Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Compared to Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States

Cost-effectiveness analysis of add-on pertuzumab to trastuzumab biosimilar and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for human epidermal growth receptor 2-positive early breast cancer patients in Singapore

OBJECTIVES

The Asian PEONY trial showed that add-on pertuzumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC). This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab as an add-on therapy to trastuzumab and chemotherapy for neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2+ EBC in Singapore.

METHODS

A six-state Markov model was developed from the Singapore healthcare system perspective, with a lifetime time horizon. Model outputs were: costs; life-years (LYs); quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs); incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity/scenario analyses explored model uncertainties.

RESULTS

The base case projected the addition of pertuzumab to be associated with improved outcomes by 0.277 LYs and 0.271 QALYs, increased costs by S$1,387, and an ICER of S$5,121/QALY. The ICER was most sensitive to the pCR rate, and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that add-on pertuzumab had an 81.3% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of S$45,000/QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

This model demonstrated that the long-term clinical impact of early pertuzumab use, particularly the avoidance of metastatic disease and thus avoidance of higher costs and mortality rates, make neoadjuvant pertuzumab a cost-effective option in the management of patients with HER2+ breast cancer in Singapore.

Development of a concise and reliable method for quantifying the antibody loaded onto lipid nanoparticles modified with Herceptin

Antibodies are essential components of the immune system with a wide range of molecular targets. They have been recognized as modalities for treating several diseases and more than 130 approved antibody-based therapeutics are available for clinical use. However, limitations remain associated with its efficacy, tissue permeability, and safety, especially in cancer treatment. Nanoparticles, particularly those responsive to external stimuli, have shown promise in improving the efficacy of antibody-based therapeutics and tissue-selective delivery. In this study, we developed a reliable and accurate method for quantifying the amount of antibody loaded onto lipid nanoparticles modified with Herceptin® (Trastuzumab), an antibody-based therapeutic used to treat HER2-positive cancers, using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by silver staining. This method proved to be a suitable alternative to commonly used protein quantification techniques, which are limited by lipid interference present in the samples. Furthermore, the amount of Herceptin modified on the liposomes, measured by this method, was confirmed by Herceptin's antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activity. Our results demonstrate the potential of this method as a critical tool for developing tissue-selective antibody delivery systems, leading to improved efficacy and reduced side effects of antibody-based therapeutics.

A cost-consequence analysis of adding pertuzumab to the neoadjuvant combination therapy in HER2-positive high-risk early breast cancer in Italy

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials confirmed the beneficial effects of adding pertuzumab (P) to the combination of trastuzumab-chemotherapy (TC) in the (neo)adjuvant setting of high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+BC). We evaluated the clinical, economic and societal impact of adding pertuzumab to neoadjuvant TC combination (TPC) in Italy.

METHODS

A cost-consequence analysis comparing TPC vs. TC was performed developing a cohort-based multi-state Markov model to estimate the clinical, societal and economic impact of the neoadjuvant therapy of TPC versus TC in HER2+BC at high-risk of recurrence. The model works on a cycle length of 1 month and 5-years-time horizon. Literature review-based data were used to populate the model. The following clinical and economic outcomes were estimated: cumulative incidence of loco-regional/distant recurrences, life of years and QALY and both direct and indirect costs (€). Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

TPC was associated with a 75,630 € saved of direct costs. Specifically, it was associated with an initial increase of treatment costs (+4.8%) followed by reduction of recurrence management cost (-20.4%). TPC was also associated with an indirect cost reduction of 1.40%, as well as decreased incidence of distant recurrence (-20.14%), days of work lost (-1.53%) and days lived with disability (-0.50%). Furthermore, TPC reported 10,47 QALY gained (+2.77%) compared to TC. The probability to achieve the pathological complete response (pCR) was the parameter that mostly affected the results in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that TPC combination could be a cost-saving option in patients with HER2+BC at high-risk of recurrence.

Impact of Pertuzumab and Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine on Cumulative Avoidance of Recurrence Among Women Treated for Locally Advanced, Inflammatory, or Early-Stage Nonmetastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the impact of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) treatment landscape changes following the introduction of pertuzumab and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) on cumulative population-level recurrences avoided since 2013 (first pertuzumab approval for EBC in the United States; US).

