Advantages of Reduced Prophylaxis after Tubularized Incised Plate Repair of Hypospadias

The diversity of hypospadias management in North America: a survey of pediatric urologists

PURPOSE

To determine trends in hypospadias management, including surgical techniques and perioperative care, by pediatric urologists in North America.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was devised to assess approaches to hypospadias repair and management, including anesthetic considerations, catheter placement, choice of dressing, and postoperative antibiotic treatment. The survey was sent to all practicing members of the Societies for Pediatric Urology.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 133 (34.5%) respondents. Hypospadias repair was overwhelmingly recommended between ages 6-12 months (89.5%). A local or regional anesthetic block (caudal, penile, pudendal, spinal) is performed nearly universally (96.2%). The majority of surgeons perform distal repairs outpatient (70.7%), while fewer perform outpatient staged repairs (47.4%) or redo surgery (33.8%). Nearly all respondents preferred either VicrylTM/DexonTM (50.4%) or MaxonTM/PDSTM (48.1%) for urethroplasty. All but one respondent leaves a stent for midshaft to proximal repairs whereas stenting for glanular repairs was split with 53.4% leaving a stent. Most surgeons (60.9-70.9%) prescribe postoperative antibiotics regardless of severity and the majority (72.9%) prescribe narcotics for analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Approaches to hypospadias repair are extremely varied such that there is a lack of consensus among pediatric urologists regarding most aspects of hypospadias management. Investigations comparing hypospadias practice patterns are necessary to develop a standard of care for this complex pediatric urologic entity.

The effect of the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis compared with non-use for stented distal hypospadias repair wound: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis investigation to measure the influence of the usage of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (POP) compared with non-usage for stented distal hypospadias repair (SDHR). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 1067 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 10 chosen investigations enclosed 1398 individuals with SDHR in the chosen investigations starting point, 812 of them were using POP, and 586 were not using POP. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compute the value of the effect of the usage of POP compared with non-usage for SDHR by the dichotomous and continuous approaches and a fixed or random model. No significant difference was found between individuals using POP and not using POP in posthypospadias repair problem (PRP) (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.42-2.34, P = .97) with moderate heterogeneity (I2  = 69%), posthypospadias repair infection problem (PRIP) (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30-1.06, P = .08) with no heterogeneity (I2  = 15%), and overall composite posthypospadias repair wound healing associated problem (OCPRWHAP) (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.61-2.63, P = .53) with moderate heterogeneity (I2  = 59%) for SDHR. No significant difference was found between individuals using POP and not using POP in PRP, PRIP, and OCPRWHAP for SDHR. However, cautilised of the small sample sizes of several chosen investigations for this meta-analysis, care must be exercised when dealing with its values, for example, the low P-value of the PRIP.

The effect of the cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation on surgical site wound infection in posterior lumbar fusion wound: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis investigation was performed to measure the influence of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation (CBTSF) and traditional pedicle screw fixation (TPSF) on surgical site wound infection (SSWI) in posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 1657 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 13 chosen investigations enclosed 1195 individuals with PLF in the chosen investigations' starting point, 578 of them were using CBTSF, and 617 were using TPSF. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilised to compute the value of the effect of the CBTSF and TPSF on SSWI in PLF by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. No significant difference was found between individuals using CBTSF and TPSF in SSWI (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.35-1.33, P = .26), superficial SSWI (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.22-1.79, P = .38), and deep SSWI (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.06-1.50, P = .14) in PLF. No significant difference was found between individuals using CBTSF and TPSF in SSWI, superficial SSWI, and deep SSWI in PLF. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the small sample sizes of several chosen investigations for this meta-analysis and the low number of selected investigations for a certain type of SSWI.

A Systematic Review on Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis after Pediatric and Adult Male Urethral Reconstruction

In the era of antibiotic overuse and increasing antibiotic resistance, there is a gap in evidence regarding antibiotic stewardship, and in particular, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis after urethral reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and relevance of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after male pediatric and adult urethral reconstruction. An online search of MEDLINE database via PubMed was performed. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022348555) and was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and AMSTAR 2 checklist. A narrative synthesis of included studies was performed. After the screening of 1176 publications, six studies regarding antibiotic prophylaxis after hypospadias reconstruction and two studies regarding antibiotic prophylaxis after urethroplasty in adults were eligible to be included in the systematic review. All but one of the studies on hypospadias repair showed no benefit from postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The level of evidence on postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after urethroplasty in adults is low. Neither of the two studies included in the review showed a benefit from antibiotic use. Postoperative prophylaxis after hypospadias repair is not effective in preventing urinary tract infections and wound infections. It seems that the use of postoperative prophylaxis after urethroplasty in adults is also not beneficial, but there is a high need for high-quality scientific data.

Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics vs. placebo after midshaft-to-distal hypospadias repair: the PROPHY Study

BACKGROUND

Use of prophylactic antibiotics after stented hypospadias repair is very common, but most research has not identified any clinical benefits of this practice. Only one study has found that postoperative prophylaxis reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Data from the same trial suggested that prophylaxis may also reduce urethroplasty complications. No studies on this subject have been placebo-controlled.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the incidence of infection or urethroplasty complications after stented repair of midshaft-to-distal hypospadias.

STUDY DESIGN

Boys were eligible for this multicenter trial if they had a primary, single-stage repair of mid-to-distal hypospadias with placement of an open-drainage urethral stent for an intended duration of 5-10 days. Participants were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo twice daily for 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic UTI, surgical site infection (SSI), and urethroplasty complications, including urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and C. difficile colitis.

RESULTS

Infection or urethroplasty complications occurred in 10 of 45 boys (22%) assigned to receive antibiotic prophylaxis as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) who received placebo (relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.8; p = 0.16). There were no significant differences between groups in symptomatic UTIs, SSIs, or any urethroplasty complications. Mild ADRs occurred in 3 of 45 boys (7%) assigned to antibiotics as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) given placebo (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5; p = 0.72). There were no moderate-to-severe ADRs, and no patients developed C. difficile colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this placebo-controlled trial of 93 patients, prophylactic antibiotics were not found to reduce infection or urethroplasty complications after stented mid-to-distal hypospadias repair. The study did not reach its desired sample size and was therefore underpowered to independently support a conclusion that prophylaxis is not beneficial. However, the result is consistent with most prior research on this subject.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02096159.

Prolonged Perioperative Antibiotics: A Hidden Problem

OBJECTIVES

National guidelines generally recommend 24 hours or less of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. In a freestanding, regional children's hospital, we evaluated the duration of antibiotic surgical prophylaxis to identify targets for standardization of practice.

METHODS

All procedures performed in 2017 were extracted from our local data warehouse; those involving an incision were considered a surgical procedure and correlated to antibiotic data. Antibiotic courses were reviewed if administered for >24 hours, or if the duration or indication for prophylaxis was uncertain. Total duration of prophylaxis (including discharge prescriptions) was calculated in hours for all procedures and categorized by department and by the quantity of prophylaxis received: none, single dose, multiple doses within 24 hours, and >24 hours. Percentage of procedures and total days of potential excess were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 15 651 procedures were included; 5009 met criteria for chart review, and after further exclusions, 12 895 procedures were included in the analysis. In total, 55% of all 12 895 procedures received prophylaxis. A single dose was given in 30%. Over 24 hours was administered in 11%, and 14% received multiple doses <24 hours (both potential excess). Results were evaluated by surgical subspecialty and procedure type. There were 5733 cumulative days of surgical prophylaxis administered after 24 hours (potential excess).

CONCLUSION

In 2017, up to 25% of procedures received potentially unnecessary perioperative prophylaxis, indicating that national guidance specific to pediatrics would have high impact on antibiotic overuse in the pediatric surgical population.

Perioperative complications within 30 days of hypospadias surgery: Results from NSQIP-Pediatrics

INTRODUCTION

There are no large multi-institutional studies reporting on perioperative complications of hypospadias repairs. We sought to determine perioperative complications of hypospadias repairs from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics (NSQIP-P) to aid in patient counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

This cohort study from 2012 to 2017 was conducted using NSQIP-P database. Pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias surgery were identified and compared based on 4 major categories: distal/midshaft repair, one-stage repair proximal, stage one repair, and stage two repair. Baseline demographics between the four groups and perioperative parameters were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis models including type of repair was used to determine associations with overall complications, infectious complications, and dehiscence.

DISCUSSION

There were 11,292 patients identified in the study population. Overall, 78% underwent distal/midshaft hypospadias repair, 12% underwent one-stage proximal repair, 1.4% underwent proximal first stage repair and 9% underwent proximal second stage repair. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that proximal first stage procedures had similar overall complications to distal/mid repairs but proximal one-stage and proximal second stage procedures were associated with significantly more overall complications, local infectious complications, and dehiscence. Age, race, operative time, prematurity were also independently associated with increased overall complications. As expected, complication rates are higher in those with proximal hypospadias. In staged hypospadias, first stage has a lower complication rate compared to second stage. All complications, especially of infectious and dehiscence are the highest in the one-stage proximal and proximal second stage repairs.

CONCLUSION

We report large multi-institutional analysis of 30-day peri-operative hypospadias repair complications; this information is useful for patient counseling and education.

