Endovascular recanalization of symptomatic portomesenteric venous obstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy and radiation

Unusual massive venous hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy treated by endovascular approach

Most post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhages (PPH) are of arterial origin, and some studies have suggested that an interventional radiology approach is most effective in reducing mortality. Venous PPH is rare, and identifying its source can be challenging. We report a case of late venous PPH in the context of a pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. During surgical exploration, the area of ​​potential bleeding was inaccessible due to major inflammatory adhesions aggravated by the presence of pancreatic fistula and the delay of relaparotomy. No intra-abdominal bleeding was detected on imaging studies or during abdominal exploration; only a massive bleeding through the drain orifice, which required packing, was observed. Percutaneous transhepatic portography was performed to localize and treat the origin of the bleeding. The hemorrhage was successfully treated by endovascular approach. We found no reports in the literature on the use of interventional radiology with venous stenting to treat venous PPH, except in cases of gastrointestinal variceal hemorrhage due to portal occlusion.

Long term clinical outcomes of portal vein stenting for symptomatic portal vein stenosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Gastrointestinal bleeding caused by portal vein (PV) stenosis is serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) The purpose of this study is to reveal the long-term clinical outcomes of PV stenting for symptomatic PV stenosis and risk factors of stent related complication.Fifteen patients who underwent portal vein stenting for symptomatic PV stenosis after PD between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The whole cohort was divided into 9 patients with benign stenosis group (Group-B) and 6 patients with recurrence group (Group-R).The median follow up period was 17.0 (interquartile range 12.0-38.0) months. The technical success rate and clinical success rate was revealed at 93.3% and 86.7%. The primary patency rate of stents was 79.4% and mean patency period was 14.0 (4.0-28.0) months. There was significant difference in time to stenosis and proportion of anticoagulation treatment between 2 groups [2.0 (1.0-4.0) months vs 18.5 (2.5-50.3) months, P  = .035 and 100% vs 50%, P  = .044. In univariable analysis, stent diameter was found to have a significant correlation with stent occlusion (P  = .036).PV stenting was found to be feasible and safe in the treatment of symptomatic PV stenosis from a long term point of view.

Benign Portal Vein Stenosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

The long-term patency of the portal vein (PV) in patients who survive after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical features and risk factors for benign PV stenosis after PD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent PD from September 2002 and December 2015 at our institution without intraoperative radiation therapy or concomitant PV resection. The postoperative computed tomography of each patient was evaluated, and PV stenosis was defined as the shortest diameter of the PV being <3 mm. The patients with PV stenosis due to local recurrence were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 458 patients, PV stenosis occurred in 57 (12.4%), including benign PV stenosis in 28 (6.1%) and PV stenosis due to local recurrence in 29 (6.3%). Of the 28 patients with benign PV stenosis, 7 (25%) developed symptoms related to portal hypertension, namely recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in 5 and refractory ascites in 2. Six patients were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement, and all of their symptoms improved. A multivariate analysis found that a postoperative pancreatic fistula was an independent risk factor for benign PV stenosis after PD (odds ratio, 4.36; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pancreatic fistula was a significant risk factor for benign PV stenosis after PD. Stent placement for benign PV stenosis was effective for the patients with symptoms due to portal hypertension.

A Case of Portal Venous Stenting for Metastatic Hilar Stricture After the Radical Resection of Colon Cancer

Like standard stenting in an unresectable malignant stricture of the biliary or digestive tract, minimally invasive modality for portal stenosis is indispensable for palliation. We describe here a safe and practical procedure of portal stenting in a case of metastatic hilar strictures developed nine years after the radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer. After urgent delivery of the biliary tract stenting for the relief of jaundice, the patient received palliative stenting for the stricture of the portal trunk. Transhepatic approach, via the anterior branch, of the portal vein intervention may fit into the standard aspects for portal stenting.

Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management

Surgical intervention in the pancreas region is complex and carries the risk of complications, also of vascular nature. Bleeding after pancreatic surgery is rare but characterized by high mortality. This review reports epidemiology, classification, diagnosis and treatment strategies of hemorrhage occurring after pancreatic surgery, focusing on the techniques, roles and outcomes of interventional radiology (IR) in this setting. We then describe the roles and techniques of IR in the treatment of other less common types of vascular complications after pancreatic surgery, such as portal vein (PV) stenosis, portal hypertension and bleeding of varices.

Portomesenteric Venous Stenting for Palliation of Ascites and Variceal Bleeding Caused by Prehepatic Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting (PVS) for palliation of refractory ascites and/or variceal bleeding caused by extrahepatic portomesenteric venous stenosis in patients with pancreaticobiliary cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of patients who underwent PVS between January 2007 and July 2015 was performed. A total of 38 patients were identified, of whom 28 met the inclusion criterion of PVS performed primarily for refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. In addition to technical success and overall survival, clinical success was measured by fraction of remaining life palliated. The palliative effect of PVS was also quantified by measuring changes in liver and ascites volumes after the procedure.

RESULTS

Technical success was 93% (26/28). Stent deployment involved more than one portomesenteric vessel in most patients (20/26). The cumulative probability of symptom recurrence at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 12%, 16%, 26%, and 40%, respectively. There was a significant difference (p < .001) in the probability of symptom recurrence, recurrence of abdominal ascites, and increase in liver volume between patients whose stents remained patent and those whose stents demonstrated partial or complete occlusion. The mean fraction of remaining life palliated was 87%. All but two patients were found to have improvement in clinical symptoms for the majority of their lives after the procedure. There were no major or minor complications.

