1
|
Emmamally M, Sobnach S, Khan R, Kotze U, Bernon M, Sonderup MW, Spearman CW, Jonas E. Prevalence, management and outcomes of pulmonary metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:1339-1348. [PMID: 39168776 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a significant global health burden, with varying survival rates across regions. The presence of pulmonary metastases (PM) in HCC predicts a poorer prognosis, yet the global understanding of the progression and management is limited. METHODS This study aims to systematically review the burden of PM in HCC, document current treatment approaches, and evaluate treatment effectiveness through meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Articles were screened, and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Statistical analyses were conducted to synthesise data and assess treatment outcomes. RESULTS A total of 82 articles were included, comprising a population of 3241 participants with documented PM. Our analysis revealed a linear relationship between the HCC population size and the occurrence of PM (p < 0.005). Surgical intervention demonstrated the lowest hazard ratio (0.128) and significantly improved survival rates compared to other treatment modalities. However, data quality limitations underscore the need for further research to delineate patient subsets benefitting from surgical intervention for PM. CONCLUSION Our findings advocate for continued investigation into PM management strategies, notably the role of surgical resection alongside systemic therapies, to improve outcomes in HCC patients with PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Emmamally
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sanju Sobnach
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Rufaida Khan
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Urda Kotze
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Marc Bernon
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mark W Sonderup
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C Wendy Spearman
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen S, Wang X, Yuan B, Peng J, Zhang Q, Yu W, Ge N, Weng Z, Huang J, Liu W, Wang X, Chen C. Apatinib plus hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: phase II trial. Nat Commun 2024; 15:8857. [PMID: 39402023 PMCID: PMC11473759 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52700-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Most patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ultimately experience tumor progression after first-line systemic therapies. Systemic therapy is generally recommended as second-line treatment for advanced HCC in the major guidelines. Combining apatinib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) likely drives synergistic activity on advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. This phase II trial (ChiCTR2000029082) aimed to assess efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with HCC with extrahepatic metastasis who have progressed after first-line systemic therapies. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progress-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), 6- and 12-month survival rates, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Thirty-nine patients received oral treatment with apatinib, and hepatic artery infusion oxaliplatinplus raltitrexed. Per RECIST v1.1, the ORR and DCR was 53.8% and 89.7% in the patients population, respectively. The median PFS and OS was 6.2 months and 11.3 months, respectively. The 6- and 12-month survival rates were 81.7% and 44.1%, respectively. All AEs were manageable by medication or dose modifications. Apatinib plus HAIC for second-line therapy in advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis shows promising efficacy and manageable toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiguang Chen
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Xiangdong Wang
- Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/ Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Yuan
- Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| | - Jianyang Peng
- Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China
| | | | - Wenchang Yu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Naijian Ge
- Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/ Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhicheng Weng
- Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China
| | - Jinqi Huang
- the First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China
| | - Weifu Liu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Wang
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chuanben Chen
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quan B, Li J, Mi H, Li M, Liu W, Yao F, Chen R, Shan Y, Xu P, Ren Z, Yin X. Development and Preliminary Validation of a Novel Convolutional Neural Network Model for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024; 37:1282-1296. [PMID: 38393621 PMCID: PMC11300745 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01003-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) with preoperative MRI and clinical factors in predicting the treatment response of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). A total of 191 patients with unresectable HCC who underwent HAIC in our hospital between May 2019 and March 2022 were retrospectively recruited. We selected InceptionV4 from three representative CNN models, AlexNet, ResNet, and InceptionV4, according to the cross-entropy loss (CEL). We subsequently developed InceptionV4 to fuse the information from qualified pretreatment MRI data and patient clinical factors. Radiomic information was evaluated based on several constant sequences, including enhanced T1-weighted sequences (with arterial, portal, and delayed phases), T2 FSE sequences, and dual-echo sequences. The performance of InceptionV4 was cross-validated in the training cohort (n = 127) and internally validated in an independent cohort (n = 64), with comparisons against single important clinical factors and radiologists in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Class activation mapping was used to visualize the InceptionV4 model. The InceptionV4 model achieved an AUC of 0.871 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.761-0.981) in the cross-validation cohort and an AUC of 0.826 (95% CI 0.682-0.970) in the internal validation cohort; these two models performed better than did the other methods (AUC ranges 0.783-0.873 and 0.708-0.806 for cross- and internal validations, respectively; P < 0.01). The present InceptionV4 model, which integrates radiomic information and clinical factors, helps predict the treatment response of unresectable HCC patients receiving HAIC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Quan
