Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient or Caregiver Regret following Surgery for Fecal Incontinence

Parental regret following decision for sons to undergo elective post-neonatal circumcision

INTRODUCTION

The reasons for performing a circumcision among males after the neonatal period are usually cultural or medical. We aimed to evaluate parental regret for providing consent and to identify factors associated with such regret.

METHODS

Included were the parents of males aged 6 months to 18 years who underwent circumcision under general anesthesia at a single center between 2/2017 and 01/2023. Those who underwent additional surgical procedures during the same session were excluded. Parents responded telephonically to the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) questionnaire. Regret was classified as none (0 points), mild (1-25) or moderate-to-strong (26-100). Surgical and demographic data were retrieved for comparison to DRS scores and identification of predictors of parental regret.

RESULTS

In total, 201 of the 265 suitable patients met the inclusion criteria. Parents of 130 patients (65% response rate) whose average age was 5.06 (IQR 1.58,7.53) years completed the DRS questionnaire (study group). The average time since surgery was 41.8 (IQR 25.4,59.3) months. Forty surgeries were undertaken for cultural reasons and 90 for medical considerations. Eighteen parents reported regret (15 mild and 3 moderate-to-strong) for their decision to consent to their son's circumcision. The time from responding since surgery was the only significant variable in the DRS scores, with a 33-month gap predicting no regret (p = 0.02 compared to shorter gaps). The reasons for circumcision did not significantly differ between the "regret" and "no-regret" groups (p = 0.23).

DISCUSSION

Our current investigation revealed a lower incidence of parental regret when compared to previous reports following distal hypospadias repair, likely attributable to the lower complication rate associated with circumcision. Our data reflect the experience of a single center in a country where neonatal male circumcision is routinely performed for cultural and religious reasons, thus precluding the generalization of our findings to places where post-natal circumcision is less commonplace.

CONCLUSION

Consent to their son's post-neonatal circumcision was regretted by 13.8% of parents. Time since surgery significantly influenced the reduction of their negative attitudes.

Caregiver decisional regret following reconstructive bladder surgery in children with neurogenic bladder

BACKGROUND

Surgical management for neurogenic bladder requires complex decision-making by physicians, patients, and caregivers. Assessing decisional regret (DR) as a patient-reported outcome among caregivers could inform future counseling and shared decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To assess DR among caregivers of children with neurogenic bladder following reconstructive bladder surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A questionnaire including a validated DR survey was distributed to English-speaking caregivers of children with neurogenic bladder who had undergone reconstructive bladder surgery at Children's Hospital Colorado. DR scores range from zero to 100, with higher numbers indicating higher regret. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Spearman correlation were performed to assess differences in DR scores by patient demographic factors or disease factors.

RESULTS

Forty-five of 210 English-speaking caregivers completed the DR survey. The median DR score was 5, with 40% of subjects reporting with a DR score of zero and 24% of subjects with a DR score of 30 or higher. Patient sex and Mitrofanoff leakage were found to be associated with DR, with caregivers of male patients reporting significantly higher DR. Surgical procedure did not have a statistically significant impact on DR scores.

DISCUSSION

Sparse existing data exploring DR among patients with neurogenic bladder suggest DR following reconstructive bladder surgery is low, with few identifiable predictors of regret. While the majority of caregivers in our study report little or no DR, one quarter of caregivers report moderate to high DR. The limitations of this study include small cohort size, low response rate, exclusion of non-English speaking patients, and the potential for recall bias due to the survey design of the study.

CONCLUSION

Caregiver DR following bladder reconstruction in children with neurogenic bladder is generally low, however a subset of caregivers reports significant DR. This study suggests that caregivers of male children may have higher DR, a finding that merits further investigation.

Application of the decisional regret scale (DRS) in men undergoing anti-incontinence procedures for stress urinary incontinence

Background

Decisional regret (DR) has previously been applied to other urologic issues (hypospadias, prostate cancer). The present study seeks to evaluate certain patient factors that directly correlate to high DR scores in anti-incontinence procedures.

Methods

Medical records for 119 patients undergoing anti-incontinence procedures between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-one patients were accessible for telephone follow-up and provided a Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) questionnaire. If patients had both a sling and an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placed, questionnaires were administered for each. DRS score was quantified in accordance with prior literature, with scores ranging 0-100. We subdivided patients based on demographics and surgical data, correlating this with DRS score.

Results

In 41 patients, 46 procedures (13 slings, 33 AUS) were performed. Thirty-nine (95.1%) men underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, and 11 (26.8%) men reported prior pelvic radiation. Post-procedural continence, irrespective of procedure, yielded an average 2±1.56 pads per day (PPD). Mean DRS score across the cohort was 29.78. DRS score was subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe, with majority noting "none to mild" regret (63%), 15.2% reporting moderate and 21.7% severe. Predictors of higher regret included history of radiation (P=0.056), choice of anti-incontinence procedure (P=0.011), and need for surgical revision (P=0.00042). DR was unrelated to race, complete continence, and time to follow-up.

Conclusions

DRS has recently been applied to anti-incontinence procedures for male stress incontinence; our study highlights novel findings not previously assessed. Majority of men had minimal regret with a subset that had significant regret-history of radiation, multiple revisions/explant, and those who elected for sling upfront. These results highlight the importance of patient selection and pre-operative counselling.

Reviewing next of kin regrets in surgical decision-making: cross-sectional analysis of systematically searched literature

BACKGROUND

Decision-making concerning relatives undergoing surgery is challenging. It remains unclear to what extent implicated next of kin eventually regret their decisions and how this regret is assessed. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on decisional regret of next of kin and to describe the assessment tools used and the surgical populations studied.