METHODS

We constructed a multi-year epidemiologic population treatment-impact model to estimate annual recurrences between 2013 and 2031. Parameters were: BC incidence; stage I-III proportion; HER2-positive disease proportion; treatment proportions for neoadjuvant-only, adjuvant-only, and neoadjuvant-adjuvant continuation; and therapeutic agent proportions within each of those settings (chemotherapy only, trastuzumab ± chemotherapy, pertuzumab with trastuzumab ± chemotherapy, or T-DM1). The primary endpoint was cumulative recurrences, estimated by incorporating extrapolated clinical trial data for each regimen of interest into the model under four scenarios.

RESULTS

Approximately 889,057 women were predicted to be diagnosed with stage I-III HER2-positive BC from 2006 to 2031 in the US and potentially indicated for HER2-targeted treatment. In steady-state equilibrium, the model estimated that real-world utilization of pertuzumab and T-DM1 will reduce the population-level number of recurrences by approximately 32%, with 7226 recurrences predicted in 2031 based on current utilization rates. In different modeled scenarios, use of neoadjuvant pertuzumab, continuation of pertuzumab in the adjuvant setting, and T-DM1 in the adjuvant setting in women with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment were all predicted to reduce the number of recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Given the improvement of HER2-targeted treatments, alongside increases in BC disease burden, we expect that the population-level impact of HER2-targeted treatments will accelerate over the next decade. Our results suggest that utilization of HER2-targeted treatments in the US has the potential to change the epidemiology of HER2-positive EBC by preventing a substantial number of women from experiencing disease recurrence. These improvements may help to inform our understanding of the future disease and economic burden of HER2-positive BC in the US.

Enhanced binding at fever temperatures of HER2 in complex with trastuzumab and pertuzumab

Aim: Fever follows the administration of trastuzumab and pertuzumab used in HER2-relevant immunotherapy, but is often eliminated in clinical practice. This work explores the role of temperature (37-39°C) in the formation of immune complexes between HER2 with either trastuzumab or pertuzumab or with both antibodies. Materials & methods: Using molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations, the binding between HER2 and these immunotherapeutic monoclonal antibodies was investigated at different temperatures. Results: Trastuzumab and pertuzumab present the highest binding free energy to HER2 at febrile temperatures (39°C), or when HER2 is in complex with both antibodies. Conclusion: Performing molecular dynamics simulations under fever temperatures may be important for delineating their role in enhancing the binding affinity of mature antibodies used in immunotherapy.

BluePrint molecular subtypes predict response to neoadjuvant pertuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The introduction of pertuzumab has greatly improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive breast cancer, yet effects on long-term survival have been limited and it is uncertain which patients derive most benefit. In this study, we determine the prognostic value of BluePrint subtyping in HER2-positive breast cancer. Additionally, we evaluate its use as a biomarker for predicting response to trastuzumab-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab.

METHODS

From a cohort of patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab, 836 patients were selected for microarray gene expression analysis, followed by readout of BluePrint standard (HER2, Basal and Luminal) and dual subtypes (HER2-single, Basal-single, Luminal-single, HER2-Basal, Luminal-HER2, Luminal-HER2-Basal). The associations between subtypes and pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed, and pertuzumab benefit was evaluated within the BluePrint subgroups.

RESULTS

BluePrint results were available for 719 patients. In patients with HER2-type tumors, the pCR rate was 71.9% in patients who received pertuzumab versus 43.5% in patients who did not (adjusted Odds Ratio 3.43, 95% CI 2.36-4.96). Additionally, a significantly decreased hazard was observed for both OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.80) and BCSS (aHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.86) with pertuzumab treatment. Findings were similar in the HER2-single subgroup. No significant benefit of pertuzumab was seen in other subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HER2-type or HER2-single-type tumors, pertuzumab significantly improved the pCR rate and decreased the risk of breast cancer mortality, which was not observed in other subtypes. BluePrint subtyping may be valuable in future studies to identify patients that are likely to be highly sensitive to HER2-targeting agents.