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jinghuan Li
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Hailin Mi
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China
| | - Miao Li
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wenfeng Liu
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fan Yao
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Rongxin Chen
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yan Shan
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Pengju Xu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhenggang Ren
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xin Yin
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang M, Jiang X, Liu H, Zhang Q, Li J, Shao L, Zhao L. Efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1410767. [PMID: 39144625 PMCID: PMC11322119 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1410767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined approach involving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods In this multicenter retrospective study conducted from January 2020 to December 2023, we reviewed advanced HCC patients who were treated either with HAIC alone or with a combination of HAIC and TKIs. To address initial disparities between the two groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM). Tumor response evaluation was performed following RECIST 1.1 criteria. We compared survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), between the two treatment groups. Safety assessments were conducted for all patients. Results Following the eligibility review, 138 patients underwent combined treatment with HAIC and TKIs (HT group), while 198 patients received HAIC monotherapy (HA group) and met the inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study. After PSM, 107 patients were assigned to each group. The HT group exhibited a longer median OS (18.0 versus 8.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52, p < 0.001) compared to the HA group. Median PFS was also longer in the HT group, although without statistical significance (6.0 versus 4.7 months; HR, 0.85, p = 0.265). The HT group demonstrated a higher ORR (41.1% versus 25.2%; p = 0.020). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) or grade 3/4 AEs (any grade: 81.2% for HT versus 78.8% for HA, p = 0.68; grade 3/4: 18.1% for HT versus 13.6% for HA, p = 0.29). Importantly, all AEs were manageable and acceptable. Notably, no grade 5 AEs occurred in either group. Conclusion Combination therapy involving HAIC and TKIs effectively prolonged survival in advanced HCC patients. It represented a preferable alternative to HAIC monotherapy, with manageable safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaomiao Yang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Xiongying Jiang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingyu Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Li Shao
- Department of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Lei Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yi JZ, Lyu N, Zhao M. Hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after systemic treatment failure: A treatment dilemma-Authors' reply. Hepatol Res 2024. [PMID: 38943553 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.14091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Zhe Yi
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ning Lyu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yi JZ, Zhu ZJ, Liu GW, Zhang YM, Xu J, Wu XT, Ding K, Liu JC, Zhang KF, Jiang XY, Chen QF, Hu Y, Chen S, Zhong SX, Wang JL, Lyu N, Zhao M. Hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after systemic treatment failure: Multicenter, real-world study. Hepatol Res 2024; 54:575-587. [PMID: 38153858 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.14007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
AIM The study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and safety profile of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) as an alternative therapeutic choice for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is refractory to systemic treatment including immune checkpoint blockades or molecular targeting agents. METHODS Two hundred and forty five consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received HAIC-FOLFOX treatment after systemic treatment failure were retrospectively reviewed in six institutions and their survival, tumor response, and tolerance were assessed. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival of the 209 included participants were 10.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1-12.9) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1-6.9), respectively. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, the objective response rate was 21.1%, and the disease control rate was 64.6%. Multivariate analysis of risk factors of OS were albumin-bilirubin grade (2 and 3 vs. 1, hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05-2.34; p = 0.028), tumor number (>3 vs. 1-3, HR 2.18; 95% CI, 1.10-4.34; p = 0.026), extrahepatic spread (present vs. absent, HR 1.61, 95% CI, 1.06-2.45; p = 0.027), synchronous systemic treatment (present vs. absent, HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.37-0.83; p = 0.004) and treatment response (responder vs. nonresponder, HR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.17-0.53; p < 0.001). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 59 (28.2%) HCC patients. All AEs were manageable, and deaths related to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy treatment were not observed. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the effectiveness and safety of HAIC-FOLFOX treatment for patients with advanced HCC who have failed systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Zhe Yi