CONCLUSION

As a low-risk procedure with a high clinical success rate, PVS can play a substantial role in improving quality of life in patients with portomesenteric stenoses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Portomesenteric venous stenosis is a challenging complication of pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Portomesenteric stenoses can lead to esophageal, gastric, and mesenteric variceal bleeding, as well as abdominal ascites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of portal vein stenting (PVS) in patients with cancer who have symptomatic portal hypertension caused by portomesenteric venous compression. As a low-risk procedure with a high clinical success rate, PVS can play a substantial role in improving quality of life in patients with portomesenteric stenoses.

Interventional treatment of mesenteric venous occlusion

Background

Mesenteric venous thrombus may be an incidental finding during imaging studies and asymptomatic patients are treated conservatively or with anticoagulant therapy only. Patients with symptomatic acute thrombosis causing bowel ischemia require urgent treatment, which frequently includes extensive surgery. Interventional treatment may be an alternative. Purpose: To present results of interventional treatment in patients with symptomatic occlusion of the mesenteric veins.

Material/Methods

Eight patients, four men and four women aged 24–74 years (mean 53 years) were treated due to symptomatic portomesenteric venous occlusion of thrombotic origin. Transhepatic (n=5), trans-splenic (n=2), and transjugular (n=4) accesses were used. Patients were treated with mechanical thrombus fragmentation (n=4), pharmacological thrombolysis (n=3) and stent placement (n=8). Additional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was created to facilitate the outflow from the treated veins (n=4).

Results

The majority of the patients required combination of different treatment methods. Resolution of symptoms with initial clinical success was achieved in seven of the eight patients, and one patient died the day after the procedure due to sepsis. Two other patients had procedure-related complications; one of them required embolization. Two patients had documented long-term clinical success with patent stents and no symptoms at one year following intervention.

Conclusions

Endovascular treatment of portomesenteric occlusion in patients with acute symptomatology showed good short-term clinical success rate.

Focal portal vein stenosis in an adolescent potentially related to complicated umbilical catheter insertion in the neonatal period

A 14-year-old girl, with no medical history except for a preterm birth at 7 months, presented with clinical and laboratory signs of pancytopenia. Radiological investigation, including abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a focal irregular main portal vein wall and splenomegaly. Endoscopy showed major esophageal and gastric varices. Definitive diagnosis was made by direct, transhepatic portography revealing a focal stenosis associated with a dissection of the main portal vein. Percutaneous treatment including balloon angioplasty and stent placement resulted in complete re-expansion of the portal vein main branch. Clinical and radiological follow-up over 5 years showed complete disappearance of all clinical signs and normalization of laboratory data and splenic volume.

Portal vein stenosis after pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

Extrahepatic portal vein (PV) stenosis has various causes, such as tumor encasement, pancreatitis and as a post-surgical complication. With regard to post-pancreaticoduodenectomy, intraoperative radiation therapy with/without PV resection is reported to be associated with PV stenosis. However, there has been no report of PV stenosis after pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT). Here we report the cases of three patients with PV stenosis after pancreatectomy and PV resection following gemcitabine-based NACRT for pancreatic cancer and their successful treatment with stent placement. We have performed NACRT in 18 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer since 2005. Of the 15 patients who completed NACRT, nine had undergone pancreatectomy. Combined portal resection was performed in eight of the nine patients. We report here three patients with PV stenosis, and thus the ratio of post-operative PV stenosis in patients with PV resection following NACRT is 37.5% in this series. We encountered no case of PV stenosis among 22 patients operated with PV resection for pancreatobiliary cancer without NACRT during the same period. A relationship between PV stenosis and NACRT is suspected, but further investigation is required to determine whether NACRT has relevance to PV stenosis.

Direct percutaneous transhepatic portomesenteric venous stenting in management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatectomy with portal and/or superior mesenteric vein resection remains a controversial procedure because of high complexity and morbidity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to increase resectability of these locally advanced lesions. We aimed to assess the utility and efficacy of direct percutaneous transhepatic portomesenteric venous stenting (THVS) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in increasing surgical resectability of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty pancreatic carcinoma patients with tumor thrombus involving the portal vein and superior mesenteric vein were identified. Patients underwent THVS followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whipple procedure was offered to responders.

RESULTS

THVS was attempted in all. The tumor thrombus could not be crossed in 2 patients (95% technical success rate). All patients underwent 3 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and capecitabine. Disease progression was noted in 16 patients and surgery was not offered. Twenty-two patients were explored with intent-to-perform a Whipple procedure. In 7 of these (32%), extensive disease precluding surgical resection was identified and the procedure was abandoned. Whipple procedure without vascular resection was performed successfully in 15 patients (68%). There were no perioperative deaths. Negative vascular margins were noted in 3 patients and negative peripancreatic lymph nodes in 5 patients. Median survival was 17 months (range, 5 to 70 mo). In the stented nonoperative group, median survival was 9 months (range, 3 to 19 mo). The stented and resected group achieved a statistically significant (P=0.0422) survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

THVS in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can increase tumor resectability and survival in a select group of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.