METHODS

We included interventional or observational, quantitative or qualitative studies reporting the measurement of decisional regret of next of kin concerning relatives undergoing surgery. We searched a variety of databases without restriction on publication year. We assessed the quality of reporting of quantitative studies using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and of qualitative studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Checklist.

RESULTS

Thirteen cross-sectional, five prospective cohorts and five qualitative studies matched our inclusion criteria. In 18 studies (78%), patients were children, in five (22%), young or middle-aged adults. No study included elderly or frail patients. Thirteen studies (57%) used the original Decision Regret Scale which was validated for patients, but not for next of kin. Only 3 of the 18 (17%) quantitative studies and only one of the 4 (25%) qualitative studies were rated as "good" in the quality assessment.

CONCLUSION

None of the retrieved studies used validated tools to assess the decisional regret of next of kin and none of them examined this issue in elderly or frail surgical patients.

Parental Regret Following Decision to Revise Circumcision

PURPOSE

Revision surgery for the removal of excess foreskin after circumcision is a common procedure. The decision regret scale (DRS) is a validated questionnaire which assesses regret after medical decision making. The aim was to evaluate parental regret by means of the DRS and querying about factors associated with regret about deciding to revise their child's circumcision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Included were all pediatric patients who underwent revision of neonatal circumcision in a single center between 2010 and 2016. Excluded were children who underwent revision for reasons other than excess foreskin, those who underwent additional surgical procedures during the same anesthetic session, and those who had undergone previous penile surgery other than circumcision. Response to the DRS questionnaire was by a telephone call with the patient's parent. Regret was classified as none (a score of 0), mild (1-25), or moderate-to-strong (26-100). Surgical and baseline demographic data were obtained from the departmental database and compared between the no regret and regret groups.

RESULTS

Of the 115 revisions of circumcisions performed during the study period, 52 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and the parents of 40 (77%) completed the DRS questionnaire. Regret was reported by 11/40 [28%: nine as mild (23%) and two as moderate-to-strong (5%)]. The average age of the child in the regret group was 17 months compared to 18 months in the no regret group (p = 0.27). The median weight percentile was 43% in both groups. Surgical variables, including anesthesia type (caudal vs. no block, p = 0.65), suture type (polyglactin vs. poliglecaprone, p = 0.29), operation time (28 vs. 25 min, p = 0.59), and anesthesia time (55 vs. 54 min, p = 0.57) were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Regret for deciding upon revision surgery for removal of excess foreskin post-circumcision was reported by 27.5% of parents of children who underwent revision. No clinical, surgical, or demographic characteristics predicted parental decisional regret.

Parental decisional regret after surgical treatment in young boys born with hypospadias

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Parental decisional conflict and decisional regret are aspects in parental adjustment to childhood elective surgery. This study assessed correlates of parental decisional regret in parents of young boys treated for hypospadias.

METHODS

Parents of 261 boys treated for hypospadias at the Radboudumc between 2006 and 2014 were approached to complete questionnaires on socio-demographics, clinical details, postoperative outcomes, decisional conflict and decisional regret.

RESULTS

Of the 97 participating parents, 50.5% reported some form of decisional regret, in 11.3% this was moderate to strong. Decisional conflict (β = .68, p < .001) and psychosocial behavior problems of the child (β = .20, p < .05) significantly predicted decisional regret. Demographic and medical variables did not correlate with parental decisional regret.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of parents report some form of decisional regret regarding the elective surgery for hypospadias in their child. Although most parents only show mild forms of regret, in the perspective of discussions on this surgery in early childhood, future research could shed more light on the interrelationship between medical and psychosocial factors in the process of decision-making around surgery, in boys with hypospadias and their parents.

Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Informal caregivers often serve as decision makers for dependent or vulnerable individuals facing health care decisions. Decision regret is one of the most prevalent outcomes reported by informal caregivers who have made such decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To examine levels of decision regret and its predictors among informal caregivers who have made health-related decisions for a loved one.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 2018. Participants were informal caregivers, and the outcome was decision regret as measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS).

REVIEW METHODS

Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We performed a narrative synthesis and presented predictors of decision regret using a conceptual framework, dividing the predictors into decision antecedents, decision-making process, and decision outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 16 of 3003 studies identified. Most studies (n = 13) reported a mean DRS score ranging from 7.0 to 32.3 out of 100 (median = 14.3). The methodological quality of studies was acceptable. We organized predictors and their estimated effects (β) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as follows: decision antecedents (e.g., caregivers' desire to avoid the decision, OR 2.07, 95% CI [1.04-4.12], P = 0.04), decision-making process (e.g., caregivers' perception of effective decision making, β = 0.49 [0.05, 0.93], P < 0.01), and decision outcomes (e.g., incontinence, OR = 4.4 [1.1, 18.1], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that informal caregivers' level of decision regret is generally low but is high for some decisions. We also identified predictors of regret during different stages of the decision-making process. These findings may guide future research on improving caregivers' experiences.

Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

No gold standard exists for managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction, specifically in individuals with spina bifida. Since the International Children's Continence Society published its consensus document on neurogenic bowel treatment in 2012, an increased focus on why we must manage bowels and how to improve our management has occurred. This review provides updated information for clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

A surge in research, mostly retrospective, has been conducted on the success and satisfaction of three types of management for neurogenic bowel. All three management techniques have relatively high success rates for fecal continence and satisfaction rates. Selection of which treatment to carry out still is debated among clinicians. Transanal irrigation is a safe and effective management option for neurogenic bowel that does not require surgery. Antegrade enemas can be carried out via cecostomy tube or Malone antegrade continence enema with similar fecal continence outcomes.