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Jian Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Ganzhou Cancer Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Gong-Wei Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Yulin, China
| | - Yi-Min Zhang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Xu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin-Tong Wu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ke Ding
- Department of Oncology, Jiangmen Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Jiangmen, China
| | - Jian-Chao Liu
- Department of Oncology, Beihai People's Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Beihai, China
| | - Ke-Fei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Air Force Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiong-Ying Jiang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi-Feng Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Hu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Song Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sui-Xing Zhong
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiong-Liang Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ning Lyu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li Z, Xu R, Chang X, Sun P. Systemic Chemotherapy with or without Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Extrahepatic Oligometastasis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:416-427.e17. [PMID: 38008375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus systemic chemotherapy (SYS) with that of SYS alone in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with extrahepatic oligometastasis in terms of overall survival (OS) and mortality related to liver failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients diagnosed with ICC with extrahepatic oligometastasis who received either HAIC plus SYS or SYS alone between January 2019 and January 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to address potential confounding factors. OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and intrahepatic progression-free survival (IPFS) were analyzed. The occurrence of death due to liver failure was also assessed. RESULTS The study included a total of 179 patients, with 96 receiving SYS alone and 83 receiving HAIC plus SYS. After PSM, 83 pairs were included for further analysis. The median OS and IPFS were significantly longer in the HAIC plus SYS group compared to the SYS alone group (OS: 15.8 months vs 12.7 months; P = .023; IPFS: 9.7 vs 6.1 months; P < .001). No difference was found in PFS between the 2 groups. The HAIC plus SYS group had a significantly lower rate of mortality due to liver failure compared to the SYS alone group (42% vs 72%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS HAIC plus SYS is a promising treatment approach for patients with ICC and extrahepatic oligometastasis with improved OS, IPFS, and freedom from liver failure mortality compared with SYS alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenfeng Li
- Department of Intervention Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ran Xu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Chang
- Department of Intervention Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Peng Sun
- Department of Intervention Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhao M, Guo Z, Zou YH, Li X, Yan ZP, Chen MS, Fan WJ, Li HL, Yang JJ, Chen XM, Xu LF, Zhang YW, Zhu KS, Sun JH, Li JP, Jin Y, Yu HP, Duan F, Xiong B, Yin GW, Lin HL, Ma YL, Wang HM, Gu SZ, Si TG, Wang XD, Zhao C, Yu WC, Guo JH, Zhai J, Huang YH, Wang WY, Lin HF, Gu YK, Chen JZ, Wang JP, Zhang YM, Yi JZ, Lyu N. Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:4-31. [PMID: 37864725 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10599-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment is widely accepted as one of the alternative therapeutic modalities for HCC owing to its local control effect and low systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, although accumulating high-quality evidence has displayed the superior survival advantages of HAIC of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (HAIC-FOLFOX) compared with standard first-line treatment in different scenarios, the lack of standardization for HAIC procedure and remained controversy limited the proper and safe performance of HAIC treatment in HCC. Therefore, an expert consensus conference was held on March 2023 in Guangzhou, China to review current practices regarding HAIC treatment in patients with HCC and develop widely accepted statements and recommendations. In this article, the latest evidence of HAIC was systematically summarized and the final 22 expert recommendations were proposed, which incorporate the assessment of candidates for HAIC treatment, procedural technique details, therapeutic outcomes, the HAIC-related complications and corresponding treatments, and therapeutic scheme management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
| | - Zhi Guo
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying-Hua Zou
- Department of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Ping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min-Shan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Jun Fan
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Liang Li
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ji-Jin Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Chen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lin-Feng Xu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue-Wei Zhang
- Hepatopancreatbiliary Center, Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kang-Shun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Hui Sun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Ping Li
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Jin
- The Interventional Therapy Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Hai-Peng Yu
