1
|
Kang M, Shin Y, Kim Y, Ha S, Sung W. Modeling the Synergistic Impact of Yttrium 90 Radioembolization and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:106. [PMID: 38391592 PMCID: PMC10886259 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The impact of yttrium 90 radioembolization (Y90-RE) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has recently gained attention. However, it is unclear how sequencing and dosage affect therapeutic efficacy. The purpose of this study was to develop a mathematical model to simulate the synergistic effects of Y90-RE and ICI combination therapy and find the optimal treatment sequences and dosages. We generated a hypothetical patient cohort and conducted simulations to apply different treatments to the same patient. The compartment of models is described with ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which represent targeted tumors, non-targeted tumors, and lymphocytes. We considered Y90-RE as a local treatment and ICIs as a systemic treatment. The model simulations show that Y90-RE and ICIs administered simultaneously yield greater benefits than subsequent sequential therapy. In addition, applying Y90-RE before ICIs has more benefits than applying ICIs before Y90-RE. Moreover, we also observed that the median PFS increased up to 31~36 months, and the DM rates at 3 years decreased up to 36~48% as the dosage of the two drugs increased (p < 0.05). The proposed model predicts a significant benefit of Y90-RE with ICIs from the results of the reduced irradiated tumor burden and the associated immune activation and suppression. Our model is expected to help optimize complex strategies and predict the efficacy of clinical trials for HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minah Kang
- Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Yerim Shin
- Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeseul Kim
- Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangseok Ha
- Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Wonmo Sung
- Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kolb M, Forschner A, Artzner C, Grözinger G, Said I, Dittmann H, Seith F. Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) and Chemosaturation Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (CS-PHP) for Metastasized Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4942. [PMID: 37894309 PMCID: PMC10605323 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Even with liver-targeted therapies, uveal melanoma with hepatic metastasis remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients treated with either SIRT or CS-PHP. We included 62 patients with hepatic metastasized uveal melanoma (n = 34 with SIRT, receiving 41 cycles; n = 28 with CS-PHP, receiving 56 cycles) that received their treatments between 12/2013 and 02/2020 at a single center. We evaluated their response according to the RECIST 1.1, as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after the initiation of the first cycle of the liver-directed treatment using Cox regression, adjusted via propensity score analysis for confounders, including the amount of hepatic involvement. The disease control rate was 18% for SIRT and 30% for CS-PHP. The median (range) of PFS was 127.5 (19-1912) days for SIRT and 408.5 (3-1809) days for CS-PHP; adjusted Cox regression showed no significant difference (p = 0.090). The median (range) of OS was 300.5 (19-1912) days for SIRT and 516 (5-1836) days for CS-PHP; adjusted Cox regression showed a significant difference (p = 0.006). In our patient cohort, patients treated with CS-PHP showed a significantly longer OS than patients treated with SIRT. CS-PHP might therefore be preferable for patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Kolb
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
- Department of Radiology, Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Christoph Artzner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
- Institute of Radiology, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
| | - Ines Said
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Helmut Dittmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Ferdinand Seith
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perez MC, Depalo DK, Zager JS. A safety review of recently approved and late-stage trial treatments for metastatic melanoma: systemic and regional therapies. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:789-797. [PMID: 37551723 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2245333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced melanoma accounts for the majority of skin cancer-associated deaths. Over the past 15 years, there has been a dramatic change in the treatment options and prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma secondary to the development of novel systemic immunotherapies (IO) and targeted therapies. In addition to these novel systemic therapies, regional therapies (intralesional and perfusional) also continue to play a major role in the management of these patients. AREAS COVERED In this article, we review recent updates in the management of advanced melanoma via Medline (PubMed) and Google Scholar, including recently published trials in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. We also review recently published trials for regional therapies and discuss future directions in the management of patients with advanced melanoma. EXPERT OPINION A significant portion of patients with advanced melanoma will develop recurrent or progressive disease following treatment with IO or targeted therapy. Therefore, identifying not only the appropriate therapeutic agent but also the sequence and duration of treatment is pivotal for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Perez
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, United States of America
| | - Danielle K Depalo
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, United States of America
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sajan A, Fordyce S, Sideris A, Liou C, Toor Z, Filtes J, Krishnasamy V, Ahmad N, Reis S, Brejt S, Baig A, Khan S, Caplan M, Sperling D, Weintraub J. Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Hepatic Uveal Melanoma Metastases. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111836. [PMID: 37296688 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is one of the most common primary intraocular malignancies that accounts for about 85% of all ocular melanomas. The pathophysiology of uveal melanoma is distinct from cutaneous melanoma and has separate tumor profiles. The management of uveal melanoma is largely dependent on the presence of metastases, which confers a poor prognosis with a one-year survival reaching only 15%. Although a better understanding of tumor biology has led to the development of novel pharmacologic agents, there is increasing demand for minimally invasive management of hepatic uveal melanoma metastases. Multiple studies have already summarized the systemic therapeutic options available for metastatic uveal melanoma. This review covers the current research for the most prevalent locoregional treatment options for metastatic uveal melanoma including percutaneous hepatic perfusion, immunoembolization, chemoembolization, thermal ablation, and radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abin Sajan
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Samuel Fordyce
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Andrew Sideris
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Connie Liou
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Zeeshan Toor
