Quality Improvement Guidelines for Diagnostic Arteriography

ESR Essentials: arterial vascular access and closure devices-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe

Vascular access is the initial, very important, step of endovascular procedures. Various access sites include the common femoral artery, brachial artery, radial artery, popliteal artery, and distal tibial vessels (pedal arteries). Successful arterial access requires advanced knowledge of anatomy, as well as proper training and experience. Today, vascular access should be obtained using real-time, ultrasound guidance to reduce access time, patient discomfort, and puncture-related complications including dissection, arteriovenous communication, and bleeding. Nevertheless, high-level evidence to support this recommendation in peripheral procedures is limited and level A data are mainly derived from randomized cardiac trials investigating only radial and femoral access. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) for femoral access can be broadly categorized as active closure devices, compression assist devices, and external/topical hemostasis devices. There is high-level evidence demonstrating that their use is related to less time for ambulation and increased patient satisfaction. However, available data failed to clearly demonstrate a benefit in complications compared to standard manual compression in peripheral endovascular arterial procedures, and thrombotic and infectious complications reported following VCD use remain an issue. Heterogeneity noted in the literature, caused by the vast variety of devices, access sites, sheath sizes, clinical scenarios, and procedures, poses difficulties in data analysis and future study design. As a result, an individualized VCD use is currently suggested for ≥ 5 Fr femoral artery access not only to reduce time to hemostasis and ambulation and to improve patient comfort, but also to reduce bleeding complications in cases of femoral access with increased bleeding risk, deranged coagulation, and large-bore access, though a high level of evidence to support this later recommendation is limited. KEY POINTS: US guidance is strongly recommended for femoral access and is mandatory to obtain more challenging access. The use of VCDs for femoral hemostasis is generally safe, effective, and currently supported by level I evidence. Proper training and correct VCD choice, based on the patient's individual characteristics, are imperative to optimize outcomes.

Safety and procedural success of daycase-based endovascular procedures in lower extremity arteries of patients with peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Timely and economic provision of revascularisation procedures is a major healthcare need. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of daycase-based lower extremity endovascular revascularisation procedures in patients with peripheral artery disease.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies from Jan 01, 2000 through Apr 01, 2024 reporting complications of lower limb endovascular revascularisation procedures with same-day discharge. Eligibility-criteria, complications, and patient characteristics were extracted, methodological quality assessed (adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), and meta-analyses of complications and technical success performed to provide pooled estimates. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022316466.

Findings

Thirty observational studies (17 retrospective, 13 prospective) and 1 RCT reported 2427 minor and 653 major complications after 99,600 daycase procedures (93,344 patients). Eighteen studies reported daycase eligibility-criteria including 'responsible adult companion' (78%), 'proximity to hospital', and 'telephone availability' and excluding unstable and severe co-morbidities, offset coagulation, and severe chronic kidney disease. Pooled incidences of minor (4.7% [95% CI 3.8-5.6%], I 2 = 96%) and major (0.64% [95% CI 0.48-0.79%], I 2  = 46%) complications were low and technical success high (93% [95% CI 91-96%], I 2 = 97%). Most complications were related to the puncture site. Pooled conversion-to-hospitalisation rates and re-admission after discharge were 1.6% (95% CI 1.1-2.2%, I 2 = 82%) and 0.11% (95% CI 0.095-0.23%, I 2 = 97%), respectively. Meta-regression identified that minor complications decreased since 2000. Male sex and coronary artery disease were associated with more frequent, and higher age and closure device use with less minor complications. Diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were associated with less major complications. Six studies reported complication rates both in daycases and inpatients and there was no significant difference (-0.8% [95% CI -1.9 to 0.3%]).

Interpretation

After careful evaluation of eligibility, lower limb angioplasty can be performed safely with high technical success in a daycase setting. Most complications arise from the puncture site and not the procedure itself highlighting the importance of optimal access site management. The heterogeneity between studies warrants standardised monitoring of complications and outcomes.

Funding

European Partnership on Metrology, co-financed from European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and UK Research and Innovation, and Medical Research Council.

Comparison of Distal Transradial and Femoral Access in Endovascular Treatment of Non-coronary Arterial Disease

This study compared the efficacy and safety of distal transradial access (dTRA) and common femoral artery access (CFA) for endovascular treatment of non-coronary arterial disease. 102 interventions were divided into dTRA (n = 51) and CFA (n = 51) groups; the puncture success rate was 100% in both groups. The mean number of punctures and puncture time were greater in the dTRA than CFA group (1.86 vs 1.04 and 3.96 vs ≤1.00 min, p < .001 for both), whereas the access-related complication rate was comparable. The surgical success rate was higher in the CFA than dTRA group (98.0 vs 84.3, p = .036), and the operative time was longer in the dTRA than CFA group (99.09 vs 84.10 min, p = .017). The postoperative adverse event rate was not different between the dTRA and CFA groups. dTRA is a safe and feasible access for non-coronary arterial disease and is comparable to CFA in terms of puncture success, access-related complications, and major adverse events. The dTRA is inferior to CFA in the treatment of lower extremity arterial disease. Due to the increase in the operation time and the contrast medium volume in the dTRA, it is necessary to be vigilant about contrast nephropathy and late radiological random side effects.

