1
|
Tanariyakul M, Saowapa S, Aiumtrakul N, Wannaphut C, Polpichai N, Siladech P. Clinical characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in the transplanted kidney in renal transplant recipients: a systematic scoping review. Proc AMIA Symp 2024; 37:832-838. [PMID: 39165804 PMCID: PMC11332624 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2375705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Renal transplant recipients confront a substantially elevated susceptibility to renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in their native kidneys as opposed to allografts. Methods In this systematic scoping review, exhaustive searches were conducted of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Information was gathered on clinical manifestations, donor demographics, diagnostic intervals, tumor dimensions, histopathological characteristics, and therapeutic outcomes associated with RCC arising in allograft kidneys. Results The searches yielded a corpus of 42 case reports and 11 retrospective cohorts, encompassing a cohort of 274 patients. The majority of cases (75.4%) were clinically latent, discerned primarily through imaging modalities. Symptomatic presentations encompassed manifestations such as hematuria, elevated serum creatinine levels, abdominal discomfort, and graft-related pain. The mean temporal interval between renal transplantation and RCC diagnosis was calculated at 11.6 years, albeit displaying considerable variance. Notably, papillary and clear cell RCC emerged as the prevailing histopathological subtypes. However, the paucity of longitudinal follow-up data represents a notable caveat. Conclusion This investigation underscores the imperative of rigorous posttransplant surveillance regimes owing to the substantial prevalence of asymptomatic RCC instances. Future research should focus on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of screening practices to develop preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasawee Tanariyakul
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Sakditad Saowapa
- Department of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Noppawit Aiumtrakul
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Chalothorn Wannaphut
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Natchaya Polpichai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Pharit Siladech
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bodard S, Boudhabhay I, Dariane C, Delavaud C, Guinebert S, Guétat P, Mejean A, Timsit MO, Anglicheau D, Joly D, Hélénon O, Correas JM. Thermoablative Treatment of De Novo Tumor in Kidney Allograft. Transplantation 2024; 108:567-578. [PMID: 37726878 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall cancer risk increases in transplant patients, including in kidney allografts. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of patients with kidney allograft malignant tumors who underwent percutaneous thermal ablation. METHODS We included 26 renal allograft tumors, including 7 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCCs), 16 papillary RCCs, 1 clear-cell papillary RCC, and 2 tubulocystic RCCs, treated in 19 ablation sessions. Outcomes of thermal ablation therapy were assessed, including technical success, adverse events, local tumor progression, development of metastases, survival after thermal ablation, and changes in renal function. RESULTS Success rate was achieved in all ablation sessions (primary success rate: 96%; secondary success rate: 100%). No adverse events were observed in grades 3, 4, or 5. The median follow-up period was of 34 mo (15-69 mo). Two patients died during follow-up from a cause independent of renal cancer. The median decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 y after procedure was -4 (interquartile range, -7 to 0) mL/min/1.73 m 2 . One patient returned to dialysis within the year of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous thermal ablation shows convincing results for treating malignant renal graft tumors and should be a useful treatment option. The shorter hospitalization time, the advantage of avoiding a potentially challenging dissection of the transplant, and the excellent preservation of allograft function appear encouraging to extend this indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Bodard
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR 7371, INSERM U 1146, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Paris, France
- École Doctorale Sciences Mécaniques, Acoustique, Électronique & Robotique, Paris, France
- Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Francophone en Onco-Néphrologie, Paris, France
| | - Idris Boudhabhay
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Néphrologie-transplantation rénale adultes, Paris, France
| | - Charles Dariane
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Delavaud
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Guinebert
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Guétat
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Mejean
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Timsit
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Néphrologie-transplantation rénale adultes, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Joly
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Néphrologie-transplantation rénale adultes, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Hélénon
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Michel Correas
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR 7371, INSERM U 1146, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Altshuler PJ. Thermo-ablation of Renal Allograft Tumors: Every Patient, and Every Nephron, Counts. Transplantation 2024; 108:333-334. [PMID: 37726885 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Altshuler
