration-assisted miniPCNL was towards equivalent or better SFRs and lower overall infectious and bleeding complication rates in suction techniques. Operation time was consistently lower in suction procedures, with a mean shortening of the procedural time of 19 min. Seven studies reported IRP values during suction miniPCNL. Two studies reported satisfactory SFRs and adequate safety profiles in paediatric patient cohorts. Conclusions: MiniPCNL with aspirating sheaths appears to be safe and effective in both adult and paediatric patients. A trend towards a reduction of overall infectious and bleeding complications with respect to non-suction procedures is evident, with comparable or better SFRs and consistently shorter operative times. The IRP profile seems to be safe with the aid of aspirating sheaths. However, high quality evidence on this topic is still lacking.

Prevention of complications in endourological management of stones: What are the basic measures needed before, during, and after interventions?

Objective

This narrative review aims to describe measures to minimise the risk of complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Methods

A literature search was conducted from the PubMed/PMC database for papers published within the last 10 years (January 2012 to December 2022). Search terms included "ureteroscopy", "retrograde intrarenal surgery", "PCNL", "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "complications", "sepsis", "infection", "bleed", "haemorrhage", and "hemorrhage". Key papers were identified and included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and primary research. The references of these papers were searched to identify any further relevant papers not included above.

Results

The evidence is assimilated with the opinions of the authors to provide recommendations. Best practice pathways for patient care in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative periods are described, including the identification and management of residual stones. Key complications (sepsis and stent issues) that are relevant for any endourological procedure are then be discussed. Operation-specific considerations are then explored. Key measures for PCNL include optimising access to minimise the chance of bleeding or visceral injury. The role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in this regard is discussed. Key measures for ureteroscopy and retrograde intrarenal surgery include planning and technique to minimise the risk of ureteric injury. The role of anaesthetic assessment is discussed. The importance of specific comorbidities on each step of the pathway is highlighted as examples.

Conclusion

This review demonstrates that the principles of meticulous planning, interdisciplinary teamworking, and good operative technique can minimise the risk of complications in endourology.

Risk factors of high fluid absorption in patients treated with mini-PCNL: a single-center prospective study

BACKGROUND

The factors influencing fluid absorption in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (mini-PCNL) are still unknown. We aim to investigate the factors that influence irrigation fluid absorption during mini-PCNL.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients who underwent mini-PCNL were included in this prospective study. The endoscopic surgical monitoring system (ESMS) was used to measure the volume of irrigation fluid absorbed during the procedure. Irrigating time, the total volume of irrigation fluid, stone size, S.T.O.N.E. score, hemoglobin, electrolyte levels, and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was observed between fluid absorption and the presence of postoperative fever, and based on this phenomenon, patients were divided into low and high fluid absorption groups. The serum creatinine level in the high fluid absorption group was significantly high (7 vs. 16.5, p = 0.02). Significant differences were observed between the low and high fluid absorption groups in terms of mean stone size (21.70 mm vs. 26.78 mm), presence of stone burden ≥ 800 mm2 (4% vs. 23%), S.T.O.N.E. score > 8 (4% vs. 38%), the fluid used > 18,596 ml (19% vs. 78%), irrigation time (55.61 min vs. 91.28 min), and perfusion rate (24% vs. 45%) (all p < 0.05). The rates of postoperative fever and SIRS in the high fluid absorption group were significantly high (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mean stone size, presence of stone burden ≥ 800 mm2, S.T.O.N.E. score > 8, the fluid used > 18596 mL, irrigation time, and perfusion rate are risk factors of intraoperative fluid absorption in mini-PCNL.

Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones

To compare the safety and effectiveness of the combination of intelligent intrarenal pressure control platforms (IPCP) and flexible ureteral access sheath (FUAS) combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of renal stones less than 2 cm. We retrospectively collected 383 patients with renal stones who underwent RIRS in our department from June 2022 to October 2023. Inclusion criteria: stone length or the sum of multiple stone lengths ≤ 2 cm. Finally, 99 cases were included and divided into an IPCP group (n = 40) and FUAS group (n = 59) based on surgical methods. The main endpoint was the stone-free rate (SFR) at third months after surgery, with no residual stones or stone fragments less than 2 mm defined as stone clearance. The secondary endpoints were surgical time and perioperative complications, including fever, sepsis, septic shock, and perirenal hematoma. There was no statistically significant difference in general information between the two groups, including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, stone side, stone location, stone length, urine bacterial culture, and hydronephrosis. The operation time for IPCP group and FUAS group was 56.83 ± 21.33 vs 55.47 ± 19.69 min (p = 0.747). The SFR of IPCP group and FUAS group on the first postoperative day was 75.00% vs 91.50% (p = 0.024). The SFR was 90.00% vs 94.90% in the third month (p = 0.349).In IPCP group, there were 11 cases with stones located in the lower renal calyces and 17 cases in FUAS group. The SFR of the two groups on the first day and third months after surgery were 45.50% vs 88.20% (p = 0.014) and 63.60% vs 94.10% (p = 0.040), respectively, with statistical differences. For kidney stones ≤ 2 cm, there was no difference in SFR and the incidence of infection-related complications between IPCP and FUAS combined with RIRS, both of which were superior to T-RIRS. For lower renal caliceal stones, FUAS has a higher SFR compared to IPCP.