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Radial Artery Intima Media Thickness and Complications at the Intervention Site After Radial Angiography

The present study investigated the relationship between pre-procedural radial intima-media thickness (rIMT) and radial artery thrombosis (RAO) in patients undergoing angiography using a transradial approach (TRA). Patients (n = 90) who underwent cerebral or peripheral arterial angiography using TRA were included in the study. Ultrasonographic evaluation was performed before and 12 h after the procedure. Preoperative rIMT measurement was performed at the distal radial artery. Presence of radial artery occlusion was evaluated by ultrasonography after radial catheterization and revealed occlusive thrombus in the radial artery in 13 patients. rIMT was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with thrombus (P < .05). When it was evaluated whether there was a correlation between age and rIMT, a positive significant correlation was found (P < .01). Our study suggests that increase of rIMT may be a risk factor for RAO in the intervention area. Before the procedure, ultrasound (US) assessment of the radial artery may be useful in determining the risk of occlusion. Thus, RAO-related technical risk factors (procedure time, number of punctures, sheath thickness, etc.) can be managed more carefully in patients having radial angiography.

Distal radial artery access is a safe and feasible technique in the anatomical snuffbox for visceral intervention

Regarding the site of arterial access during the intervention, transracial intervention can reduce the risk of bleeding and vessel-related complications as well as improve patient comfort. Importantly, the distal radial artery (DRA) approach may reduce the incidence of radial artery occlusion and digital ischemia, but the feasibility and safety of DRA in performing subdiaphragmatic vascular interventions remain unclear. From January 2018 to December 2019, 106 patients were admitted to our department for visceral angiography and intervention by left distal radial artery accessing in an anatomical snuffbox. In total, 152 times of vascular interventions were performed during this period. Patients demographics, procedure details, technical success, and access site-related complications were recorded and evaluated. The mean age was 58.9 (range 22-86) years. Males accounted for 80.2%. Thirty-five patients (33%) had 2 or more procedures via the DRA approach. Technical success was achieved for 96.1% of procedures (146 cases) and 3.9% of cases failed to perform the intended procedure via the DRA approach (6 cases). The 4-Fr sheath was used in 86.8% of cases, and the 5 Fr sheath was used in the rest of the 13.2% of procedures. The rate of asymptomatic radial artery occlusion was 5.7% (6 of 106 patients). No patient suffered from distal limb ischemia after a long-time follow-up. Eight patients suffered postoperative local pain, transient numbness, or local bruised in the anatomical snuffbox without major complications. Patients with postoperative complications recovered quickly by using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or without further treatment. Left distal radial artery access is safe and feasible as a new technique for visceral angiography and intervention.

Noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of dual-energy CT angiographies improve assessability of the lower leg arterial segments in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a noise optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm (VMI+) on the image quality and assessability of dual energy (DE) computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower extremity runoff.

METHODS

A total of 118 lower extremity runoff CTA performed on a 3rd generation DE-CT scanner in 109 patients (54 females; 75.6 ± 9.5 years) were included in this retrospective study. Axial image stacks were reconstructed with a standard 120 kV setting and VMI+ of different keV levels. Objective image quality criteria (contrast attenuation, signal-to-noise [SNR] and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were measured. Two radiologists evaluated subjective image quality regarding intraluminal attenuation and image noise using a 5-point Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy for significant stenosis (>75%) and vessel occlusion was assessed for 120 kV and 50 keV VMI+ images rated by two radiologists. In all patients, a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) rated by on board-certified radiologist served as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

Intraluminal attenuation was highest in 40/50 keV VMI+ while SNR were similar to 120 kV images. In subjective assessment, intraluminal contrast of 50 keV images was deemed superior compared to 120 kV despite higher image noise. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of a vessel occlusion were similar in 50 keV VMI+ compared to 120 kV (70%/92%/84%; 70%/91%/83%; p < 0.001) but 13 of 118 (11%) lower leg runoffs were only assessable with 50 keV VMI+.

CONCLUSION

VMI+ reconstructions improve assessability of DE-CTA by increased luminal attenuation with consistent image noise, also allowing the evaluation of lower leg arterial segments inassessable with standard reconstructions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Providing higher intraluminal attenuation and similar image noise compared with conventional reconstructions, 50 keV VMI+ may be appropriate for routine evaluation of DE-CTA.

CIRSE Clinical Practice Manual

Background

Interventional radiology (IR) has come a long way to a nowadays UEMS-CESMA endorsed clinical specialty. Over the last decades IR became an essential part of modern medicine, delivering minimally invasive patient-focused care.

Purpose

To provide principles for delivering high quality of care in IR.

Methods

Systematic description of clinical skills, principles of practice, organizational standards and infrastructure needed for the provision of professional IR services.

Results

There are IR procedures for almost all body parts and organs, covering a broad range of medical conditions. In many cases IR procedures are the mainstay of therapy, e.g. in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. In parallel the specialty moved from the delivery of a procedure towards taking care for a patient’s condition with the interventional radiologists taking ultimate responsibility for the patient’s outcomes.

Conclusions

The evolution from a technical specialty to a clinical specialty goes along with changing demands on how clinical care in IR is provided. The CIRSE Clinical Practice Manual provides interventional radiologist with a starting point for developing his or her IR practice as a clinician.

Management of arterial dissections in 12 patients during transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 selective internal radiotherapy for primary and secondary liver tumours

OBJECTIVE

To describe rates and management strategies of arterial dissections in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and Yttrium-90 selective internal radiotherapy (⁹⁰Y SIRT) for primary and secondary liver tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review included 1377 hepatic angiographies between May 2010 and June 2015 in a single centre for TACE and ⁹⁰Y SIRT of liver tumours. The angiogram results, management, treatment outcomes and follow-up angiography/imaging findings were recorded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twelve cases of arterial dissections (12/1377, 0.87%) were documented. Three dissections (3/633, 0.47%) occurred during TACE, seven (7/449, 1.56%) during pre-treatment planning angiographies (PTPA) for ⁹⁰Y SIRT, and two (2/249, 0.80%) during the treatment procedure of ⁹⁰Y SIRT. The preferred management strategy was to manoeuvre past the dissection and complete the procedure, which was achieved in six patients (50%). Angioplasty with stenting was performed in one patient. In three patients, the procedure was held off for up to 3 months to allow the dissection to heal before repeating the procedure. A dissection that occurred during PTPA was detected only when the patient returned for ⁹⁰Y SIRT. PTPA was immediately repeated for this patient. The last patient opted for sorafenib. Residual 50% stenosis was seen in one patient on follow-up hepatic angiography, but he was otherwise asymptomatic. In the remaining patients, no residual dissection or clinical sequelae was observed on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Arterial dissection is a rare but important complication of transarterial locoregional therapy. Where possible, attempts should be made at completing the therapy. Deferring treatment can be considered as dissections usually heal within 3 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, case series.

