Evaluating Alternative Materials for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Comparison of the In Vivo Response to Meshes Implanted in Rabbits

Where are we in 2024 in the development of materials for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.

SUMMARY

This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.

The use of animal models in preclinical investigations for the development of a surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Polypropylene (PP) mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has raised substantial concerns over long-term complications, leading to its ban in multiple countries. In response, emerging materials are being explored as alternatives for prolapse surgery. Preclinical animal models have historically played a pivotal role in validating medical devices, prior to clinical trials. Successful translation of these materials necessitates the identification of suitable animal models that replicate the female human pelvis and its biomechanical properties. Preclinical in vivo testing assesses the safety of surgical mesh and treatment efficacy in preventing POP recurrence.

METHODS

The research critically reviews animal models used for preclinical pelvic mesh testing over the last decade and proposes a promising model for future preclinical studies.

RESULTS

Rats were the most common mammal used for toxicity and biocompatibility investigations through abdominal implantation. Although non-human primates serve as a gold standard for efficacy testing, ethical considerations limit their use owing to their close biological and cognitive resemblance to humans. Consequently, sheep were the most preferred large animal model owing to their reproductive system similarities and propensity for spontaneous POP following parity.

CONCLUSION

The study contributes valuable insights into the selection of appropriate animal models for preclinical pelvic mesh testing, offering guidance that is crucial for enhancing the safety and efficacy of novel surgical interventions in the treatment of POP.

Evaluation of the short-term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation

Objective

To evaluate the host‐ and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh.

Design

In vivo animal experiment.

Setting

KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies.

Population

Fourteen parous female Mule sheep.

Methods

P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously.

Main outcome measures

Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60‐ and 180‐days post‐implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM).

Results

Gross necropsy revealed no implant‐related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180‐days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60‐days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post‐implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0–4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0–4) at 180‐days.

Conclusions

P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load‐bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow‐up in‐vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy.

Tweetable Abstract

Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.

Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.

Tissue engineering to treat pelvic organ prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a frequent chronic illness, which seriously affects women's living quality. In recent years, tissue engineering has made superior progress in POP treatment, and biological scaffolds have received considerable attention. Nevertheless, pelvic floor reconstruction still faces severe challenges, including the construction of ideal scaffolds, the selection of optimal seed cells, and growth factors. This paper summarizes the recent progress of pelvic floor reconstruction in tissue engineering, and discusses the problems that need to be further considered and solved to provide references for the further development of this field.

Laparoscopic latero-abdominal colposuspension: Description of the technique, advantages and preliminary results

INTRODUCTION

There are currently various fixation or suspension techniques for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. Laparoscopic colposacropexy is considered the gold standard. We present the surgical steps of the laparoscopic latero-abdominal colposuspension (LACS) technique and the preliminary results obtained.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with anterior and/or apical compartment symptomatic POP undergoing LACS are included. The Baden-Walker scale, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Short Form (OAB-q SF), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale were used to assess the degree of prolapse, urinary filling and sexual symptoms and the level of satisfaction before and after surgery, respectively. Conventional laparoscopic material and a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh were used.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included with a minimum follow-up time of 6months. The mean surgical time was 70.3±23.8min. Anatomic correction of prolapse was seen in all cases. Only one recurrence was detected. High levels of patient satisfaction were achieved.

CONCLUSION

LACS allowed the anatomical reconstruction of the pelvic floor and proved to be a minimally invasive, fast, effective, safe and reproducible technique. More series are needed to evaluate its role against laparoscopic colposacropexy.

Biodegradable materials for surgical management of stress urinary incontinence: A narrative review

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was managed with techniques such as colposuspension, autologous fascia sling and urethral bulking agents. The introduction of the mid-urethral polypropylene (PP) sling in the 1990s led to a significant and rapid global change in SUI surgery. The synthetic non-degradable PP sling had superior results to traditional SUI procedures but its use has now declined due to significant complications such as pain and mesh erosion. These complications are attributed to its poor biocompatibility and integration into vaginal tissues. The efficacy of PP was extrapolated from studies on abdominal wall repair and it is now clear that integration of implanted materials in the pelvic floor differs from the abdominal wall. With PP prohibited in some jurisdictions, female patients with SUI have few management options. In the present review we summarise recent advances in SUI surgery and evaluate potential alternatives to PP slings with a particular focus on degradable materials. Allograft and xenograft materials demonstrate good biocompatibility but have yielded suboptimal cure rates. Tissue engineered synthetic degradable materials outperform unmodified synthetic degradable materials in terms of biomechanics and cell support. Synthetic tissue engineered degradable materials show promising results from in vitro studies and future research should focus on animal and human trials in this field.