Experimental study of a new technique for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: intelligent pressure-controlled minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy

BACKGROUND

To test the reliability and safety of a newly invented technique for minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, intelligent pressure-controlled minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (IPC-MPCNL).

METHODS

Eighteen kidneys of nine female pigs were randomly divided into three groups. Those in Groups A and B underwent IPC-MPCNL through the new system composed of a pressure-measuring MPCNL suctioning sheath and an irrigation and suctioning platform with pressure feedback control. The infusion flow rate was 500 ml/min in Group A and 750 ml/min in Group B. Those in Group C underwent MPCNL at an infusion flow rate of 500 ml/min. The renal pelvic pressure (RPP) monitored by a ureteral catheter and that monitored by the pressure-measuring sheath in Groups A and B were compared. The RPP in Group C was monitored by a ureteral catheter.

RESULTS

The RPP measured by the pressure-measuring sheath and that measured by the ureteral catheter in Group A was - 5.59 ± 1.95 mmHg and 4.46 ± 2.08 mmHg, respectively. The RPP measured by the pressure-measuring sheath and that measured by the ureteral catheter in Group B was - 4.00 ± 2.01 mmHg and 5.92 ± 2.05 mmHg, respectively. Hence, the RPPs measured by the pressure-measuring sheath in Groups A and B were consistent with those measured by the ureteral catheter. The RPP in Group C was 27.75 ± 5.98 mmHg (large fluctuations).

CONCLUSIONS

IPC-MPCNL can be used to accurately monitor the RPP and maintain it within a preset safe range via suction. The new technique and the new system are safe and reliable.

Can Perioperative Antibiotic Choice Impact Rates of Infectious Complications After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Single-Blind, Prospective Randomized Trial

Objective: National guidelines recommend periprocedural antibiotics before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet it is not clear which is superior. We conducted a randomized trial to compare two guideline-recommended antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (cipro) vs cefazolin, on PCNL outcomes, focusing on the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Methods: Adult patients who were not considered high risk for surgical or infectious complications and undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either cipro or cefazolin perioperatively. All had negative preoperative urine cultures. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including SIRS criteria, intraoperative urine culture, duration of hospitalization, and need for intensive care. SIRS is defined by ≥2 of the following: body temperature <96.8°F or >100.4°F, heart rate >90 bpm, respiratory rate >20 per minute, and white blood cell count <4000 or >12,000 cells/mm3. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled and randomized (79 cefazolin and 68 cipro). All preoperative characteristics were similar (p > 0.05), except for mean age, which was higher in the cipro group (64 vs 57 years, p = 0.03). Intra- and postoperative findings were similar, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05), except a longer mean hospital stay in the cefazolin group (2 hours longer, p = 0.02). There was no difference between SIRS episodes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Despite the relatively broader coverage for urinary tract pathogens with ciprofloxacin, this prospective randomized trial did not show superiority over cefazolin. Our findings therefore support two appropriate options for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCNL who are nonhigh risk for infectious complications.

Retrospective first-in-human use of the LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope to measure intrarenal pressure

OBJECTIVE

To report on our first-in-human experience using the LithoVue Elite™ ureteroscope (Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA) to measure intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-arm retrospective observational analysis was performed in 50 consecutive patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy using the LithoVue Elite™ system with pressure sensing capability between April 2022 and February 2023 at two centres. A pressure bag set at 150 mmHg or hand irrigation with a 60-mL syringe was used for irrigation and a ureteric access sheath (UAS) was placed at the physician's discretion. Median and maximum IRPs, and relative cumulative time exceeding 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, and 200 mmHg per total procedure time were analysed. The two-sample Mann-Whitney U-test was used, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient age and body mass index (BMI) was 62.5 (46.7-68.2) years and 27.6 (23.3-32.1) kg/m2 , respectively. During the median (IQR) total procedure time of 31.9 (17.4-44.9) min, the median and maximum IRPs were 28.5 (20.0-47.5) and 174.0 (133.5-266.0) mmHg, respectively. IRP remained at <60 mmHg during 92% of the procedure times. Patients with Asian ethnicity, and those without pre-stenting or UAS use exhibited longer cumulative/total durations exceeding pre-defined IRP cut-off values. The smaller 10/12-F UAS did not lower pressures as much as the 11/13-F or 12/14-F UAS (P < 0.001). Age, diabetes, hypertension, preoperative α-blockade, stone size, and BMI did not show any statistically significant associations with IRP.

CONCLUSIONS

The IRP can now be routinely measured during ureteroscopy. Patients had a median IRP of 28.5 mmHg and a maximum of 174 mmHg. Using a smaller UAS (10/12 F), Asian ethnicity, and tight ureters were found to have higher IRPs.

