Should Renal Mass Biopsy Be Performed prior to or Concomitantly with Thermal Ablation?

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Biopsy in Advance of Ablation with Concurrent Biopsy and Ablation for Small Renal Masses Measuring 1-3 cm

PURPOSE

To analyze the cost effectiveness of performing a renal mass biopsy in advance of ablation or concurrently with a percutaneous ablation procedure for the management of small renal masses (SRMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed with a cohort of 65-year-old male patients with an incidental, unilateral 1-3 cm SRM. A decision tree modeled the first year of clinical intervention, after which patients entered a Markov model with a lifetime horizon. Patients were assumed to be treated in accordance with established clinical practice guidelines, including surveillance, repeat ablation for recurrence, and systemic therapy for metastasis. Healthcare cost and utility values were determined from published literature or local hospital estimates, discounted at 1.5%. Total lifetime costs were calculated from the perspective of a Canadian healthcare payer and converted to 2022 Canadian dollars (C$). The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of C$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The secondary outcome was ICER at a willingness-to-pay threshold of C$50,000 per life year (LY) gained.

RESULTS

Concurrent biopsy and ablation resulted in a gain of 16.4 quality-adjusted days, at an incremental cost of $386, with an ICER of C$8,494/QALY. The concurrent strategy was the dominant strategy for a prevalence of benign mass of <5%. Sequential biopsy and ablation was only cost-effective when LYs were not quality-adjusted and ablation cost was >C$4,300 or benign mass prevalence was >28%.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent biopsy and ablation is cost-effective relative to pretreatment diagnostic biopsy for management of incidental SRMs.

Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Ablative (percutaneous and stereotactic) thermal and radiotherapy procedures for management of both primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma are increasing in popularity in clinical practice. Data suggest comparable efficacy with lower cost and morbidity compared to nephrectomy. Ablative therapies may be used alone or in conjunction with surgery or chemotherapy for treatment of primary tumor and metastatic disease. Imaging plays a crucial role in pre-treatment selection and planning of ablation, intra-procedural guidance, evaluation for complications, short- and long-term post-procedural surveillance of disease, and treatment response. Treatment response and disease recurrence may differ considerably after ablation, particularly for stereotactic radiotherapy, when compared to conventional surgical and chemotherapies. This article reviews the current and emerging role of imaging for ablative therapy of renal cell carcinoma.

Computed Tomography-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Renal Tumors: A Review

Small renal tumors are sometimes challenging to diagnose accurately through imaging alone, and image-guided biopsies are performed when histological diagnoses are needed. Although ultrasound guidance is usually chosen for renal tumor biopsies, computed tomography guidance is preferred for selected cases; e.g., obese patients or when the target is undetectable by ultrasound (as those in the upper pole). In the 14 recently published studies covering ≥50 procedures, computed tomography-guided renal tumor biopsies had a wide range diagnostic yield (67.4%-97.4%). Complications often occurred; however, most were minor and asymptomatic. No biopsy-related deaths and tumor seeding occurred. This study aimed to review the advantages and disadvantages, procedure techniques, diagnostic yields, and complications of core needle biopsies for renal tumors under computed tomography guidance.

Renal biopsies performed before versus during ablation of T1 renal tumors: implications for prevention of overtreatment and follow-up

Purpose

To assess the difference between renal mass biopsy (RMB) performed either before or during the ablation procedure.

Methods

A retrospective multicenter study was performed in patients with a cT1 renal mass treated with ablation between January 2007 and July 2019, including a search in the national pathology database for patients with a RMB planned for ablation. Patient and tumor characteristics and information on malignant, benign, and non-diagnostic biopsy results were collected to establish rates of overtreatment and number of ablations avoided in case of benign or non-diagnostic histology.

Results

RMB was performed in 714 patients, of which 231 patients received biopsy before planned ablation, and 483 patients at the time of ablation. Pathology results before ablation were malignant in 63% (145/231), benign in 20% (46/231) and non-diagnostic in 17% (40/231). Pathology results at the time of ablation were malignant in 67.5% (326/483), benign in 16.8% (81/483) and non-diagnostic in 15.7% (76/483), leading to a total of 32.5% of ablation of benign or non-diagnostic lesions. Of the patients with a benign biopsy obtained before ablation, 80.4% (37/46) chose not to undergo ablation. Patients with inconclusive biopsy before planned ablation chose an informed individualized approach including ablation, repeated biopsy, or no intervention in 56%, 34% and 10%.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the importance of obtaining a biopsy prior to the ablation procedure in a separate session to lower the rate of potentially unnecessary ablations.

Update on Indications for Percutaneous Renal Mass Biopsy in the Era of Advanced CT and MRI

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this article is to review the burgeoning role of percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB). CONCLUSION. Percutaneous RMB is safe, accurate, and indicated for an expanded list of clinical scenarios. The chief scenarios among them are to prevent treatment of benign masses and help select patients for active surveillance (AS). Imaging characterization of renal masses has improved; however, management decisions often depend on a histologic diagnosis and an assessment of biologic behavior of renal cancers, both of which are currently best achieved with RMB.

Percutaneous Cryoablation of Stage T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: Safety, Technical Results, and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

The use of percutaneous cryoablation for T1b (4.1-7.0 cm) renal cell carcinoma, has not yet been widely adopted. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience in the cryoablation of stage T1b tumors with an emphasis on safety, technical results, and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of hospital records identified 37 patients who underwent cryoablation for T1b lesions from 2008 to 2018. Patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, technical parameters, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Recurrence-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (22 males, 15 females; mean age 66.5 ± 11.3) with 37 T1b tumors (mean diameter 47.3 ± 6.3 mm) were included. A median of 3 probes were used (range: 1-7). Angio-embolization was used in 3/37 (8.1%) and 2/37 patients (5.4%) required hydrodissection. The mean number of total cryoablation procedures for each patient was 1.5 (median 1; range: 1-4). Technical success was achieved in 88.2% of patients. Recurrence-free survival was 96.5%, 86.1%, and 62.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. Cancer-specific survival was 100% at 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. Overall survival was 96.7%, 91.8%, and 77.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. Complications classified as CIRSE grade 2 or higher occurred in 6/37 (16.2%) patients.

CONCLUSION

T1b cryoablation is associated with high rates of technical success, excellent cancer-specific survival, and an acceptable safety profile.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, Case Series.