Radiation emission from patients treated with holmium-166 radioembolization

Contact restriction time after common nuclear medicine therapies: spreadsheet implementation based on conservative retention function and individual measurements

The increasing use of new radiopharmaceuticals invites us to reconsider some radiation protection issues, such as the contact restriction time that limits public exposure by nuclear medicine patients. Contact restriction time should be patient specific and conservative, and its assessment made easy for clinicians. Here a method is proposed based on conservative estimation of the whole-body retention function and at least one measurement of the patient's dose rate. Recommended values of the retention function are given for eight therapies:¹³¹I (Graves' disease, remnant ablation, patient follow-up, meta-iodobenzylguanidine),¹⁷⁷Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen and¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapies, and⁹⁰Y and¹⁶⁶Ho microsphere injection of the liver. The patient line source model for scaling dose rate from one distance to another is included in the restriction time calculation. The method is benchmarked against published values and the influence of the dose rate scaling and whole-body retention function illustrated. A spreadsheet is provided, along with the source code, with recommended values for the eight therapies. The recommended values can be changed as well as the dose rate scaling function, and other radiopharmaceuticals can be included in the spreadsheet provided retention functions are defined.

Main challenges in radiation protection with emerging radionuclide therapies

The recent development of radionuclide therapy and radioligand therapy has raised a call for achieving the highest quality standards, for either radiopharmacy or radiation protection. Novel radionuclides are now being used, either under the form of in-house production radiopharmaceuticals or available from companies. Over the last 20 years, they include radiolabeled microspheres for selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT), the introduction of the first commercially available alpha emitter radiopharmaceutical, ²²³Ra, and the radiosynoviorthesis which is highly variable across Europe. More important is the development of radioligand therapy, often called theranostics. In this concept, a diagnostic radiopharmaceutical can determine the chance of success of a therapeutic one. Typically, diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography, are labeled with ¹⁸F or ⁶⁸Ga, such as the PSMA ligands or somatostatin analogs, and the therapeutic radiopharmaceutical is labeled with ¹⁷⁷Lu. This has revolutionized the world of Nuclear Medicine, but also all concepts that shall be applied to properly apply quality assurance and radiation protection in the field. This article will follow the example of ¹³¹I as the main used radionuclide for therapy during the last 80 years. Proposals can be general, and in parallel expert's articles will give specific guidance on issues with particular radionuclides, i.e., alpha emitters and ¹⁷⁷Lu. This article will also give insight in the radiation protection issues related to the use of microspheres radiolabeled with either ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁶⁶Ho.

Transarterial Radioembolization Planning and Treatment with Microspheres Containing Holmium-166: Determination of Renal and Intestinal Radionuclide Elimination, Effective Half-Life, and Regulatory Aspects

After transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with microspheres loaded with holmium-166, radioactivity is excreted from the body. The aim of this study was to evaluate radioactive renal and intestinal excretions after TARE planning and treatment procedures with holmium-166-loaded microspheres and to correlate the findings with the intratherapeutic effective half-life. Urinary and intestinal excretions of patients who underwent TARE procedures were collected during postinterventional intervals of 24 h (TARE planning) and 48 h (TARE treatment). Whole-body effective half-life measurements were performed. Calibrations of the ¹⁶⁶Ho measuring system showed evidence of long-living nuclides. For excretion determination, 22 TARE planning procedures and 29 TARE treatment procedures were evaluated. Mean/maximum total excretion proportions of the injected ¹⁶⁶Ho were 0.0038%/0.0096% for TARE planning procedures and 0.0061%/0.0184% for TARE treatment procedures. The mean renal fractions of all measured excretions were 97.1% and 98.1%, respectively. Weak correlations were apparent between the injected and excreted activities (R² planning/treatment: 0.11/0.32). Mean effective ¹⁶⁶Ho half-lives of 24.03 h (planning) and 25.62 h (treatment) confirmed low excretions. Radioactive waste disposal regulations of selected jurisdictions can be met but must be reviewed before implementing this method into clinical practice. Inherent long-living nuclide impurities should be considered.