STARD Adherence in an Interventional Radiology Guideline for Diagnostic Arteriography

Objective: To assess the quality of reporting in diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) referenced by the Quality Improvement Guidelines for Diagnostic Arteriography and their adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement.Materials and Methods: Citations specific to the Society of Interventional Radiology's Quality Improvement Guidelines for Diagnostic Arteriography were collected. Using the 34-item STARD checklist, two authors in a duplicate and blinded fashion documented the number of items reported per diagnostic accuracy study. Authors met, and any discrepancies were resolved in a resolution meeting.Results: Of the 26 diagnostic accuracy studies included, the mean number of STARD items reported was 17.8 (SD ± 3.1). The median adherence was 18 (IQR, 17-19) items. Ten articles were published prior to 2003, the original date of STARD publication, and 16 articles were published after 2003. The mean number of reported items for the articles published prior to STARD 2003, and after STARD 2003 was 17.4 (SD ± 2.4) and 18.1 (SD ± 3.5), respectively. There were 14 STARD items that demonstrated an adherence of < 25%, and 13 an adherence > 75%.Conclusion: The dichotomous distribution of adherence to the STARD statement by DAS investigated demonstrates that areas of deficient reporting may be present and require attention to ensure complete and transparent reporting in the future.

Adherence to the RIGHT statement in Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines

Context

The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Health Care (RIGHT) Statement was developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts to improve reporting quality and transparency in clinical practice guideline development.

Objective

To assess the quality of reporting in clinical practice guidelines put forth by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) and their adherence to the RIGHT statement checklist.

Methods

In March 2018, using the 22 criteria listed in the RIGHT statement, two researchers independently documented adherence to each item for all eligible guidelines listed by the SIR by reading through each guideline and using the RIGHT statement elaboration and explanation document as a guide to determine if each item was appropriately addressed as listed in the checklist. To qualify for inclusion in this study, each guideline must have met the strict definition for a clinical practice guideline as set forth by the National Institute of Health and the Institute of Medicine, meaning they were informed by a systematic review of evidence and intended to direct patient care and physician decisions. Guidelines were excluded if they were identified as consensus statements, position statements, reporting standards, and training standards or guidelines. After exclusion criteria were applied, the two researchers scored each of the remaining clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) using a prespecified abstraction Google form that reflected the RIGHT statement checklist (22 criteria; 35 items inclusive of subset questions). Each item on the abstraction form consisted of a “yes/no” option; each item on the RIGHT checklist was recorded as “yes” if it was included in the guideline and “no” if it was not. Each checklist item was weighed equally. Partial adherence to checklist items was recorded as “no.” Data were extracted into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation) for statistical analysis.

Results

The initial search results yielded 129 CPGs in the following areas: 13 of the guidelines were in the field of interventional oncology; 16 in neurovascular disorders; five in nonvascular interventions; four in pediatrics; 25 in peripheral, arterial, and aortic disease; one in cardiac; one in portal and mesenteric vascular disease; 37 in practice development and safety; three in spine and musculoskeletal disorders; 14 in venous disease; five in renal failure/hemodialysis; and five in women’s health. Of the 46 guidelines deemed eligible for evaluation by the RIGHT checklist, 12 of the checklist items showed less than 25% adherence and 13 showed more than 75% adherence. Of 35 individual RIGHT statement checklist items, adherence was found for a mean (SD) of 22.9 items (16.3). The median number of items with adherence was 21 (interquartile range, 7.5–38).

Conclusion

The quality of reporting in interventional radiology guidelines is lacking in several key areas, including whether patient preferences were considered, whether costs and resources were considered, the strength of the recommendations, and the certainty of the body of evidence. Poor adherence to the RIGHT statement checklist in these guidelines reveals many areas for improvement in guideline reporting.

Clinical experience with distal transradial access for endovascular treatment of various noncoronary interventions in a multicenter study

Background

Transradial access is a well-known alternative to conventional transfemoral access for interventional procedures. Recently, transradial access through the “snuffbox”, which lies in the radial dorsal aspect of the hand, has been introduced as a new technique with positional versatility. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of distal transradial access for interventional procedures in a retrospective, multicenter study.

Material & methods

Distal transradial access was attempted in 46 patients (36 men and 10 women; mean age, 64 years) who underwent 47 consecutive procedures from January 2018 to December 2019. Procedures included chemoembolization (19/47, 40.4%), bronchial artery embolization (7/47, 14.9%), renal intervention (3/47, 6.4%), arteriovenous fistula angioplasty (7/47, 14.9%), subclavian artery stenting (5/47, 10.6%), other embolization (5/47, 10.6%), and uterine artery embolization (1/47, 2.1%). We recorded the success rate of the procedures, complications, and postprocedural hemostasis time during the follow-up period.

