1
|
Wolden M, Brown S, Carlsson SV, Noah TA, Mungovan SF. Implementation of Physical Therapist Services for Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: An Administrative Case Report. Phys Ther 2024; 104:pzad163. [PMID: 38006363 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in the USA, and radical prostatectomy (RP) is the primary surgical treatment option. With an increasing number of men undergoing RP and surviving prostate cancer, clinical management strategies have broadened to improve the preoperative and postoperative patient experience and minimize treatment-related functional consequences. Urinary incontinence is a predictable functional consequence of RP. Recent reviews recommend preoperative and postoperative physical therapist services as the standard of care for men undergoing RP to decrease the severity of urinary incontinence and improve patients' quality of life. Despite compelling evidence, the routine provision of physical therapist services preoperatively and postoperatively for men undergoing RP is limited. The purpose of this case report is to describe the implementation of preoperative and postoperative physical therapist services for men undergoing RP in a US health care system using the knowledge-to-action process and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research frameworks. CASE DESCRIPTION The implementation process included 4 steps: (1) development of a preoperative and postoperative physical therapist services program; (2) identification of barriers and enablers for implementation; (3) implementation of the program; and (4) evaluation of the effectiveness of the implemented program. RESULTS Outcomes from the implementation of a physical therapist services program for men undergoing RP included lower urinary incontinence rates, improved patient satisfaction, and increased physical therapist utilization. CONCLUSION This case report documents the implementation of physical therapist services for men undergoing RP. The use of implementation frameworks enabled the identification of unique enablers, barriers, and strategies for the implementation of physical therapist services for men undergoing RP. IMPACT Implementing preoperative and postoperative physical therapist services for men undergoing RP improves patient outcomes. The implementation process and outcomes can be considered by other health care systems when developing preoperative and postoperative physical therapist services for men undergoing RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Wolden
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Jamestown, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA
- Westmead Specialist Centre, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Scott Brown
- Department of Physical Therapy, Sanford Health, Fargo, North Dakota, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas A Noah
- Department of Urology, Sanford Health, Fargo, North Dakota, USA
| | - Sean F Mungovan
- Westmead Specialist Centre, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Private Physiotherapy Services, Westmead Private Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Professions, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lindsay D, Schofield P, Nabukalu D, Roberts MJ, Yaxley J, Quinn S, Richards N, Frydenberg M, Gardiner R, Lawrentschuk N, Juraskova I, Murphy DG, Gordon LG. The impact of management option on out-of-pocket costs and perceived financial burden among men with localised prostate cancer in Australia within 6 months of diagnosis. AUST HEALTH REV 2024; 48:172-181. [PMID: 38342484 DOI: 10.1071/ah23231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to quantify the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and perceived financial burden among Australian men with localised prostate cancer in the first 6 months after diagnosis, by primary management option. Methods This cost-analysis quantified OOP costs using administrative claims data and self-reported survey data. Financial burden was assessed using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) tool. Participants were recruited into a randomised control trial from public or private treatment centres in Victoria and Queensland. Generalised linear models were used to predict OOP costs and COST-FACIT scores. Results Median total OOP costs within 6 months of diagnosis for 256 Australian patients with localised prostate cancer was A$1172 (A$343-2548). Up to 50% of the sample reported A$0 costs for most medical services. Compared with those managed with active surveillance, men having active treatment had 6.4 (95% CI: 3.2-12.7) times greater total OOP costs. Management option, higher Gleason score at diagnosis and having multiple comorbidities were significant predictors of higher OOP costs. Overall high scores on the COST-FACIT indicated low levels of financial burden for the entire sample. Conclusion Largely attributable to being managed with active surveillance, Australian men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer reported relatively low OOP costs and financial burden in the first 6 months post-diagnosis. Together with clinical outcomes, clinicians can use this up to date evidence on costs and perceived financial burdens to assist localised prostate cancer patients and their families make informed decisions about their preferred management option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Doreen Nabukalu
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Qld, Australia
| | - John Yaxley
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Qld, Australia; and Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Qld, Australia
| | - Stephen Quinn
- Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Natalie Richards
- Behavioural Science Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Urology, Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Robert Gardiner
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Qld, Australia; and Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Louisa G Gordon
- Health Economics, Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia; and School of Nursing and Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Macaluso JN, Venkataraman SS, Adams J, Nacev AN, Kumar D. Advantageous Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using a Low-Field, Office-Based MRI System. Cureus 2022; 14:e32105. [PMID: 36601170 PMCID: PMC9805358 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methods to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa), a highly prevalent disease, remain inadequate in terms of accuracy, cost, and logistical constraints for both patients and providers. Early and accurate detection of PCa is crucial to patient management, most notably in increasing quality of life and lowering cost burdens when considering the associated treatment and follow-up pathways. This article aims to discuss the impact to care pathways for nine patients whose PCa was detected by a novel Food and Drug Administration-cleared low-field magnetic resonance imager (MRI) for transperineal PCa interventions but was missed by standard-of-care systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Methodology From December 2020 to March 2022, 41 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, positive digital rectal exam findings, and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System scores of three or higher were enrolled. Patients first underwent targeted transperineal biopsy guided by a low-field MRI (MRIgTBx) and co-registered with T2-weighted images from a pre-procedural 3-T MRI with suspicious lesions annotated by a board-certified radiologist. Following this procedure, patients underwent standard-of-care systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSgSBx). The entire procedure was supervised by a board-certified urologist. Results Of the 41 enrolled patients, both MRIgTBx and TRUSgSBx biopsies detected PCa in 20 patients. MRIgTBx detected PCa in an additional nine patients that were missed by TRUSgSBx. Five of the nine patients elected to pursue immediate treatment. Patients with suspected PCa and a negative biopsy return to the clinic every three to six months for PSA tests, with additional biopsies performed every year for cases with increasing PSA levels. Conclusions Early detection of PCa in nine of the 41 patients using a novel MRIgTBx method has allowed for change management resulting in an improved quality of life and cost saving for those who opted for immediate treatment. Early intervention in cases where the standard-of-care TRUSgSBx treatment was falsely negative ultimately led to a decrease in additional screening procedures, biopsies, associated tests, and an improved pathway for patient management.
Collapse
|
4
|
The Economic Burden of Localized Prostate Cancer and Insights Derived from Cost-Effectiveness Studies of the Different Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174088. [PMID: 36077625 PMCID: PMC9454560 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer has huge health and societal impacts, and there is no clear consensus on the most effective and efficient treatment strategy for this disease, particularly for localized prostate cancer. We have reviewed the scientific literature describing the economic burden and cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies for localized prostate cancer in OECD countries. We initially identified 315 articles, studying 13 of them in depth (those that met the inclusion criteria), comparing the social perspectives of cost, time period, geographical area, and severity. The economic burden arising from prostate cancer due to losses in productivity and increased caregiver load is noticeable, but clinical decision-making is carried out with more subjective variability than would be advisable. The direct cost of the intervention was the main driver for the treatment of less severe cases of prostate cancer, whereas for more severe cases, the most important determinant was the loss in productivity. Newer, more affordable radiotherapy strategies may play a crucial role in the future treatment of early prostate cancer. The interpretation of our results depends on conducting thorough sensitivity analyses. This approach may help better understand parameter uncertainty and the methodological choices discussed in health economics studies. Future results of ongoing clinical trials that are considering genetic characteristics in assessing treatment response of patients with localized prostate cancer may shed new light on important clinical and pharmacoeconomic decisions.
Collapse
|