1
|
Qvigstad LF, Eri LM, Lien MD, Fosså SD, Aas K, Berge V. Reduction of lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients treated with robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 2024; 59:121-125. [PMID: 38888041 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v59.40070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PROBLEM The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in LUTS in patients treated with RALP and to assess factors that may predict an improvement of LUTS. MATERIALS AND METHOD In our institutional prospective research registry, 1935 patients operated in the period between 2009 and 2021 with complete baseline- and 12-month EPIC-26 questionnaire were eligible for the study. Also SF-12 data estimating general quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. A LUTS summary score was constructed from the two questions concerning voiding stream/residual and frequency, and transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing less symptoms A change of 6 points or more were considered Meaningful Clinical Differences (MCD). Two summary scores were calculated from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12). Multivariate regression was used to estimate covariates associated with postoperative MCD, MCS-12 and PCS-12. RESULTS Mean change of LUTS-score showed an increase of 10 points 12-months post-RALP. 52% of patients achieved MCD. In multivariate logistic regression, preoperative LUTS was statistically significant associated with MCD. Reduction of LUTS was associated improved mean score of MCS-12 and PCS-12. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Along with information about risk for urinary incontinence after RALP, patients with LUTS at baseline must be informed that these symptoms may be reduced after RALP. In our study, this LUTS reduction was associated with better general QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lars Magne Eri
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - My Diep Lien
- Oslo Hospital Service, Research Support, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sophie Dorothea Fosså
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; dDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kirsti Aas
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Viktor Berge
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Windisch P, Becker I, Tang H, Schröder C, Buchali A, Aebersold DM, Zwahlen DR, Förster R, Shelan M. Converting between the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary subscales: modeling and external validation. BMC Urol 2024; 24:28. [PMID: 38310268 PMCID: PMC10837947 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01421-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-related quality of life can be assessed with a variety of different questionnaires. The 50-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) are two widely used options. The goal of this study was, therefore, to develop and validate a model that is able to convert between the EPIC and the IPSS to enable comparisons across different studies. METHODS Three hundred forty-seven consecutive patients who had previously received radiotherapy and surgery for prostate cancer at two institutions in Switzerland and Germany were contacted via mail and instructed to complete both questionnaires. The Swiss cohort was used to train and internally validate different machine learning models using fourfold cross-validation. The German cohort was used for external validation. RESULTS Converting between the EPIC Urinary Irritative/Obstructive subscale and the IPSS using linear regressions resulted in mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.88 and 6.12, which is below the respective previously published minimal important differences (MIDs) of 5.2 and 10 points. Converting between the EPIC Urinary Summary and the IPSS was less accurate with MAEs of 5.13 and 10.45, similar to the MIDs. More complex model architectures did not result in improved performance in this study. The study was limited to the German versions of the respective questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS Linear regressions can be used to convert between the IPSS and the EPIC Urinary subscales. While the equations obtained in this study can be used to compare results across clinical trials, they should not be used to inform clinical decision-making in individual patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov on January 14th, 2022, under the registration number NCT05192876.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
| | - Ivo Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hongjian Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Christina Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - André Buchali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Robert Förster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, Haus R, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yoder AK, Lakomy DS, Wu J, Andring LM, Corrigan KL, Fellman B, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Colbert LE, Soliman PT, Frumovitz MM, Peterson SK, Lin LL. Comparing long-term sexual dysfunction across different uterine cancer treatment modalities. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:1-9. [PMID: 37914588 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to assess differences in long-term sexual and menopausal side effects after uterine cancer treatment among treatment modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a cross-sectional study that examined women treated for uterine cancer from 2006-2018. Eligible women included those who underwent a hysterectomy/bilateral salpino-oophorectemy alone (HS), with brachytherapy (BT), or with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). A noncancer cohort of women who underwent a hysterectomy/BSO for benign indications were also identified (non-CA). To compare outcomes, we utilized a shortened form of the female sexual function index (FSFI) and the menopause survey, which consists of 3 subscales: hot flashes, vaginal symptoms, and urinary symptoms. Demographic, comorbidity, and other treatment variables were collected. Survey totals were compared across cohorts using ANOVA tests and logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 284 women completed the Menopause Survey (Non-CA 64, HS 60, BT 69, EBRT 91); 116 women reported sexual activity in the last 4 weeks and completed the FSFI (NC 32, HS 21, BT 31, EBRT 32). The mean FSFI score for the entire cohort was 11.4 (SD 4.16), which indicates poor sexual function. There was no significant difference between any cohort in the overall FSFI score (p = 0.708) or in any of the FSFI subscales (all p > 0.05). On univariate analysis, BT was associated with fewer menopausal hot flashes and vaginal symptoms compared to the non-CA cohort (p < 0.05), which did not persist on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in sexual dysfunction or menopausal symptoms in those treated for uterine cancer with or without adjuvant radiation. Most patients reported poor sexual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison K Yoder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David S Lakomy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Juliana Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX
| | - Lauren M Andring
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kelsey L Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bryan Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lauren E Colbert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael M Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lilie L Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Slot MA, Remmers S, van Leenders GJLH, Busstra MB, Gan M, Klaver S, Rietbergen JBW, den Bakker MA, Kweldam CF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Venderbos LDF. Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Function After the Introduction of NeuroSAFE in Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:824-831. [PMID: 37032279 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy (RP) results in better functional outcomes. Intraoperative neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen section examination (NeuroSAFE) significantly increases the frequency of NS surgery. The effect of NeuroSAFE on postoperative erectile function (EF) and continence is not yet clear. OBJECTIVE To describe EF and continence outcomes for men undergoing RP with the NeuroSAFE technique. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between September 2018 and February 2021, 1034 men underwent robot-assisted RP. Data for patient-reported outcomes were collected via validated questionnaires. INTERVENTION NeuroSAFE technique for RP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Continence was assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short form (EPIC-26) and defined as use of 0-1 pads/d. EF was evaluated using EPIC-26 or the International Index of Erectile Function short form (IIEF-5), with data converted according to the Vertosick method and categorized. Descriptive statistics were used to asses and describe tumor characteristics and continence and EF outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 1034 men who underwent RP after introduction of the NeuroSAFE technique, 63% and 60% completed a preoperative and at least one postoperative questionnaire on continence and EF, respectively. Of the men who underwent unilateral or bilateral NS surgery, use of 0-1 pads/d was reported by 93% after 1 yr and 96% after 2 yr; the corresponding rates for men who underwent non-NS surgery were 86% and 78%. Overall, use of 0-1 pads/d was reported by 92% of the men at 1 yr and by 94% at 2 yr after RP. Men in the NS group had a good or intermediate Vertosick score after RP more often than the non-NS group. Overall, 44% of the men had a good or intermediate Vertosick score at 1 and 2 yr after RP. CONCLUSIONS After introduction of the NeuroSAFE technique, the continence rate was 92% at 1 yr and 94% at 2 yr after RP. The NS group had a greater percentage of men with an intermediate or good Vertosick score and a higher continence rate after RP in comparison to the non-NS group. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study shows that after introduction of the NeuroSAFE technique during removal of the prostate, the continence rate among patients was 92% at 1 year and 94% at 2 years after surgery. Some 44% of the men had a good or intermediate score for erectile function 1 and 2 years after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaretha A van der Slot
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B Busstra
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie Gan
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd Klaver
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John B W Rietbergen
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A den Bakker
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte F Kweldam
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Anser Prostate Operation Clinic, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lionne D F Venderbos