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Crocerossa F, Autorino R, Derweesh I, Carbonara U, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Rubio-Briones J, Roupret M, Breda A, Volpe A, Mir MC. Management of renal cell carcinoma in transplant kidney: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:1-16. [PMID: 36094386 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04881-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After transplantation, approximately 10% of renal cell carcinomas are detected in graft kidneys. These tumors (gRCC) present surgeons with the difficulty of finding a treatment that guarantees both oncological clearance and maintenance of function. We conducted a systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis on the oncology, safety and functional outcomes of the available treatments for gRCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science including any study reporting perioperative, functional and survival outcomes for patients undergoing graft nephrectomy (GN), partial nephrectomy (PN) or thermal ablation (TA) for gRCC. Quade's ANCOVA, Spearman Rho and Pearson χ2, Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank and Standard Cox regression and other tests were used to compare treatments. Studies' quality was evaluated using a modified version of Newcastle Ottawa Scale. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A number of 29 studies (357 patients) were included. No differences between TA and PN were found in terms of safety, functional and oncological outcomes for T1a gRCCs. When applied to pT1b gRCC, PN showed no difference in complications, progression or cancer-specific deaths compared to smaller lesions; PN validity for pT2 gRCCs should be considered unverified due to lack of sufficient evidence. The efficacy and safety of PN or TA for multiple gRCC remain controversial. In case of non-functioning, large (T≥2), complicated or metastatic gRCCs, GN appears to be the most reasonable choice. Quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Studies with large cohorts and longer follow-up are still needed to clarify oncological and functional differences. CONCLUSIONS PN and TA might be offered as a nephron-sparing treatment in patients with T1a gRCC. There is no significant difference between these options and GN in terms of oncological outcomes and complications. PN and TA offer similar functional outcomes and graft preservation. PN for T1b gRCC seems feasible and safe, but its validity should be considered unverified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.,Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | | | - Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.,Unit of Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Jose Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia (IVO) Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Department of Urology, GRC5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Urology Department, IMED Hospitals, Valencia, Spain -
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Romagnoli J, Tagliaferri L, Acampora A, Bianchi V, D'Ambrosio V, D'Aviero A, Esposito I, Hohaus S, Iezzi R, Lancellotta V, Maiolo E, Maiorano BA, Paoletti F, Peris K, Posa A, Preziosi F, Rossi E, Scaletta G, Schinzari G, Spagnoletti G, Tanzilli A, Scambia G, Tortora G, Valentini V, Maggiore U, Grandaliano G. Management of the kidney transplant patient with Cancer: Report from a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100636. [PMID: 34237586 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer is the second most common cause of mortality and morbidity in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). Immunosuppression can influence the efficacy of cancer treatment and modification of the immunosuppressive regimen may restore anti-neoplastic immune responses improving oncologic prognosis. However, patients and transplant physicians are usually reluctant to modify immunosuppression, fearing rejection and potential graft loss. Due to the lack of extensive and recognised data supporting how to manage the immunosuppressive therapy in KTRs, in the context of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and loco-regional treatments, a Consensus Conference was organised under the auspices of the European Society of Organ Transplantation and the Italian Society of Organ Transplantation. The conference involved a multidisciplinary group of transplant experts in the field across Europe. METHODS The overall process included a) the formulation of 12 specific questions based on the PICO methodology, b) systematic literature review and summary for experts for each question, c) a two-day conference celebration and the collection of experts' agreements. The conference was articulated in three sessions: "Immunosuppressive therapy and immunotherapy", "Systemic therapy", "Integrated Therapy", while the final experts' agreement was collected with a televoting procedure and defined according to the majority criterion. RESULTS Twenty-six European experts attended the conference and expressed their vote. A total of 14 statements were finally elaborated and voted. Strong agreement was found for ten statements, moderate agreement for two, moderate disagreement for one and uncertainty for the last one. CONCLUSIONS The consensus statements provide guidance to transplant physicians caring for kidney transplant recipients with cancer and indicate key aspects that need to be addressed by future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Romagnoli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Trapianti di Rene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia; Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
| | - Anna Acampora
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Bianchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Trapianti di Rene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Viola D'Ambrosio
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Nefrologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Andrea D'Aviero
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Esposito