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Duan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Wen Yin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hai-Lan Lin
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Long Ma
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hua-Ming Wang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, The Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shan-Zhi Gu
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tong-Guo Si
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Wang
- Departments of Interventional Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Zhao
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Wen-Chang Yu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Hai Guo
- Departments of Interventional Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Zhai
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong-Hui Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Yu Wang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai-Feng Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Yang-Kui Gu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Zhang Chen
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Peng Wang
- Department of Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Foshan, China
| | - Yi-Min Zhang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Zhe Yi
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ning Lyu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He M, Huang Y, Du Z, Lai Z, Ouyang H, Shen J, Wen D, Li Q, Zhang Y, Wei W, Chen M, Xu L, Kan A, Shi M. Lenvatinib, Toripalimab plus FOLFOX Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Extrahepatic Metastasis: A Biomolecular Exploratory, Phase II Trial (LTSC). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:5104-5115. [PMID: 37819944 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of systemic chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) in combination with lenvatinib and toripalimab as the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this biomolecular exploratory, phase II trial, eligible patients underwent the triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus FOLFOX chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months by RECIST v1.1. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) of tumor biopsy samples was performed for exploratory biomarker analyses. RESULTS Between November 19, 2019, and July 4, 2021, 30 patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a 6-month PFS rate of 66.7%, with a median PFS of 9.73 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.89-16.58]. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.63 months (95% CI, 11.77-17.50), with an objective response rate of 43.3%. Twenty-four (80.0%) patients exhibited high-risk features, among whom the median OS and PFS were 13.7 months (95% CI, 9.24-18.16) and 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.02-13.58), respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, and increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels. Exploratory analyses of snRNA-seq profiles suggested that patients with higher abundance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells were more likely to benefit from this combination. In addition, two subtypes of hepatocytes (AKR1C2+ and CFHR4+ malignant hepatocytes) were associated with reduced clinical benefits. CONCLUSIONS FOLFOX chemotherapy in combination with lenvatinib and toripalimab showed promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicities in advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. AKR1C2+ and CFHR4+ hepatocyte subtypes may be predictive biomarkers of resistance to the combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MinKe He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - YeXing Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZeFeng Du
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZhiCheng Lai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hanyue Ouyang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - JingXian Shen
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - DongSheng Wen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - QiJiong Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - YaoJun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - MinShan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Anna Kan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tang HH, Zhang MQ, Zhang ZC, Fan C, Jin Y, Wang WD. The Safety and Efficacy of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with PD-(L)1 Inhibitors and Molecular Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Unsuitable for Transarterial Chemoembolization. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2023; 10:2211-2221. [PMID: 38107540 PMCID: PMC10725683 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s441024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with PD-(L)1 inhibitors and molecular targeted therapies (MTT) for intermediate and advanced HCC that are unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC who were receiving triple therapy from January 2020 to December 2021 at two medical centers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 55 patients were enrolled in the study with median treatment periods of 4 and 6 for HAIC and PD-(L)1 inhibitors, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 15.0 and 10.0 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 11.0 months (range: 4.0-27.5 months). According to the mRECIST criteria, the optimal ORR was 43.6% (24/55) and the DCR was 61.8% (34/55). The incidence of AEs was 58.2%, with grade 3 and above accounting for 20.0%; elevated AST (18.2%), hyperbilirubinemia (16.4%), and thrombocytopenia (16.4%) were most common. There were no treatment-related fatalities and all AEs were effectively managed. Multifactorial analysis showed that NLR > 3.82 (HR 2.380, 95% CI 1.116-2-5.079, P = 0.025), ECOG 1 (HR 2.906, 95% CI 1.373-6.154, P = 0.005), and extrahepatic metastases (HR 8.373, 95% CI 3.492-20.078, P < 0.001) were associated with the median OS. Conclusion Triple therapy with HAIC, PD-(L)1 inhibitors, and MTT was safe and effective for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC for TACE-unsuitability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Huan Tang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People’s Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214023, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming-Qing Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zi-Chen Zhang