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haeuser L, Tully KH, Reicherz A, Berg S, Moritz R, Roghmann F, Noldus J, Palisaar RJ. Functional outcome after radical prostatectomy in 1313 patients: A single-center study. Prostate 2023; 83:1290-1297. [PMID: 37350456 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of urinary continence and erectile function on the quality of life in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC), we analyzed the preoperative and 1-year postoperative outcomes of five functional domains and their influencing factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this prospective study, all patients undergoing open or robot-assisted RP between Febuary 2017 and March 2020 in a single academic center were included. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed pre- and 12 months postoperatively using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) survey, evaluating continence, irritative/obstructive micturition, gastrointestinal symptoms, sexuality, and overall vitality. We examined the impact of RP on sexual function and urinary continence using multivariable logistic regression models, accounting for patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 1313 consecutive patients gave consent for study participation and completed both surveys. The median age was 66 years (IQR: 60-70). The majority of patients (n = 601, 46%) had an intermediate risk PC. Robotic RP was performed in 71.6% and nerve-sparing technique in 81% of the cases. The median pre- versus postoperative scores were the following: urinary continence 100 (IQR: 91.8-100) versus 85.5 (64.8-100), irritative micturition 87.5 (IQR: 75-100) versus 93.8 (IQR: 87.5-100), gastrointestinal symptoms the same with 100 (IQR: 95.8-100), vitality 95 (IQR: 80-100) versus 90 (IQR: 75-100), and erectile function 65.3 (IQR: 38.8-87.5) versus 22.2 (IQR: 12.5-48.7), respectively. Age (p < 0.001), risk classification (p = 0.002), and nerve-sparing surgery (p = 0.016) were associated with good sexual function (EPIC-26 score ≥60), while only age (p = 0.001) was statistically significantly associated with good urinary continence (EPIC-26 score ≥80). CONCLUSION Non-modifiable factors such as age and PC risk classification impact urinary continence and sexual function after RP. Nevertheless, urologic surgeons should further focus on improving nerve-sparing techniques, the only modifiable variable, to reduce the surgery's negative impact on urinary continence and sexual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorine Haeuser
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Alina Reicherz
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Berg
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Rudolf Moritz
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Rein-Jüri Palisaar
- Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lefèvre AC, Serup-Hansen E, Storm KS, Wind KL, Kronborg C, Spindler KLG. One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1165-1177. [PMID: 36179989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcome (PRO) and National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) data for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) treated with modern radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to report bowel and bladder PRO and NCI-CTCAE for patients with SCCA 1 year after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2015 to 2020, we included patients in a prospective Danish national study. Data were collected before treatment (PT) and 1 year after treatment (1Y) using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, as well as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and CR29. We evaluated the combined PRO scores according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring guidelines, and classified changes according to score difference from PT to 1Y as no change (0-5), minor (5-10), moderate (11-20), and major (>20). Raw scores were reported as frequencies of each of the scores: Not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much. RESULTS Of the 270 patients, 81% had complete data sets, including PT and 1Y answers. Functional mean scores were equal to a matched normal population cohort at PT and 1Y. From PT to 1Y, C30 scores were stable despite minor improvements in global health status/quality of life (7.3), emotional functioning (9.3), insomnia (8.0), and appetite loss (7.8). For questionnaire CR29, bowel and bladder symptoms and sore skin improved with minor change (6.2), and buttocks, anal, or rectal pain improved with moderate change (18.3). Flatulence worsened moderately (12.6), and fecal incontinence had minor worsening (7.8). Agreement between PROs and NCI-CTCAE was generally only fair to moderate, especially for quantitative symptoms, such as pain (κ = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS For patients with SCCA who underwent definitive RT, only a few patients had high scores (indicating quite a bit or very much frequency of bother) regarding bowel and bladder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cecilie Lefèvre
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Karen Lycke Wind
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures into health care for men with localized prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:263-279. [PMID: 35260844 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00575-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Measuring treatment-related quality of life (QOL) has become an increasingly requisite component of delivering high-quality care for patients with prostate cancer. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have, therefore, become an important tool for understanding the adverse effects of radical prostate cancer treatment and have been widely integrated into clinical practice. By providing real-time symptom monitoring and improved clinical feedback to patients and providers, PRO assessment has led to meaningful gains in prostate cancer care delivery and quality improvement worldwide. By providing an avenue for benchmarking, collaboration and population health monitoring, PROMs have delivered substantial improvements beyond providing individual symptom feedback. However, multilevel barriers exist that need to be addressed before the routine implementation of PROMs is achieved. Improvements in collection, interpretation, standardization and reporting will be crucial for the continued implementation of PROM instruments in prostate cancer pathways.