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. di Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefan Hohaus
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. di Radiologia diagnostica e interventistica generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Elena Maiolo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Brigida A Maiorano
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Unità di Oncologia, Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| | - Filippo Paoletti
- Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Ketty Peris
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. di Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dermatologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Posa
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. di Radiologia diagnostica e interventistica generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Preziosi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scaletta
- Dipartimento della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gionata Spagnoletti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Trapianti di Rene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia; Dipartimento di Chirurgie Specialistiche, Ch. Epato-Bilio-Pancreatica e Dei Trapianti di Fegato e Rene, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tanzilli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, UO Nefrologia, Azienda-Ospedaliero di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grandaliano
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Nefrologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
[Long-term follow-up of renal cell carcinomas T1a treated by percutaneous radiofrequency]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:576-583. [PMID: 33593696 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term oncological and functional results of the ablative treatment of T1a kidney malignancies by percutaneous radiofrequency (RF). MATERIALS AND METHODS Monocentric retrospective study including all patients treated for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) T1a by radiofrequency, in our center, from 2005 to 2009. All patients had a tumor biopsy before treatment. The primary endpoint was local recurrence. A total of 44 RCCs in 41 consecutive patients were treated (1 patient had 3 synchronous tumors and 1 patient had 2 tumors). There were 26 clear cell RCCs, 13 papillary RCCs and 5 chromophobe RCCs. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years [48-82]. The median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 2 [1-3] and the median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 64mL/min [26-109]. Furhman grade was defined for 39 tumors (Clear cell RCC and papillary RCC), of which 82% were grade 1-2. The median tumor size was 20mm [11-40], and the median RENAL score was 4 [4-6]. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median follow-up was 90.5 months [17.8-145.3]. Three (7%) local recurrences were reported within a median of 26 months [12-93]. All were treated by a 2nd RF. The overall 10-year survival was 70% (95% CI [56-85]). The 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72% (95% CI [57-88]). The 10-year metastasis-free survival was 87% (95% CI [74-97]). The median GFR on the date of the last news was 51mL/min [16-98] (P=0.05). Post-RFA complications consisted in 5 (11.3%) Clavien-Dindo 1-2 complications. No high grade (Clavien ≥3). CONCLUSION Percutaneous radiofrequency for RCC T1a is an alternative. It appears to be safe with low morbidity, satisfaying long-term oncological and functional results, but a risk of reprocessing of 7%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
7
|
Motta G, Ferraresso M, Lamperti L, Di Paolo D, Raison N, Perego M, Favi E. Treatment options for localised renal cell carcinoma of the transplanted kidney. World J Transplant 2020; 10:147-161. [PMID: 32742948 PMCID: PMC7360528 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i6.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, there is no consensus among the transplant community about the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of the transplanted kidney. Until recently, graftectomy was universally considered the golden standard, regardless of the characteristics of the neoplasm. Due to the encouraging results observed in native kidneys, conservative options such as nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) (enucleation and partial nephrectomy) and ablative therapy (radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and irreversible electroporation) have been progressively used in carefully selected recipients with early-stage allograft RCC. Available reports show excellent patient survival, optimal oncological outcome, and preserved renal function with acceptable complication rates. Nevertheless, the rarity and the heterogeneity of the disease, the number of options available, and the lack of long-term follow-up data do not allow to adequately define treatment-specific advantages and limitations. The role of active surveillance and immunosuppression management remain also debated. In order to offer a better insight into this difficult topic and to help clinicians choose the best therapy for their patients, we performed and extensive review of the literature. We focused on epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work up, staging strategies, tumour characteristics, treatment modalities, and follow-up protocols. Our research confirms that both NSS and focal ablation represent a valuable alternative to graftectomy for kidney transplant recipients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1aN0M0 RCC. Data on T1bN0M0 lesions are scarce but suggest extra caution. Properly designed multi-centre prospective clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Motta
- Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese 27288, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Lamperti
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Dhanai Di Paolo
