Outcomes using a 1470-nm laser for symptomatic varicose veins

Treatment of varicose great saphenous vein with endovenous laser alone or combined with eco-guided foam sclerotherapy: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives: This study compares Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) alone versus combined with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) insufficiency. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to EVLA or EVLA-UGFS groups which focused on GSV occlusion rates, complications, additional treatments, and quality of life (QoL) changes. Results: Among 55 participants, the EVLA group had higher 12-month occlusion rates (92.3% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.11). Nervous injury (NI) was rarer in EVLA-UGFS (3.4% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.04). No significant difference in other complication rates (p > 0.05). QoL improved in both groups (p < 0.001). EVLA-UGFS required more subsequent procedures (24.1% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: EVLA and EVLA-UGFS effectively treat GSV insufficiency, enhancing QoL. The combined method reduces NI risk but may require more follow-up procedures.

The origin of loud claps during endovenous laser treatments

Optoacoustic and ultrasound methods have shown that the loud "claps" perceived by patients and medical staff during endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) are caused by volumetric blood boiling when large vapor-gas bubbles appear and collapse under the action of laser radiation, which is well absorbed in water. Acoustic effects when using lasers in the near infrared range (1.94, 1.47, and 0.97 μm) were studied in an experiment with non-deaerated water, as well as in EVLA. The nature of these acoustic signals was investigated using high-speed video recording. It turned out that the amplitude of the emerging acoustic pulses in the case of surface boiling, which prevails when using lasers with a wavelength of 0.97 μm, is two orders of magnitude smaller than in the case of volumetric boiling (1.94 and 1.47 μm). The reasons for the decrease in sound effects in this case are associated with numerous microbubbles at the tip of the laser fiber. The results obtained may be useful for further understanding of the mechanisms of EVLA.

Technique, Efficiency and Safety of Different Nerve Blocks for Analgesia in Laser Ablation and Sclerotherapy for Lower Limb Superficial Venous Insufficiency - A Multicentre Experience

INTRODUCTION

Laser ablation and sclerotherapy, as minimally invasive alternatives to surgery for varicose veins, have good efficacy, safety and cosmetic result. Some form of anaesthesia is generally used for pain control.

AIM

To describe the technique and evaluate the efficacy and safety of femoral, saphenous and sciatic nerve blocks in isolation or in combination for analgesia during laser ablation and sclerotherapy for lower limb varicose veins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, over a period of 33 months, in 856 limbs of 681 patients with varicose veins, ultrasound guided femoral, saphenous and sciatic nerve blocks for analgesia were performed in 769, 808 and 52 instances respectively; following which, endovenous laser ablation, sclerotherapy or combination of both were carried out using standard practice. After completion of the procedure, Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment, and muscle weakness was assessed clinically.

RESULTS

Nerve blocks could be successfully performed in all patients. Observed pain scores were 0 or 1 in 591 (69%), 2 or 3 in 214 (25%) and 4 in 51 (9%) legs with no score more than 4. Higher grades of pain were noted in femoral blocks during early stages of our learning curve. Mild to moderate muscle weakness was observed in 163 (2%) and 7 (13%) patients who underwent femoral and sciatic block respectively, which persisted for an average of two and a half hours and none beyond four and a half hours; saphenous nerve being a pure sensory nerve, did not cause motor weakness.

CONCLUSION

For analgesia during laser ablation and/or sclerotherapy of varicose veins, ultrasound guided nerve blocks can be easily and quickly performed. They provide excellent pain relief and comfort to the patient and to the operator; and they do not cause any additional complication.

Endovenous Laser Ablation for Incompetent Saphenous Vein Combined With Fluoroscopy-Guided Endovenous Foam Sclerotherapy in Varicose Tributaries: Long-Term Follow-up Results

The aim of this study is to describe the long-term results of 980-nm endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) combined with fluoroscopy-guided endovenous foam sclerotherapy using a microcatheter into varicose tributaries. This report reviewed experiences with fluoroscopy-guided endovenous foam sclerotherapy using a microcatheter followed by EVLA, from July 2005 to November 2007. The sclerosing foam was injected through the microcatheter using 1% polidocanol or sodium tetradecyl sulfate. Patients were evaluated clinically and with duplex ultrasound from 1 week to 3 years to assess treatment efficacy and adverse reactions. Technical success was seen in 460 of 461 limbs (99.8%). Continued closure of the saphenous veins and complete sclerosis of varicose tributaries were noted in 351 of 408 limbs (86%) at 1-month follow-up, all 328 limbs at 3-month follow-up, all 299 limbs at 6-month follow-up, all 146 limbs at 1-year follow-up, all 94 limbs at 2-year follow-up, and all 32 limbs at 3-year follow-up. No serious complications were noted. Bruising was noted in 79.0%, and pain or tightness was noted in 68.4%. Hyperpigmentation was noted in 54.2%. EVLA for incompetent saphenous vein combined with endovenous foam sclerotherapy appears to offer the obvious benefits of less additional percutaneous sclerotherapy. However, many problems, like long-lasting pain and hyperpigmentation, can lessen the value of this procedure.

Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins – A review of the clinical evidence

Objectives

The objective is to identify the factors that affect the optimal linear endovenous energy density (LEED) to ablate incompetent truncal veins.

