1
|
Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin‐Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Herskin M, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Candiani D, Rapagnà C, Van der Stede Y, Michel V. Welfare of sheep and goats at slaughter. EFSA J 2021; 19:e06882. [PMID: 34765030 PMCID: PMC8573542 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The killing of sheep and goats for human consumption (slaughtering) can take place in a slaughterhouse or on-farm. The processes of slaughtering that were assessed for welfare, from the arrival of sheep and goats until their death (including slaughtering without stunning), were grouped into three main phases: pre-stunning (including arrival, unloading from the truck, lairage, handling and moving of sheep and goats); stunning (including restraint); and bleeding. Stunning methods were grouped into two categories: mechanical and electrical. Twelve welfare consequences that sheep and goats may experience during slaughter were identified: heat stress, cold stress, fatigue, prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, impeded movement, restriction of movements, resting problems, social stress, pain, fear and distress. These welfare consequences and their relevant animal-based measures are described in detail in this Scientific Opinion. In total, 40 welfare hazards that could occur during slaughter were identified and characterised, most of them related to stunning and bleeding. Staff were identified as the origin of 39 hazards, which were attributed to the lack of appropriate skill sets needed to perform tasks or to fatigue. Measures to prevent and correct hazards were identified, and structural and managerial measures were identified as those with a crucial role in prevention. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal-based measures, origin of hazards and preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are proposed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ni JQ, Erasmus MA, Croney CC, Li C, Li Y. A critical review of advancement in scientific research on food animal welfare-related air pollution. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2021; 408:124468. [PMID: 33218910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Air pollution generates hazardous pollutants that have resulted in safety, health, and other welfare issues of food animals. This paper reviewed scientific research advancement in food animal welfare-related air pollution based on 219 first-hand research publications in refereed journals (referred to as "RPs") over the past nine decades. Scientific studies in this area began in the 1930s. The number of RPs has increased significantly with each decade from the 1960s to the 1980s, then decreased until the 2010s. Twenty-six countries have contributed to this multidisciplinary research. About 52% of the studies were conducted in the U.S. and U.K. Research activities have surged in China since the 2010s. On-farm discoveries in air toxicity that resulted in animal death or injury were all from observational studies. About 75% of the studies were experimental and conducted primarily under laboratory conditions. Ammonia (NH3) was the main pollutant in 59% of the RPs, followed by dust, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), bacteria and endotoxins, carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), silo gas, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and odor. Approximately 23% of RPs reported multiple pollutants in the same study. The most intensively studied animal species were poultry (broilers, hens, turkeys, ducks, and eggs and embryos in 44% of the RPs) and pigs (also 44%), followed by cattle, and sheep and goats. Scientific investigations in this area were driven by the research focuses in the areas of animal agriculture and industrial air pollution. Some major research teams played important roles in advancing scientific research. However, research in this area is still relatively limited. There is a great need to overcome some technical challenges and reverse the trend of decreasing research activities in North America and Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Qin Ni
- Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| | - Marisa A Erasmus
- Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Candace C Croney
- Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Chunmei Li
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| | - Yansen Li
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Navarro T, Ramos J, Ruíz de Arcaute M, González J. Predisposing factors inducing ovine respiratory complex in intensive-reared lambs. Small Rumin Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
4
|
Zhang Y, Guinnefollau L, Sullivan M, Phillips CJ. Behaviour and physiology of sheep exposed to ammonia at a similar concentration to those experienced by sheep during export by sea. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
5
|
Wu Y, Yan F, Hu J, Chen H, Tucker C, Green A, Cheng H. The effect of chronic ammonia exposure on acute-phase proteins, immunoglobulin, and cytokines in laying hens. Poult Sci 2017; 96:1524-1530. [DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
6
|
Teixeira D, Villarroel M, María G. Assessment of different organic beddings materials for fattening lamb. Small Rumin Res 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
7
|
Pines MK, Phillips CJC. Microclimatic conditions and their effects on sheep behavior during a live export shipment from Australia to the Middle East. J Anim Sci 2013; 91:4406-16. [PMID: 23825334 DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The microclimate can potentially impact the health and welfare of livestock exported by ship. Within-pen microclimatic conditions were recorded and the effects of ammonia on sheep behavior investigated on a voyage from Australia to the Middle East. Ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide as well as wet-bulb, dry-bulb, and dew-point temperature and air speed were mapped in 20 open-deck focal pens, with the focus on the behavior and location of a marked sheep in each pen. Air speed was highly variable in most pens, with pockets of high but transient concentrations of ammonia (30.7 to 44.2 mg/m(3)) in 20% of pens that had no or minimal air flow. Carbon dioxide concentrations varied in some pens, but overall concentrations of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide were low. Sheep in pens previously identified to have high ammonia concentrations, high wet-bulb temperatures, and low wind speed stood longer (P = 0.003) and spent less time feeding (P = 0.01) and ruminating (P = 0.004) than those in pens previously identified with low ammonia, low wet-bulb temperature, and high wind speed. Moreover, sheep exposed to increased ammonia concentrations held their head higher (P = 0.004) to avoid the greater ammonia concentrations at lower heights, and these sheep had more conjunctivitis (P < 0.001). Sheep movement around the pen was limited. Increased time spent lying down (P = 0.04) and more rhythmical behavior in the second half of the voyage indicated that the sheep adjusted to shipboard conditions over time. It is concluded that high, transient concentrations of ammonia existed in some pens, which adversely affected the behavior of sheep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Pines
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Phillips CJC, Santurtun E. The welfare of livestock transported by ship. Vet J 2013; 196:309-14. [PMID: 23473873 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 01/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The transport of livestock by ship is growing in importance, but there are concerns about the welfare impact on the animals. Short sea journeys are usually completed in the vehicles that are used to transport the animals by road, and injury and stress can result. Long sea journeys require offloading of the animals into pens, where they are mixed and provided with feed, water and sometimes artificial ventilation. In addition, animals are often exposed to high stocking densities, elevated temperature and ammonia concentration, as well as noise and changes in photoperiod and light intensity. Mortality rate is the main measure of welfare used by the Australian live export industry for long distance shipments, and the rate is higher at sea compared to the same period of transport on land. Heat stress often challenges livestock when they are transported from cold to hot regions at high stocking densities with no diurnal temperature fluctuation. Sheep cope with heat stress better than cattle, but can still develop respiratory alkalosis if hyperventilation ensues. Bos taurus cattle cope less well with heat stress than Bos indicus breeds. High ammonia concentrations may accumulate on long voyages, causing mucosal irritation and pulmonary inflammation. Some sheep and goats do not adapt to the pellets provided after extensive grazing in Australia, resulting in inanition, often in combination with salmonellosis, which together are the main cause of high mortality rates. Long distance transport may also result in disease transmission to the recipient country and high standards of biosecurity are necessary. It is concluded that there are significant risks to the welfare of livestock caused by transporting them in ships, especially over long distances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clive J C Phillips
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, QLD, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Phillips CJC, Pines MK, Latter M, Muller T, Petherick JC, Norman ST, Gaughan JB. Physiological and behavioral responses of sheep to gaseous ammonia. J Anim Sci 2012; 90:1562-9. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C. J. C. Phillips
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
| | - M. K. Pines
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
| | - M. Latter
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
| | - T. Muller
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
| | - J. C. Petherick
- Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Rockhampton, Queensland, 4702, Australia
| | - S. T. Norman
- Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
| | - J. B. Gaughan
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, 4343, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Overall KL. Improving welfare by quantifying function. J Vet Behav 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|