Results

The technical success of distal transradial access without major complications was 97.9% (46/47). Of the 46 patients, one patient (2.2%) had a minor complication, which was a thrombotic segmental occlusion of the distal radial artery. Of the enrolled patients, only one patient did not complete the transradial access procedure via the snuffbox because the left proximal subclavian artery was occluded and a crossover to conventional transfemoral access was performed. The mean postprocedural hemostasis time was 131.7 minutes (range, 120–360 minutes).

Conclusion

Distal transradial access can be a valid option for the endovascular treatment of various noncoronary interventions with technical feasibility and safety.

Safety and Feasibility of Transradial Access in Patients Presenting With Traumatic Injuries: A Single Urban Center Experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of transradial approach (TRA) for endovascular management of traumatic bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at a single level 1 trauma institution from August 2018 to July 2019. Patients presented to the interventional radiology department who were intended to be treating using TRA for the management of trauma-induced bleeding were selected. Demographics, indication for embolization, embolization site, preprocedural labs, hemodynamic stability, technical success, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Transradial approach was attempted in 29 (74.4%) of the 39 patients identified by operators who prefer TRA. Four patients received treatment using TRA on 2 separate occasions, for a total of 33 procedures completed with a technical success of 97% (32/33). Transradial approach was safely completed in 9 patients (27.3%) with preprocedural hemodynamically unstable status. For the 10 patients who received treatment via a transfemoral approach (TFA), traumatic disfiguration of the left upper extremity, preexisting arterial lines placed by the trauma team, and external iliac artery injuries requiring covered stent placement were the most common indications for TFA over TRA. There were no procedural or access site-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Transradial approach for the endovascular management of bleeding in a trauma setting is safe and effective with a high technical success rate and no complications.

Endovascular Pressure Measurements to Assess the Functional Severity of Mesenteric Arterial Stenoses

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of pressure measurements to discriminate clinically significant celiac artery (CA) or superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center, retrospective cohort study of 41 intra-arterial pressure measurements during mesenteric angiography with intended revascularization, performed in 37 patients (mean age 67.7 ± 10.8 years, 62% female) between April 2015 and May 2017. Simultaneous prestenotic and poststenotic pressure measurements had been obtained before and after intra-arterial administration of nitroglycerin. Revascularization was performed in 38 of 41 procedures. Definitive diagnosis of CMI was defined as patient-reported symptom relief or improvement after successful revascularization.

RESULTS

Pressure gradients obtained after vasodilator administration were significantly higher in CAs and SMAs with ≥50% stenosis. Pressure ratios (pressure distal [Pd]/pressure aorta [Pa]) obtained after vasodilator administration were significantly higher in CAs with ≥50% stenosis. Subgroup analysis of 22 patients with a ≥50% stenosis of either CA or SMA showed significantly higher pressure gradients and Pd/Pa ratios after vasodilator administration in CMI patients (median pressure gradient: CMI [interquartile ratio] 36 [21-40] mm Hg versus no-CMI 20 [9-21] mm Hg, P = 0.041; Pd/Pa: CMI 0.703 [0.598-0.769] versus no-CMI 0.827 [0.818-0.906], P = .009). A ≤0.8 Pd/Pa cutoff value after administration of a vasodilator best identified a clinically relevant stenosis, with 86% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Complications related to the pressure measurements were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-arterial pressure measurements are feasible and safe. Low Pd/Pa ratios were associated with clinically relevant CA or SMA stenosis.

Expedited TR Band Removal for Transradial Approach for Noncoronary Visceral Procedures: Initial Experience

PURPOSE

For transradial interventions, most published studies report an initial Terumo Radial (TR) band placement time of 60 minutes, with gradual deflation over 30 to 90 minutes. We aimed to determine, retrospectively, whether TR band removal time could be expedited to 45 to 60 minutes, without adverse effects via an expedited single-step deflation protocol.

METHODS

A total of 115 consecutive noncoronary visceral interventions that utilized TR band from September 2017 till February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Alternative single-step deflation protocol was utilized where the nursing staff was instructed to deflate the TR band in 1 step between 45 and 60 minutes; 79 patients (43 men, 36 women, mean age of 55.3 ± 13.6 years) underwent 115 transradial interventions. Mean procedure time was 49.8 ± 22.1 minutes, and mean fluoroscopy time was 18.5 ± 10.6 minutes. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure details, and nursing notes on complications including bleeding and reinflation of the TR band. Univariate and Multivariate analyses of independent variables were performed using a binary logistic regression model. All patients were followed up postoperatively before discharge and in clinic upon follow-up.

RESULTS

The TR band was deflated at 51.3 ± 14.5 minutes, with successful removal achieved on the first attempt in 103 cases (90.3% primary technical success rate). In 12 cases, bleeding was noted upon initial deflation, secondary technical success was achieved when the band was reinflated for an additional mean time of 37.0 ± 19.1 minutes. There was 1 incidence of radial artery occlusion (0.8%) and 1 incidence of a grade 1 hematoma (0.8%). The only variable predictive of technical outcome upon initial band deflation on univariate binomial logistic regression was initial TR band removal time (P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-step deflation protocol for TR band placement may be safe for nonocclusive patent hemostasis and may translate to even further shorten postprocedural hospital times for patients and cost savings for hospitals.

