Malfunctioning and Infected Tunneled Infusion Catheters: Over-the-Wire Catheter Exchange versus Catheter Removal and Replacement

Efficacy of same venous route Hickman catheter replacement in patients with intestinal failure

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Periodical replacement of venous Hickman catheters is required for the nutritional care of patients with intestinal failure. The conventional de novo operation (DN-OP) involves inserting the catheter into a new venous tract in each replacement; however, this could result in fast consumption of functional central vessels in patients with intestinal failure. Recently, same-route operation (SR-OP) has been adopted as an alternative approach for retaining venous access.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of Hickman catheters and the survival of venous vessels using two different operative strategies.

RESULTS

Overall, 181 catheters were inserted, 109 using DN-OP and 72 using SR-OP. The mean catheter duration was 11.9 ± 8.8 months in the DN-OP group and 10.5 ± 5.6 months in the SR-OP group; the infection rate was 0.74 in the DN-OP group and 0.44 in the SR-OP group. The vein accesses used in these insertions (n = 113) were classified: the DN-vein group for veins accessed only by DN-OP (n = 75) and the SR-vein group for veins accessed by an initial DN-OP and subsequent SR-OPs (n = 38). Mean working duration per vein access was 12.3 ± 10.1 months in the DN-vein group and 28.2 ± 14.8 months in the SR-vein group (p < 0.001); mean infection-free duration was 11.4 ± 10.1 months in the DN-vein group and 27.7 ± 15.3 months in the SR-vein group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Application of SR-OP in Hickman catheter replacement significantly extended the working duration of venous access by re-using the same venous route without compromising catheter efficacy in patients with IF having poor venous access.

Radiologic placement of Hickman catheters using intravenous sedation in pediatric patients under 20 kg

Surgeons generally perform Hickman catheter insertion in children under general anesthesia. At times, it is difficult to perform procedures with an anesthesiologist for an interventional radiologist. Several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are efficiently and safely conducted using intravenous (IV) sedation in children with a pediatrician. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiologically placed Hickman catheters using IV sedation in children under 20 kg.Fifty-nine catheters were inserted in 45 children under IV sedation. With continuous monitoring of vital signs, IV midazolam and ketamine were slowly infused by a pediatrician. Mean age and body weights were 3.2 years and 15.2 kg, respectively. Acute leukemia was the most common disease for the procedure (72.9%). The location of the catheter tip was evaluated by measuring the height of the thoracic vertebra.Technical success rate was 100%, and IV sedation-related complications did not occur. The right internal jugular vein was accessed for 51 catheters (86.4%), and the mean procedure time was 21.5 minutes. The 2 vertebral body units below the carina were the cavoatrial junction on a fluoroscopy image. Mean catheter life was 285 days, and catheters were removed post-treatment (35.6%). During follow-up, complications occurred in 29 cases (1.72 per 1000 catheter-days). Catheter-related infections were suspected in 4 patients (6.8%), with 1 positive result.Radiological Hickman catheter placement in children under 20 kg using IV sedation by pediatricians is effective and safe, with minimal complications. The carina is a landmark to estimate the cavoatrial junction in pediatric patients.

Line days as a determinant of central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients with tunneled femoral peripherally inserted central catheters

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US)-guided tunneled femoral peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are a safe central venous access option in infants and neonates. Studies have shown, however, that femoral central venous access has the potential for high central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates with a significant increase in risk around line day 30, though no studies have evaluated these risks exclusively for tunneled femoral PICCs.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between line duration and the risk of CLABSI in tunneled femoral PICCs in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred forty-five patients (196 females, 249 males; median age: 49.4 days; median weight: 3.7 kg) who underwent 573 tunneled femoral PICC placements or exchanges from Jan. 1, 2017, to Jan. 31, 2020, were included in the study. All tunneled femoral PICCs were placed using US technique and catheter specifications, including catheter size (French) and length (cm), were retrieved from the electronic medical record. The location of the PICC placement, the number of lumens, the laterality of placement, and the patient's age and weight were also recorded. Only non-mucosal barrier injury CLABSIs, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions, were counted as CLABSI for this study. The number of central line days until a CLABSI event was analyzed with an accelerated failure time model using the exponential, Weibull, and log-normal distributions to determine the probability of a CLABSI over time, taking into consideration the recorded covariates.

RESULTS

Tunneled femoral PICC placements accounted for 14,855 line days, during which 20 non-mucosal barrier injury CLABSIs (CLABSI rate of 1.35 per 1,000 line days) occurred during the study period. The highest CLABSI rate occurred in PICCs placed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at 2.01 per 1,000 line days and the lowest occurred in PICCs placed in interventional radiology at 0.26 per 1,000 line days. Overall, PICCs placed outside of interventional radiology had a CLABSI rate of 1.72 per 1,000 line days. The CLABSI rate during the first 30 days a line was in situ was lower than the rate after 30 days (0.51 per 1,000 line days vs. 3.06 per 1,000 line days, respectively). Statistical modeling and hazard estimation using the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc)-average of log-normal, Weibull and exponential distributions demonstrate the daily risk of CLABSI rapidly increases from day 1 to day 30, with the risk remaining high for the duration of line days.

CONCLUSION

While tunneled femoral PICCs are a relatively safe and effective central venous access alternative, the rate of CLABSI appears to rapidly increase with increasing line days until around day 30 and then remains high thereafter.