- Department of Interventional Vascular Medicine, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, The Second People’s Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, 230011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chen Fan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People’s Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214023, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong Jin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei-Dong Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People’s Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214023, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin W, Lu L, Zheng R, Yuan S, Li S, Ling Y, Wei W, Guo R. Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters: a novel efficacy predictor of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17231-17239. [PMID: 37801135 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05444-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) is a novel vascular pattern structurally and functionally distinct from microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to explore the prognostic value of VETC in patients receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable HCC. METHODS From January 2016 to December 2017, 145 patients receiving HAIC as the initial treatment for unresectable HCC were enrolled and stratified into two groups according to their VETC status. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated. RESULTS The patients were divided into two groups: VETC+ (n = 31, 21.8%) and VETC- (n = 114, 78.2%). The patients in the VETC+ group had worse ORR and DCR than those in the VETC- group (RECIST: ORR: 25.8% vs. 47.4%, P = 0.031; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007; mRECIST: ORR: 41.0% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.008; DCR: 56.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007). Patients with VETC+ had significantly shorter OS and PFS than those with VETC- (median OS: 10.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 3.3 vs. 7.2 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed VETC status as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.46-3.94; P = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.20-3.22; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION VETC status correlates remarkably well with the tumor response and long-term survival in patients undergoing HAIC. It may be a promising efficacy predictor and help identify patients who will benefit from HAIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenping Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Lianghe Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Rongliang Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shasha Yuan
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaohua Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yihong Ling
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| | - Rongping Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
New Regimen of Combining Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Lipiodol Embolization in Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Portal Vein Invasion. J Pers Med 2022; 13:jpm13010088. [PMID: 36675749 PMCID: PMC9864974 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of HCC patients with main portal vein invasion (Vp4) is poor. We retrospectively reviewed the therapeutic outcomes with our new HAIC regimen in treating Vp4 HCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-one patients received the new regimen of combining HAIC (daily infusion of cisplatin (10 mg/m2), mitomycin-C (2 mg/m2) and Leucovorin (15 mg/m2) plus 100 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) using an infusion pump for 5 consecutive days) with Lipiodol embolization between 2002 and 2018. Twenty-two patients (31.0%) also received sorafenib. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The OS of patients with or without additional sorafenib use or extrahepatic spread (EHS) was also compared. RESULTS Fifty-six patients (78.9%) had Child-Pugh A liver function. The mean maximal tumor size was 10.3 cm. Twenty patients (28.2%) had EHS at their initial diagnosis. The objective response rate according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and median OS were 64.8% and 13 months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 53.1%, 21.5% and 18.7%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, there were no significant survival difference between patients with HAIC only vs. HAIC plus sorafenib (14 vs. 13 months) and between patients with vs. without EHS (12 vs. 13 months). CONCLUSIONS Our new HAIC regimen is effective in treating Vp4 HCC patients. Additional sorafenib use with our new HAIC regimen provided no survival benefit.
Collapse
|
13
|
You H, Liu X, Guo J, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Li C. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sequential ablation treatment in large hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:1097-1105. [PMID: 35993224 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2112307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the individualized survival benefit of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sequential ablation treatment in large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS Between February 2016 and December 2020, a total of 228 HCC patients (diameter > 5 cm) who underwent HAIC alone (HAIC group, n = 135) or HAIC and sequential ablation (HAIC-ablation group, n = 93) treatment were reviewed. We applied the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for potential bias of two treatment groups. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. And a prediction nomogram based on these independent prognostic factors was built, aiming to make probabilistic survival predictions and estimate personalized ablation benefits. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 17.9 months, HCC patients in the HAIC-ablation group have longer significantly OS and PFS than those in the HAIC alone group (median OS: 22.2 months vs. 14.5 months; median PFS: 8.5 months vs. 4.6 months; both, p < 0.001). The IPTW-adjusted analysis revealed similar findings (both, p < 0.001). Tumor size, tumor number, and treatment modality were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. The nomogram based on these factors showed favorable discrimination and well calibration. CONCLUSIONS HAIC and sequential ablation provided significant survival benefits in patients with large HCC. The nomogram could help predict individual survival probabilities and estimate personalized sequential ablation benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin You
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Endocrinology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xingyi Liu
- Department of Comprehensive Ward, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiandong Guo
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinsheng Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chengzhi Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lyu N, Zhao M. Reply to O. Sütcüoğlu et al. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1961-1962. [PMID: 35349329 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ming Zhao
- Ning Lyu, MD, and Ming Zhao, MD, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sütcüoğlu O, Ulaş Kahya B, Özdemir N, Yazıcı O. Can Systemic Control Be Achieved in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Cancer With Hepatic Artery Infusion Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin Treatment? J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1960-1961. [PMID: 35349330 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Sütcüoğlu
- Osman Sütcüoğlu, MD, Burcu Ulaş Kahya, MD, Nuriye Özdemir, MD, and Ozan Yazıcı, MD, Gazi University, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Ulaş Kahya
- Osman Sütcüoğlu, MD, Burcu Ulaş Kahya, MD, Nuriye Özdemir, MD, and Ozan Yazıcı, MD, Gazi University, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Özdemir
- Osman Sütcüoğlu, MD, Burcu Ulaş Kahya, MD, Nuriye Özdemir, MD, and Ozan Yazıcı, MD, Gazi University, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Yazıcı
- Osman Sütcüoğlu, MD, Burcu Ulaş Kahya, MD, Nuriye Özdemir, MD, and Ozan Yazıcı, MD, Gazi University, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lyu N, Wang X, Li JB, Lai JF, Chen QF, Li SL, Deng HJ, He M, Mu LW, Zhao M. Arterial Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin Plus Fluorouracil Versus Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Biomolecular Exploratory, Randomized, Phase III Trial (FOHAIC-1). J Clin Oncol 2021; 40:468-480. [PMID: 34905388 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Interventional hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) displayed an encouraging safety profile and antitumor activity in a previous phase II trial and a propensity-score-matching study involving patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS In this open-label, phase III trial, patients with advanced HCC, previously untreated with systemic therapy, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive HAIC-FO or sorafenib. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. An exploratory model for predicting the efficacy of HAIC-FO on the basis of genomic sequencing was developed. RESULTS Between May 2017 and May 2020, 262 patients were randomly assigned. The median tumor size was 11.2 cm (interquartile range, 8.5-13.7 cm). Macrovascular invasion was present in 65.6%, and the percentage of patients with > 50% tumor volume involvement of the liver and/or Vp-4 portal vein tumor thrombosis was 49.2%. At data cutoff (October 31, 2020), median OS was 13.9 months for HAIC-FO and 8.2 for sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.408; 95% CI, 0.301 to 0.552; P < .001). Tumor downstaging occurred in 16 (12.3% of 130) patients receiving HAIC-FO, including 15 receiving curative surgery or ablation, and finally achieving a median OS of 20.8 months, with a 1-year OS rate of 93.8%. In high-risk subpopulations, OS was significantly longer with HAIC-FO than with sorafenib (10.8 months v 5.7 months; HR 0.343; 95% CI, 0.219 to 0.538; P < .001). A newly developed 15-mutant-gene prediction model identified 83% of patients with response to HAIC-FO. HAIC-FO responders had longer OS than HAIC-FO nonresponders (19.3 months v 10.6 months; HR 0.323; 95% CI, 0.186 to 0.560; P = .002). CONCLUSION HAIC-FO achieved better survival outcomes than sorafenib in advanced HCC, even in association with a high intrahepatic disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Lyu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xun Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin-Fa Lai
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi-Feng Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shao-Long Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Jing Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meng He