Quantifying the value of older adult-specific clinical trials: Post-lumpectomy irradiation among older adults with early-stage breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although there is increasing interest in conducting cancer clinical trials in older adults, the benefit of such trials is unclear. We aimed to quantify the real-world clinical and economic effects of two phase 3 trials (CALGB 9343 and PRIME II) which showed that post-lumpectomy radiation therapy (RT) improves loco-regional recurrence but makes no improvement in overall survival among older women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a health-transition model to quantify the incremental clinical and economic outcomes between scenarios with vs. without older adult-specific trial results from a societal perspective between 2004 and 2018. The transition probabilities in the model were mainly derived from the 10-year results of CALGB 9343. The total number of the affected patient population in the US and the change in the probability of omitting post-lumpectomy RT due to the CALGB 9343 and PRIME II results were derived from a retrospective analysis of the SEER registry data for patients with ESBC. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to calculate the 95% credible interval (CR) of the incremental clinical and economic outcomes between the two scenarios.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2018, 32,936 (95% CR: 31,512, 34,357) fewer patients received post-lumpectomy RT among those aged 70 years or older diagnosed with ESBC in the US and there was a decrease cost of $419 M USD (95% CR: -$238 M, -$689 M) in scenarios with vs. without older adult-specific trial results. The difference in projected life years (1083 years, 95% CI: -2542, 7985) and QALYs (866 years, 95% CI: -2561, 7780) were not significant. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 k/QALY, the probability of older adult-specific trial results generating a positive net monetary benefit was 98%.

DISCUSSION

The CALGB 9343 and PRIME II trial results were associated with a substantial cost-saving in the US society. Our results suggest that older adult-specific clinical trials that demonstrate no survival benefit of an intervention in older adults could be correlated with a significant monetary benefit. Further case studies are needed for different types of older adult-specific trials to understand the value of older adult-specific trials comprehensively.

Economic evaluation of margetuximab vs. trastuzumab for pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer in the US and China

Objective

To assess the economic evaluation of margetuximab plus chemotherapy over trastuzumab plus chemotherapy for women with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer in the United States (US) and China.

Methods

Based on the SOPHIA trial, a three-state Markov model was developed to compare the cost and efficacy of margetuximab to trastuzumab for previously treated women with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer. The model inputs were derived from existing literature and the US life table. Primary outcomes included lifetime costs in US dollars, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of uncertainty.

Results

The base case analyses demonstrated that margetuximab plus chemotherapy had an increasing cost of $68,132 and $20,540 over trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in the US and China, respectively, with a gain of 0.11 and 0.09 QALYs both favored margetuximab. The ICERs for two treatment strategies were $260,176 in the US and $630,777 in China, resulting in a poor cost-effectiveness at their respective threshold of willingness to play. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results to be most sensitive to the price of margetuximab and that of trastuzumab. And an 11 and 82% price reduction of margetuximab would make this regimen cost-effective in the US and China, respectively.

Conclusion

In the US and China, margetuximab plus chemotherapy is not likely to be cost-effective for women with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, whereas price reduction effectively improves insufficient cost-effectiveness.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Ado-trastuzumab emtansine for the treatment of residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Alternative trastuzumab dosing strategies in HER2-positive early breast cancer are associated with patient out-of-pocket savings

Patients with breast cancer frequently experience financial hardship, often due to the high costs of anti-cancer drugs. We sought to develop alternative trastuzumab dosing strategies, compare their pharmacokinetic effectiveness to standard dosing, and assess the expected financial implications of transitioning to them. We extracted clinical data from the records of 135 retrospectively identified patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer at a single, urban comprehensive cancer center who were treated with trastuzumab between 2017 and 2019. We performed pharmacokinetic simulations on a range of trastuzumab dose levels and frequencies, assessing efficacy by trough trastuzumab concentration (Ctrough) and population and individual likelihoods of Ctrough exceeding trastuzumab minimum effective concentration (MEC). We performed deterministic financial modeling to estimate the treatment-associated financial savings from alternative dosing strategies. Trastuzumab maintenance doses of 4 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) and 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) had nearly identical probabilities of Ctrough being above MEC as standard of care 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. In the primary financial analysis, both trastuzumab 4 mg/kg Q3W and 6 mg/kg Q4W were associated with significant drug- and administration-related out-of-pocket cost savings over the duration of therapy, ranging from $765 (neoadjuvant, Q4W) to $2791 (adjuvant, Q4W). In particular, Q4W trastuzumab increased savings related to lost wages and travel cost avoidance. Low-dose and reduced frequency trastuzumab in appropriately selected patients may significantly reduce total drug utilization and meaningfully reduce patient financial toxicity. Prospective clinical trials evaluating low-dose or reduced-frequency administration of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are warranted and needed.