Effect of outflow resistance on intrarenal pressure at different irrigation rates during ureteroscopy: in vivo evaluation

To maintain visualization and control temperature elevation during ureteroscopy, higher irrigation rates are necessary, but this can increase intrarenal pressure (IRP) and lead to adverse effects like sepsis. The IRP is also dependent on outflow resistance but this has not been quantitatively evaluated in a biological system. In this study, we sought to characterize the IRP as a function of irrigation rate in an in vivo porcine model at different outflow resistances. Ureteroscopy was performed in a porcine model with a 9.5 Fr prototype ureteroscope containing a pressure sensor. A modified ureteral access sheath (UAS) (11/13 Fr, 36 cm) was configured to adjust outflow resistance. IRP-irrigation rate curves were generated at four different outlet resistances representing different outflow scenarios. At lower irrigation rates, the pressure change in response to increased irrigation was gradual and non-linear, likely reflecting a "compliant" phase of the renal collecting system. Once IRP reached the range of 35-50 cm H2O, the pressure increased in a linear fashion with irrigation rate, suggesting that the distensibility of the collecting system had become saturated. The relationship between IRP and irrigation rate becomes linear during in vivo porcine studies once the initial compliance of the system is saturated. IRP is more sensitive to changes in irrigation rate in systems with higher outflow resistance. The modified UAS is a novel research tool which allows variance of outflow resistance to mimic different clinical scenarios. Knowledge of outflow resistance may simplify the decision to use an UAS.

Progress in the study of biomarkers for early prediction of systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Urolithiasis is a common and frequent disease in urology. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is preferred for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones and complicated renal stones &gt;2 cm in diameter, but it has a higher rate of postoperative complications, especially infection, compared with other minimally invasive treatments for urinary stones. Complications associated with infection after percutaneous nephrolithotomy include transient fever, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and sepsis, which is considered one of the most common causes of perioperative death after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In contrast, SIRS serves as a sentinel for sepsis, so early intervention of SIRS by biomarker identification can reduce the incidence of postoperative sepsis, which in turn reduces the length of stay and hospital costs for patients. In this paper, we summarize traditional inflammatory indicators, novel inflammatory indicators, composite inflammatory indicators and other biomarkers for early identification of systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature to ascertain the upper tract pressures generated during endourology, the relevant influencing variables and clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed by two authors independently (S.C., N.D.). Studies reporting ureteric or intrarenal pressures (IRP) during semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS)/flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS)/percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)/miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL) in the period 1950-2021 were identified. Both in vitro and in vivo studies were considered for inclusion. Findings were independently screened for eligibility based on content, with disagreements resolved by author consensus. Data were assessed for bias and compiled based on predefined variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Mean IRP appeared to frequently exceed a previously proposed threshold of 40 cmH₂ O. Semi-rigid URS with low-pressure irrigation (gravity <1 m) resulted in a wide mean IRP range (lowest reported 6.9 cmH₂ O, highest mean 149.5 ± 6.2 cmH₂ O; animal models). The lowest mean observed with fURS without a ureteric access sheath (UAS) was 47.6 ± 4.1 cmH₂ O, with the maximum peak IRP being 557.4 cmH₂ O (in vivo human data). UAS placement significantly reduced IRP during fURS, but did not guarantee pressure control with hand-operated pump/syringe irrigation. Miniaturization of PCNL sheaths was associated with increased IRP; however, a wide mean human IRP range has been recorded with both mPCNL (lowest -6.8 ± 2.2 cmH₂ O [suction sheath]; highest 41.2 ± 5.3 cmH₂ O) and standard PCNL (lowest 6.5 cmH₂ O; highest 41.2 cmH₂ O). Use of continuous suction in mPCNL results in greater control of mean IRP, although short pressure peaks >40 cmH₂ O are not entirely prevented. Definitive conclusions are limited by heterogeneity in study design and results. Postoperative pain and pyrexia may be correlated with increased IRP, however, few in vivo studies correlate clinical outcome with measured IRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrarenal pressure generated during upper tract endoscopy often exceeds 40 cmH₂ O. IRP is multifactorial in origin, with contributory variables discussed. Larger prospective human in vivo studies are required to further our understanding of IRP thresholds and clinical sequelae.

Predictive value of CD3+ cells and interleukin 2 receptor in systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Objective

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the risk factors that influence the development of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), including cytokines and lymphocyte subsets.

Methods

A total of 154 patients who underwent PCNL at our hospital between October 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The development of post-PCNL SIRS was the primary endpoint of the study. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to identify independent risk factors of post-PCNL SIRS. A nomogram was constructed using the independent risk factors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn.

Results

There were 50 patients (32.5%) who developed SIRS after PCNL. In multivariate analysis, positive urine culture (odds ratio [OR], 3.556; p = 0.048), long operation time (OR, 1.011; p = 0.027), high IL-2R (OR, 1.002; p = 0.018), low percentage of CD3⁺ cells (OR 0.931; p = 0.006), and high white blood cell (WBC) count (OR, 1.282; p = 0.044) were independent risk factors for post-PCNL SIRS. These five significant variables were used to generate a nomogram that exhibited favorable fitting. The discrimination area under the ROC curves was 0.795.