Replacement Versus Same-Site Salvage Using Hickman Catheter for Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing bone marrow transplant need a double-lumen Hickman line. Therefore, changing Port-a-Cath ports to double-lumen Hickman catheter is mandatory. Several methods were described for changing Port-a-Cath ports either through the same-site or a new placement access site. The advantage of one method over the other is still debatable. We conducted this study to compare the safety and effectiveness of replacement versus salvage techniques to change ports to the Hickman lines before bone marrow transplants in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We included 85 pediatric patients who underwent stem cell transplants. Their age ranged from 0.2 to 15 years. According to the Hickman reinsertion technique, we classified the patients into 2 groups; the Replacement group (n = 47) and the Same-site salvage group (n = 38). We compared the data before and after Hickman insertion between both groups. Study outcomes were the catheter duration, its complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients was 4.7 ± 3.9 years, and 65.9% were males. There was no difference in the baseline data between both groups. During Port-a- Cath first insertion; 16.5% of patients suffered complications, with 10.6% had conversion to cut down, 1.2% had a hematoma, and 4.7% had multiple site insertion. We did not report differences between groups in the complications of the first port insertion. The Hickman duration was longer in the replacement group (4 (Q1-Q2: 2-6) vs. 1 (0.5-3) months, P = 0.005). Increased age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.31, P = 0.001) and male gender (OR: 1.19, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular same-site salvage technique could help preserve vascular access during the tunnel catheter exchange for noninfectious reasons. We recommend the use of the same-site salvage technique in pediatric transplant patients.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Exchange: An Analysis of 23,000 Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

Catheter exchange over a guidewire is frequently performed for malfunctioning peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Whether such exchanges are associated with venous thromboembolism is not known.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the association between PICC exchange and risk of thromboembolism. Adult hospitalized patients that received a PICC during clinical care at one of 51 hospitals participating in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety consortium were included. The primary outcome was hazard of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (radiographically confirmed upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in those that underwent PICC exchange vs those that did not.

RESULTS

Of 23,010 patients that underwent PICC insertion in the study, 589 patients (2.6%) experienced a PICC exchange. Almost half of all exchanges were performed for catheter dislodgement or occlusion. A total of 480 patients (2.1%) experienced PICC-associated deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was greater in those that underwent PICC exchange vs those that did not (3.6% vs 2.0%, P < .001). Median time to thrombosis was shorter among those that underwent exchange vs those that did not (5 vs 11 days, P = .02). Following adjustment, PICC exchange was independently associated with twofold greater risk of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.85) vs no exchange. The effect size of PICC exchange on thrombosis was second in magnitude to device lumens (HR 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.66 and HR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.6-3.33 for double- and triple-lumen devices, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Guidewire exchange of PICCs may be associated with increased risk of thrombosis. As some exchanges may be preventable, consideration of risks and benefits of exchanges in clinical practice is needed.

Treatment of Tunneled Dialysis Catheter Malfunction: Revision versus Exchange

Introduction

Exchange procedures involve tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) removal and exchange over a wire, using the same exit site and venotomy site. Diagnostic imaging or intervention was generally not performed in exchange procedures. Revision procedures involve placement of new TDC using the previous venotomy site and a new tunnel and exit site. The majority of revisions usually include diagnostic imaging and intervention in the central circulation if needed.

Methods

A retrospective single review of 70 patients who underwent 97 TDC replacements from 2010 to early 2012 because of catheter malfunction was evaluated for either infection or malfunction within 30 days of the procedure.

Results

There were 41 exchanges and 56 revisions out of the 97 procedures performed. There were eight infections (documented by positive blood culture) in the exchanges (19.5%) and one in the revision group (1.8%). The need for an additional procedure due to malfunction was 10 in the exchange (24.4%) and 10 (17.8%) in the revision group.

Conclusions

Revision is a clearly superior procedure with regard to infection and more data need to be gathered as to whether it will decrease repeat procedures.

Tunneled Central Venous Catheter Exchange: Techniques to Improve Prevention of Air Embolism

Malfunctioning tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheters (CVCs), because of thrombotic or infectious complications, are frequently exchanged. During the CVC exchanging procedure, there are several possible technical complications, as in first insertion, including air embolism. Prevention remains the key to the management of air embolism. Herein, we emphasize the technical tricks capable of reducing the risk of air embolism in long-term CVC exchange. In particular, adoption of a 5 to 10 degrees Trendelenburg position, direct puncture of the previous CVC venous lumen for guide-wire insertion, as opposed to guide-wire introduction after cutting the CVC, a light manual compression of the internal jugular vein venotomy site after catheter removal. The Valsalva maneuvre in collaborating patients, valved introducers, and correction of hypovolemia are also useful precautions. Principles of air embolism diagnosis and treatment are also outlined in the article.

Central venous access devices in pediatric malignancies: a position paper of Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of pediatric malignancies is becoming progressively more complex, implying the adoption of multimodal therapies. A reliable, long-lasting venous access represents one of the critical requirements for the success of those treatments. Recent technical innovations-such as minimally invasive procedures for placement, new devices and novel materials-have rapidly spread for clinical use in adult patients, but are still not consistently used in the pediatric population.

METHODS

The Supportive Therapy Working Group of Italian Association of Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) reviewed medical literature focusing on new aspects of central venous access devices (VADs) in pediatric patients affected by oncohematological diseases.

RESULTS

Appropriate recommendations for clinical use in these patients have been discussed and formulated.

CONCLUSIONS

The importance of the correct choice, management and use of VADs in pediatric oncohematological patients is a necessary prerequisite for an adequate standard of care, also considering the increased chances of cure and the longer life expectancy of those patients with modern therapies.

Prevention and management of central line-associated bloodstream infections in hospital practice

In this article aimed at hospitalists, we examine the literature on preventive measures for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and optimal management once a CLABSI has been established. We focus on a number of core preventive measures and the contemporary approach of bundling these measures for maximal impact in reducing infection rates. We then discuss empiric and pathogen-specific antibiotic therapy, including the role of newer antimicrobial agents, as well as the management of an infected central venous catheter.