Collapse
|
8
|
Amarasekera C, Wong V, Jackson K, Yura E, Patel M, Manjunath A, Kundu S. A Pilot Study Assessing Aspects of Sexual Function Predicted to Be Important After Treatment for Prostate Cancer in Gay Men: An Underserved Domain Highlighted. LGBT Health 2020; 7:271-276. [PMID: 32584648 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Existing questionnaires assessing sexual function after prostate cancer (PCa) were developed in predominantly heterosexual male cohorts and may measure function incompletely in gay men. We sought to determine if there are sexual function domains relevant to gay men that are not captured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) sexual function assessment. Methods: Fifty-three gay men with PCa responded to an online survey regarding the applicability of the sexual function domain in the validated EPIC questionnaire. They were then queried about whether the prostate is a source of sexual pleasure and the importance of measuring sexual satisfaction as it relates to receptive anal intercourse. Results: A majority of gay men with PCa found the EPIC sexual function tool to be applicable when measuring erectile function (76.5%). Of the men queried, 64.2% felt that the prostate is a source of sexual pleasure and 52.8% felt it important to measure sexual satisfaction associated with receptive anal intercourse. A larger proportion of gay men who engaged in receptive anal intercourse, compared with those who did not engage in receptive anal intercourse, felt that the prostate is a source of sexual pleasure (100% vs. 57.1%), and thought it important to measure sexual satisfaction as it relates to receptive anal intercourse after PCa treatment (90.0% vs. 45.2%). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need to create a validated questionnaire to measure sexual satisfaction from receptive anal intercourse to help care for men engaging in receptive anal intercourse after PCa treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Channa Amarasekera
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vincent Wong
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kathryn Jackson
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emily Yura
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mehul Patel
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Adarsh Manjunath
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shilajit Kundu
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jeong CW, Cowan JE, Broering JM, ten Ham RM, Wilson LS, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Robust Health Utility Assessment Among Long-term Survivors of Prostate Cancer: Results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor Registry. Eur Urol 2019; 76:743-751. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
10
|
Agochukwu NQ, Wittmann D, Boileau NR, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Kim T, Miller DC, Peabody J, Carlozzi NE. Validity of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Interest and Satisfaction Measures in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2017-2027. [PMID: 31232671 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes after radical prostatectomy have focused on erectile function. To date, no studies have validated the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Interest and Satisfaction single item measures in patients with prostate cancer, nor have studies examined how these measures relate to erectile function. In addition, data are lacking with regard to the clinical responsiveness of these measures to treatment. We sought to validate and examine the clinical utility of these measures in men after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified men who underwent a robotic radical prostatectomy from May 2014 to January 2016 in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. A single item from the PROMIS Global Satisfaction With Sex Life subdomain and a single item from the PROMIS Interest in Sexual Activity subdomain were administered. Erectile function was also assessed. Differences between baseline and 24-month T-scores for both PROMIS interest and satisfaction were examined. Multilevel models were constructed to examine change over time. RESULTS A total of 1,604 patients were included in the analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity of the PROMIS measures was supported. The mean PROMIS interest T-score decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months (P = .001) and significantly increased from 3 months to 24 months in this cohort, with 24-month scores exceeding baseline scores (P < .001). The mean PROMIS satisfaction T-score declined from baseline to 3 months and increased from 3 months to 24 months (P < .002). CONCLUSION PROMIS Global Satisfaction With Sex Life and Interest in Sexual Activity single-item measures are fundamental measures in prostate cancer survivorship. Patients are interested in sex despite functional losses and can salvage satisfaction, thereby giving insight into attainable patient-centered survivorship goals for sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nnenaya Q Agochukwu
- 1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Daniela Wittmann
- 1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Rodney L Dunn
- 1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - James E Montie
- 1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tae Kim
- 1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - David C Miller