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - John Filtes
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Venkatesh Krishnasamy
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Noor Ahmad
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Stephen Reis
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Sidney Brejt
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Asad Baig
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Shaheer Khan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael Caplan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - David Sperling
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Joshua Weintraub
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang W, Zhao H, Wang S. Identification of a novel immune-related gene signature for prognosis and the tumor microenvironment in patients with uveal melanoma combining single-cell and bulk sequencing data. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1099071. [PMID: 36793711 PMCID: PMC9922847 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1099071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Uveal melanoma (UVM) is the most invasive intraocular malignancy in adults with a poor prognosis. Growing evidence revealed that immune-related gene is related to tumorigenesis and prognosis. This study aimed to construct an immune-related prognostic signature for UVM and clarify the molecular and immune classification. Methods Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, single-sample gene set enrichment (ssGSEA) and hierarchical clustering analysis were performed to identify the immune infiltration pattern of UVM and classify patients into two immunity clusters. Then, we proposed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify immune-related genes that related to overall survival (OS) and validated in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) external validation cohort. The molecular and immune classification in the immune-related gene prognostic signature defined subgroups were analyzed. Results The immune-related gene prognostic signature was constructed based on S100A13, MMP9, and SEMA3B genes. The prognostic value of this risk model was validated in three bulk RNA sequencing datasets and one single-cell sequencing dataset. Patients in the low-risk group had better OS than those in the high-risk group. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed its strong predictive ability for UVM patients. Lower expression of immune checkpoint genes was presented in the low-risk group. Functional studies showed that S100A13 knockdown via siRNA inhibited UVM cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro, with the increased expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) related markers in UVM cell lines. Discussion The immune-related gene prognostic signature is an independent predictive factor for the survival of patients with UVM and provides new information about cancer immunotherapy in UVM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanpeng Wang
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hunan, Changsha, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Han Zhao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sha Wang
- Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hunan, Changsha, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaprin AD, Ivanov SA, Unguryan VM, Kazantsev AN, Belov YV. [Isolated liver perfusion with melphalan followed by pembrolizumab therapy for unresectable metastases of uveal melanoma to the liver]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:94-99. [PMID: 37379411 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202307194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma accounts for 80% of all ocular melanomas, and 30-60% of patients have metastases to the liver. A few patients are candidates for liver resection, and this disease is associated with poor prognosis. There are few data on optimal management of metastatic uveal melanoma. Isolated hepatic perfusion is a perspective method for regional treatment of inoperable metastatic liver lesions with uveal melanoma. We present a patient with uveal melanoma who underwent previous enucleation of the eye. Cancer progressed 15 years later as an isolated inoperable metastatic liver lesion. The patient underwent isolated liver perfusion with melphalan, hyperthermia and oxygenation. Subsequently, the patient received systemic therapy with pembrolizumab. Partial response was achieved 1 month after the procedure. There was no progression for 20 months after surgery under systemic therapy with pembrolizumab. Thus, isolated liver chemoperfusion with melphalan is advisable in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Kaprin
- Herzen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - S A Ivanov
- Tsyb Medical Radiology Research Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | | | - A N Kazantsev
- Kostroma Oncology Center, Kostroma, Russia
- Korolev Kostroma Regional Clinical Hospital, Kostroma, Russia
- Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu V Belov
- Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Estler A, Artzner C, Bitzer M, Nikolaou K, Hoffmann R, Hepp T, Hagen F, Eigentler T, Forschner A, Grözinger G. Efficacy and tolerability of chemosaturation in patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma. Acta Radiol 2022; 63:577-585. [PMID: 34034537 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211019808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma still have a poor outcome. PURPOSE To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response predictors in these patients treated with chemosaturation by percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (CS-PHP). MATERIAL AND METHODS Between June 2015 and March 2020, a total of 29 patients (median age 69.7 years; age range 30-81 years; 60% women; median BMI 25.7 kg/m2; range 18.7-35.3kg/m2; 1-6 procedures per patient) were treated with 53 CS-PHPs. All patients received cross-sectional imaging for initial and follow-up examinations. Baseline tumor load, extrahepatic tumor load, tumor response, PFS, and OS were assessed. Non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS After the initial CS-PHP, a partial response was observed in 11 patients (41%), stable disease in 12 patients (44%) and progressive disease in 4 patients (15%); two patients died before the response was evaluated. After initial CS-PHP, median OS was 12.9 ± 7.4 months and median PFS was 7.1 ± 7.4 months. OS after one year was 50%. After the second CS-PHP, median PFS was 7.9 ± 5.7 months. Seven patients had a liver tumor burden >25%, associated with a significantly shorter OS (6.0 ± 2.4 vs. 14.1 ± 12.7 months; P = 0.008). At the time of first CS-PHP, 41% (12/29) of the patients had extrahepatic metastases that did not affect OS (11.1 ± 8.4 months vs. 12.9 ± 13.6 months; P = 0.66). CONCLUSION CS-PHP is a safe and effective treatment for the hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma, especially for patients with a hepatic tumor burden <25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Estler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Artzner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hoffmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Hepp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Hagen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu Y, Lin H, You X, Guo T, Sun T, Xu H, Fu X. Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Chinese Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Characteristics and Particularity. Front Oncol 2022; 12:764923. [PMID: 35356200 PMCID: PMC8960046 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.764923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