Cost-Effectiveness of Trastuzumab With or Without Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial, the RESPECT Trial

Background and Objective

Trastuzumab is a standard care as adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive primary breast cancer (BC) in Japan. However, no reports have evaluated its economics for patients with HER2-positive BC over 70 years of age. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HER2-targeted trastuzumab + chemotherapy in Japan, comparing it with trastuzumab monotherapy.

Methods

A three-state-partitioned survival model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab + chemotherapy versus trastuzumab monotherapy for AdjCT in elderly patients with HER2-positive BC. We derived the efficacy data, utilities, and costs of both arms from individual patient data in the RESPECT trial (NCT01104935) and published studies. The costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 2% per annum using a payer perspective. The respective cost estimates were reported in 2019 Japanese Yen (JPY) or US dollars (US$). The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We assured robustness with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

The cost per patient for trastuzumab + chemotherapy was JPY 14.6 million (US$137,000), and their QALYs were 9.308, compared with JPY 14.2 million (US$131,000) and 9.101, respectively, for trastuzumab monotherapy. The ICER of trastuzumab + chemotherapy versus trastuzumab monotherapy was JPY 2.7 milllion/QALY (US$17,200/QALY). The ICER for trastuzumab with chemotherapy varied from "Dominant" to "Dominated" in one-way sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

The base-case analysis suggests that AdjCT with trastuzumab + chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective choice for patients with HER2-positive BC aged 70 years or older. However, the sensitivity analysis suggested uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab + chemotherapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01124-y.

Assessment of the Cost-Effectiveness of HER2-Targeted Treatment Pathways in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk HER2-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to assess differences in costs and benefits of treatment strategies for high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

METHODS

We used a hybrid decision-tree/Markov model to simulate costs and outcomes across six health states: Invasive disease-free, non-metastatic recurrence, remission, first-line and second-line metastatic cancer, and death. We considered several strategies, defined by four attributes: (1) Neoadjuvant targeted therapy (infused pertuzumab and trastuzumab (PH) versus subcutaneous fixed-dose combination (FDC) of pertuzumab and trastuzumab versus trastuzumab alone (H)); (2) adjuvant targeted therapy if pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved (PH, FDC, or H); (3) adjuvant targeted therapy (T-DM1 or H) in the case of residual disease (RD); and (4) use of branded or biosimilar H. Transition probabilities were derived from relevant clinical trials. We included drug costs and costs associated with adverse events and administration. Health state utilities were obtained from clinical trials and the literature.

RESULTS

Strategies not containing T-DM1 were dominated (worse outcomes and greater costs) by strategies containing T-DM1. Among strategies with pertuzumab continuation in the case of pCR and T-DM1 in the case of RD, use of FDC was dominant (equivalent outcomes and lower costs), relative to strategies using infused therapies, regardless of biosimilar versus branded trastuzumab. Adjuvant continuation of FDC was also cost-effective (better outcomes at reasonable cost increases) relative to strategies which discontinued pertuzumab following pCR.

CONCLUSION

Dual targeted therapy via FDC (with transition to T-DM1 in the case of RD) is a cost-effective treatment strategy in high-risk HER2+ ESBC.

Cost-Effectiveness in Perioperative Care: Application of Markov Modeling to Pathways of Perioperative Care

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the application of cost-effectiveness modeling to redesign of perioperative care pathways, from a hospital perspective.

METHODS

A Markov cost-effectiveness model of patient transition between care locations, each with different characteristics and cost, was developed. Inputs were derived from clinical trials piloting a preoperative call center and a postoperative medium-acuity care unit. The effect chosen was days at home (DAH) after surgery, reflecting quality of in-hospital care, acknowledged financially by fundholders, and relevant to consumers. Cost was from the hospital's perspective. A model cycle time of 4 hours for 30 days reflected relevant timelines and costs.