A New Preprocedural Score to Predict Bleeding Complications of Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease

Purpose: To investigate the bleeding complications associated with endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease (PAD) and develop a dedicated peripheral bleeding score (PBS). Materials and Methods: This prospective, single-center study enrolled 530 patients (mean age 67.6±9.8 years; 396 men) undergoing endovascular procedures between August 2016 and July 2018 for chronic PAD. Primary endpoints were the incidence of 30-day bleeding complications [minor and major (prolonging hospitalization, causing permanent sequelae, or resulting in death)], the identification of factors associated with bleeding events, and the development of a dedicated PBS based on univariate and multivariate analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. The HAS-BLED score was compared with the PBS. Results: The overall peripheral bleeding complication rate was 3.8% (20/530), of which 3.2% (17/530) were major and included 4 (0.7%) active retroperitoneal bleeding events and 13 (2.4%) pseudoaneurysms. The annualized incidences of overall bleeding and major bleeding complications were 1.9% and 1.6%, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis identified age ≥75 as a correlate of significantly increased bleeding risk (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.12 to 9.80, p<0.02). Male gender (HR 0.193, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.75, p<0.001) and statin therapy (HR 0.245, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.71, p=0.01) were correlated with a significantly decreased bleeding risk. Based on the regression analysis findings an 8-point PBS was developed, demonstrating 75.0% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity in detecting bleeding complications. The HAS-BLED score failed to identify 30-day bleeding events. Conclusion: The annualized incidence of bleeding complications associated with peripheral EVT was low. Advanced age and female sex were correlated with increased bleeding risk. The PBS demonstrated satisfactory statistical performance and could be considered for inclusion in the preprocedural endovascular checklist to help optimize intra- and postprocedural care.

Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Transradial, Transbrachial, and Transfemoral Approach for Mesenteric Arterial Procedures

PURPOSE

To assess feasibility and safety of transradial access (TRA) compared with transfemoral access (TFA) and transbrachial access (TBA) for mesenteric arterial endovascular procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent a mesenteric arterial procedure in a tertiary referral center between May 2012 and February 2018. Exclusion criteria were absence of data and lost to follow-up within 24 hours after the procedure. During the study period, 103 patients underwent 148 mesenteric arterial procedures (TBA, n = 52; TFA, n = 39; TRA, n = 57). Mean patient age was 64.3 years ± 13.3, and 91 patients (62%) were women. Primary outcomes were vascular access specified technical success rate and access site complication rate, as reported in hospital records.

RESULTS

Technical success rate specified for the vascular access technique did not differ between the 3 approaches (TBA 96%, TFA 87%, TRA 91%; TRA vs TBA, P = .295; TBA vs TFA, P = .112; TRA vs TFA, P = .524), and overall access site complication rate was not different between the 3 approaches (TBA 42%, TFA 23%, TRA 35%; TRA vs TBA, P = .439; TBA vs TFA, P = .055; TRA vs TFA, P = .208). However, more major access site complications were reported for TBA than for TRA or TFA (TBA 17%, TFA 3%, TRA 2%; TRA vs TBA, P = .005; TBA vs TFA, P = .026; TRA vs TFA, P = .785).

CONCLUSIONS

TRA is a safe and feasible approach for mesenteric arterial procedures comparable to TFA, but with a significantly lower major access site complication rate than TBA.

Transradial access chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in comparation with transfemoral access

Background

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of transradial access (TRA) with transfemoral access (TFA) chemoembolization in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

HCC patients who were late for curative treatment on initial diagnosis or HCC patients who had undergone one or several rounds of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) were enrolled. The clinical and angiographic characteristics, the procedure related details, and the follow-up data from patients who underwent TRA and TFA were analyzed and compared.

Results

In total, 112 patients undergoing 160 TRA-TACE and 107 patients undergoing 163 TFA-TACE were included. The technical success rate of TRA was 95.0% and that of TFA was 98.8% (P=0.102). In the TFA-TACE group, 5.5% of cases suffered access site-related complications, including 6 with minor bleeding and 3 with severe bleeding or pseudoaneurysm. In the TRA-TACE group, 1.9% of cases underwent crossover to femoral access for selective cannulation failure. The rate of radial artery occlusion (RAO) was 2.7% (3 of 112 patients), and none of the RAO patients suffered paresthesia, pain at the site of occlusion, hand function loss or distal ischemia. Comparing patients with/without access site-related complications in the TFA-TACE group, there was a statistical difference in patient age and in the percentage of patient with a PT time >15 s (72.6% vs. 57.1%, P<0.001; 44.4% vs. 11.7%, P=0.022).

Conclusions

TRA is a safe and effective method for patients undergoing TACE. Compared with TFA, TRA may reduce the occurrence of access site-related bleeding and vascular complications. TRA-TACE may especially benefit older patients or those with a longer prothrombin time (PT).

A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of the Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Cerebral Angiography: A Learning Curve Analysis

Purpose: To compare the characteristics and learning curve of the transfemoral approach (TFA) vs the transradial approach (TRA) for cerebral angiography. Materials and Methods: Between February 2016 and April 2017, 101 patients undergoing cerebral angiography were enrolled. Fifty-one patients (mean age 67 years; 40 men) were randomized to TFA and 50 (mean age 68 years; 41 men) to TRA using a computer-generated random table. The patients’ demographic and angiographic data were recorded and analyzed. The learning curve of a novice interventionist was analyzed for procedure time, puncture time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume as markers of technical proficiency with TFA compared with TRA. Median values are given with the interquartile range (IQR). Results: Procedure time [35 (IQR 30, 47.5) vs 31.0 (IQR 25.0, 48.9) minutes, p=0.16), fluoroscopy time [10.3 (IQR 7.6, 13.9) vs 9.4 (IQR 6.1, 17.6) minutes, p=0.70], contrast volume [105 (IQR 92, 120) vs 95.5 (IQR 90, 111.3) mL, p=0.13), radiation exposure [390.2 (IQR 268.2, 617.9) vs 455.8 (IQR 286.8, 602.3) mGy, p=0.74], and the number of catheter exchanges [1 (IQR 1, 3) vs 1 (IQR 1, 1), p=0.06] were not significantly different between the TFA and TRA groups, respectively, but puncture time was shorter with TFA than with TRA [0.6 (IQR 0.5, 1.1) vs 1 (IQR 0.6, 1.9) minutes, p=0.01]. The learning curve was steeper with TRA than with TFA in the beginning stages of training, but with increasing experience, the procedure and fluoroscopy times were better for TRA than for TFA. Training progress was made earlier in TRA. Conclusion: TRA is a reasonable alternative to TFA for cerebral angiography. TRA has a shorter learning curve for novice interventionists.