Conclusions

Patients with long operation times, positive urine cultures, high interleukin 2 receptor, high white blood cell counts, and low percentages of CD3⁺ cells may be at a higher risk of developing SIRS after PCNL. In these patients, cautious and comprehensive preoperative evaluations and appropriate treatment strategies should be considered.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) in predicting systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL)

The objective of this prospective observational study was to assess the clinical significance of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR) as potential biomarkers to identify post-PNL SIRS or sepsis. Demographic data and laboratory data including hemoglobin (Hb), total leucocyte count (TLC), serum creatinine, urine microscopy and culture were collected. The NLR, LMR and PLR were calculated by the mathematical division of their absolute values derived from routine complete blood counts from peripheral blood samples. Stone factors were assessed by non-contrast computerized tomography of kidneys, ureter and bladder (NCCT KUB) and included stone burden (Volume = L × W × D × π × 0.167), location and Hounsfield value and laterality. Intraoperative factors assessed were puncture site, tract size, tract number, operative time, the need for blood transfusion and stone clearance. Of 517 patients evaluated, 56 (10.8%) developed SIRS and 8 (1.5%) developed sepsis. Patients developing SIRS had significantly higher TLC (10.4 ± 3.5 vs 8.6 ± 2.6, OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.3, p = 0.000002), higher NLR (3.6 ± 2.4 vs 2.5 ± 1.04, OR 1.3, 95% CI = 1.09–1.5, p = 0.0000001), higher PLR (129.3 ± 53.8 vs 115.4 ± 68.9, OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.008, p = 0.005) and lower LMR (2.5 ± 1.7 vs 3.2 ± 1.8, OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04–1.34, p = 0.006). Staghorn stones (12.8 vs 3.24%, OR 4.361, 95% CI 1.605–11.846, p = 0.008) and long operative times (59.6 ± 14.01 vs 55.2 ± 16.02, OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.03, p = 0.05) had significant association with postoperative SIRS. In conclusion, NLR, PLR and LMR can be useful independent, easily accessible and cost-effective predictors for early identification of post-PNL SIRS/sepsis.

Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted sheaths and conventional sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in the treatment of nephrolithiasis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases (updated March 2021) were used to search for studies assessing the effect of vacuum-assisted sheaths in patients who underwent MPCNL. The search strategy and study selection processes were implemented in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

RESULT

Three randomized controlled trials and two case-controlled trials that satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Overall, the stone-free rate (SFR) in patients who underwent vacuum-assisted sheaths was significantly higher than that in patients who underwent conventional sheaths (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04, 1.46, P = 0.02), with significant heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 72%, P = 0.03). In terms of the outcome of complications, vacuum-assisted sheath could bring a benefit to the postoperative infection rate (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33, 0.70, P < 0.00001) with insignificant heterogeneity among the studies (I² = 0%, P = 0.68). There was no significant difference in the blood transfusion rate (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.07, 1.73, P = 0.17), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 66%, P = 0.35). Three studies contained operative time data, and the results indicated that the vacuum-assisted sheath led to a shorter operative time (MD = - 15.74; 95% CI - 1944, - 12.04, P < 0.00001) with insignificant heterogeneity (I² = 0%, P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The application of a vacuum-assisted sheath in MPCNL improves the safety and efficiency compared to the conventional sheath. A vacuum-assisted sheath significantly increases the SFR while reducing operative time and postoperative infection.

Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome of Patients after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) is widely used. However, no study evaluated TEAS on systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) of patients after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The study was to evaluate TEAS on SIRS of patients after PCNL.

Methods

67 patients were enrolled and divided into group TEAS and group sham TEAS. Data were collected from 60 participants finally. In the study, TEAS or sham TEAS on bilateral Shenshu (BL23), Yinlingquan (SP9), Hegu (LI4), and Neiguan (PC6) was performed continuously throughout the procedure. The primary outcome included the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, hemodynamics changes, complications, and hospital stay after surgery. The serum levels of tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α and interleukin- (IL-) 6, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) at 30 min before anesthesia (T₀), the time after surgery (T₁), 24 h postoperation (T₂), and 48 h postoperation (T₃) were recorded. The consumption of analgesic during surgery was also recorded, as well as the complications and duration of hospital stay after PCNL.

Results

The incidence of SIRS in group TEAS was lower than group sham TEAS (30% vs. 6.67%, p=0.023). Compared with the sham TEAS group, both levels of TNF-α and IL-6 at T₁, T₂, and T₃ were lower in the TEAS group (p < 0.05). The levels of MAP and HR in sham TEAS at T₁, T₂, and T₃ were markedly higher than that in the TEAS group (p < 0.05). The total consumption of propofol and remifentanil during surgery in group TEAS was lower than that in the sham TEAS group. The incidence of hypotension, hypertension, emergence agitation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was also lower in group TEAS after PCNL (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

TEAS could effectively reduce the incidence of SIRS and inflammatory cytokines for patients who underwent PCNL. In addition, TEAS helped to maintain the hemodynamic stability and cut down the consumption of analgesics during PCNL, reducing the complications after PCNL.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with nondilated collecting system: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with nondilated collecting system.