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Nicholas Raison
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Marta Perego
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Evaldo Favi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sugi MD, Joshi G, Maddu KK, Dahiya N, Menias CO. Imaging of Renal Transplant Complications throughout the Life of the Allograft: Comprehensive Multimodality Review. Radiographics 2020; 39:1327-1355. [PMID: 31498742 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019190096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The kidney is the most commonly transplanted solid organ. Advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression regimens, surveillance imaging, and histopathologic diagnosis of rejection have allowed prolonged graft survival times. However, the demand for kidneys continues to outgrow the available supply, and there are efforts to increase use of donor kidneys with moderate- or high-risk profiles. This highlights the importance of evaluating the renal transplant patient in the context of both donor and recipient risk factors. Radiologists play an integral role within the multidisciplinary team in care of the transplant patient at every stage of the transplant process. In the immediate postoperative period, duplex US is the modality of choice for evaluating the renal allograft. It is useful for establishing a baseline examination for comparison at future surveillance imaging. In the setting of allograft dysfunction, advanced imaging techniques including MRI or contrast-enhanced US may be useful for providing a more specific diagnosis and excluding nonrejection causes of renal dysfunction. When a pathologic diagnosis is deemed necessary to guide therapy, US-guided biopsy is a relatively low-risk, safe procedure. The range of complications of renal transplantation can be organized temporally in relation to the time since surgery and/or according to disease categories, including immunologic (rejection), surgical or iatrogenic, vascular, urinary, infectious, and neoplastic complications. The unique heterotopic location of the renal allograft in the iliac fossa predisposes it to a specific set of complications. As imaging features of infection or malignancy may be nonspecific, awareness of the patient's risk profile and time since transplantation can be used to assign the probability of a certain diagnosis and thus guide more specific diagnostic workup. It is critical to understand variations in vascular anatomy, surgical technique, and independent donor and recipient risk factors to make an accurate diagnosis and initiate appropriate treatment.©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Sugi
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (M.D.S., N.D., C.O.M.); and Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.J., K.K.M.) and Emergency Medicine (G.J., K.K.M.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Gayatri Joshi
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (M.D.S., N.D., C.O.M.); and Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.J., K.K.M.) and Emergency Medicine (G.J., K.K.M.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Kiran K Maddu
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (M.D.S., N.D., C.O.M.); and Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.J., K.K.M.) and Emergency Medicine (G.J., K.K.M.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Nirvikar Dahiya
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (M.D.S., N.D., C.O.M.); and Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.J., K.K.M.) and Emergency Medicine (G.J., K.K.M.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Christine O Menias
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (M.D.S., N.D., C.O.M.); and Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (G.J., K.K.M.) and Emergency Medicine (G.J., K.K.M.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Goldberg H, Ajaj R, Cáceres JOH, Berlin A, Chandrasekar T, Klaassen Z, Wallis CJD, Ahmad AE, Leao R, Petrella AR, Kachura JR, Fleshner N, Matthew A, Finelli A, Jewett MAS, Hamilton RJ. Psychological distress associated with active surveillance in patients younger than 70 with a small renal mass. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:603.e17-603.e25. [PMID: 32253117 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 12/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the psychological distress throughout several predefined disease time points in patients younger than 70 with small renal masses (SRMs) treated with either active surveillance (AS) or ablative/surgical therapy. METHODS Using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System - revised (ESAS-r) questionnaire, we focused on psychological distress symptoms in all consecutive patients with an SRM between 2014 and 2017. We further evaluated the psychological distress sub-score (PDSS) of ESAS-r, consisting of the sum scores of anxiety, depression, and well-being. PDSS of patients treated with AS or ablation/surgery were compared at 4 distinct time points (before and after diagnosis, after a biopsy is performed, and at last follow-up). Multivariable linear regression models were performed to assess factors associated with worse PDSS (1-point score increase). RESULTS We examined 477 patients, of whom 217 and 260 were treated with AS and surgery/ablation, respectively. Similar ESAS-r and PDSS scores were shown at all predefined disease time points except following an SRM biopsy and at last, follow-up, where AS-treated patients with a biopsy-proven malignancy had significantly worse PDSS (11.4 vs. 6.1, P = 0.035), and (13.2 vs. 5.4, P = 0.004), respectively. At last follow-up, multivariable linear models demonstrated that a biopsy-proven malignancy (B = 2.630, 95% CI 0.024-5.236, P = 0.048) and AS strategy (B = 6.499, 95% CI 2.340-10.658, P = 0.002) were associated with worse PDSS in all patients, and in those who underwent a biopsy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Offering standardized psychological supportive care may be required for patients younger than 70 years on AS for SRM, especially for those with a biopsy-proven tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Goldberg