Distal Radial Artery Access for Noncoronary Endovascular Treatment Is a Safe and Feasible Technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and feasibility of distal radial artery (DRA) access for noncoronary interventional radiology procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All interventional radiology procedures by means of DRA puncture from July 2017 to August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-two punctures in 56 patients were included, mostly in male patients (84% vs 16%). Mean age was 67.8 years (range, 33.3-87.3 years); mean height was 172 cm (range, 142-190 cm); and mean weight was 83 kg (range, 43-120 kg). Procedural characteristics, technical success, and complication rates were gathered from the medical records and follow-up ultrasound when available. Prerequisites for DRA access were adequate radioulnar collateral circulation, sufficient radial artery diameter, and informed consent in patients initially intended for conventional transradial access.

RESULTS

Procedures included transarterial chemoembolization (n = 34), yittrium-90 pretreatment angiography (n = 21), yittrium-90 administration (transarterial radioembolization; n = 20), and embolization of visceral organs (n = 7). Both 4-Fr (n = 35) and 5-Fr (n = 46) sheaths were used. Technical success of DRA access was 97.6%, with conversion to transfemoral access in 2 cases (2.4%). No major complications were reported as a result of DRA access.

CONCLUSION

DRA access is a feasible and safe technique for abdominal interventional radiology embolization procedures. No radial artery occlusion or other major complications were observed in patients who underwent follow-up ultrasound.

French Guidelines for the Management of Ambulatory Endovascular Procedures for Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory hospitalization for endovascular repair of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) could be a real opportunity to respond to the burden of PAD, to reduce costs, and to improve patients' empowerment. The French Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SCVE) established guidelines to facilitate the development of ambulatory hospitalization in France.

METHODS

In 2017, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and MEDLINE database to conduct a systematic review of available literature. A total of 448 relevant articles were found. Twelve articles, all published after the year 2000, were included and reviewed by two independent investigators. The SCVE mandated a scientific committee to collectively establish these guidelines.

RESULTS

Eligibility for ambulatory management shall be based on the assessment of the triad: (1) patient, (2) procedure, and (3) structure. Comprehensive information and a detailed procedural pathway should be provided for the patient. No age limit is recommended. American Society of Anesthesiologists I, II, and III stable patients are eligible for ambulatory intervention. Specific comorbidities such as severe obesity, sleep apnea, and/or chronic kidney failure should be assessed preoperatively. Critical limb ischemia and complex lesions have not been considered as exclusion criteria. Antiplatelet drug use (aspirin and/or clopidogrel) has not been considered as a contraindication. Femoral ultrasound-guided puncture is recommended. Manual compression or closure devices have been recommended for 7F sheath or less. A minimum of 4 hours of monitoring after percutaneous femoral access is required before discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCVE guidelines aim to frame the practice of ambulatory endovascular procedures for lower extremity peripheral artery disease and to give vascular interventionalists help in their routine practice.

Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Stenting of Aortic Endograft Limb Occlusion

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous stenting for the management of chronic ischemia caused by endograft limb occlusion following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study investigating all patients who underwent percutaneous endovascular covered or bare metal stent placement for the management of intermittent claudication (IC) or critical limb ischemia following EVAR limb occlusion, between January 2010 and October 2017. Cases suffering from acute limb ischemia were treated surgically and were excluded from the analysis. Primary outcome measures were technical success and symptoms-free interval. Secondary outcome measures included clinically driven target-lesion reintervention (TLR)-free survival, primary patency, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of 29 limb occlusions, 11 limbs (11 patients; 100% male; mean age: 71.6 ± 6.9 years) were treated percutaneously and were included in the study. The majority suffered from IC (10/11; 90.9%) with a single case of rest pain. Technical success was obtained in 10 patients (90%). No major complications occurred. Mean follow-up time was 37.6 ± 25.7 months. Stent grafts were mainly used, while and in 2 cases (18.18%), only nitinol bare stents were deployed. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, both symptoms-free interval and primary patency were 83.33% in up to 5 years follow-up. TLR-free survival was 100% at 5 years, as 2 cases of claudication relapse were managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous stenting for the management chronic ischemia due to EVAR limb occlusion is feasible and safe, with satisfactory long-term outcomes. Careful patient selection warrants clinical success.

Percutaneous Venous Interventions in The Pulmonary Vascular, Central and Peripheral Venous Systems: How to Recognize, Avoid and Treat Complications

Endovascular treatment of venous disease encompasses a broad range of interventions. Both central and peripheral venous interventions can range from the simple to the complex which increases the need for proper patient selection, procedural planning and technical proficiency. The following article will discuss the importance of avoiding, recognizing and addressing complications associated with venous interventions. Our goal is to raise awareness and educate to help the reader improve performance.