METHODS

Between July 2018 and July 2020, 160 kidney stone patients with nondilated collecting system planned for PCNL were randomly assigned into two groups, CEUS with retrograde ureteral contrast injection and conventional ultrasound with retrograde ureteral normal saline injection. Patient's demographics, the success rate of puncture, success rate of a single-needle puncture, number of punctures, puncture time, perioperative outcomes, stone-free rate, and incidence of complications were compared.

RESULTS

The success rate of a single-needle puncture for CEUS-guided PCNL was higher than that in the conventional ultrasound group (88.5% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.02). Patients performed with CEUS-guided PCNL required less needle passes (p = 0.02), shorter needle puncture time (p = 0.031), and shorter channel establishment time (p = 0.04) than those guided with conventional ultrasound. The postoperative hemoglobin decrease in the CEUS-guided PCNL group was less than that of the control group (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in operating time, length of hospital stays, kidney function change, and complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). The 1-month stone-free rate was 94.9% in the CEUS group and 90.8% in the control group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS-guided PCNL may facilitate ultrasound-guided PCNL for patients without hydronephrosis, and benefited with a higher success rate of a single-needle puncture, less needle passes, shorter puncture time, and lower postoperative Hb drop.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800016981 KEY POINTS: • Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS-guided PCNL is a safe and efficacious procedure for kidney stone patients with nondilated collecting system. • Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS-guided PCNL benefited with a higher success rate of a single-needle puncture, less needle passes, shorter puncture time, and lower postoperative Hb drop. • CEUS-guided PCNL associated with the more accurate needle puncture and acceptable complications.

Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy (PTCSL) is Effective for the Treatment of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

To explore percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotomy (PTCSL) as a treatment for intrahepatic and extrahepatic choledocholithiasis.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 67 patients with intrahepatic and extrahepatic choledocholithiasis treated by PTCSL from January 2014 to January 2019, including 36 males and 31 females, with an average age of 66 years. During the operation, the doctor established a channel through a 16-Fr Amplatz sheath and removed the stone in the channel with the aid of nephroscope. The clinical efficacy and complications of all patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (67/67, 100%) had their stones successfully removed in the first operation. Only 2 patients (2/67, 3.0%) developed mild reactive pleural effusion after the operation, and 1 patient (1/67, 1.5%) with cholangiocarcinoma after the operation. The incidence of severe bleeding during the operation was 0%.

CONCLUSION

PTCSL is a minimally invasive, simple, effective and easy to repeat procedure for use in the clinic. It is an effective surgical treatment and is worthy of clinical use.

Influence of Body Mass Index on the Surgical Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Pediatric Upper Urinary Tract Aalculi-A Single Surgeon Experience

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and surgical outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for pediatric upper urinary tract calculi and to estimate the influence of BMI percentile on the learning curve of pediatric FURS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively maintained database containing children who had kidney or ureteral stones from June 2014 to April 2019. We calculated BMI and plotted it on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth chart for sex and age to estimate BMI percentile. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, stone characteristics, stone-free rate (SFR), and complication rate (CR) were analyzed. Learning curves stratified by BMI percentile groups were generated.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 161 children, of whom 63 (39.1%) had upper body weight percentile (UBW), 64 (39.8%) had normal body weight percentile (NBW), and 34 (21.1%) had lower body weight percentile (LBW). The median stone burden of the 3 groups were 1.14 (IQR 0.50-3.41), 1.13 (IQR 0.70-3.14), and 0.95 (IQR 0.50-1.77), respectively (P = .17). The SFRs were 90.5% (57/63) in the UBW group, 81.2% (52/64) in the NBW group and 70.6% (24/34) in the LBW group (P = .04). The CRs were 15.9% (10/63), 21.9% (14/64), and 29.4% (10/34), respectively (P = .29). The learning curves showed that the SFR of FURS could be improved after about 100 cases. And decreasing BMI could steepen the learning curve of SFR.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI is associated with the SFR of FURS. LBW children had the lowest SFR compared to UBW and NBW children. Lower BMI percentile makes the success of FURS more challenging.

Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled "Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy" held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019.

RESULTS

New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS).

CONCLUSION

Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient.

Risk factors for the fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective analysis

Background

It’s very common to see the onset of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), it’s necessary to analyze the risk factors for the fever following PCNL, and to provide evidence for infection prevention after PCNL.

Methods

A total of 546 adult PCNL patients were included as study subjects and retrospective studies were performed. We collected clinical data of patients using a prospectively designed database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the potential risk factors for the fever after PCNL.