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Rami Ajaj
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jaime Omar Herrera Cáceres
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA; Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ardalan E Ahmad
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ricardo Leao
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anika R Petrella
- Departments of Surgery and Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R Kachura
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Departments of Surgery and Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Urology Division, Surgical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lum MA, Shah SB, Durack JC, Nikolovski I. Imaging of Small Renal Masses before and after Thermal Ablation. Radiographics 2019; 39:2134-2145. [PMID: 31560613 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019190083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Thermal ablation of small renal masses is increasingly accepted as an alternative to partial nephrectomy, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities. Many professional societies support this alternate treatment with updated guidelines. Before performing thermal ablation, it is important to stratify risk and assess technical feasibility by evaluating tumor imaging features such as size, location, and centrality. Routine postablation imaging with CT or MRI is necessary for assessment of residual or recurrent tumor, evidence of complications, or new renal masses outside the ablation zone. The normal spectrum and evolution of findings at CT and MRI include a halo appearance of the ablation zone, ablation zone contraction, and ablation zone calcifications. Tumor recurrence frequently manifests at CT or MRI as new nodular enhancement at the periphery of an expanding ablation zone, although it is normal for the ablation zone to enlarge within the first few months. Recognizing early tumor recurrence is important, as small renal masses are often easily treated with repeat ablations. Potential complications of thermal ablation include vascular injury, urine leak, ureteral stricture, nerve injury, and bowel perforation. The risk of these complications may be related to tumor size and location.©RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Lum
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Shreena B Shah
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Jeremy C Durack
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| | - Ines Nikolovski
- From the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065 (M.A.L., S.B.S.); and Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.C.D., I.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Favi E, Raison N, Ambrogi F, Delbue S, Clementi MC, Lamperti L, Perego M, Bischeri M, Ferraresso M. Systematic review of ablative therapy for the treatment of renal allograft neoplasms. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:2487-2504. [PMID: 31559284 PMCID: PMC6745334 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, there are no guidelines on the treatment of solid neoplasms in the transplanted kidney. Historically, allograft nephrectomy has been considered the only reasonable option. More recently, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and ablative therapy (AT) have been proposed as alternative procedures in selected cases.
AIM To review outcomes of AT for the treatment of renal allograft tumours.
METHODS We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 Checklist. PubMed was searched in March 2019 without time restrictions for all papers reporting on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and irreversible electroporation (IRE) of solid tumours of the kidney allograft. Only original manuscripts describing actual cases and edited in English were considered. All relevant articles were accessed in full text. Additional searches included all pertinent references. Selected studies were also assessed for methodological quality using a tool based on a modification of the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Data on recipient characteristics, transplant characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment protocols, and treatment outcomes were extracted and analysed. Given the nature and the quality of the studies available (mostly retrospective case reports and small retrospective uncontrolled case series), a descriptive summary was provided.
RESULTS Twenty-eight relevant studies were selected describing a total of 100 AT procedures in 92 patients. Recipient age at diagnosis ranged from 21 to 71 years whereas time from transplant to diagnosis ranged from 0.1 to 312 mo. Most of the neoplasms were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during imaging carried out for screening purposes or for other clinical reasons. Preferred diagnostic modality was Doppler-ultrasound scan followed by computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging. Main tumour types were: papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clear cell RCC. Maximal tumour diameter ranged from 5 to 55 mm. The vast majority of neoplasms were T1a N0 M0 with only 2 lesions staged T1b N0 M0. Neoplasms were managed by RFA (n = 78), CA (n = 15), MWA (n = 3), HIFU (n = 3), and IRE (n = 1). Overall, 3 episodes of primary treatment failure were reported. A single case of recurrence was identified. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 81 mo. No cancer-related deaths were observed. Complication rate was extremely low (mostly < 10%). Graft function remained stable in the majority of recipients. Due to the limited sample size, no clear benefit of a single procedure over the other ones could be demonstrated.