More than half of new cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and associated deaths occurring annually worldwide are recorded in China. Chinese patients with HCC exhibit special characteristics in terms of etiology, leading to differences in prognosis versus Western patients. In recent years, several angiogenesis inhibitors were approved, and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) were recommended as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. In addition, the recent success of a combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab signals resulted in an essential change in the first-line treatment of HCC. We investigated the characteristics of patients with HCC in China and summarized the rapidly emerging relevant clinical data, which relate to the prospects and challenges associated with the use of ICBs in this setting. We further evaluated the efficacy of ICBs in Chinese patients with HCC based on data obtained from global trials, and discussed possible factors influencing the effectiveness of ICBs in patients with HCC in China. Immunotherapy offers new options for the treatment of advanced HCC, though responses varied between patients. Currently, there is a need to discover specific biomarkers for the accurate identification of patients who would more likely benefit from immunotherapy. Furthermore, investigation of patient characteristics in different countries is necessary to provide a clinical practice basis and reference value for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaoqiang Wu
- General Surgery, Dangdong First Hospital, Dandong, China
| | - Han Lin
- Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, Department of Hepatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xia You
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Taiyan Guo
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Tingting Sun
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
- The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal/Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Hao Xu, ; Xibo Fu,
| | - Xibo Fu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Hao Xu, ; Xibo Fu,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Safety and Efficacy of Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab and Sequential Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051162. [PMID: 35267470 PMCID: PMC8909598 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Despite recent progress on the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM), prognosis remains dismal for the majority of patients. Directed liver therapies including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) have been the pillar of hepatic metastases management. Independently, immune checkpoint blockade by combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab has demonstrated a median survival slightly superior to 1 year. However, the benefit of sequential ipilimumab plus nivolumab immunotherapy and SIRT has not been elucidated. Abstract To assess the safety and efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab around selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). We present a retrospective, single center study of 32 patients with mUM divided into two groups based on the treatment received between April 2013 and April 2021. The SIRT_IpiNivo cohort was treated with Yttrium-90 microspheres and ipilimumab plus nivolumab before or after the SIRT (n = 18). The SIRT cohort underwent SIRT but did not receive combined immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 14). Twelve patients (66.7%) of the SIRT_IpiNivo arm received SIRT as first-line treatment and six patients (33.3%) received ipilimumab plus nivolumab prior to SIRT. In the SIRT group, seven patients (50.0%) received single-agent immunotherapy. One patient treated with combined immunotherapy 68 months after the SIRT was included in this group. At the start of ipilimumab plus nivolumab, 94.4% (n = 17) presented hepatic metastases and 72.2% (n = 13) had extra liver disease. Eight patients (44.4%) of the SIRT_IpiNivo group experienced grade 3 or 4 immune related adverse events, mainly colitis and hepatitis. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of metastases was 49.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI); 24.1-not available (NA)) in the SIRT_IpiNivo group compared with 13.6 months (95% CI; 11.5-NA) in the SIRT group (log-rank p-value 0.027). The presence of extra liver metastases at the time of SIRT, largest liver lesion more than 8 cm (M1c) and liver tumor volume negatively impacted the survival. This real-world cohort suggests that a sequential treatment of ipilimumab plus nivolumab and SIRT is a well-tolerated therapeutic approach with promising survival rates.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tong TML, van der Kooij MK, Speetjens FM, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Lutjeboer J, van Persijn van Meerten EL, Martini CH, Zoethout RWM, Tijl FGJ, Blank CU, Burgmans MC, Kapiteijn E. Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion with Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): study protocol for a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Trials 2022; 23:137. [PMID: 35152908 PMCID: PMC8842930 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06036-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, no standard treatments are available for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). Several locoregional therapies are effective in the treatment of liver metastases, such as percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP). The available literature suggests that treatment with ICI following locoregional treatment of liver UM metastases can result in clinical response. We hypothesize that combining M-PHP with ICI will lead to enhanced antigen presentation and increased immunomodulatory effect, improving control of both hepatic and extrahepatic disease. Methods Open-label, single-center, phase Ib/randomized phase II trial, evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of M-PHP with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases of UM in first-line treatment, with or without the limited extrahepatic disease. The primary objective is to determine the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of the combination regimen, defined by maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). A maximum of 88 patients will be treated in phase I and phase II combined. Baseline characteristics will be described with descriptive statistics (t-test, chi-square test). To study the association between risk factors and toxicity, a logistic regression model will be applied. PFS and OS will be summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Discussion This is the first trial to evaluate this treatment combination by establishing the maximum tolerated dose and evaluating the efficacy of the combination treatment. M-PHP has shown to be a safe and effective treatment for UM patients with liver metastases and became the standard treatment option in our center. The combination of ICI with M-PHP is investigated in the currently described trial which might lead to a better treatment response both in and outside the liver. Trial Registration This trial was registered in the US National Library of Medicine with identifier NCT04283890. Registered as per February 2020 - Retrospectively registered. EudraCT registration number: 2018-004248-49. Local MREC registration number: NL60508.058.19.