Results

Of the included 546 PCNL patients, there were 82 fever patients and 464 no-fever patients following PCNL. Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis are the two most common infectious bacteria. Preoperative urinary tract infection (OR =4.38, 95% CI: 1.15–9.53), multiple access (OR =5.31, 95% CI: 1.23–10.75), diabetes (OR =4.97, 95% CI: 1.37–9.86), length of operation ≥60 min (OR =5.67, 95% CI: 2.24–13.42), estimated blood loss in PCNL ≥500 mL (OR=2.78, 95% CI: 2.32–3.61) were the independent risk factors associated with postoperative infection.

Conclusions

Effective control of urinary tract infection, reduction of access number, strict control of blood glucose, length of operation control, reduction of intraoperative bleeding should be considered as measures to prevent postoperative fever for patients with PCNL.

Predicting and comparing postoperative infections in different stratification following PCNL based on nomograms

To discuss the mechanisms of infection complications in different degrees after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) through predicting and comparing post-PCNL infections based on nomograms, a retrospective cohort study was conducted among 969 cases who underwent PCNL from Dec 5, 2016 to Dec 25, 2017 in Kunming, Yunnan Province. We examined clinical features, urine routine, blood routine, blood biochemistry, imaging studies and operative information and recorded the examination results before surgery for univariate and multivariate logistic regression. We applied receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value to evaluate and compare the models. Nomograms were used to visualize the different degrees of postoperative infection complications. The risk scores of the three groups were compared by diabetes mellitus distribution. Our results suggest that the more severe the infection is, the more accurate the model predicts and that the occurrence of severe infection mostly is related to the patients' homeostasis. Hence, we developed an online post-PCNL sepsis dynamic nomogram which can achieve visualization and dynamically predict the incidence of sepsis in postoperative patients.

Performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

OBJECTIVE

The new clinical criteria termed SOFA and qSOFA were demonstrated to be more accurate than SIRS in screening patients at high risk of sepsis. We aim to evaluate the ability of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock after PCNL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing PCNL were included to assess the performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS in predicting septic shock, the AUC of ROC curve and decision curve analysis were used, and the optimal cutoff values and their achieving time were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 431 included patients, 12 (2.7%) cases developed septic shock. Compared with non-septic shock patients, patients with septic shock were more likely to be female, have positive history of urine culture and higher urine leukocyte count, and show increased postoperative serum creatinine, PCT and decreased leukocyte. The optimal cutoff of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS was > 2, > 0 and > 1, respectively. All of the 12 patients with verified septic shock met SOFA and SIRS criteria, while only 11 cases met qSOFA criterion. SOFA had the identical highest sensitivity (100%) and greater specificity (87% vs. 81%) than SIRS. qSOFA had higher specificity (92%) than both SOFA and SIRS at the expense of lower sensitivity (92%). The AUC of SOFA (0.973) to predict septic shock was greater than that of qSOFA (0.928) and SIRS (0.935). When combined with SIRS, SOFA outperformed qSOFA for discrimination of septic shock (AUC 0.987 vs. 0.978). Decision curve analysis indicated SOFA was clearly superior to both qSOFA and SIRS with a higher net benefit and net reduction in intervention. The qSOFA achieved the best time-based predictive efficiency, with the shortest median time to meet its cutoff, followed by SOFA and SIRS.

CONCLUSION

The performance of SOFA in predicting septic shock after PCNL was slightly greater than qSOFA and SIRS. The comprehensive application of various criteria is recommended to assist early detection of septic shock following PCNL.

Comparison of two different minimally invasive percutaneous nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of staghorn stones

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of using a conventional nephrostomy sheath (NS) vs using a new NS with suction and evacuation functions in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the treatment of staghorn stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective and randomised study of 60 patients with staghorn stones randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients. One group underwent MPCNL using conventional NS, whereas the other group underwent MPCNL with suction-evacuation NS (SENS). Patient demographics, stone characteristics, intraoperative data, perioperative data, and surgical results were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

The patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar amongst the two groups. The SENS group had a significantly lower peak and a significantly lower average renal pelvic pressure (RPP) throughout the procedure. The SENS group was more efficient for stone removal and had a much shorter stone treatment time, a lesser use of the stone extractor, and ultimately a higher stone-free rate (SFR). The effects of a lower RPP and shorter stone treatment time translated into less severe postoperative complications as measured per modified Clavien grade.

CONCLUSION

Using SENS in MPCNL for the treatment of staghorn stones has the advantages of lower RPP, increased effectiveness in stone retrieval, decreased surgery related complications, and an improved SFR.

[Role of pressure and temperature in ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy : Pressure and temperature changes during stone treatment]

Ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy are minimally invasive procedures and are the standard procedures for the treatment of kidney stones and ureteral calculi. To achieve an adequate view, in both methods an optimal and sufficient irrigation flow is necessary. The intrarenal pressure is influenced by the irrigation pressure and irrigation volume and has to be controlled. Pathologically elevated intrarenal pressure can lead to irreversible damage of the kidneys. Lasers are frequently used for stone fragmentation. It has been shown in studies that the laser energy can lead to an increase in the temperature and that thermal effects can also damage the kidneys. This article provides the surgeon with an overview about the effects of temperature and pressure changes during ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy and how damages can be avoided.