RESULTS

A Markov model was successfully created, accounting for the care locations in the 2 pathways as model states and accounting for consequences and costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis allowed the calculation of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing these pathways, providing a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -$427 per additional DAH, where incremental costs and DAH were -$644 and +1.51, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested the new pathway had a 61% probability of reduced costs and a 74% probability of increased DAH and a 58% probability this pathway was dominant. Tornado analysis revealed the major contributor to increased costs as intensive care unit stay and the major contributor to decreased costs as ward stay. For the new pathway, the probability of transfer from ward to home and the probability of staying at home had the greatest impact on DAH.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest Markov modeling may be a useful tool for the cost-effectiveness analysis of initiatives in perioperative care.

Neoadjuvant pertuzumab in non‑metastatic HER2‑positive breast tumors: Multicentric study in Peru (NeoHer)

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. The comparison of outcomes between nonrandomized groups of patients who received similar treatments in routine practice remains difficult. The present study aimed to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) rates achieved with pertuzumab among patients in routine clinical care in Peru using real-world data. The definition of pCR used was the absence of residual invasive cancer from the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy. A total of 44 patients with non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (stages II and III) treated with pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting and who underwent surgery at three private clinics in Lima (Peru) were retrospectively evaluated. The pCR was the efficacy endpoint and it was determined and compared with the results from other clinical trials. Furthermore, safety data were described. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range, 39.5-50.5 years) and 65.9% of patients were premenopausal. Regarding the clinical stage, 56.8% were IIA/IIB and 36.4% were IIIA/IIIB/IIIC. All treatment schemes included concurrent trastuzumab. The patients' treatment comprised neoadjuvant therapy of docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (THP) with a median of 4 cycles in 30 patients (68.2%) or docetaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab/carboplatin (THPCarb) with a median of 6 cycles in 14 patients (31.8%). In total, 70.5% of patients experienced pCR; among hormone receptor-negative cases, 75.0% achieved pCR and in tumors expressing hormone receptors, the rate of pCR was 66.7%. Of those patients subjected to neoadjuvant treatment with THP, 66.7% (20/30) achieved pCR, whereas 78.6% (11/14) of patients who received THPCarb had a pCR. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 59.1% and in none of the patients, administration was discontinued due to toxicity. The present results of Peruvian patients with HER2 breast cancer treated according to clinical routine demonstrated that dual blockade of HER2 with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting achieved high rates of pCR even in hormone receptor-positive patients. These results are consistent with those of randomized controlled trials, with a good safety profile.

The Hidden Pandemic: the Cost of Postoperative Complications

Purpose of Review

Population-based increases in ageing and medical co-morbidities are expected to substantially increase the incidence of expensive postoperative complications. This threatens the sustainability of essential surgical care, with negative impacts on patients' health and wellbeing.

Recent Findings

Identification of key high-risk areas, and implementation of proven cost-effective strategies to manage both outcome and cost across the end-to-end journey of the surgical episode of care, is clearly feasible. However, good programme design and formal cost-effectiveness analysis is critical to identify, and implement, true high value change.

Summary

Both outcome and cost need to be a high priority for both fundholders and clinicians in perioperative care, with the focus for both groups on delivering high-quality care, which in itself, is the key to good cost management.

The addition of neoadjuvant pertuzumab for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer: a cost estimate with real-world data

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) is largely prevalent worldwide. HER2-positive BC account for roughly 20-25% of all BC cases and has an overall survival lower than other BC. Innovation on BC therapeutics is a constant, but novel therapies have higher costs. Therefore, cost-effectiveness research is essential to provide healthcare decision-makers with solid foundations for a resource allocation. This study aims to estimate the average direct medical costs/patient and cost-effectiveness of adding pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment (NeoT) for HER2-positive breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