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lu-Wen Mu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu JZ, Li CL, Shi HB, Liu S, Yang W, Zhou WZ. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy following simultaneous metallic stent placement and iodine-125 seed strands for advanced cholangiocarcinoma causing malignant obstructive jaundice: a propensity score matching study. Jpn J Radiol 2021; 40:396-403. [PMID: 34727330 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-021-01212-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) following the simultaneous placement of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and iodine-125 (125I) seed strands for the management of advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients presenting with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ). METHODS Data from 74 patients with MOJ caused by advanced CCA treated with stent placement with 125I seed strands with or without HAIC between November 2015 and October 2020 were analysed retrospectively. Eighteen patients received 5 sessions of HAIC after SEMS placement with 125I seed strands (HAIC group), and 56 patients only underwent SEMS placement with 125I seed strands and served as controls (control group). HAIC consisted of infusions of gemcitabine (600-1000 mg/m2 given over 30 min) followed by oxaliplatin (60-100 mg/m2 given over 2 h), with an interval of 4 weeks. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of the groups (including age, total bilirubin, and serum alanine aminotransferase level). Overall survival (OS), stent patency, and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS OS and stent patency were significantly better in patients in the HAIC group than in those in the control group (median survival time: before PSM, 362 vs. 185 days, p = 0.005; after PSM, 357 vs. 183 days, p = 0.012; median duration of stent patency: before PSM, 294 vs. 156 days, p = 0.001; after PSM, 287 vs. 183 days, p = 0.039). All adverse reactions were controllable by temporary symptomatic treatment. Serious complications and treatment-related deaths were not observed. CONCLUSION Our preliminary study showed that HAIC following SEMS placement with 125I seed strands is effective and safe for the management of advanced CCA patients presenting with MOJ and could improve stent patency and patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Zheng Wu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Cong-Lei Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Fourth People's Hospital of Taizhou, 99 Guloubei Road, Hailing District, Taizhou, 225300, China
| | - Hai-Bin Shi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Sheng Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Wei-Zhong Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hsu SJ, Xu X, Chen MP, Zhao ZY, Wang Y, Yin X, Zhang L, Ge NL, Chen Y, Wang YH, Luo JF, Ren ZG, Chen RX. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Modified FOLFOX as an Alternative Treatment Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failed or Unsuitability for Transarterial Chemoembolization. Acad Radiol 2021; 28 Suppl 1:S157-S166. [PMID: 33653656 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with modified FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) as an alternative treatment option in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with failed or unsuitability for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2018 to January 2020, 87 advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were not eligible for TACE received HAIC treatment with modified FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, and adverse events graded according to CTCAE 5.0. Based on prognostic factors determined by multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict patient survival. RESULTS The median OS and PFS were 9.0 months (95%CI 7.6-10.4) and 3.7 months (95%CI 3.1-4.3), respectively. The objective response rate was 13.8%, with a disease control rate of 48.3%. Grade 3 adverse events were observed, such as infection (9.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (3.4%), abdominal pain (2.3%) and alanine aminotransferase increase (2.3%). Albumin, AST, and extrahepatic metastasis were incorporated to construct a new nomogram that could stratify patients into three prognostic subgroups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in 9-month OS rates (71%, 42% and 6%, respectively; p< 0.001). The nomogram was better than the Okuda, AJCC, and CLIP staging systems for OS prediction. CONCLUSION These findings support the feasibility of HAIC with modified FOLFOX as an alternative treatment strategy for advanced HCC when TACE is ineffective or unsuitable.
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen X, Ma W, Yao Y, Zhang Q, Li J, Wu X, Mei C, Jiang X, Chen Y, Wang G, Wang K, Liu Y, Guo Y, Liu Z, Yuan Y. Serum deprivation-response protein induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma through ASK1-JNK/p38 MAPK pathways. Cell Death Dis 2021; 12:425. [PMID: 33931585 PMCID: PMC8087765 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-03711-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Serum deprivation-response protein (SDPR), a phosphatidylserine-binding protein, which is known to have a promising role in caveolar biogenesis and morphology. However, its function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was still largely unknown. In this study, we discussed the characterization and identification of SDPR, and to present it as a novel apoptosis candidate in the incidence of HCC. We identified 81 HCC cases with lower SDPR expression in the tumor tissues with the help of qRT-PCR assay, and lower SDPR expression was potentially associated with poor prognostication. The phenotypic assays revealed that cell proliferation, invasion, and migration were profoundly connected with SDPR, both in vivo and in vitro. The data obtained from the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) carried out on the liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), and also The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) findings indicated that SDPR was involved in apoptosis and flow cytometry experiments further confirmed this. Furthermore, we identified the interaction between SDPR and apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), which facilitated the ASK1 N-terminus-mediated dimerization and increased ASK1-mediated signaling, thereby activating the JNK/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and finally enhanced cell apoptosis. Overall, this work identified SDPR as a tumor suppressor, because it promoted apoptosis by activating ASK1-JNK/p38 MAPK pathways in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Weijie Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Ye Yao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of General Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Jinghua Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoling Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Chengjie Mei