Collapse
|
11
|
Rantala ES, Hernberg MM, Piperno-Neumann S, Grossniklaus HE, Kivelä TT. Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier. Prog Retin Eye Res 2022; 90:101041. [PMID: 34999237 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina S Rantala
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Micaela M Hernberg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Paciuksenkatu 3, PL 180, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | - Hans E Grossniklaus
- Section of Ocular Oncology, Emory Eye Center, 1365 Clifton Road B, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Tero T Kivelä
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alexander H, Wen D, Chu M, Han C, Hadden P, Thomas R, Bartlett A. Selective internal radiation therapy for hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210200. [PMID: 34757824 PMCID: PMC8722257 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uveal melanoma (UM) commonly metastasizes to the liver. Treatment usually consists of liver-directed therapies, such as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). This review aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of SIRT for hepatic metastases from UM. METHODS The study protocol is available at OSF (https://osf.io/vhyct/). EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched until July 2020, using terms related to SIRT and hepatic metastases from UM. Studies reporting outcomes of SIRT in patients with UM and at least one hepatic metastasis were included. Data on overall survival (OS), hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) or tumor response were collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS 11 studies were included, reporting outcomes for 268 patients with hepatic metastases from UM. Most studies (n = 9, 81.8%) were retrospective. Disease control was achieved in 170 patients (67.5%) and the median OS from time of SIRT was 12.3 months. Median hPFS was 5.4 months. Low-grade side-effects were common but serious complications were infrequent. There were two treatment-related deaths. The median NOS score was 6 (moderate risk of bias). CONCLUSION SIRT appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from UM. The certainty of our results is unclear due to predominantly retrospective data with moderate risk of bias. Further prospective studies are required to explore the role of SIRT in UM. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SIRT appears to be a safe treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from UM. Further prospective work is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Alexander
- Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel Wen
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michael Chu
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Catherine Han
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter Hadden
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Robert Thomas
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adam Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Proietti I, Skroza N, Filippi L, Bernardini N, Mambrin A, Tolino E, Rossi G, Marchesiello A, Marraffa F, Volpe S, Bagni O, Potenza C. Long-Term Maintained Response to Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in an Oligometastatic Uveal Melanoma Patient Treated with Concomitant Anti-PD-1 Therapy. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:692. [PMID: 34357064 PMCID: PMC8307638 DOI: 10.3390/life11070692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a primary neoplasm of the eye arising from the melanocytes residing in the iris, ciliary body or choroid. It is the most frequent intraocular malignancy and often determines metastases at distant sites, with a peculiar tropism for the liver. Metastatic UM has a poor prognosis, as any treatment affects the natural course of this fatal disease. Herein, we report a case of a UM metastatic to the liver in a 54 year-old female patient, initially treated with nivolumab without success. The patient was then scheduled for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) while continuing immunotherapy. This combination led to a complete and durable response and the patient is currently free of disease, two years after the diagnosis of the hepatic metastases. The association between SIRT and immunotherapy (IT) has very promising perspectives for metastatic UM, especially considering the disappointing or contradictory results of classic chemotherapies, IT alone and targeted therapies. Furthermore, this combination has been shown to have a good security profile. However, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of associating SIRT and IT and to clarify some unsolved problems, such as the timing of administration of these two therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Proietti
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Nevena Skroza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Luca Filippi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy; (L.F.); (O.B.)
| | - Nicoletta Bernardini
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Alessandra Mambrin
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Ersilia Tolino
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Giovanni Rossi
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Anna Marchesiello
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Federica Marraffa
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Salvatore Volpe
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Oreste Bagni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy; (L.F.); (O.B.)