- 1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martin NE. Now You're Speaking My Language: Getting Patient-reported Outcomes to Talk to One Another. Eur Urol 2019; 75:731-732. [PMID: 30737075 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neil E Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Development and Validation of Crosswalks for Patient-reported Sexual and Urinary Outcomes Between Commonly Used Instruments. Eur Urol 2018; 75:723-730. [PMID: 30573317 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become widely adopted in the care of patients with prostate cancer, but there is no validated crosswalk between two commonly used instruments, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) instrument, which consists of the International Index of Erectile Function-6 (IIEF-6) questionnaire and the MSK radical prostatectomy urinary outcome scale. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate bidirectional crosswalks between the sexual and urinary domains (single domain in MSK, separate incontinence and irritative/obstructive domains in EPIC-26) of the MSK and EPIC-26 instruments. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Radical prostatectomy (RP) patients completing instruments at MSK and Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) between January and May of 2017 were invited to enroll. Stratified random sampling (by institution, MSK urinary function score, and MSK erectile function score) was used to divide patient data into training and test sets. Models were developed to predict the domain score for each instrument using the other's item responses and domain scores. Performance was evaluated using capped root-mean-squared error and accuracy at established thresholds. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We received 517 instruments at MSK and 1033 within MUSIC, which were assigned to training (825), post-RP test (412), and pre-RP test (313) sets. We found the crosswalks to have low error and high accuracy. Although the crosswalks are more accurate if responses to each item are known, it is possible to convert between instruments on the basis of a total domain score. CONCLUSIONS The crosswalks are a valid way to convert between sexual and urinary domains of the MSK and EPIC-26 instruments. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed and validated a set of formulas that allow conversion of sexual and urinary function scores between the Memorial Sloan Kettering and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form patient-reported outcome questionnaires. These crosswalks allow seamless transition between the two questionnaires.
Collapse
|
13
|
Re: The Accuracy of Patients' Perceptions of the Risks Associated with Localised Prostate Cancer Treatments. J Urol 2018; 199:329. [PMID: 29357539 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
14
|
Re: Association between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes after 3 Years. J Urol 2017; 198:466-468. [PMID: 28817883 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
15
|
Yang L, Kibel AS, Colditz GA, Pakpahan R, Imm KR, Izadi S, Grubb RL, Wolin KY, Sutcliffe S. Caution with Use of the EPIC-50 Urinary Bother Scale: How Voiding Dysfunction Modifies its Performance. J Urol 2017; 198:1397-1403. [PMID: 28728989 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated agreement between patient reported urinary function and bother, and sexual function and bother in patients treated with radical prostatectomy to help inform possible nonfunctional, modifiable mechanisms for patient bother. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were recruited from 2011 to 2014 at Washington University, and Brigham and Women's Hospital. Urinary and sexual outcomes were assessed by EPIC-50 (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-50) before, 5 weeks and 12 months after radical prostatectomy. Spearman rank correlation coefficients and agreement/disagreement categories were used to describe the relation between function and bother. RESULTS Despite moderate to good agreement between function and bother (urinary r = 0.51-0.69 and sexual r = 0.65-0.80) discordant groups were observed. In the urinary domain these groups were men disproportionately bothered by function at baseline (16.9%) and 12 months after radical prostatectomy (6.1%) and men less bothered by function 5 weeks (26.8%) and 12 months (9.9%) after radical prostatectomy. Discordant groups in the sexual domain were men less bothered by function at baseline (20.8%), and 5 weeks (21.1%) and 12 months (15.7%) after radical prostatectomy. Splitting the urinary bother scale into 2 subscales, including one for incontinence related bother to complement the urinary function scale which measures only incontinence, and one for voiding dysfunction related bother yielded considerably better agreement (urinary function and incontinence related bother r = 0.78-0.83). Factors contributing to the group less bothered by sexual function were unclear. CONCLUSIONS When using EPIC-50, investigators should consider splitting the urinary bother scale by the relation to incontinence to prevent distortions of function-bother and comparisons before vs after radical prostatectomy by coexisting voiding dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ratna Pakpahan
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kellie R Imm
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sonya Izadi
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert L Grubb
- Division of Urological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Siobhan Sutcliffe
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|