Urogynecological surgical mesh implants: New trends in materials, manufacturing and therapeutic approaches

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) are two prevalent disorders affecting 30-40% of women worldwide. Current strategies to repair or improve these medical conditions are non-surgical options such as physiotherapy, or surgical options such as the use of vaginal meshes. The synthetic material polypropylene (PP), which has long been used for manufacturing these vaginal meshes, is associated with severe complications such as chronic pain, infection or mesh erosion. As a result of a widespread reporting and unacceptably high rates of complications, these issues have become a public health concern. Regulatory bodies have recently deemed the transvaginal placement of PP mesh in the pelvic floor (PF) no longer a suitable treatment method for PF repair, leading to the need for a novel approach to the manufacture and selection of materials for urogynecological meshes. Medical devices, such as vaginal meshes can be manufactured using a variety of techniques including injection moulding, electrospinning, hot-melt extrusion (HME) or more recently 3D printing. Over the past decade, the use of 3D printing within the medical device industry has expanded and offers a promising approach to manufacture patient-specific surgical mesh when combined with imaging tools. This review will summarise the current strategies to treat POP and SUI, the issues and use of current meshes for the treatment of these pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), and the future directions for the manufacture of more suitable urogynecological meshes, as well as their potential materials.

Emerging Nano/Micro-Structured Degradable Polymeric Meshes for Pelvic Floor Reconstruction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a hidden women's health disorder that impacts 1 in 4 women across all age groups. Surgical intervention has been the only treatment option, often involving non-degradable meshes, with variable results. However, recent reports have highlighted the adverse effects of meshes in the long term, which involve unacceptable rates of erosion, chronic infection and severe pain related to mesh shrinkage. Therefore, there is an urgent unmet need to fabricate of new class of biocompatible meshes for the treatment of POP. This review focuses on the causes for the downfall of commercial meshes, and discusses the use of emerging technologies such as electrospinning and 3D printing to design new meshes. Furthermore, we discuss the impact and advantage of nano-/microstructured alternative meshes over commercial meshes with respect to their tissue integration performance. Considering the key challenges of current meshes, we discuss the potential of cell-based tissue engineering strategies to augment the new class of meshes to improve biocompatibility and immunomodulation. Finally, this review highlights the future direction in designing the new class of mesh to overcome the hurdles of foreign body rejection faced by the traditional meshes, in order to have safe and effective treatment for women in the long term.

The importance of developing relevant animal models to assess existing and new materials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We summarize the recent literature on the use of different animal models for testing existing and new materials for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

RECENT FINDINGS

A wide spectrum of animal models is being used in urogynecology, both for the study of physiologic and pathophysiologic processes, training in surgical procedures, yet mainly to study the host response to implant materials. The quality of studies is variable, and procedures, read-outs, and reporting are not standardized. This makes comparison very difficult. The research community is experimenting with different knitting patterns, novel polymers, bioactivation, as well as resorbable rather than durable implants. Outcomes of the experiments are dependent on the location of implantation. Lighter polypropylene constructs seem to induce a less vigorous host response than elder heavier products. Modification of the surface yields contradictory findings. Resorbable acellular collagen matrices may be reintroduced as prophylactically inserted support structures.

SUMMARY

Although animal experimentation with novel candidate implants is advocated, there is a lack of standardization in reporting. The concept of resorbable construct is being revived, as durable materials have caused clinical graft-related complications. Large animal experiments seem to provide interesting and more comprehensive information, yet their use may be contested.