| | - Concetta Potenza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, “A. Fiorini” Hospital, Via Firenze, 1, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (A.M.); (E.T.); (G.R.); (A.M.); (F.M.); (S.V.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Masaoutis C, Kokkali S, Theocharis S. Immunotherapy in uveal melanoma: novel strategies and opportunities for personalized treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2021; 30:555-569. [PMID: 33650931 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2021.1898587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer and represents a discrete subtype of melanoma. Metastatic disease, which occurs in half of patients, has a dismal prognosis. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has produced promising results in cutaneous melanoma but has failed to show analogous efficacy in metastatic UM. This is attributable to UM's distinct genetics and its complex interaction with the immune system. Hence, more efficacious immunotherapeutic approaches are under investigation. AREAS COVERED We discuss those novel immunotherapeutic strategies in clinical and preclinical studies for advanced disease and which are thought to overcome the hurdles set by UM in terms of immune recognition. We also highlight the need to determine predictive markers in relation to these strategies to improve clinical outcomes. We used a simple narrative analysis to summarize the data. The search methodology is located in the Introduction. EXPERT OPINION Novel immunotherapeutic strategies focus on transforming immune excluded tumor microenvironment in metastatic UM to T cell inflamed. Preliminary results of approaches such as vaccines, adoptive cell transfer and other novel molecules are encouraging. Factors such as HLA compatibility and expression level of targeted antigens should be considered to optimize personalized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Masaoutis
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Stefania Kokkali
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,First Medical Oncology Clinic, Saint-Savvas Anticancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stamatios Theocharis
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
IO + IO = More to Know:: The Uncertain Potential for Combined Interventional and Immuno-Oncology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32:196-197. [PMID: 33506768 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
16
|
Liu J, Lu J, Li W. A Comprehensive Prognostic and Immunological Analysis of a Six-Gene Signature Associated With Glycolysis and Immune Response in Uveal Melanoma. Front Immunol 2021; 12:738068. [PMID: 34630418 PMCID: PMC8494389 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.738068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is a subtype of melanoma with poor prognosis. This study aimed to construct a new prognostic gene signature that can be used for survival prediction and risk stratification of UM patients. In this work, transcriptome data from the Molecular Signatures Database were used to identify the cancer hallmarks most relevant to the prognosis of UM patients. Weighted gene co-expression network, univariate least absolute contraction and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to construct the prognostic gene characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the survival predictive ability of the gene signature. The results showed that glycolysis and immune response were the main risk factors for overall survival (OS) in UM patients. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, 238 candidates related to the prognosis of UM patients were identified (p < 0.05). Using LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses, a six-gene signature including ARPC1B, BTBD6, GUSB, KRTCAP2, RHBDD3, and SLC39A4 was constructed. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the UM cohort in the training set showed that patients with higher risk scores had worse OS (HR = 2.61, p < 0.001). The time-dependent ROC (t-ROC) curve showed that the risk score had good predictive efficiency for UM patients in the training set (AUC > 0.9). Besides, t-ROC analysis showed that the predictive ability of risk scores was significantly higher than that of other clinicopathological characteristics. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that risk score was an independent risk factor for OS in UM patients. The prognostic value of risk scores was further verified in two external UM cohorts (GSE22138 and GSE84976). Two-factor survival analysis showed that UM patients with high hypoxia or immune response scores and high risk scores had the worst prognosis. Moreover, a nomogram based on the six-gene signature was established for clinical practice. In addition, risk scores were related to the immune infiltration profiles. Taken together, this study identified a new prognostic six-gene signature related to glycolysis and immune response. This six-gene signature can not only be used for survival prediction and risk stratification but also may be a potential therapeutic target for UM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
- Medical Research Center, Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
| | - Jianjun Lu
- Department of Medical Affairs, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenli Li
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Yue Bei People’s Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China
- *Correspondence: Wenli Li,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Höppener DJ, Grünhagen DJ, Eggermont AMM, van der Veldt AAM, Verhoef C. An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:103-123. [PMID: 33220800 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chua V, Mattei J, Han A, Johnston L, LiPira K, Selig SM, Carvajal RD, Aplin AE, Patel SP. The Latest on Uveal Melanoma Research and Clinical Trials: Updates from the Cure Ocular Melanoma (CURE OM) Science Meeting (2019). Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:28-33. [PMID: 33060121 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is a rare cancer in adults, but its treatment is one of the clinical unmet needs in the melanoma field. Metastatic disease develops in approximately 50% of patients and is associated with poor survival due to the lack of effective treatment options. It provides a paradigm for cancers that show evidence of aberrant G protein-coupled receptor signaling, tumor dormancy, and liver-selective metastatic tropism and are associated with the loss of the BAP1 tumor suppressor. At the Melanoma Research Foundation CURE OM Science Meeting at the Society for Melanoma Research Meeting held in Utah on November 20, 2019, clinicians and researchers presented findings from their studies according to three themes within uveal melanoma: (i) ongoing clinical trials, (ii) molecular determinants, and (iii) novel targets that could be translated into clinical trials. This meeting underscored the high interest in the uveal melanoma research field and the unmet need for effective treatment strategies for late-stage disease. Findings from ongoing clinical trials are promising, and multiple studies show how novel combinatorial strategies increase response rates. Novel targets and tumor vulnerabilities identified bioinformatically or through high-throughput screens also reveal new opportunities to target uveal melanoma. The future directions pursued by the uveal melanoma research field will likely have an impact on other cancer types that harbor similar genetic alterations and/or show similar biological properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Chua