Incidence and Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease: Outcomes from the IPAD Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To report the incidence and long-term outcomes following endovascular treatment of symptomatic, atherosclerotic isolated popliteal artery disease (IPAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included all patients who underwent endovascular treatment of IPAD between January 2010 and December 2016 because of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI), in three tertiary University Hospitals. In total, 4717 peripheral arterial disease (PAD) procedures were analyzed. The study's primary outcome measures were: IPAD incidence, binary restenosis rate and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcome measures included technical success, limb salvage rate and the identification of predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

The incidence of IPAD was 0.98% (46/4717 PAD procedures). In total, 46 patients (38 male; mean age 73 ± 12 years) underwent plain balloon (69.5%) or bail-out stenting (30.5%) procedures. Most patients suffered from CLI (65.2%). Mean lesion length was 52.5 ± 32.0 mm and 45.6% of the cases were occlusions. Severe calcifications were noted in 26.1%. Technical success was 100%. Mean time follow-up was 32.6 ± 25.6 months. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, restenosis was 15.8, 40.9, 45.8% and TLR-free rate was 90.5, 79.0, 74.1%, at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Survival and limb salvage rates were 73.6 and 88.1%, at 5 years, respectively. The major amputation rate for CLI patients was 10.0% (3/29 limbs), while no major amputations occurred in the claudication subgroup. Cox multivariable analysis detected baseline occlusion as an independent predictor of increased restenosis (HR 5.3; 95% CI 0.21-0.66, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated popliteal lesions requiring treatment appear in nearly 1% of patients with PAD. Balloon angioplasty and bail-out stenting resulted in acceptable long-term clinical outcomes. Treatment of occlusions was correlated with increased restenosis rate.

Recanalization of Occluded Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts Using the Rösch-Uchida Stiffening Cannula

PURPOSE

To report the safety and efficacy of occluded transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) recanalization using the stiffening cannula (SC) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-centre, single-arm study, investigating the safety and efficacy of transjugular recanalization of occluded TIPS using the SC (Cook, Ind. USA), in cases of failure to cross the occlusion with standard angiographic catheters and balloons. Between October 2015 and October 2017, a total of 15 TIPS revisions have been performed due to shunt occlusion. In all cases in which the initial standard approach to cross the lesion failed, the SC technique was used. The study's primary efficacy outcome measure was technical success, and primary safety outcome measure was immediate procedure-related complications rate. Secondary outcome measures included restenosis and peri-procedural adverse events rates.

RESULTS

Among 15 patients with shunt occlusion, seven (7/15; 46.5%) were successfully crossed via transjugular access, using standard angiographic catheters. In the remaining eight patients (nine procedures), recanalization with the SC technique was performed. Technical success was 100%. No complications or peri-procedural adverse events were noted. Restenosis rate was 11.1% (1/9 cases) as only one case of re-occlusion was noted, 3 months following recanalization using sole balloon angioplasty and successfully retreated using the SC technique and stent graft deployment.

CONCLUSIONS

The SC technique is a safe and efficient option for the recanalization of occluded TIPS, in cases in which conventional lesion crossing is not feasible, in order to avoid percutaneous transhepatic access or new TIPS creation.

Endovascular treatment of iliac and common femoral arteries disease by the transradial access: A prospective, feasibility study

AIM

To report feasibility and safety of endovascular interventions on iliac and common femoral arteries, using the transradial access (TRA).

METHODS

100 consecutive patients (19 women; mean age 71, range 37-90years) with critical limb ischemia (30%) or claudication, and TASC A-D lesions in iliac or common femoral arteries, were prospectively enrolled, from January 2013 to June 2015, to be treated via the TRA. Exclusion criteria included no palpable radial arteries (RA) and the presence of a fistula for hemodialysis. Patients were evaluated for procedural technical success, in-hospital complications, and 30days clinical success (defined as improvement of at least one grade in the Rutherford classification of symptoms).

RESULTS

A total of 131 iliac and common femoral arteries lesions were treated (58 in common iliac arteries, 38 in external iliac arteries and 35 in common femoral arteries). Ninety-two stents were deployed in 58 patients. Procedural technical success was achieved in 91% of the lesions; with 95% technical success rate in common iliac arteries, 87% in external iliac arteries and 89% in common femoral arteries; with 72% technical success rate in occlusions and 98% in stenosis. No in-hospital complications were observed. At 30days, 93 patients (93%) had an improvement of at least one category in the Rutherford classification of symptoms (clinical success rate 93%); 12 patients (12%) had an asymptomatic occlusion of the RA.

CONCLUSIONS

TRA can be used to treat iliac and common femoral arteries lesions with a high grade of technical success and a low rate of complications.

Observation time after outpatient non-arterial interventional procedures: standards, safety, and outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of standardized reduced post-procedure observation time on subsequent healthcare encounters such as emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and clinic visits.

METHODS

800 consecutive patients undergoing outpatient non-arterial interventional radiologic procedures within the vascular interventional department between 1 June 2013 and 21 July 2014 were included in this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant single center observational retrospective study. Electronic medical records were reviewed for subsequent healthcare encounters, such as ED visits, hospital admissions, and clinic visits. An attending interventional radiologist and radiology resident reviewed, in consensus, medical records for relevance of the encounter to the index procedure. Procedure-related encounters were analyzed to determine relationship to length of observation time, using Matlab for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

397 and 403 patients were in the pre- and post-standardization groups, respectively. Median observation time decreased overall from 1.67 h [interquartile range (IQR) 1.17-2.17] to 1.42 h (IQR 1.08-1.92), p < 0.001. There was no significant change in either overall or procedure-related ED visits (16.6% [66/397] and 1.0% [4/397] pre-standardization vs. 20.1% [81/403] and 2.2% [9/403] post-standardization, p = 0.24 and 0.26), hospital admissions (27.7% [110/397] and 4.0% [16/397] prestandardization vs. 28.3% [114/403] and 2.7% [11/403] post-standardization, p = 0.88 and 0.33), or clinic visits (41.3% [164/397] and 1.0% [4/397] pre-standardization vs. 39.5% [159/403] and 2.2% [9/403] post-standardization, p = 0.61 and 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Proposed standardized shortened observation times after outpatient interventional radiologic procedures are safe, without change in either total or procedure-related ED visits, hospital admissions, or clinic visits.

