Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies for People Undergoing Elective Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Incidence of Subclinical Deep Vein Thrombosis after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Correlated with Number of Tranexamic Acid Doses

Background: Recent studies increasingly highlight the efficacy of tranexamic acid administration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal dosage of tranexamic acid is still controversial. Methods: The current study analyzes the efficiency of tranexamic acid dosage and the number of administrations in THA and TKA. The objective of this study is to compare the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) based on the number of dosages. We divided the patients into two groups; one group received a single dosage, and the other group received two dosages. Doppler ultrasound examinations were conducted on the lower limbs of all patients at both six and thirty days postoperatively. The second objective is to compare the decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) in the two groups. Results: The results show that there is no difference in DVT incidence between the patients with different TXA numbers of dosages. There is no statistically significant decrease in Hb between the two groups at day one and day five postoperatively. Day one shows a statistically higher average in the two-dose group, approximately 0.06 g/dL, and day five shows a slightly elevated average in the single-dose group, approximately 0.06 g/dL. Blood transfusion requirements show no significant differences in the groups; one patient in the single-dose tranexamic acid group needed transfusion at day five postoperatively, while two patients in each group required immediate postoperative transfusion. Conclusion: There was no increase in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis among patients receiving two dosages of tranexamic acid.

Statistical Fragility of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Statistical fragility is a quantitative measure of the robustness of the statistical conclusions drawn in a study. Although statistical fragility has been comprehensively evaluated in the arthroplasty literature, the statistical fragility of large-scale randomized trials evaluating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of applying the fragility index (FI) and the fragility quotient (FQ) analysis to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating VTE prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty.

Methods

A systematic review was performed by searching multiple databases to identify RCTs that evaluated VTE prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty from 2000 to 2020. The FI was determined by manipulating each reported dichotomous outcome event until a reversal of significance was appreciated with 2 × 2 contingency tables. The associated FQ was determined by dividing the FI by the sample size.

Results

Thirty-two RCTs were ultimately included for analysis. The overall FI incorporating all 32 RCTs was only 7 (interquartile range 3-9), suggesting that the reversal of only 7 events is required to change study significance. The associated FQ was determined to be 0.01. Of the RCTs that reported lost-to-follow-up data, the majority of studies had lost-to-follow-up numbers greater than 7.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that RCTs evaluating VTE prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty may lack statistical stability as few outcome events are required to reverse the significance of outcomes. Future randomized trials should consider reporting FI and FQ along with the P value analysis to provide better context to the integrity of statistical stability.

Rivaroxaban in Outpatients with Mild or Moderate COVID-19: Rationale and Design of the Study CARE (CARE - Coalition COVID-19 Brazil VIII)

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated a high risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic events as a consequence of direct viral damage to endothelial cells by SARS-CoV-2 and a procoagulant milieu due to increased biomarkers, such as D-dimer, fibrinogen, and factor VIII. Although randomized controlled trials of antithrombotic therapies have been conducted in hospitalized patients, few have evaluated the role of thromboprophylaxis in an outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether antithrombotic prophylaxis with rivaroxaban reduces the risk of venous or arterial thrombotic events, invasive ventilatory support, and death in COVID-19 outpatients.

METHODS

The COVID Antithrombotic Rivaroxaban Evaluation (CARE) study, a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial of rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 14 days or local standard treatment alone to prevent adverse outcomes, is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04757857). The inclusion criteria are adults with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection and mild or moderate symptoms without indication for hospitalization, within 7 days of symptom onset, and 1 risk factor for COVID-19 complication (> 65 years, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other chronic lung diseases, smoking, immunosuppression, or obesity). The primary composite endpoint, which includes venous thromboembolism, invasive mechanical ventilation, major acute cardiovascular events, and mortality within 30 days of randomization, will be assessed according to the intention-to-treat principle. All patients will provide informed consent. A significance level of 5% will be used for all statistical tests.

RESULTS

Major thrombotic and bleeding outcomes, hospitalizations, and deaths will be centrally adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee blinded to the assigned treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The CARE study will provide relevant and contemporary information about the potential role of thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19.

New Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: There is controversy over whether use of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased hemorrhage risk compared with non-NOAC. Meanwhile, determining which NOAC to use remains unclear. We aimed to summarize the evidence about NOACs in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention for patients with total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA).

Methods: We searched RCTs assessing NOACs for VTE prophylaxis in adults undergoing THA and TKA in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to May 2021. Primary outcomes were VTE [included deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)], major VTE, and major bleeding. The rank probabilities of each treatment were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA).

Results: 25 RCTs with 42,994 patients were included. Compared with non-NOAC, NOACs were associated with a decreased risk of VTE (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.55–0.84) and major VTE (RR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.35–0.76). Additionally, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban but not dabigatran and betrixaban, did confer a higher efficacy compared with non-NOAC. None of the individual NOACs increased the risk of bleeding, while apixaban and betrixaban were even associated with a decreased risk of bleeding. In the comparison of different NOACs, rivaroxaban was associated with the greatest benefits in VTE (SUCRA = 79.6), DVT (SUCRA = 88.8), and major VTE (SUCRA = 89.9) prevention. Furthermore, subgroup analysis confirmed that NOACs associated with a higher efficacy tendency in patients with follow-up duration <60 days than follow-up duration ≥60 days.

Conclusion: Evidence suggests that NOACs exert more benefits on VTE prophylaxis, and none of the individual NOACs increased hemorrhage compared with non-NOAC. Among various NOACs, rivaroxaban is recommended in patients with lower bleeding risk, and apixaban is recommended in patients with higher bleeding risk.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021266890].

Venous thromboembolism after fast-track elective revision hip and knee arthroplasty - A multicentre cohort study of 2814 unselected consecutive procedures

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is much debated within total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Revision hip and knee arthroplasty (rTHA/rTKA) are more extensive procedures, but data on the risk of postoperative VTE is conflicting and there are no specific guidelines for thromboprophylaxis. Furthermore, data on rTHA/rTKA within a fast-track protocol is sparse. Thus, we aimed at evaluating the incidence and time course of VTE in unselected elective rTHA/rTKA within our established multicentre fast-track collaboration with in-hospital only thromboprophylaxis if length of stay (LOS) ≤ 5 days.

METHODS

We used an observational study design of unselected consecutive fast-track elective major component rTHA/rTKA from 6 dedicated fast-track centres between 2010 and 2018. We obtained information on revisions through Danish hip and knee arthroplasty registers and complete (>99%) 90 days follow-up through the Danish National Patient Registry in combination with chart review.

RESULTS

We included 2814 procedures with median LOS 3 days [2-5] and 21% had LOS >5 days. The 90-day incidence of VTE was 0.42% (n = 12), with 8 (0.28%) DVT and 4 (0.14%) PE, after median 14 days [IQR: 11-23] with the latest on day 31.

CONCLUSION

The 90-day incidence of VTE after elective fast-track rTHA and rTKA was about 0.4% which is comparable to the 90-day VTE incidence after primary fast-track THA, TKA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Future investigations should focus on identification of high-risk patients while the surgical trauma per se may be less important.