The effect of intraurethral dexpanthenol in hypospadias repair: experimental rabbit study

INTRODUCTION

In this study, the authors aimed to research the histopathologic effects of intraurethral use of dexpanthenol for hypospadias repair. Dexpanthenol is a derivative of pantothenic acid, a B complex vitamin. Pantothenic acid is a molecule contributing in the structure of coenzyme A. It decreases the release of myeloperoxidase from granulocytes and inhibits the formation of free oxygen radicals, and it exhibits an anti-inflammatory effect by increasing mitotic activity.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of dexpanthenol after a tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) on wound healing, inflammation, and fibrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

In this study, 18 healthy male New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2500-3000 g were used. The 18 rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups. For the hypospadias model, rabbits had a urethral catheter inserted in the urethra and a ventral midline incision was made from the glans tip to the central line of the penis. Afterward, the incision was closed with Vicryl (7/0) using the continuous suture technique, and urethroplasty was completed. For fourteen days, group I had 0.9% saline solution administered intraurethrally twice per day with a 22G catheter sleeve (control group), group II had one dose of 500 mg/kg dexpanthenol (Bepanthene®; Bayer Turk Chemical Industry Limited Company, Turkey) ampoule and one dose of saline solution administered in the same way, and group III had two doses of 500 mg/kg dexpanthenol ampoule administered. On the fifteenth day, the penis was degloved and rabbits had penectomy performed with samples sent to the pathology department for histopathological assessment.

RESULTS

The degree of fibrosis and inflammation in group I (control group) was more severe than groups II and III. The differences between groups I and II were statistically significantly different for both fibrosis and inflammation (P = 0.018 and P = 0.041, respectively). The differences between groups I and III were also statistically significantly different for both fibrosis and inflammation (P = 0.019 and P = 0.011, respectively). Groups II and III were not different significantly for fibrosis and inflammation (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that intraurethral dexpanthenol application has positive effects on fibrosis and inflammation. The main limitations of the study are that the hypospadias model was created surgically and long-term follow-up for fistula formation was not assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of intraurethral dexpanthenol after hypospadias repair has positive effects on fibrosis and inflammation.

The use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in stented distal hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The current literature on the use of antibiotics perioperatively for many pediatric procedures, including hypospadias, is inconsistent. There is currently no clear evidence for the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stented distal hypospadias repair.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to synthesize and assess the available literature on the use versus non-use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for stented distal hypospadias repair.

METHODOLOGY

Systematic literature search was performed on March 2018 for evaluation of trials that assessed the use and non-use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics among stented distal hypospadias repair in children. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the study design as recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The outcome assessed includes composite overall posthypospadias repair complications of infection and wound healing complications. The event rate for each treatment group was extracted to extrapolate intervention relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Mantel-Haenszel method with random effect model was used in pooling of effect estimates from the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed with subgroup analysis performed according to the study design. Publication bias was likewise determined. The protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018087301) and reported in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULT

A total of seven studies (four cohorts, three randomized controlled trials) with 986 stented distal hypospadias repairs (408 with no post-operative prophylactic antibiotics and 578 given postoperative prophylactic antibiotics) were included for the meta-analysis. Moderate to serious risk of bias was noted among the cohort studies, while the included randomized controlled trials (RCT) were of high risk of bias. Inconsistencies of effect estimates between subgroups and publication bias with small study effect were likely present. The overall pooled effect estimates comparing treatment groups showed no significant difference for outcomes of overall composite postoperative complication (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.45, 1.93). Assessment of composite infection related complications and wound healing complications likewise did not show any significant between-group differences (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.49, 3.35 and RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.48, 2.12; respectively) (Table). Asymptomatic bacteriuria was noted to be significantly higher among the intervention group with no postoperative prophylactic antibiotics (RR 4.01, 95% CI 1.11, 14.54).

CONCLUSION

The available evidence to date was assessed to be of high risk. The low level of evidence generated suggests that there is limited utility in the use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics to prevent clinically significant posthypospadias repair complications.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus No Treatment after Mid-to-Distal Hypospadias Repair: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of prophylactic antibiotics after distal hypospadias repair on postoperative bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection, and postoperative complications in a prospective, randomized trial.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients aged 6 months to 2 years were enrolled at our institution between June 2013 and May 2017. Consenting patients were randomized to antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus no antibiotic. Patients had catheterized urine samples obtained at surgery and 6–10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was bacteriuria and pyuria at postoperative urine collection. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic urinary tract infection and postoperative complications.

Results

70 patients consented to the study, of which 35 were randomized to receive antibiotics compared to 32 who did not. Demographics, severity of hypospadias, and type of repair were similar between the groups. Patients in the treatment group had significantly less pyuria (18%) and bacteriuria (11%) present at stent removal compared to the nontreatment group (55% and 63%; p=0.01 and p < 0.001, resp.). No patient had a symptomatic urinary tract infection. There were 11 postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Routine antibiotic prophylaxis appears to significantly decrease bacteriuria and pyuria in the immediate postoperative period; however, no difference was observed in symptomatic urinary tract infection or postoperative complications. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02593903.

Current hypospadias management: Diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patient-centred outcomes

In this article, we present the current approach to hypospadias, a review of the classification, preoperative evaluation, and factors that enable decision-making during surgery. We will then discuss patient-reported outcomes, evaluating the patients' and parents' perspectives regarding hypospadias repair.