1
|
Ahmed N, Gandhi D, Melhem ER, Frenkel V. MRI Guided Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Delivery of Therapeutic Cells to the Brain: A Review of the State-of-the-Art Methodology and Future Applications. Front Neurol 2021; 12:669449. [PMID: 34220679 PMCID: PMC8248790 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Stem cell and immune cell therapies are being investigated as a potential therapeutic modality for CNS disorders, performing functions such as targeted drug or growth factor delivery, tumor cell destruction, or inflammatory regulation. Despite promising preclinical studies, delivery routes for maximizing cell engraftment, such as stereotactic or intrathecal injection, are invasive and carry risks of hemorrhage and infection. Recent developments in MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technology have significant implications for treating focal CNS pathologies including neurodegenerative, vascular and malignant processes. MRgFUS is currently employed in the clinic for treating essential tremor and Parkinson's Disease by producing precise, incisionless, transcranial lesions. This non-invasive technology can also be modified for non-destructive applications to safely and transiently open the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to deliver a range of therapeutics, including cells. This review is meant to familiarize the neuro-interventionalist with this topic and discusses the use of MRgFUS for facilitating cellular delivery to the brain. A detailed and comprehensive description is provided on routes of cell administration, imaging strategies for targeting and tracking cellular delivery and engraftment, biophysical mechanisms of BBB enhanced permeability, supportive proof-of-concept studies, and potential for clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabid Ahmed
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, and Department of Neuroradiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Dheeraj Gandhi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, and Department of Neuroradiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Elias R Melhem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, and Department of Neuroradiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Victor Frenkel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, and Department of Neuroradiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pandey T, Thomas S, Heller MT. Current Indications, Techniques, and Imaging Findings of Stem Cell Treatment and Bone Marrow Transplant. Radiol Clin North Am 2016; 54:375-96. [PMID: 26896230 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2015.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The role of stem cell therapy in the treatment of hematologic and nonhematologic conditions is ever increasing. A thorough knowledge of the applications of stem cells and transplant physiology is essential for understanding the imaging manifestations. Stem cell imaging includes molecular imaging, and diagnostic and interventional radiology. It is possible to make a diagnosis of various complications and diseases associated with stem cell transplant. This article presents a simplified overview of stem cell applications and techniques with focus on hematopoietic stem cell transplant imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarun Pandey
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot #556 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Matthew T Heller
- Radiology Residency Program, Division of Abdominal Imaging, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite 201 East, Wing PUH, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prologo JD, Hawkins M, Gilliland C, Chinnadurai R, Harkey P, Chadid T, Lee Z, Brewster L. Interventional stem cell therapy. Clin Radiol 2016; 71:307-11. [PMID: 26874660 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The ability to deliver cells in appropriate doses to their targeted site of action is a well-known obstacle to optimising stem cell therapy. Systemic administration of cells results in pulmonary "trapping," which significantly decreases the number of available circulating cells to impact underlying disorders. Directed delivery of stem cells in interventional radiology may provide an additional option for bypassing the lungs, as well as introduce novel potential avenues for decreasing doses required to effect cellular therapy, efficiently obtain local paracrine effects, and/or to simplify targeting strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Prologo
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Suite AG05, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| | - M Hawkins
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Suite AG05, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - C Gilliland
- Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Suite AG05, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - R Chinnadurai
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, 1365B Clifton Rd NE, Suite B506, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - P Harkey
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Suite AG05, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - T Chadid
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Suite H100, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Z Lee
- Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University College of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Luke Brewster
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Suite H100, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Department of Surgical and Research Services, Atlanta Veterans Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Road, Decatur, GA 30033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arnberg F, Lundberg J, Söderman M, Damberg P, Holmin S. Image-Guided Method in the Rat for Inducing Cortical or Striatal Infarction and for Controlling Cerebral Blood Flow Under MRI. Stroke 2012; 43:2437-43. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.655126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Arnberg
- From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.); and the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.), Radiology (F.A.), and Neurobiology Care Science and Society (P.D.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lundberg
- From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.); and the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.), Radiology (F.A.), and Neurobiology Care Science and Society (P.D.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Söderman
- From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.); and the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.), Radiology (F.A.), and Neurobiology Care Science and Society (P.D.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Damberg
- From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.); and the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.), Radiology (F.A.), and Neurobiology Care Science and Society (P.D.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Staffan Holmin
- From the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.); and the Departments of Neuroradiology (F.A., J.L., M.S., S.H.), Radiology (F.A.), and Neurobiology Care Science and Society (P.D.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gaba RC, Garcia-Roca R, Oberholzer J. Pancreatic islet cell transplantation: an update for interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:583-94; quiz 594. [PMID: 22417970 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.01.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2011] [Revised: 01/09/2012] [Accepted: 01/09/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic islet cell transplantation is a promising cellular-based therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus. This procedure involves portal venous injection of islet cells and affords 1-year insulin independence in as many as 80% of recipients. Although transplant surgeons represent historical drivers of islet therapy, requirement for image guidance and transcatheter techniques has fostered collaboration with interventional radiologists, who are positioned to play a significant role in clinical performance of islet transplantation and in basic science research in this field. This review article aims to familiarize interventional radiologists with islet cell transplantation patient selection, procedure technique, clinical outcomes, and future clinical and research avenues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron C Gaba
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Section, University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, 1740 West Taylor St, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eker OF, Quesson B, Rome C, Arsaut J, Deminière C, Moonen CT, Grenier N, Couillaud F. Combination of cell delivery and thermoinducible transcription for in vivo spatiotemporal control of gene expression: a feasibility study. Radiology 2010; 258:496-504. [PMID: 21163917 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of combining in situ delivery of genetically modified cells into the rat kidney, to induce expression of a reporter gene under transcriptional control of a heat-inducible promoter activated with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focused ultrasonography (US), and to demonstrate in vivo the local expression of the synthesized protein. MATERIALS AND METHODS Experiments were conducted in agreement with the European Commission guidelines and directives of the French Research Ministry. C6 cells were genetically modified by incorporating the firefly luciferase (LucF) gene under transcriptional control of a heat-sensitive promoter (human heat shock protein 70B). Engineered cells were injected in the renal artery of a superficialized left kidney (15 rats). Two days later, intrarenal LucF expression was induced noninvasively by local hyperthermia in 15 renal locations in nine rats with focused US and was controlled with MR temperature imaging. Six hours after heating, LucF activity was detected in vivo with bioluminescence imaging. RESULTS The genetically engineered C6 cell line was characterized in vitro for LucF expression related to the heating parameters. Changes in renal morphology and hemodynamic parameters as a result of rat kidney superficialization were not significant. Intrarenal temperature measurement at the focal point followed the scheduled temperature in 13 of 15 cases. On bioluminescence images, LucF activity was present only in heated regions. The level of LucF expression was also dependent on heating parameters. Substantial tissue damage was noted at histologic analysis in only the two cases in which temperature control was inadequate. CONCLUSION A strategy combining cell delivery of a transgene and a thermosensitive promoter that can be locally activated with MR-guided focused US is able to induce in vivo gene expression controlled in space and time. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10100767/-/DC1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer F Eker
- Laboratory for Molecular and Functional Imaging, UMR5231 CNRS/University Victor Segalen Bordeaux, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
|