Landmarks in vaginal mesh development: polypropylene mesh for treatment of SUI and POP

Vaginal meshes used in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have produced highly variable outcomes, causing life-changing complications in some patients while providing others with effective, minimally invasive treatments. The risk:benefit ratio when using vaginal meshes is a complex issue in which a combination of several factors, including the inherent incompatibility of the mesh material with some applications in pelvic reconstructive surgeries and the lack of appropriate regulatory approval processes at the time of the premarket clearance of these products, have contributed to the occurrence of complications caused by vaginal mesh. Surgical mesh used in hernia repair has evolved over many years, from metal implants to knitted polymer meshes that were adopted for use in the pelvic floor for treatment of POP and SUI. The evolution of the material and textile properties of the surgical mesh was guided by clinical feedback from hernia repair procedures, which were also being modified to obtain the best outcomes with use of the mesh. Current evidence shows how surgical mesh fails biomechanically when used in the pelvic floor and materials with improved performance can be developed using modern material processing and tissue engineering techniques.

Recent advances in pelvic floor repair

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are conditions which result in significant physical, mental and social consequences for women worldwide. The high rates of recurrence reported with primary repair for POP led to the use of synthetic mesh to augment repairs in both primary and secondary cases following failed previous POP repair. The widely reported, unacceptably high rates of complications associated with the use of synthetic, transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor repair have severely limited the treatment options that surgeons can offer. This article summarises the recent advances in pelvic floor repair, such as improved quantification and modelling of the biomechanics of the pelvic floor and the developing technology within the field of tissue engineering for treatment of SUI/POP, including biomaterials and cell-based therapies. Finally, we will discuss the issues surrounding the commercial introduction of synthetic mesh for use within the pelvic floor and what lessons can be learned for the future as well as the current guidance surrounding treatment for SUI/POP.

Management of Occult Urinary Incontinence with Prolapse Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper is to review (1) the epidemiology and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI), (2) examine the data on combined operative management of POP and occult SUI, (3) discuss the approaches to clinical decision making, and (4) present future therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prospective data on many approaches to concomitant treatment of prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence, such as minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and midurethral sling, or older approaches that have regained favor among patients and clinicians wishing to avoid synthetic mesh, such as native tissue prolapse repair and pubovaginal sling, are limited. Safe durable treatments with absorbable graft materials that promote a beneficial host response are intriguing but may be far from clinical implementation. Stem cell therapy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence has demonstrated benefit in phase I/II trials but has not been studied in the setting of concomitant treatment of occult SUI with POP surgery and remains in the preclinical phase for the treatment of POP. A personalized approach to concomitant SUI surgery that incorporates individual risk assessment as well as informed patient preferences likely optimizes the risk/benefit ratio and patient satisfaction. Novel therapies, including graft materials and cellular therapies that stimulate a regenerative response, may improve or maintain continence outcomes while mitigating risk and alter the approach to both POP and SUI surgery.

Biomimetic implants for pelvic floor repair

BACKGROUND

Polypropylene implants are used for the reconstructive surgery of urogynaecological disorders like pelvic organ prolapse, but severe complications associated with their use have been reported. There is evidence that surface properties and a difference in mechanical stiffness between the implant and the host tissue contribute to these adverse events. Electrospinning is an innovative engineering alternative that provides a biomimetic microstructure for implants, resulting in a different mechano-biological performance.

AIM

The main objective of this review is to inform about the potential of electrospun matrices as an alternative modality for pelvic floor repair.

METHODS

Publications with the following studies of electrospun matrices were reviewed: (i) the technique; (ii) in vitro use for soft tissue engineering; (iii) in vivo use for reconstruction of soft tissues in animals; and (iv) clinical use in humans.

RESULTS

Electrospun matrices provide a synthetic mimic of natural extracellular matrix (ECM), favoring cellular attachment, proliferation and matrix deposition, through which a proper, low-inflammatory tissue-implant interaction can be established. Electrospun sheets can also be created with sufficient mechanical strength and stiffness for usage in prolapse surgery.

CONCLUSION

Electrospun matrices mimic the structural topography of the extracellular matrix and can be functionalized for better biological performance. As such, they have great potential for the next generation of urogynecological implants. However, their long-term safety and efficacy must still be established in vivo.

Structural differences and architectural features of two different polypropylene slings (TVT-O and I-STOP) have no impact on biocompatibility and tissue reactions

Introduction

To evaluate the impact of design features of the synthetic mid-urethral slings on tissue integrity and inflammatory responses.