CONCLUSION AT for renal allograft neoplasms represents a promising alternative to radical nephrectomy and NSS in carefully selected patients. Properly designed clinical trials are needed to validate this therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evaldo Favi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Nicholas Raison
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Ambrogi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Serena Delbue
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan 20100, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Clementi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Lamperti
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Marta Perego
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Matteo Bischeri
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Konstantinidis C, Trilla E, Serres X, Montealegre C, Lorente D, Castellón R, Morote J. Association among the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and clinical outcomes in patients with small renal masses treated with percutaneous contrast enhanced ultrasound radiofrequency ablation. Cent European J Urol 2019; 72:92-99. [PMID: 31482014 PMCID: PMC6715079 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction An association between the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) and clinical outcomes in patients with a small renal mass (SRM) has been proposed. We analyzed clinical outcomes according to the RNS in patients with a SRM treated with percutaneous contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Material and methods Patients with a SRM, who underwent RFA between January 2005 and March 2015, were retrospectively identified. The association between RNS and clinical outcomes was evaluated using parametric and non-parametric analysis. Results We analyzed 163 SRMs in 149 consecutive patients. The mean age was 71.7 years. Mean follow-up time was 33.3 months ±20.6 (2-102). The mean RNS was 5.6 ±1.52 (4-11). A total of 121 (74.2%) cases were of low complexity and 42 (25.8%) were medium complexity. We identified 11 cases of tumor persistence (6.7%). The mean RNS was 5.58 in the cases with no persistence and 5.73 in the cases with persistence (p = 0.788). We identified 15 (9.2%) cases of recurrence. The mean RNS was 5.57 ±0.1 (4-11) in the cases without recurrence and 5.73 ±0.4 (4-9) in recurrence cases (p = 0.804). Of the 76 biopsy proven RCC cases, 8 (10.5%) cases of recurrence were observed, 5 in the low complexity group and 3 in the medium complexity group (p = 0.690). A total of 9 (5.5%) cases of complications were observed, with 5 (4.3%) in the low complexity group and 4 cases in the medium complexity group (p = 0.23). The mean length of stay was 1.5 days with a significant difference between low and medium complexity groups (1.3 vs. 2.1 days, p = 0.02). The mean difference between preoperative eGFR and estimated eGFRat 12 months was -3.08 mL / min ±13.3 (-49.4-34.1) and was significant (p = 0.008).However, this variation did not show significant differences between the low and medium complexity groups (p = 0.936). All-cause mortality was 11.7%, 14 cases (11.6%) in the low complexity group and 5 (11.9%) in the medium complexity group (p = 1.0). No cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) specific mortality were identified. Conclusions The RNS was not associated with tumor persistence, recurrence, cancer specific mortality, complications or renal function 12 months after the first treatment, showing significant difference only in length of hospital stay between low and medium complexity groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Konstantinidis
- Department of Urology, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Trilla
- Department of Urology, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Serres
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Radiology, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - David Lorente
- Department of Urology, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Castellón
- Department of Radiology, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Iezzi R, Posa A, Carchesio F, Romagnoli J, Salerno MP, Citterio F, Manfredi R. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of renal graft neoplasms: A literature review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2019; 33:161-165. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
14
|
Focal Ablative Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma in Transplant Allograft Kidneys. Urology 2018; 125:118-122. [PMID: 30552936 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes after focal ablative therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in transplant allograft kidneys. METHODS After institutional review board approval, patients with a history of RCC in a transplanted allograft kidney who underwent focal ablative therapy were identified. Complete chart reviews were performed and the relevant data were extracted for cumulative analysis. RESULTS Six patients were treated with focal ablative therapy for RCC in a transplanted allograft kidney at our institutional between 2010 and 2017. Masses were diagnosed at a median of 8 years (range 1 month-8 years) after transplantation. Median mass size was 3 cm. Three patients were treated with microwave ablation, 1 with percutaneous irreversible electroporation, 1 with laparoscopic cryoablation, and 1 with open cryoablation. Median follow-up was 45 months (range 8-61 months). The median creatinine level was 1.65 before ablation and 1.58 1 year after ablation. No patients required dialysis after ablation. No patients developed local recurrence during the follow-up period. However, 1 patient developed lymph node metastases 4 years after ablation. Two patients died during follow-up of other causes. At the time of death both patients had functioning grafts. CONCLUSION Focal ablative therapies are a feasible, renal-sparing intervention for the management of RCC in renal allografts at intermediate-term follow-up.
Collapse
|