Methods

We performed a literature review of clinical studies, which reported truncal vein ablation rates and LEED. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flow diagram documents the search strategy. We analysed 13 clinical papers which fulfilled the criteria to be able to compare results of great saphenous vein occlusion as defined by venous duplex ultrasound, with the LEED used in the treatment.

Results

Evidence suggests that the optimal LEED for endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein is >80 J/cm and <100 J/cm in terms of optimal closure rates with minimal side-effects and complications. Longer wavelengths targeting water might have a lower optimal LEED. A LEED <60 J/cm has reduced efficacy regardless of wavelength. The optimal LEED may vary with vein diameter and may be reduced by using specially shaped fibre tips. Laser delivery technique and type as well as the duration time of energy delivery appear to play a role in determining LEED.

Conclusion

The optimal LEED to ablate an incompetent great saphenous vein appears to be >80 J/cm and <95 J/cm based on current evidence for shorter wavelength lasers. There is evidence that longer wavelength lasers may be effective at LEEDs of <85 J/cm.

Ozone Gas Bath Combined with Endovenous Laser Therapy for Lower Limb Venous Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) is safe and effective for lower limb venous ulcers. However, severe necrosis and infection in the ulcer area are contraindications of puncture and EVLT. Local bath with ozone gas has been shown to improve the condition of ulcer areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ozone gas bath combined with EVLT in comparison with EVLT alone for the treatment for lower limb venous ulcers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients with venous ulcers were randomized to receive ozone gas bath combined with EVLT (OEVLT group) or EVLT alone (EVLT group). In the OEVLT group, the venous ulcers were preconditioned with ozone gas bath prior to EVLT. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. The two groups were compared in terms of complete occlusion of the treated veins, ulcer healing ratio, ratio of ulcer recurrence, patient satisfaction, complications, and side effects.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in venous occlusion between the two groups. The ratio of ulcer healing in the OEVLT group was significantly higher than the EVLT group at 12 months follow-up. Patients in the OEVLT group showed better satisfaction and a lower recurrence ratio than the OEVLT group. No severe complications or side effects occurred in either groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ozone gas bath combined with EVLT showed improved efficacy for the treatment of lower limb venous ulcers and lower recurrence ratio comparison with EVLT alone. This procedure is a safe and technically feasible.

Clinical results of endovenous LASER ablation (EVLA) using low linear endovenous energy density (LEED) combined with high ligation for great saphenous varicose veins

PURPOSE

This study was designed to analyze the efficacy and complications in endovenous LASER ablation (EVLA) with 1470 nm diode lasers using low linear endovenous energy density (LEED) combined with high ligation for varicose veins of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

METHODS

One hundred and sixteen limbs of 102 patients were analyzed using 6 W with 2 mm/s constant pullback speed delivered by 30 J/cm LEED. The SFJ was ligated with a small inguinal incision. The complications and status of the GSV were checked at 1 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The occlusion rates for the GSV were 98 (84.5 %) at 1 month and 116 (100 %) at 6 months, postoperatively. The rate of partial occlusion was higher in males than in females (p = 0.004). There were 2 DVT, 27 feelings of the cord (23.3 %), and 36 numbness at the knee area (31.0 %) at 1 month, and 3 feelings of the cord (3.4 %) and 6 numbness of the knee (8.6 %) at 6 months postoperatively. The diameter and depth of the GSV did not affect the rates of feeling of the cord or numbness (p = 0.728, 0.208, 0.247, 0.884, respectively).

CONCLUSION

EVLA with a 1470-nm diode laser using low LEED combined with high ligation for the GSV has lower complication rates and higher occlusion rates of GSV.

The 1,470-nm bare-fiber diode laser ablation of the great saphenous vein and small saphenous vein at 1-year follow-up using 8-12 W and a mean linear endovenous energy density of 72 J/cm

PURPOSE

To demonstrate 1-year outcomes after low-energy endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins with linear endovenous energy density (LEED) of 80 J/cm or lower with the use of a 1,470-nm diode laser.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incompetent saphenous veins in 236 patients (355 limbs; Clinical/Etiology/Anatomy/Pathophysiology classifications of C2-C4) were treated by EVLA with a bare-tipped 1,470-nm laser with LEED no greater than 80 J/cm (mean, 72.4 J/cm) and laser power of 8-12 W. Patients were evaluated clinically and with duplex ultrasonography at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after EVLA to assess the technical and clinical success and complication rates.

RESULTS

In the 355 limbs, the technical success rate was 100%. The great saphenous vein (GSV) remained occluded in all 229 limbs (100%) after 1 week, 202 of 203 limbs (99.5%) after 1 month, 157 of 158 limbs after 3 months (99.3%), all 99 limbs after 6 months (100%), and all 41 limbs after 1 year (100%). The small saphenous vein (SSV) remained occluded in all 103 limbs (100%) after 1 week, all 94 limbs (100%) after 1 month, 68 of 69 limbs (98.5%) after 3 months, 40 of 41 limbs (97.5%) after 6 months, and all 14 limbs after 1 year (100%). Two GSVs and two SSVs were recanalized and underwent repeated EVLA. No major complications occurred, although bruising (21% of cases), pain (15%), and paresthesia (4%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy EVLA with the use of a 1,470-nm laser with LEED of 80 J/cm or lower is an effective, safe, and technically successful option for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.