1
|
Charles D, Fitzgerald J, Landowski T, Cooper B, Yong R, Everett R, See W, Jacobsohn K, Johnson S, Langenstroer P. Is chest imaging needed as part of pT1a renal cell carcinoma surveillance after surgical resection? Urol Oncol 2024; 42:23.e1-23.e4. [PMID: 38040536 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Following surgical excision of pT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 2% to 5% will recur, with 50% to 60% being lung metastases. The ideal surveillance strategy to identify recurrences is unclear. Guidelines are mixed, with NCCN and AUA recommending surveillance via chest x-ray (CXR) at least annually for 5 years, while EAU guidelines do not specifically recommend the use of CXR. In an effort to clarify the utility of surveillance CXR, we retrospectively evaluated pT1a patients following surgical treatment at a single institution. METHODS We performed retrospective analysis of unique patients who underwent surgical excision of pT1 RCC between January 2000 and January 2020. In addition to demographic information, we collected RCC pathology, recurrence details, and most recent chest imaging. We excluded non-RCC pathology, and patients with pulmonary nodules on baseline imaging. RESULTS We identified 463 unique patients (mean age 58.3 years, range 23-87) that underwent surgical excision of pT1a RCC with mean follow-up of 47.6 months (range 1-201). On the most recent pulmonary surveillance imaging, 72.4% (335/463) had CXR while 27.6% (128/463) had chest CT performed. Regardless of modality, pulmonary recurrence was not detected on any surveillance imaging (0/463). CONCLUSION In patients without baseline preoperative lung pathology, we found that there is questionable clinical value in surveillance for pulmonary recurrence after resection of pT1a RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Charles
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
| | - John Fitzgerald
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Truman Landowski
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Brennen Cooper
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Raymond Yong
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Ross Everett
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - William See
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pleunis N, Pouwer AW, Ploegmakers MJ, de Hullu JA, Pijnenborg JMA. Low incidence of pulmonary metastases in vulvar cancer patients: limited value of routine chest imaging based on a cohort study. BJOG 2022; 129:769-776. [PMID: 33342026 PMCID: PMC9290465 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence of pulmonary metastases in the preoperative work-up of patients with primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary referral centre. POPULATION Patients treated for primary vulvar SCC from 2000 to 2018. METHODS The pre-operative chest imaging of 452 consecutively treated patients was documented with a minimal follow-up period of 2 years. MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence of pulmonary metastases, frequency of chest imaging and subsequent coincidental findings. RESULTS In total, 80.8% of patients underwent pre-operative chest imaging. Seven patients (1.9%), with a median tumour size of 80 mm, presented with pulmonary metastases. None of the patients with early stage disease and tumour size <40 mm who underwent radical local excision (RLE) with sentinel node (SN)-procedure, was diagnosed with pulmonary metastasis. Chest imaging was performed by radiography (58.9%) and computerised tomography (CT) (41.1%). Coincidental findings were reported in 40.7% of patients who underwent CT, compared with 15.8% of patients undergoing radiography, resulting in additional diagnostics in 14.7 and 19.7% and being of limited consequence for outcome in 2.9 and 3.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of pulmonary metastases in patients with primary vulvar SCC is extremely low, and none in patients with early stage disease undergoing the SN procedure. Chest imaging was performed in the majority of patients and was associated with frequent coincidental findings leading to clinically irrelevant diagnostic procedures. Therefore, we recommend omitting chest imaging in patients with early stage disease and tumours <40 mm, considering chest CT only in patients with large tumours and/or advanced stage disease. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT The incidence of pulmonary metastases is 1.9%, none in early stage disease planned for SN. Omitting chest imaging in this group is advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Pleunis
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - AW Pouwer
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
- Present address:
Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyCatharina HospitalEindhoventhe Netherlands
| | - MJ Ploegmakers
- Department of RadiologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - JA de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - JMA Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richard PO, Violette PD, Bhindi B, Breau RH, Kassouf W, Lavallée LT, Jewett M, Kachura JR, Kapoor A, Noel-Lamy M, Ordon M, Pautler SE, Pouliot F, So AI, Rendon RA, Tanguay S, Collins C, Kandi M, Shayegan B, Weller A, Finelli A, Kokorovic A, Nayak J. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:E61-E75. [PMID: 35133268 PMCID: PMC8932428 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O. Richard
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe D. Violette
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rodney H. Breau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luke T. Lavallée
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R. Kachura
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maxime Noel-Lamy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Ordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen E. Pautler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Alan I. So
- Division of Urology, British Columbia Cancer Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ricardo A. Rendon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Capital Health - QEII, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Maryam Kandi
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Kokorovic
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jay Nayak
- Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Available active surveillance follow-up protocols for small renal mass: a systematic review. World J Urol 2021; 39:2875-2882. [PMID: 33452911 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03581-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate follow-up strategies for active surveillance of renal masses and to assess contemporary data. METHODS We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases (Embase, Medline, and Cochrane). A systematic review of the follow-up protocols was carried out. A total of 20 studies were included. RESULT Our analysis highlights that most of the series used different protocols of follow-up without consistent differences in the outcomes. Most common protocol consisted in imaging and clinical evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Median length of follow-up was 42 months (range 1-137). Mean age was 74 years (range 67-83). Of 2243 patients 223 (10%) died during the follow-up and 19 patients died of kidney cancer (0.8%). The growth rate was the most used parameter to evaluate disease progression eventually triggering delayed intervention. Maximal axial diameter was the most common method to evaluate growth rate. CT scan is the most used, probably because it is usually more precise than kidney ultrasound and more accessible than MRI. Performing chest X-ray at every check does not seem to alter the clinical outcome during AS. CONCLUSION The minimal cancer-specific mortality does not seem to correlate with the follow-up scheme. Outside of growth rate and initial size, imaging features to predict outcome of RCC during AS are limited. Active surveillance of SRM is a well-established treatment option. However, standardized follow-up protocols are lacking. Prospective, randomized, trials to evaluate the best follow-up strategies are pending.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bensalah K, Bigot P, Albiges L, Bernhard J, Bodin T, Boissier R, Correas J, Gimel P, Hetet J, Long J, Nouhaud F, Ouzaïd I, Rioux-Leclercq N, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU – actualisation 2020–2022 : prise en charge du cancer du rein. Prog Urol 2020; 30:S2-S51. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30749-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
7
|
Impact of routine imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence for patients with localized and locally advanced renal tumor treated with nephrectomy. World J Urol 2019; 37:2727-2736. [PMID: 30895362 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02724-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Modalities of surveillance to detect recurrence after nephrectomy for localized or locally advanced renal tumor are not standardized. The aim was to assess the impact of surveillance scheme on oncological outcomes. METHODS Patients treated for localized or locally advanced renal tumor with total or partial nephrectomy between 2006 and 2010 in an academic institution were included retrospectively. According to the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) protocol, follow-up was considered adequate or not. Symptoms, location and number of lesions at recurrence diagnosis were collected. Recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were calculated to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS A total of 267 patients were included. Median follow-up was 72 months. Recurrence rate was 23.2% (62/267 patients). Recurrences were local (16%), single metastatic (23%), oligo-metastatic (15%) or multi-metastatic (46%). 72.6% of the recurrences occurred within the 3 years after surgery. No recurrence was diagnosed by chest X-ray or abdominal ultrasound. One hundred and twenty-one patients had inadequate follow-up. They had similar recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival as patients with adequate follow-up. In multivariable analysis, the presence of multi-metastatic lesions was an independent prognostic factor of worse cancer-specific mortality after recurrence diagnosis (HR = 10.15, 95% CI: 2.29-44.82, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Role of chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound for the detection of recurrences is limited. Rigorous follow-up according to the UISS protocol does not improve oncological outcomes. Follow-up schedules with less frequent imaging should be discussed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Should We Separate the Pulmonary Surveillance Protocol for Postsurgical T1a and T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma? A Multicenter Database Analysis. Urology 2018; 122:127-132. [PMID: 30205104 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence of pulmonary metastases (PM) and the utility of the surveillance chest radiography (CXR) in detecting PM after curative treatment to better define surveillance recommendations for T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of a multi-institutional database was performed to include patients with renal masses treated with partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. Patients were excluded for ≥T2 disease, benign pathology, and metastases. The primary outcome was the incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary lesion concerning for PM detected by CXR within 3 years. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-eight patients met criteria of which 384 had T1a and 184 had T1b at a mean follow-up of 45 and 43 months, respectively. Patients averaged 2.96 and 2.99 CXRs for T1a and T1b with 46.8% having surveillance beyond 3 years. Indeterminate lesions were found in 5.7% (22) of T1a and 5.4% (10) in T1b of which 0.01% (2) and 1.1% (2) were confirmed PM by chest computed tomography and biopsy. Three-year CXR surveillance period detected asymptomatic PM in zero and two patients for T1a and T1b, respectively. High risk pathological features were not present in patients with PM. There was no difference in the incidence PM for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (3/290) or radical nephrectomy (1/278) (P = .62). CONCLUSION Our review suggests that post-treatment pulmonary surveillance should be reserved for T1b and may not be required for T1a given the low yield and false positives of CXR leading to unnecessary radiation and potential biopsies.
Collapse
|
9
|
National recommendations document on the follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Actas Urol Esp 2018; 42:381-388. [PMID: 29398094 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This document was developed to establish directives for the follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) based on the best available scientific evidence and on expert opinions, which can help urologists in the decision-making process and standardise the criteria at the national level. MATERIAL AND METHODS The methodology is based on the RAND/UCLA method. A panel of 9 experts on RCC participated in designing a thematic index, identifying and reading the available evidence, formulating recommendations and drafting the content. A validating group of 25 experts, who did not participate in the previous phases, assessed the recommendations through anonymous voting in a face-to-face consensus meeting. The recommendations that were agreed upon by 75% or more of the participants in this vote were accepted as consensus. The recommendations that did not achieve this consensus were rejected. RESULTS A total of 25 recommendations were accepted as consensus. These recommendations cover the laboratory tests, clinical assessment tests and imaging tests that should be performed for patients with RCC. The presented recommendations have been adapted according to relapse risk. The current document also outlines the frequency and duration of follow-up for each patient profile. CONCLUSIONS The current document enables standardisation of the follow-up criteria for patients with RCC treated in the Spanish healthcare setting, according to the patients' relapse risk.
Collapse
|