1
|
Guha C, van Zwieten A, Khalid R, Kim S, Walker A, Francis A, Didsbury M, Teixeira-Pinto A, Barton B, Prestidge C, Lancsar E, Mackie F, Kwon J, Howard K, Mallitt KA, Howell M, Jaure A, Hayes A, Raghunandan R, Petrou S, Lah S, McTaggart S, Craig JC, Wong G. Longitudinal assessment of the health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2023; 103:357-364. [PMID: 36374824 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
In this multi-center longitudinal cohort study conducted in Australia and New Zealand, we assessed the trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) over time. A total of 377 children (aged 6-18 years) with CKD stages 1-5 (pre-dialysis), dialysis, or transplant, were followed biennially for four years. Multi Attribute Utility (MAU) scores of HRQoL were measured at baseline and at two and four years using the McMaster Health Utilities Index Mark 3 tool, a generic multi-attribute, preference-based system. A multivariable linear mixed model was used to assess the trajectories of HRQoL over time in 199 children with CKD stage 1-5, 43 children receiving dialysis and 135 kidney transplant recipients. An interaction between CKD stage at baseline and follow-up time indicated that the slopes of the HRQoL scores differed between children by CKD stage at inception. Over half of the cohort on dialysis at baseline had received a kidney transplant by the end of year four and the MAU scores of these children increased by a meaningful amount averaging 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.09) per year in comparison to those who were transplant recipients at baseline. The mean difference between baseline and year two MAU scores was 0.09 (95% confidence interval -0.05, 0.23), (Cohen's d effect size 0.31). Thus, improvement in HRQoL over time of children on dialysis at baseline was likely to have been driven by their transition from dialysis to transplantation. Additionally, children with CKD stage 1-5 and transplant recipients at baseline had no changes in their disease stage or treatment modality and experienced stable HRQoL over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandana Guha
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Anita van Zwieten
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rabia Khalid
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Siah Kim
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Walker
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Francis
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Child and Adolescent Renal Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Madeleine Didsbury
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Belinda Barton
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead and Paediatrics and Child Health (CHERI), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Fiona Mackie
- Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; School of Women's and Child Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joseph Kwon
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Menzies Centre for Health Policy & Economics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kylie-Ann Mallitt
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Hayes
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rakhee Raghunandan
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Suncica Lah
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven McTaggart
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Child and Adolescent Renal Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolbocean C, Anderson PJ, Bartmann P, Cheong JLY, Doyle LW, Wolke D, Petrou S. Comparative evaluation of the health utilities index mark 3 and the short form 6D: evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis of very preterm and very low birthweight adults. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:1703-1716. [PMID: 36705795 PMCID: PMC10172285 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03344-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most appropriate preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments for trials or research studies that ascertain the consequences of individuals born very preterm and/or low birthweight (VP/VLBW) are not known. Agreement between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures have not been previously investigated for VP/VLBW and normal birthweight or term-born controls. This study examined the agreement between the outputs of the HUI3 and SF-6D measures among adults born VP/VLBW and normal birthweight or term born controls. METHODS We used two prospective cohorts of individuals born VP/VLBW and controls contributing to the 'Research on European Children and Adults Born Preterm' (RECAP) consortium which assessed HRQoL using two preference-based measures. The combined dataset of individual participant data (IPD) included 407 adult VP/VLBW survivors and 367 controls, ranging in age from 18 to 26 years. Bland-Altman plots, intra-class correlation coefficients, and generalized linear mixed models in a one-step approach were used to examine agreement between the measures. RESULTS There was significant discordance between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures in the VP/VLBW sample, controls, and in the combined samples. Agreement between the HUI3 and SF-6D multi-attribute utility measures was weaker in controls compared with VP/VLBW individuals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The HUI3 and SF-6D each provide unique information on different aspects of health status across the groups. The HUI3 better captures preterm-related changes to HRQoL in adulthood compared to SF-6D. Studies focused on measuring physical or cognitive aspects of health will likely benefit from using the HUI3 instead of the SF-6D, regardless of gestational age at birth and birthweight status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corneliu Bolbocean
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| | - Peter J Anderson
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Bartmann
- Department of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care, Children's Hospital, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jeanie L Y Cheong
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Newborn Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lex W Doyle
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Newborn Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dieter Wolke
- Department of Psychology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick and Division of Health Sciences, Coventry, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tanaka T, Morishita S, Hashimoto M, Nakamichi T, Uchiyama Y, Hasegawa S, Domen K. Relationship Between Physical Function and Health Utility in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Integr Cancer Ther 2021; 20:15347354211043508. [PMID: 34472358 PMCID: PMC8419542 DOI: 10.1177/15347354211043508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Health utility, which is a measure of patient-reported outcome (PRO), has recently been used in health-related quality of life for patients with various cancers. However, the relationship between health utility and the physical function and of patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) as surgical treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has not been reported in the perioperative and convalescent phases. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative health utility of patients undergoing P/D for MPM at one year postoperatively and to examine the relationship with physical function. METHODS We included patients underwent P/D. Grip strength, knee extension strength, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured to assess physical function, and the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) was completed to assess health utility. These assessments were performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and one year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance for comparison of pre and postoperative and one year mean values. RESULTS There were 24 subjects (23 males, 65.5±8.3 year). SF-6D, 6MWD, FVC, and FEV1 values one year operatively improved significantly compared with postoperative. Additionally, SF-6D was correlated with 6MWD. CONCLUSION Health utility were also correlated with exercise capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tanaka
- Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Morishita
- Fukushima Medical University, Sakaemachi, Fukushima, Japan.,Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yuki Uchiyama
- Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Self-reported quality of life following stroke: a systematic review of instruments with a focus on their psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:329-342. [PMID: 34247327 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02944-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the psychometric properties of common health-related quality-of-life instruments used post stroke and provide recommendations for research and clinical use with this diagnostic group. METHODS A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the five most commonly used quality-of-life measurement tools (EQ-5D, SF-36, SF-6D, AQoL, SS-QOL) was conducted. Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE on November 27th 2019. Two authors screened papers against the inclusion criteria and where consensus was not reached, a third author was consulted. Included papers were appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and findings synthesized to make recommendations. RESULTS A total of n = 50,908 papers were screened and n = 45 papers reporting on 40 separate evaluations of psychometric properties met inclusion criteria (EQ-5D = 19, SF-36 = 16, SF-6D = 4, AQoL = 2, SS-QOL = 4). Studies reported varied psychometric quality of instruments, and results show that psychometric properties of quality-of-life instruments for the stroke population have not been well established. The strongest evidence was identified for the use of the EQ-5D as a quality-of-life assessment for adult stroke survivors. CONCLUSIONS This systematic evaluation of the psychometric properties of self-reported quality-of-life instruments used with adults after stroke suggests that validity across tools should not be assumed. Clinicians and researchers alike may use findings to help identify the most valid and reliable measurement instrument for understanding the impact of stroke on patient-reported quality of life.
Collapse
|
5
|
Berrigan P, Hodge J, Kirton A, Moretti ME, Ungar WJ, Zwicker JD. Protocol for a cost-utility analysis of neurostimulation and intensive camp-based therapy for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis based on a multicentre clinical trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041444. [PMID: 33468454 PMCID: PMC7817786 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perinatal stroke leads to cerebral palsy (CP) and lifelong disability for thousands of Canadian children. Hemiparesis, referring to impaired functionality in one side of the body, is a common complication of perinatal stroke. Standard long-term care for hemiparetic CP focuses on rehabilitation therapies. Early research suggests that patients with hemiparesis may benefit from adjunctive neuromodulation treatments such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS uses electric current to stimulate targeted areas of the brain non-invasively, potentially enhancing the effects of motor learning therapies. This protocol describes an economic evaluation to be conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the incremental cost of tDCS added to a camp-based therapy compared with camp-based therapy alone per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in children with hemiparetic CP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Stimulation for Perinatal Stroke Optimising Recovery Trajectories (SPORT) trial is a multicentre RCT evaluating tDCS added to a 2-week camp-based therapy for children aged 6-18 years with perinatal ischaemic stroke and disabling hemiparetic CP affecting the upper limb. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 1 week, 2 months and 6 months following intervention. Cost and quality of life data are collected at baseline and 6 months and results will be used to conduct a cost-utility analysis (CUA). The evaluation will be conducted from the perspectives of the public healthcare system and society. The CUA will be conducted over a 6-month time horizon. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the SPORT trial and the associated economic evaluation has been given by the research ethics boards at each of the study sites. The findings of the economic evaluation will be submitted for publication in a peer reviewed academic journal and submitted for presentation at conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03216837; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Berrigan
- School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jacquie Hodge
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Myla E Moretti
- Ontario Child Health Support Unit and the Clinical Trials Unit, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Technology Assessment at SickKids, Program of Child Heath Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer D Zwicker
- School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Economic evaluations help decision-makers faced with tough decisions on how to allocate resources. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations are useful as they allow readers to assess whether interventions have been demonstrated to be cost effective, the uncertainty in the evidence base, and key limitations or gaps in the evidence base. The synthesis of systematic reviews of economic evaluations commonly takes a narrative approach whereas a meta-analysis is common step for reviews of clinical evidence (e.g. effectiveness or adverse event outcomes). As they are common objectives in other reviews, readers may query why a synthesis has not been attempted for economic outcomes. However, a meta-analysis of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, costs, or health benefits (including quality-adjusted life years) is fraught with issues largely due to heterogeneity across study designs and methods and further practical challenges. Therefore, meta-analysis is rarely feasible or robust. This commentary outlines these issues, supported by examples from the literature, to support researchers and reviewers considering systematic review of economic evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma E. Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PY UK
| | - Jamie Elvidge
- Centre for Health Technology Evaluation, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Level 1A, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester, M1 4BT UK
| |
Collapse
|