Two retrospective real-world consecutive cohorts of ≥18yo female patients diagnosed with HER2-positive BC treated with NeoT at the Breast Clinic of IPO-Porto were studied. The AC-DH regimen (2012-2015) comprised 8 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (4 cycles of doxorubicin + cyclosphosphamide followed by 4 cycles ofdocetaxel + trastuzumab), while the AC-DHP regimen (2015-2017) included also pertuzumab as NeoT. NeoT was followed by surgery and adjuvant trastuzumab. Micro-costing technique and a bottom-up approach was used comprising all medical direct costs from the hospital perspective. Unit costs were obtained from government official prices or from IPO-Porto costing system. Costs were adjusted to 2017 and are expressed in euros. Multivariable logistic regression models were used for effectiveness assessment, while generalized linear models with gamma distribution were used for costs. ICER was calculated using the pathological complete response (pCR) as the preferential measure of effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

AC-DHP (n = 40) and AC-DH (n = 54) cohorts had heterogenous patient profiles (median age 43y/53y; 67.5%/59.3% positive HR; 60.0%/27.8% operable; 25.0%/24.1% inflammatory, respectively). The AC-DHP average total cost/patient was 56,375€, with pertuzumab accounting for 13,978€ (24.79%) and increasing in 15,982€ the average cost/patient (p < 0.001). Clinical staging and hormone receptors (HR) were significantly associated with pCR. ICER was 1.370€ per percentage point of pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

ICER was more favourable in stage III HR negative BC patients compared to other patient profiles. Innovative treatments access is critical to deliver high-quality healthcare, but sustainability must be considered. These results suggest the importance of establishing a cost-effectiveness profile of Pertuzumab in NeoT for HER2-positive BC.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) for the Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Residual Invasive HER2+ Early Breast Cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was recently approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (eBC) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based treatment. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare T-DM1 versus trastuzumab in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Markov cohort-based model tracked clinical and economic outcomes over a lifetime horizon from a US payer perspective. The model included 6 health states: invasive disease-free, nonmetastatic (locoregional) recurrence, remission, first-line and second-line metastatic BC and death. Model state transitions were based on statistical extrapolation of the head-to-head KATHERINE study and published sources. Dosing and treatment duration reflected prescribing information and trials. Costs (2019 US dollars) associated with pharmaceutical treatment (wholesale acquisition costs), health state specific care, adverse events, and end-of-life care were included. Health state utilities were obtained from KATHERINE and published literature.

RESULTS

T-DM1 dominated trastuzumab, yielding lower lifetime costs (-$40,271), and higher life-years (2.980) and quality-adjusted life-years (2.336). Results were driven by patients receiving T-DM1 spending less time in more costly downstream health states, as these patients are less likely to experience a recurrence overall, despite having a higher likelihood of metastatic disease (distant recurrence) in the subset of patients who experience recurrence. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated robust results, with 96.7% of 5000 stochastic simulations producing dominance for T-DM1. The most influential variables were related to treatment costs, off treatment utilities, and health state costs. Additional scenario analyses tested a range of model inputs and assumptions, and produced consistent results.

CONCLUSION

Relative to trastuzumab, T-DM1 treatment for patients with HER2+ eBC who have residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based treatment is likely to reduce the overall financial burden of cancer, while simultaneously improving patient outcomes.

The challenge of value-based pricing in combination therapy: the case of trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Under current reimbursement (CR) practice even though an add-on drug in a combination therapy may produce marginal value in terms of health gain, the original therapy may also share in the reward for this additional value. We examine an alternative 'marginal value-based reimbursement' (MVBR) model in which an original therapy would not share in the marginal value.

METHODS

In a case study for treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, we computed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel (PHT) vs. trastuzumab and docetaxel (HT) under the CR and the MVBR models, respectively. We further estimated the revised cost of pertuzumab under three alternative willingness-to-pay thresholds based on (a) using the current ICER of PHT vs. HT, (b) the historical ICER of HT vs. docetaxel, and (c) applying the oft-used $150,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

If reimbursement were changed from CR to MVBR, at the current price of pertuzumab, the ICER would decline from $409,213 to $323,236/QALY gained. If the price were adjusted under the three thresholds, the payment for pertuzumab would be increased by between 32% and 93%.