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jane Mattei
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anna Han
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Richard D Carvajal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew E Aplin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rodriguez-Vidal C, Fernandez-Diaz D, Fernandez-Marta B, Lago-Baameiro N, Pardo M, Silva P, Paniagua L, Blanco-Teijeiro MJ, Piñeiro A, Bande M. Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2557. [PMID: 32911759 PMCID: PMC7565536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease. METHODS A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically. RESULTS After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Rodriguez-Vidal
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cruces, Cruces Plaza S/N, 48903 Barakaldo-Vizcaya, Spain;
| | - Daniel Fernandez-Diaz
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Beatriz Fernandez-Marta
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
| | - Nerea Lago-Baameiro
- Grupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - María Pardo
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
- Grupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - Paula Silva
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Clinical University Hospital, SERGAS, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Laura Paniagua
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Coruña, Praza Parrote s/n, 15006 A Coruña, Spain;
| | - María José Blanco-Teijeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Antonio Piñeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Manuel Bande
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Safety and Effectiveness of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization around the Time of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatic Metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:1233-1241. [PMID: 32741550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 radioembolization and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy within a short interval for the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-institution retrospective study included 22 patients (12 men; median age, 65 y ± 11) with unresectable hepatic metastases and preserved functional status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1) who received immunotherapy and radioembolization within a 15-month period (median, 63.5 d; interquartile range, 19.7-178.2 d) from February 2013 to March 2018. Primary malignancies were uveal melanoma (12 of 22; 54.5%), soft tissue sarcoma (3; 13.6%), cutaneous melanoma (3; 14%), and others (4; 18.2%). Studies were reviewed to March 2019 to assess Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3/4 toxicities, disease progression, and death. RESULTS There were no grade 4 toxicities within 6 mo of radioembolization. Grade 3 hepatobiliary toxicities occurred in 3 patients (13.6%) within 6 months, 2 from rapid disease progression and 1 from a biliary stricture. Two patients (9.1%) experienced clinical toxicities, including grade 4 colitis at 6 months and hepatic abscess at 3 months. Median overall survival (OS) from first radioembolization was 20 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5-27.5 mo), and median OS from first immunotherapy was 23 months (95% CI, 15.9-30.1 mo). Within the uveal melanoma subgroup, the median OS from first radioembolization was 17.0 months (95% CI, 14.2-19.8 mo). Median time to progression was 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.3-12.2 mo), and median progression-free survival was 7.8 mo (95% CI, 3.1-12.4 mo). CONCLUSIONS Checkpoint immunotherapy around the time of radioembolization is safe, with a low incidence of toxicity independent of primary malignancy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Uveal melanoma is a distinct subtype of melanoma characterized by a unique biology and divergent response to immune therapies. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of the pathophysiology of uveal melanoma, systemic treatment options for advanced disease, and potential future therapeutic directions. RECENT FINDINGS Although treatment with single-agent checkpoint blockade has been generally disappointing, the results of combined checkpoint blockade are modestly more promising. Several alternative systemic therapeutic approaches have been or are currently being investigated, including two agents that have been taken into registration-intent clinical trials: tebentafusp, a T cell redirecting agent, and IDE196, an oral protein kinase C inhibitor. Treatment of advanced uveal melanoma remains challenging, however, encouraging results from novel agents offer hope for improvement in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaheer Khan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Ft. Washington Avenue, MHB 6GN-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Richard D Carvajal
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 177 Ft. Washington Avenue, MHB 6GN-435, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kaštelan S, Antunica AG, Oresković LB, Pelčić G, Kasun E, Hat K. Immunotherapy for Uveal Melanoma - Current Knowledge and Perspectives. Curr Med Chem 2020; 27:1350-1366. [DOI: 10.2174/0929867326666190704141444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most prevalent primary intraocular tumour in adults with
the incidence between five and six cases per million people in the United States and Europe.
The prognosis of patients with uveal melanoma is unfavourable with a 5-year survival rate of
50-70% despite significant advances in local tumour treatment using radiotherapy or surgical
resection. Approximately 50% of the patients develop metastases within 15 years from initial
diagnosis, mostly in the liver. The median survival rate after the onset of metastases is 6
months. Potential treatment options for metastatic uveal melanoma are chemotherapy, targeted
therapy, and immunotherapy but no method showed satisfactory results. Immunotherapy
with checkpoint inhibition showed promising results in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma;
however, it did not appear to be equally effective with uveal melanoma. This may be
due to differences in mutational burden, expression of neoantigens between these two types of
tumour, immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, and low immunogenicity and immune
privilege of uveal melanoma. Considering the disappointing results of treatment with
anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in patients with advanced uveal melanoma several
new forms of therapies are being developed. This may include immunotherapy with
IMCgp100, glembatumumab vedotin and the infusion of autologous TILs, targeted therapy
with selective MEK inhibitors, epigenetic therapy, and nanotherapy. Better insight into the
molecular and genetic profile of uveal melanoma will facilitate detection of new prognostic
biomarkers and thus enable a better modification of the existing immunotherapy methods and
development of new forms of treatment specifically designed for uveal melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snježana Kaštelan
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - Goran Pelčić
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka and Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ema Kasun
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Koraljka Hat