Material and methods

In total 30 female Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with type I monofilamentous, macroporous polypropylene meshes: Gynecare TVT-Obturator tape^® (Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, NJ, USA) and I-STOP^® (CL Medical Inc., Lyon, France). All animal groups were sacrificed at set time intervals – 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months – and the abdominal wall was harvested with mesh strips for histological evaluation.

Results

All mesh strips appeared to be well incorporated into the abdominal wall, and no signs of shrinkage was noticed. All specimens showed a thin/delicate, loose, fibrous interface between the synthetic graft plate and abdominal wall, along with mild inflammatory reactions from 6 weeks to 12 months.

Conclusions

Both mesh brands induced comparable, minimal foreign body reactions and integrated well into the host tissues despite differences in architectural features. TVT-O^® and I-STOP^® evoked similar low-grade inflammatory responses up to 12 months in this animal model.

Structural differences and architectural features of polypropylene slings used in this study have had no impact on tissue integrity and inflammatory responses.

Oestradiol-releasing Biodegradable Mesh Stimulates Collagen Production and Angiogenesis: An Approach to Improving Biomaterial Integration in Pelvic Floor Repair

BACKGROUND

Polypropylene meshes cause severe complications in some patients. Materials that are biomechanically compatible and can better integrate into host tissues are urgently needed.

OBJECTIVE

To design an oestradiol-releasing electrospun poly-l-lactic acid (PLA) mesh and evaluate its ability to stimulate new extracellular matrix and new blood vessel formation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Human adipose derived mesenchymal cells (ADMSC) were isolated from fat. PLA meshes with micro- to nano-sized fibres containing 1%, 5%, and 10% oestradiol were constructed and used for in vitro and in vivo experiments.

INTERVENTION

The angiogenic potential of the fibrous meshes was evaluated using an in vivo chorioallantoic membrane and an in vitro chick aortic arch assays.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Oestradiol release was measured fluorometrically. The effect of fibrous meshes on proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production of ADMSC was assessed using immunohistology. Mechanical properties were tested using a tensiometer.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The ultrastructure of the mesh was not affected by the inclusion of oestradiol and mechanical properties were only slightly modified. Oestradiol was released from PLA meshes over a 5-mo period. ADMSCs cultured on oestradiol-releasing PLA meshes produced more ECM involving collagen I, collagen III, and elastin. Oestradiol-releasing meshes doubled new blood vessel formation in the chorioallantoic membrane assay (p=0.001) and outgrowth of pro-angiogenic cells in the aortic arch assay (p=0.001). Further studies in longer-term animal models are required to confirm these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Oestradiol-releasing PLA meshes increase ECM production and stimulate angiogenesis. As such, they are promising candidate materials to be used in pelvic floor repair and to improve the initial healing phase of a repair material following implantation.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we designed a tissue engineered material to be used to support weakened pelvic floor tissues in women to avoid the complications associated with current surgical mesh. Our results showed that this material can stimulate new blood vessel formation in simple chick assays and tissue production in vitro. Both properties should help with the integration of this material into patients' tissues and merit further study in physiologically relevant animal models.

Methods for Implant Acceptance and Wound Healing: Material Selection and Implant Location Modulate Macrophage and Fibroblast Phenotypes

This review focuses on materials and methods used to induce phenotypic changes in macrophages and fibroblasts. Herein, we give a brief overview on how changes in macrophages and fibroblasts phenotypes are critical biomarkers for identification of implant acceptance, wound healing effectiveness, and are also essential for evaluating the regenerative capabilities of some hybrid strategies that involve the combination of natural and synthetic materials. The different types of cells present during the host response have been extensively studied for evaluating the reaction to different materials and there are varied material approaches towards fabrication of biocompatible substrates. We discuss how natural and synthetic materials have been used to engineer desirable outcomes in lung, heart, liver, skin, and musculoskeletal implants, and how certain properties such as rigidity, surface shape, and porosity play key roles in the progression of the host response. Several fabrication strategies are discussed to control the phenotype of infiltrating macrophages and fibroblasts: decellularization of scaffolds, surface coatings, implant shape, and pore size apart from biochemical signaling pathways that can inhibit or accelerate unfavorable host responses. It is essential to factor all the different design principles and material fabrication criteria for evaluating the choice of implant materials or regenerative therapeutic strategies.