CONCLUSION

The proposed MVBR model would provide a stronger economic incentive to develop add-on drugs.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a new biosimilar trastuzumab (HL02): a Phase I bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese men

Objectives: The study aimed to explore the bioequivalence of a proposed biosimilar HL02 vs. its reference products (US-trastuzumab) among healthy Chinese men.Methods: In this study, nine healthy male subjects received single ascending doses of trastuzumab biosimilar (HL02, 2-8 mg/kg), and then a randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel study was conducted to investigate the PK similarity of HL02 (6 mg/kg) with that of US-trastuzumab as a reference drug.Results: PK properties exhibited by HL02 (N = 55) were similar to those of US-trastuzumab (N = 52). The comparison of biosimilarity with US-trastuzumab showed that the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratios for C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ were within 80-125%. Nineteen subjects were positive for ADA and negative for NAb in both HL02 and US-trastuzumab groups. In total, 81.67% of subjects in HL02 and 78.95% in US-trastuzumab groups showed treatment-related mild or moderate adverse events, mild elevation of transaminase level being the most common adverse events (AE) recorded.Conclusions: The PK characteristics and immunogenicity exhibited by HL02 were similar to that of the reference product, US-trastuzumab. The safety profiles were similar in both the treatment groups with mild-moderate adverse effects.

Real-world evidence from a University Hospital system regarding the uptake of adjuvant pertuzumab and/or neratinib before and after their FDA approval

Purpose

Adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib are independently FDA-approved for treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in combination with or following trastuzumab for one year, respectively. Both agents reduce the risk of recurrence; however, the absolute benefit is modest for many patients with added risk of adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at four University of Colorado Health hospitals between July 2016 and April 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment, and administration of pertuzumab and/or neratinib were obtained.

Results

We identified a total of 350 patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab for stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer; 253 (73.1%) had tumors that were ≥ T2 or node-positive disease. The rate of adjuvant pertuzumab use increased following FDA approval; pertuzumab was administered to the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant pertuzumab was associated with younger age, premenopausal status, and node-positive disease. Rates of administration of adjuvant neratinib were lower, with only 15.2% of patients receiving this therapy within 3 months of completing adjuvant trastuzumab.

Conclusion

In our cohort of patients treated within a diverse healthcare network, the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer received adjuvant pertuzumab following FDA approval. The use of adjuvant neratinib was less common, potentially as a result of adverse effects, prolongation of therapy, previous administration of adjuvant pertuzumab, and modest benefit.

Cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab and trastuzumab biosimilar combination therapy as initial treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Singapore

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab with trastuzumab biosimilar and docetaxel as initial treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Singapore.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model with three health states was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab biosimilar and docetaxel with or without pertuzumab from a healthcare system perspective over a 15-year time horizon for patients with HER2-positive MBC. Key clinical inputs were derived from the CLEOPATRA trial. Health state utilities were derived from the literature and direct medical costs were obtained from local public healthcare institutions.

RESULTS

The base-case resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD366,658 (USD272,244) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was sensitive to utilities in the progression-free state, price of pertuzumab and time horizon. When the price for trastuzumab reference biologic (branded) was applied, the ICER was even higher (SGD426,996 [USD317,045]/QALY).

CONCLUSION

Although trastuzumab biosimilar reduced the cost of the pertuzumab combination regimen, the ICER remained high and was not cost effective in Singapore's context. As pertuzumab contributed 80% of the overall combination treatment cost, price reductions for pertuzumab will be required to improve the cost-effectiveness of combination treatment to an acceptable level.

Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to update key recommendations of the ASCO guideline adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario guideline on the selection of optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer and adjuvant targeted therapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review guided by a signals approach to identify new, potentially practice-changing data that might translate into revised guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The Expert Panel reviewed abstracts from the literature review and identified one article for inclusion that reported results of the phase III, open-label KATHERINE trial. In the KATHERINE trial, patients with stage I to III human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with residual invasive disease in the breast or axilla after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy were allocated to adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; n = 743) or to trastuzumab (n = 743). Invasive disease-free survival was significantly higher in the T-DM1 group than in the trastuzumab arm (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.64; P < .001), and risk of distant recurrence was lower in patients who received T-DM1 than in patients who received trastuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 190 patients (25.7%) who received T-DM1 and in 111 patients (15.4%) who received trastuzumab.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with pathologic invasive residual disease at surgery after standard preoperative chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy should be offered 14 cycles of adjuvant T-DM1, unless there is disease recurrence or unmanageable toxicity. Clinicians may offer any of the available and approved formulations of trastuzumab, including trastuzumab, trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk, and available biosimilars.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Cost-effectiveness analyses of breast cancer medications use in developing countries: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation is important for breast-cancer medications due to their high costs. To our knowledge, no systematic literature reviews of pharmacoeconomic studies for breast-cancer medication use are present in developing-countries.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the existing cost-effectiveness evaluations of breast-cancer medication in developing-countries.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and EconLit. Two researchers determined the final articles, extracted data, and evaluated their quality using the Quality of Health-Economic Studies (QHES) tool. The interclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess interrater-reliability. Data were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