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Basile MS, Mazzon E, Fagone P, Longo A, Russo A, Fallico M, Bonfiglio V, Nicoletti F, Avitabile T, Reibaldi M. Immunobiology of Uveal Melanoma: State of the Art and Therapeutic Targets. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1145. [PMID: 31750244 PMCID: PMC6848265 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal Melanoma (UM) represents the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Although it originates from melanocytes as cutaneous melanoma, it shows significant clinical and biological differences with the latter, including high resistance to immune therapy. Indeed, UM can evade immune surveillance via multiple mechanisms, such as the expression of inhibitory checkpoints (e.g., PD-L1, CD47, CD200) and the production of IDO-1 and soluble FasL, among others. More in-depth understanding of these mechanisms will suggest potential targets for the design of novel and more effective management strategies for UM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sofia Basile
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Emanuela Mazzon
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, C.da Casazza, Messina, Italy
| | - Paolo Fagone
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Longo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Russo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Matteo Fallico
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Ferdinando Nicoletti
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Levey AO, Elsayed M, Lawson DH, Ermentrout RM, Kudchadkar RR, Bercu ZL, Yushak ML, Newsome J, Kokabi N. Predictors of Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Ocular Melanoma Metastatic to the Liver Undergoing Y90 Radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 43:254-263. [PMID: 31686137 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02366-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ocular melanoma metastatic to the liver undergoing yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization, including the effect of concurrent immunotherapy. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective review of 24 patients with ocular melanoma metastatic to the liver who underwent Y-90 treatment between June 2003 and January 2018 was performed. Data regarding patients' performance status at the time of Y90, intra-/extrahepatic tumor burden, and treatment response were evaluated. RECIST was used to determine objective tumor response. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate OS and PFS from the first Y90 therapy. Log-rank analysis was used to determine predictors of prolonged OS and PFS. RESULTS Median OS from primary diagnosis and diagnosis of liver metastases was 66 months (mo) and 26.3 mo, respectively. Median OS for those who received immunotherapy within 3 months of undergoing Y90 was prolonged at 26.0 mo versus 9.5 mo for others (p = 0.014). Median OS for patients with an ECOG performance status of 0 was prolonged at 26 mo versus 5.5 mo for others (p = 0.003). Median hepatic PFS was prolonged in patients treated with Y-90 on concurrent immunotherapy at 10.3 mo versus 2.7 mo for TARE only (p = 0.002). Patients with an ECOG performance status of 0 had prolonged PFS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Concurrent immunotherapy and an ECOG performance status of 0 at the time of Y90 therapy appear to be predictors of prolonged OS and PFS in patients with ocular melanoma metastatic to the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa O Levey
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Mohammad Elsayed
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - David H Lawson
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Robert M Ermentrout
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Ragini R Kudchadkar
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Zachary L Bercu
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Melinda L Yushak
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Janice Newsome
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oncolysis without viruses — inducing systemic anticancer immune responses with local therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 17:49-64. [DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0272-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
26
|
Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, Adamo RD, Anne PR, Orloff MM, Terai M, Hage AN, Yi M, Chervoneva I, Sato T. A Prospective Phase II Trial of Radioembolization for Treatment of Uveal Melanoma Hepatic Metastasis. Radiology 2019; 293:223-231. [PMID: 31453767 PMCID: PMC6776232 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Overall survival (OS) for patients with uveal melanoma (UM) hepatic metastases is extremely poor. Therefore, stabilization of hepatic metastases is essential to prolonging OS. Purpose To assess the safety and effectiveness of radioembolization (RE) for treatment of UM hepatic metastases. Materials and Methods Enrollment for this prospective phase II trial began November 2011 and concluded January 2017. Treatment-naïve participants (group A) and participants who progressed after immunoembolization (group B) with hepatic tumor burden less than 50% underwent RE. Participants were followed for 1 month and every 3 months for acute and delayed toxicities, respectively. MRI, CT, and PET were performed every 3 months to evaluate for tumor response and extrahepatic disease. Participants were followed for at least 2 years or until death. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used for data analysis. Results In group A, 24 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 13; 13 men and 11 women) underwent unilobar (n = 7), fractionated whole-liver (n = 1), or sequential lobar (n = 16) RE. One participant was excluded from the trial. Complete response (n = 0), partial response (n = 9), or stable disease (n = 11) was achieved in 20 of 23 (87.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.4%, 97.2%) participants. Median progression-free survival from liver metastasis was 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.4, 11.8; range, 3.3-33.7 months). Median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI: 11.3, 23.5; range, 6.5-73.7 months). In group B, 24 participants (mean age, 58 years ± 10; nine men and 15 women) underwent unilobar (n = 5) or sequential lobar (n = 19) RE. Complete response (n = 0), partial response (n = 8), or stable disease (n = 6) was achieved in 14 of 24 (58.3%; 95% CI: 36.3%, 77.9%) participants. Median progression-free survival from liver metastasis was 5.2 months (95% CI: 3.7, 9.8; range, 2.9-22.0 months). Median OS was 19.2 months (95% CI: 11.5, 24.0; range, 4.8-76.6 months). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included transient lymphopenia (group A, n = 1; group B, n = 1), pain (group A, n = 2) and nausea or vomiting (group A, n = 1). Conclusion Radioembolization is a promising treatment for patients with uveal melanoma hepatic metastases. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carin F. Gonsalves
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - David J. Eschelman
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Robert D. Adamo
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - P. Rani Anne
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Marlana M. Orloff
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Mizue Terai
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Anthony N. Hage
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Misung Yi
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Inna Chervoneva
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| | - Takami Sato
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology (C.F.G., D.J.E., R.D.A., A.N.H.), Department of Radiation Oncology (P.R.A.), Department of Medical Oncology (M.O., M.T., T.S.), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (M.Y., I.C.), Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Main Building, Suite 766, Philadelphia, Pa 19107