Starclose SE® hemostasis after 6F direct antegrade superficial femoral artery access distal to the femoral head for peripheral endovascular procedures in obese patients

PURPOSE

Direct superficial femoral artery (SFA) antegrade puncture is a valid alternative to common femoral artery (CFA) access for peripheral vascular interventions. Data investigating vascular closure device (VCD) hemostasis of distant SFA 6F access are limited. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Starclose SE® VCD for hemostasis, following direct 6F antegrade SFA access distal to the femoral head.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center study included patients who were not suitable for CFA puncture and were scheduled to undergo peripheral endovascular interventions using direct antegrade SFA 6F access, at least 2 cm below the inferior edge of femoral head. Hemostasis was obtained with the Starclose SE® VCD (Abbott Laboratories). Primary endpoints were successful hemostasis rate and periprocedural (30-day) major complication rate. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor complications. Clinical and Doppler ultrasound follow-up was performed at discharge and at one month.

RESULTS

Between September 2014 and August 2015, a total of 30 patients (21 male; 70.0%) with a mean body mass index of 41.2 kg/m2 were enrolled. Mean age was 72±9 years (range, 67-88 years). Most patients suffered from critical limb ischemia (87.1%) and diabetes (61.3%). Calcifications were present in eight cases (26.6%). Reason for direct SFA puncture was obesity (100%). Successful hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the cases. No major complications were noted after one-month follow-up. Minor complications included two <5 cm hematomas (6.6%) not necessitating treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, Starclose SE® VCD was safe and effective for hemostasis of antegrade direct SFA puncture. Uncomplicated hemostasis was achieved even in cases of puncturing 2 to 7 cm below the inferior edge of the femoral head.

[Management of Radius-Maumenee syndrome : Treatment with deep sclerectomy, viscocanalostomy and collagen matrix implantation]

We describe the case of an 18-year-old female patient who presented with vasodilation of the episcleral vessels in both eyes. The dilated vessels were more prominent in the right eye and, furthermore, examination of the fundus oculi showed a glaucomatous excavation of the right optic disc. No underlying eye or systemic disease was found as the cause for the vasodilation, therefore, Radius-Maumenee syndrome (idiopathic dilated episcleral vessels with secondary open angle glaucoma) was diagnosed. Radius-Maumenee syndrome is a diagnosis by exclusion. If no underlying disease can be detected primary therapy of the glaucoma is required. Carotid cavernous fistulas as the most common cause for dilated episcleral vessels and elevated episcleral venous pressure should be ruled out. Due to the progression of the excavation and the pathologically elevated intraocular pressure in the right eye of our patient we decided to perform a deep sclerectomy in combination with viscocanalostomy and implantation of a collagen matrix. The operation and postoperative period were free from complications. Two months after the surgical procedure the right eye showed a normalized intraocular pressure of 7 mmHg but no morphological changes in terms of reduction of the vasodilation. In summary, deep sclerectomy in combination with viscocanalostomy and implantation of a collagen matrix showed good results in the reduction of intraocular eye pressure in Radius-Maumenee syndrome.

Radiological Evaluation and Endovascular Treatment of Hemoptysis

Hemoptysis can be a life-threatening condition that warrants urgent investigation and intervention. Common causes include bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tuberculosis, and malignancy. Computed tomography angiography is an accurate imaging modality for assessment of hemoptysis. The bronchial arteries are the source of bleeding in most cases of hemoptysis, and bronchial artery embolization is the treatment of choice. The aim of this article is to summarize the pathophysiology, causes, initial management, and diagnostic approach of hemoptysis. Endovascular treatment of hemoptysis, technique, embolic materials, outcomes, complications, and follow-up of patients are discussed.

Technical Approach to Antegrade Femoral Access

The number of endovascular procedures for treatment of peripheral arterial disease continues to increase as minimally invasive procedures have become the first-approach solution for lower extremity arterial lesions of any complexity, including Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II category C and D. Although the usual treatment strategy has been to access the contralateral common femoral artery (CFA), an ipsilateral, antegrade CFA approach has certain advantages. The greatest advantages are the decrease in the access-to-lesion distance, which in turn improves the mechanical advantage and responsiveness of the tools used to perform the intervention. In certain clinical situations such as prior endovascular aneurysm repair, aortobifemoral surgical bypass, iliac kissing stents, and aortoiliac occlusive disease, an antegrade approach may be mandatory. In this article, we describe our institutional thought process and techniques for performing a successful antegrade puncture of the CFA, as well as highlight some pitfalls and the associated complication rates of which to be aware.

Optimizing Common Femoral Artery Access

Common femoral artery (CFA) access is an important step of many vascular interventional procedures such as peripheral arterial, aortic, and endovascular oncologic interventions. The anatomical location of the CFA as it crosses over the femoral head provides a unique location to establish a relatively large arterial access to a vessel that is conveniently located near the aorta and its major branches. A proper access helps the interventionist with the remainder of the procedure and diminishes the risk of severe complications leading to surgery, thrombolysis, patient morbidity, or occasionally mortality. On the contrary, a suboptimal access can jeopardize the entire procedure and may lead to limb and life-threatening complications. With the introduction of ultrasonography-assisted CFA access, the process has become more predictable and possibly less adventurous; however, there remain tips and tricks that can guarantee a safe and proper start for any arterial procedure. We review the preprocedural evaluation, procedural techniques, and postprocedural care to optimize CFA access.