Ciprofloxacin infusion versus third generation cephalosporin as a surgical prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized study

Introduction

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered a clean-contaminated surgical procedure. The American Urological Association has recommended different preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis for various urological procedures to prevent surgical site infections, postoperative fever, and possible sepsis. The European Association of Urology (EAU) antibiotic guidelines endorse giving either a second or third-generation cephalosporin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolone or aminopenicillin with a β-lactamase inhibitor. The aim of the present study is to prospectively compare two different protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis in PCNL.

Material and methods

Successfully consented patients with sterile urine preoperatively who were awaiting percutaneous nephrolithotomy were randomized into two groups. The first group (n = 41) was given a single dose of 200 mg ciprofloxacin infusion, while group two (n = 43) was given 2 mg of cefotaxime divided into 2 doses; during induction of anesthesia and 12 hours later. The occurrence of perioperative infection-related events would be compared in both groups.

Results

Both groups had similar age, sex, Body Mass Index, and stone composition. No statistical difference was found regarding stone size, stone culture, irrigation fluid volume, operative time and urine pelvis culture result in both groups (Table 2). Two patients (5%) developed postoperative fever in the 1^st group compared to 12 patients (28%) in the second group (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

A prophylactic regimen consisting of a single dose ciprofloxacin infusion during induction of surgery showed a higher efficacy as a preoperative antibacterial preparation, compared to cefotaxime, in protection against postoperative fever in patients undergoing PCNL.

Characterization of Flow-Caused Intrarenal Pressure Conditions During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy In Vitro

PURPOSE

To investigate renal pelvic pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the standard, mini, and ultramini PCNL systems.

METHODS

We studied an ultramini PCNL system (UMP, outer shaft diameter 13F), a mini PCNL system (MPCNL, shaft 18F, nephroscope 12F), and a standard PCNL system (SPCNL, shaft 27F, nephroscope 24F). Pressure profiles were first investigated in an open model setup, subsequently in a closed model, and finally in an ex vivo porcine kidney. Measurements were determined with the nephroscope in an advanced and pulled-back position for all models.

RESULTS

In the advanced position, maximum pressures of 41.61 ± 0.20 mmHg (UMP), 15.61 ± 0.15 mmHg (MPCNL), and 15.46 ± 0.14 mmHg (SPCNL) were measured in the closed model. In the pulled-back position, maximum pressures were 16.04 ± 0.22 mmHg (UMP), 17.02 ± 0.11 mmHg (MPCNL), and 20.50 ± 0.11 mmHg (SPCNL). In the ex vivo porcine kidney model, maximum pressures were 13.81 ± 6.04 mmHg (UMP), 5.64 ± 0.21 (MPCNL), and 9.21 ± 0.52 (SPCNL) with the nephroscope pushed to end position. After retracting the nephroscope from the outer shaft, pressures in all systems did not exceed 10 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum pressures achieved with the three PCNL systems in all three models were kept below the 30 mmHg critical threshold value. High pressures were only determined for the UMP system with the nephroscope pushed to its end position. This was attributed to the conical shape of the nephroscope, which occupies the space between the nephroscope and outer shaft, resulting in outflow obstruction.

The Influence of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo

OBJECTIVE

Renal pelvic pressure (RPP) is expected to rise during percutaneous procedures. A very small tract size was expected to bring high RPP, and super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) uses a 14F sheath, which is even smaller than that used in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, so the RPP in SMP was more worrisome. Interestingly, the sheath had suction, which aimed to decrease the RPP, so we measured the RPP in an in vivo model to explore the relationship of implying negative pressure through the sheath with the RPP.

METHODS

Seventy-four consecutive patients were enrolled for RPP measurement during SMP between April 2016 and July 2017. Prospective RPP measurements were recorded using the MINDRAY-PM9000 monitor by connecting its baroceptor of the invasive blood pressure channel to a retrogradely inserted renal pelvic open-ended ureteric catheter. RPP data were collected each second by a computer program. All data were evaluated statistically with SPSS 13.0 software.

RESULTS

During SMP with a 14F irrigation-suction sheath, the average RPP was 19.51 ± 5.83 mm Hg. The median accumulative time of RPP ≥30 mm Hg was 55 (3-345) seconds. Postoperative fever was recorded in four patients (5.4%). A receiver operating characteristic -curve analysis showed that when suction pressure was set to 0.03 Mpa (≈230 mm Hg), irrigation pressure between 200 and 250 mm Hg, and the irrigation flow to 320 mL/minute, the accumulative high RPP was more likely <50 seconds, and the sensitivity and specificity were 75.0% and 66.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The RPP in SMP remains <30 mm Hg. Controlling the pressures as well as the flow of irrigating saline is important for the safety and efficiency of percutaneous procedures.

Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology

PURPOSE

To perform a review on the latest evidence related to normal and pathological intrarenal pressures (IRPs), complications of incremented values, and IRP ranges during endourology.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, restricted to original English-written articles, including animal, artificial model, and human studies. Different keywords were: percutaneous nephrolithotomy, PCNL, ureteroscopy, URS, RIRS, irrigation flow, irrigation pressure, intrarenal pressure, intrapelvic pressure and renal pelvic pressure.