Holmium-166 Radioembolization: Current Status and Future Prospective

Since its first suggestion as possible option for liver radioembolization treatment, the therapeutic isotope holmium-166 (¹⁶⁶Ho) caught the experts’ attention due to its imaging possibilities. Being not only a beta, but also a gamma emitter and a lanthanide, ¹⁶⁶Ho can be imaged using single-photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Another advantage of ¹⁶⁶Ho is the possibility to perform the scout and treatment procedure with the same particle. This prospect paves the way to an individualized treatment procedure, gaining more control over dosimetry-based patient selection and treatment planning. In this review, an overview on ¹⁶⁶Ho liver radioembolization will be presented. The current clinical workflow, together with the most relevant clinical findings and the future prospective will be provided.

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Primary liver tumours (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. However, only 10-20% of patients are amenable to curative treatment, such as resection or transplant. Liver metastases are most frequently caused by colorectal cancer, which accounts for the second most cancer-related deaths in Europe. In both primary and secondary tumours, radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. The vast potential of personalized dosimetry has also been shown, resulting in markedly increased response rates and overall survival. In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, the role of radioembolization will be subject to changes. Therefore, the decision for radioembolization should be taken by a multidisciplinary tumour board in accordance with the current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this procedure guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing radioembolization treatment. PREAMBLE: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners in providing appropriate nuclear medicine care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set out in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognised that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

The various therapeutic applications of the medical isotope holmium-166: a narrative review

Over the years, a broad spectrum of applications of the radionuclide holmium-166 as a medical isotope has been established. The isotope holmium-166 is attractive as it emits high-energy beta radiation which can be used for a therapeutic effect and gamma radiation which can be used for nuclear imaging purposes. Furthermore, holmium-165 can be visualized by MRI because of its paramagnetic properties and by CT because of its high density. Since holmium-165 has a natural abundance of 100%, the only by-product is metastable holmium-166 and no costly chemical purification steps are necessary for production of nuclear reactor derived holmium-166. Several compounds labelled with holmium-166 are now used in patients, such Ho¹⁶⁶-labelled microspheres for liver malignancies, Ho¹⁶⁶-labelled chitosan for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and [¹⁶⁶Ho]Ho DOTMP for bone metastases. The outcomes in patients are very promising, making this isotope more and more interesting for applications in interventional oncology. Both drugs as well as medical devices labelled with radioactive holmium are used for internal radiotherapy. One of the treatment possibilities is direct intratumoural treatment, in which the radioactive compound is injected with a needle directly into the tumour. Numerous other applications have been developed, like patches for treatment of skin cancer and holmium labelled antibodies and peptides. The second major application that is currently clinically applied is selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT, also called radioembolization), a novel treatment option for liver malignancies. This review discusses medical drugs and medical devices based on the therapeutic radionuclide holmium-166.

Holmium-166 Microsphere Radioembolization of Hepatic Malignancies

Holmium microspheres have recently become available in the European market as the third type of microspheres for radioembolization of unresectable liver malignancies. Holmium microspheres come with a dedicated administration system, and since these microspheres contain holmium-166 (¹⁶⁶Ho) instead of yttrium-90, unique dosing and imaging possibilities have become available as well. In addition, a scout dose of ¹⁶⁶Ho microspheres (Conformité Européenne mark is now granted and not pending anymore) can be used instead of ^99mTc-macroaggragated albumin during the preparatory angiography procedure. So far, two prospective phase I and phase II clinical studies have been performed on ¹⁶⁶Ho radioembolization in a population of liver metastases from mixed origins. These studies showed that a mean whole-liver dose of 60 Gy is safe and induces tumor response. Ongoing trials investigate the effect of ¹⁶⁶Ho radioembolization in patients with neuroendocrine tumor metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, and colorectal cancer metastases. Data derived from these studies will be used to refine the dosing schedule of 60 Gy to the whole liver and determine the optimal level of activity for each patient. This paper discusses several basics and provides an overview of relevant dosing aspects, technical aspects of performing holmium radioembolization, as well as a summary of completed and ongoing clinical studies and the upcoming developments regarding these microspheres.

Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) Agents beyond 90Y-Microspheres

Liver malignancies, either primary tumours (mainly hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma) or secondary hepatic metastases, are a major cause of death, with an increasing incidence. Among them, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents with a dark prognosis because of underlying liver diseases and an often late diagnosis. A curative surgical treatment can therefore only be proposed in 20 to 30% of the patients. However, new treatment options for intermediate to advanced stages, such as internal radionuclide therapy, seem particularly attractive. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE), which consists in the use of intra-arterial injection of a radiolabelled embolising agent, has led to very promising results. TARE with 90Y-loaded microspheres is now becoming an established procedure to treat liver tumours, with two commercially available products (namely, SIR-Sphere® and TheraSphere®). However, this technology remains expensive and is thus not available everywhere. The aim of this review is to describe TARE alternative technologies currently developed and investigated in clinical trials, with special emphasis on HCC.

Efficacy of Radioembolization with 166Ho-Microspheres in Salvage Patients with Liver Metastases: A Phase 2 Study

Radioembolization of liver malignancies with ¹⁶⁶Ho-microspheres has been shown to be safe in a phase 1 dose-escalation study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ¹⁶⁶Ho radioembolization. Methods: In this prospective single-arm study, 56 patients were enrolled, all with liver metastases refractory to systemic therapy and ineligible for surgical resection. The primary outcome was a response by 2 target lesions on triphasic liver CT scans 3 mo after therapy, as assessed using RECIST, version 1.1. Secondary outcomes included overall tumor response, time to imaging progression, overall survival, toxicity, quality of life, and quantification of the microspheres on SPECT and MRI. Results: Between May 2012 and March 2015, 38 eligible patients were treated, one of whom was not evaluable. In 27 (73%) of 37 patients, the target lesions showed complete response, partial response, or stable disease (disease control) at 3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-85%). The median overall survival was 14.5 mo (95% CI, 8.6-22.8 mo). For colorectal cancer patients (n = 23), the median overall survival was 13.4 mo (95% CI, 8.2-15.7 mo). Grade 3 or 4 toxic events after treatment (according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03) included abdominal pain (in 18% of patients), nausea (8%), ascites (3%), fatigue (3%), gastric stenosis (3%), hepatic failure (3%), liver abscesses (3%), paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (3%), thoracic pain (3%), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (3%), and vomiting (3%). On SPECT, ¹⁶⁶Ho could be quantified with high accuracy and precision, with a mean overestimation of 9.3% ± 7.1% in the liver. Conclusion: Radioembolization with ¹⁶⁶Ho-microspheres induced a tumor response with an acceptable toxicity profile in salvage patients with liver metastases.

Biodegradable seeds of holmium don't change neurological function after implant in brain of rats

AIM

To evaluate the surgical procedure and parenchymal abnormalities related to implantation of ceramic seeds with holmium-165 in rats' brain.

BACKGROUND

An effective method of cancer treatment is brachytherapy in which radioactive seeds are implanted in the tumor, generating a high local dose of ionizing radiation that can eliminate tumor cells while protecting the surrounding healthy tissue. Biodegradable Ho¹⁶⁶-ceramic-seeds have been addressed recently.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The experiments in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use at the Federal University of Ouro Preto, protocol number 2012/034. Twenty-one adult Fischer rats were divided into Naive Group, Sham Group and Group for seed implants (ISH). Surgical procedures for implantation of biodegradable seeds were done and 30 days after the implant radiographic examination and biopsy of the brain were performed. Neurological assays were also accomplished to exclude any injury resulting from either surgery or implantation of the seeds.

RESULTS

Radiographic examination confirmed the location of the seeds in the brain. Neurological assays showed animals with regular spontaneous activity. The histological analysis showed an increase of inflammatory cells in the brain of the ISH group. Electron microscopy evidenced cytoplasmic organelles to be unchanged. Biochemical analyzes indicate there was neither oxidative stress nor oxidative damage in the ISH brain. CAT activity showed no difference between the groups as well as lipid peroxidation measured by TBARS.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the data pointed out that the performed procedure is safe as no animal showed alterations of the neurological parameters and the seeds did not promote histological architectural changes in the brain tissue.