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhan C, Ruohoniemi D, Shanbhogue KP, Wei J, Welling TH, Gu P, Park JS, Dagher NN, Taslakian B, Hickey RM. Safety of Combined Yttrium-90 Radioembolization and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 31:25-34. [PMID: 31422022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety of yttrium-90 radioembolization in combination with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 26 consecutive patients with HCC who received checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy within 90 days of radioembolization from April 2015 to May 2018. Patients had preserved liver function (Child-Pugh scores A-B7) and either advanced HCC due to macrovascular invasion or limited extrahepatic disease (21 patients) or aggressive intermediate stage HCC that resulted in earlier incorporation of systemic immunotherapy (5 patients). Clinical documentation, laboratory results, and imaging results at 1- and 3-month follow-up intervals were reviewed to assess treatment-related adverse events and treatment responses. RESULTS The median follow-up period after radioembolization was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-11.8). There were no early (30-day) mortality or grades 3/4 hepatobiliary or immunotherapy-related toxicities. Delayed grades 3/4 hepatobiliary toxicities (1-3 months) occurred in 2 patients in the setting of HCC disease progression. One patient developed pneumonitis. The median overall survival from first immunotherapy was 17.2 months (95% CI, 10.9-23.4). The median overall survival from first radioembolization was 16.5 months (95% CI, 6.6-26.4). From first radioembolization, time to tumor progression was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.2), and progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.1). CONCLUSIONS Radioembolization combined with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in cases of HCC appears to be safe and causes limited treatment-related toxicity. Future prospective studies are needed to identify the optimal combination treatment protocols and evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyang Zhan
- Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York City, New York
| | - David Ruohoniemi
- New York University Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Krishna P Shanbhogue
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Jason Wei
- New York University Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Theodore H Welling
- Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Ping Gu
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - James S Park
- Hepatology Section, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Nabil N Dagher
- Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Bedros Taslakian
- Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York City, New York
| | - Ryan M Hickey
- Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York City, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhen Y, Liu B, Chang Z, Ren H, Liu Z, Zheng J. A pooled analysis of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:4489-4498. [PMID: 31239717 PMCID: PMC6560193 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s202875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, SCI with the English language from inception to October 2018. A pooled analysis was conducted using Stata software. Results: There were 16 eligible studies included in this pooled analysis. The pooled median overall survival (OS) from 12 studies was 14.3 (95% CI: 11.9-17.1) months. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), no complete response was reported, and the median of partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were 11.5% (range: 4.8-35.3%), 61.5% (range: 42.9-81.3%) and 22.7% (range: 12.5-52.4%) respectively. The pooled disease control rate (DCR) from nine studies was 77.2% (95% CI: 70.2-84.2%). According to the type of microspheres, subgroup analysis was performed, the median OS in the glass microspheres group was 14.0 (95% CI: 9.1-21.4) months, and 14.3 (95% CI: 11.5-17.8) months in the resin microspheres group. The DCR was 77.3% (95% CI: 63.5-91.1%) and 77.4% (95% CI: 66.8-87.9%) in the glass and resin microspheres groups respectively. Most of the side effects reported in the included studies were mild and did not require intervention. Conclusion: TARE with 90Y microspheres is safe and effective for patients with unresectable ICC with acceptable side effects. And it seems that the type of microsphere has no influence on therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhua Zhen
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihui Chang
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Haiyan Ren
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoyu Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiahe Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Artzner C, Mossakowski O, Hefferman G, Grosse U, Hoffmann R, Forschner A, Eigentler T, Syha R, Grözinger G. Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion of melphalan for liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma: a single center experience. Cancer Imaging 2019; 19:31. [PMID: 31146793 PMCID: PMC6543599 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0218-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the outcome and safety data of chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) of melphalan in patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma. Material and methods This is a HIPAA compliant, IRB approved, retrospective study. A total of 28 CS-PHPs were performed in 16 individual patients (six men and ten women, median age 63.1 years [range 49.1 to 78.7 years], one to six CS-PHP procedures per patient) for treatment of liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma between June, 2015 and December, 2018. All patients received cross-sectional imaging at baseline and during follow-up. CS-PHP was performed with the Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System (Delcath Systems, Inc., NY, USA) facilitating extracorporeal filtration of hepatic blood for melphalan removal. Ideal body weight-adjusted melphalan doses were administered into the hepatic arteries. Serious adverse events (SAE), progression-free survival based on response criteria in solid tumors, and overall survival were noted. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results Partial response after first CS-PHP was observed in nine patients (60%), stable disease in five patients (33%) and progressive disease in one patient (7%). Median overall survival was 27.4 months (95% CI 4.1 to 35.4 month) after first CS-PHP. Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months after first CS-PHP (95% CI 4.9 to 23.6 months). SAEs were observed in the majority of patients with most SAEs limited to grades one and two. Thirteen SAEs of grades three and four were observed in seven individual patients. No grade five SAE was observed. Conclusion CS-PHP is an efficacious and safe treatment for patients presenting with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Artzner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Mossakowski
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gerald Hefferman
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.,The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ulrich Grosse
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hoffmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roland Syha
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|