RESULTS

Normal IRPs range from zero to a few cm H₂O. Pyelovenous backflow may occur at pressure range of 13.6-27.2 cm H₂O. During upper tract endourology, complications such as pyelorenal backflow, sepsis, and renal damage are directly related to increased IRPs. Duration of increased IRPs and concomitant obstruction are independent predictors of complication development.

CONCLUSIONS

IRP increase remains a neglected predictor of upper tract endourology complications and its intraoperative monitoring should be taken into consideration. Further research is necessary, to quantify pressures generated during upper tract endourology, and introduce means of controlling them.

Renal Pelvic Pressure in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The Effect of Multiple Tracts

INTRODUCTION

During percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), elevated renal pelvic pressures (RPPs) may spread infection through pyelovenous backflow whereas decreased pressures can hinder observation and increase bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of multiple access tracts and different sized endoscopic equipment on RPP in a porcine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RPP was measured in one- vs two-tract access, rigid vs flexible nephroscopy, and suction vs no suction. Twenty trials were performed for each condition. An independent samples Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare parameters, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

With one tract, rigid nephroscopy resulted in higher mean pressures (31.35 mm Hg) than flexible nephroscopy (11.1 mm Hg; p < 0.001). The RPP was higher with rigid nephroscopy in one tract (31.35 mm Hg) than when two tracts were present (9.35 mm Hg; p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no difference in pressure during the use of a flexible nephroscope in one (11.1 mm Hg) vs two tracts (10.7 mm Hg; p = 0.63). Use of suction with the rigid nephroscope resulted in significantly lower pressures with one (-1.3 mm Hg) than with two tracts (1.8 mm Hg; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

In PCNL, RPP is significantly affected by an additional tract during rigid nephroscopy and suctioning but not when using a flexible nephroscope. Understanding the effects of multiple tracts and equipment type on RPP may improve the safety of PCNL.

Predictive value of preoperative inflammatory response biomarkers for metabolic syndrome and post-PCNL systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with nephrolithiasis

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) were promising biomarkers used to predict diagnosis and prognosis in various inflammatory responses diseases and cancers. However, there have been no reports regarding these biomarkers in kidney stone patients. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and post-PCNL SIRS in nephrolithiasis patients. We retrospectively enrolled 513 patients with nephrolithiasis and 204 healthy controls. NLR, dNLR, LMR and PLR in nephrolithiasis patients were significantly higher than control group. Patients with renal stone have higher NLR, dNLR, LMR and PLR than those without. ROC curve analysis indicated NLR, dNLR, LMR and PLR for predicting patients with nephrolithiasis and MetS, displayed AUC of 0.730, 0.717, 0.627 and 0.606. Additionally, ROC curves, using post-PCNL SIRS as the end-point for NLR, dNLR, LMR and PLR with AUC of 0.831, 0.813, 0.723 and 0.685. Multivariate analysis revealed that NLR, dNLR represented independent factors for predicting post-PCNL SIRS. While LMR independently associated with MetS. These resluts demonstrate preoperative NLR, dNLR and LMR appears to be effective predictors of post-PCNL SIRS and LMR of MetS in nephrolithiasis patients.

Elevated Renal Pelvic Pressures during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Risk Higher Postoperative Pain and Longer Hospital Stay

PURPOSE

Renal pelvic pressure may vary during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We sought to determine the relationship of postoperative pain to endoscope caliber, renal pelvic pressure and hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 20 percutaneous nephrolithotomies done under ureteroscopic guidance with renal pelvic pressure monitoring. The ureteroscope working channel was connected to a pressure transducer and used to determine renal pelvic pressure at baseline, when irrigating with a 26Fr rigid nephroscope and a 16Fr flexible nephroscope, and during suction. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, Likert pain scores and length of hospital stay were compared as stratified by average renal pelvic pressure. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests were used with p <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 220 measurements were recorded in 20 patients undergoing single access percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Mean patient age was 55.2 years (range 20 to 77) and mean body mass index was 32.4 kg/m² (range 18 to 53.3). Rigid nephroscopy resulted in significantly higher average renal pelvic pressure than flexible nephroscopy (30.3 vs 12.9 mm Hg, p = 0.007). Average renal pelvic pressure was 30 mm Hg or greater in 7 patients (35%) undergoing rigid nephroscopy and in none (0%) undergoing flexible nephroscopy (p <0.01). Patients exposed to an average renal pelvic pressure of 30 mm Hg or greater during rigid nephroscopy had significantly higher average pain scores (p = 0.004) and longer hospital stays (p = 0.04) than patients with renal pelvic pressure less than 30 mm Hg. Average renal pelvic pressure 30 mm Hg or greater during rigid nephroscopy was also associated with a longer skin to calyx distance (105.5 vs 79.7 mm, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the factors that influence renal pelvic pressure and methods to control pressure extremes may improve patient outcomes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.