Fourteen pharmacoeconomic studies published from 2009 to 2019 were included. Thirteen used patient-life-years as their effectiveness unit, of which 10 used quality-adjusted life-years. Most of the evaluations focused on trastuzumab as a single agent or on regimens containing trastuzumab (n = 10). The conclusion of cost-effectiveness analysis varied among the studies. All the studies were of high quality (QHES score >75). Interrater reliability between the two reviewers was high (ICC = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

In many studies included in the review, the use of breast-cancer drugs in developing countries was not cost-effective. Yet, more pharmacoeconomic evaluations for the use of recently approved agents in different disease stages are needed in developing countries.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in advanced triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The IMpassion130 trial demonstrated that adding atezolizumab to nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel improved the survival of patients with untreated, advanced, programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1)-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In view of the high cost of immunotherapy, it is important to examine its value with respect to both benefits and costs. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab/nab-paclitaxel combination therapy relative to nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was evaluated for the first-line treatment of advanced, PDL1-positive TNBC, from a healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

A three-state partitioned-survival model was developed to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of treatment with atezolizumab/nab-paclitaxel combination therapy with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with advanced TNBC. Clinical data were obtained from the IMpassion130 trial and extrapolated to 5 years. Health state utilities were retrieved from the literature, while direct costs (in Singapore dollars, S$) were sourced from public healthcare institutions in Singapore. The primary outcomes of the model were life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of specific assumptions and uncertainties.

RESULTS

Adding atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel resulted in an additional 0.361 QALYs (0.636 LYs) at an ICER of S$324,550 per QALY gained. The ICER remained high at S$67,092 per QALY even when atezolizumab was priced zero. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the ICER was most sensitive to variations in the cost of atezolizumab and the time horizon. Scenario analyses confirmed that the ICERs remained high even under extremely favourable assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the exceedingly high ICER, adding atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel was unlikely to represent good value for money for the treatment of advanced PDL1-positive TNBC. Our findings will be useful in informing funding policy decisions alongside other considerations such as comparative effectiveness, unmet need and budget impact.

Pertuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: an evidence-based review of its safety, efficacy, and place in therapy

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is a distinct subset of breast cancer that results from overexpression of HER2 protein. Pertuzumab-a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the extracellular dimerization domain II of HER2-was recently approved for adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant therapy of HER2-positive early breast cancer. As pertuzumab and trastuzumab bind to different domains of the extracellular dimerization domain of HER2, a combination therapy of pertuzumab and trastuzumab is beneficial for the treatment of metastatic cancer, advanced local cancer, or early cancer by dual HER2 blockage. Many clinical trials have been performed using pertuzumab for breast cancer patients; these include the CLEOPATRA trial for palliative therapy, the APHINITY trial for adjuvant therapy, and the NeoSphere and the TRYPHAENA trials for neoadjuvant therapy. These trials revealed pertuzumab to be a safe and effective drug regardless of the patient age and hormone receptor status. Notably, pertuzumab use was associated with severe cardiac toxicity in some cases; however, the risk of pertuzumab-induced cardiac dysfunction was low. The most common adverse effect associated with pertuzumab-use was diarrhea, but most cases were not severe. Several different chemotherapeutic agents have been investigated to determine optimal chemotherapeutic combinations for dual HER2 blockage. Some exploratory analyses indicate that pertuzumab treatment offered little benefit to patients with node-negative and small primary tumors; pertuzumab treatment was also found not be cost-effective. Further research will reveal the appropriate usage of pertuzumab for treating a subset of eligible patients.