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Xiang Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Yiran Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Ganggang Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Kunlei Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Yingyi Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Yonghua Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Zhisu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
| | - Yufeng Yuan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Radiologic and Clinical Factors Predictive of Survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:1566-1573. [PMID: 33852336 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The goal of this study was to evaluate radiologic and clinical factors associated with overall survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This single-center retrospective study included 180 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent HAIC with a 5-fluorouracil (250-500 mg/m2 for 5 hours) plus cisplatin (10-20 mg/m2 for 1-2 hours) regimen via an implantable port system. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. Factors associated with overall survival were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS. The median overall survival time was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.1), and the objective response rate was 15%. In multivariate analysis, infiltrative tumor growth (hazard ratio [HR], 1.002; p = .03) and rimlike arterial enhancement (HR, 3.040; p < .001) were pretreatment radiologic factors associated with reduced overall survival. No early response to treatment (HR, 2.064-6.491) and higher Child-Pugh class (HR, 2.010-2.815) were strong prognostic factors of poor outcome. Treatment with three or more HAIC cycles (HR, 0.371; p = .001) and high-dose HAIC (HR, 0.447; p < .001) were favorable for increased overall survival. CONCLUSION. Infiltrative tumor growth and rimlike arterial enhancement in pre-treatment imaging studies were associated with poor prognosis, and better early radiologic response and preserved liver function reserve were strong indicators of prolonged survival. Recognizing these radiologic and clinical predictors may help optimize care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
|
21
|
Deschamps F, Tselikas L, Tasaki M, Motoyama S, Isoardo T, Ducreux M, Paunovic D, Moine L, de Baere T. Sustained-hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin: pharmacokinetic advantages over hepatic arterial infusion using a preclinical animal tumour model. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2021; 11:2144-2150. [PMID: 33432522 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-020-00881-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin allows greater liver tumour drug exposure compared to systemic infusion. However, the therapeutic index of HAI oxaliplatin remains poor. Using Pickering emulsion technology, we developed a platform able to provide sustained releases of oxaliplatin. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic advantages of sustained-HAI oxaliplatin over HAI using a preclinical animal tumour model. Injections of 0.6 mg oxaliplatin in 20 min were selectively done in left hepatic arteries of 20 rabbits bearing a VX2 liver tumour in the middle left-lobe, using HAI (n = 10) or sustained-HAI (n = 10). In each group, half of the rabbits were sacrificed at 24 h and half at 72 h. Mass spectrometry was used to quantify drug pharmacokinetics in blood and oxaliplatin concentrations in tumour tissues, right- and middle left-liver lobes, spleen and lung. Compared to HAI, sustained-HAI of oxaliplatin resulted in lower plasmatic peak (Cmax: 275 ± 41 vs. 416 ± 133 ng/mL, p = 0.02) and higher concentration in the tumour at 24 h (2118 ± 2107 vs. 210 ± 93 ng/g, p = 0.008). After HAI, oxaliplatin concentration in tumours was significantly higher than in lung at 24 h (p = 0.03) but no other difference was found between oxaliplatin concentrations in tumours and in liver lobes, spleen or lung, neither at 24 h nor at 72 h. On the opposite, sustained-HAI resulted in higher concentrations of oxaliplatin in tumour compared to oxaliplatin concentrations in the middle left lobe (163 ± 86 ng/g at 24 h, p = 0.01, and 90 ± 15 ng/g at 72 h, p = 0.04), right lobe (174 ± 112 ng/g at 24 h, p = 0.01, and 112 ± 35 ng/g, p = 0.04 at 72 h), spleen (142 ± 21 ng/g at 24 h, p = 0.01, and 98 ± 12 ng/g at 72 h, p = 0.04), and lung (85 ± 11 ng/g at 24 h, p = 0.01, and 52 ± 4 ng/g at 72 h, p = 0.03). Sustained-HAI improves the therapeutic index of HAI oxaliplatin and offers a great potential for patients suffering from unresectable colorectal liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Interventional Radiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Laboratory of Translational Research in Immunology (LTRI), UMR 1015, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Thomas Isoardo
- Interventional Radiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Laboratory of Translational Research in Immunology (LTRI), UMR 1015, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Oncology department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Dragica Paunovic
- Global Medical Affairs, Terumo Corporation, Interventional Systems, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Laurence Moine
- Institut Galien, CNRS. Paris-Sud University, Châtenay-Malabry, France
| | - Thierry de Baere
- Interventional Radiology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fang X, Shen A. Preparation and evaluation of phytantriol liquid crystal as a liquid embolic agent. Pharm Dev Technol 2020; 25:610-616. [PMID: 32008407 DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2020.1725046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the preferred treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it lacks safe and effective embolic agents. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a broad-spectrum anticancer drug, but its clinical application is limited due to drug resistance and toxic side effects. Therefore, in this study, we developed a new liquid embolic agent with 5-FU as the model drug. We found that this liquid embolic agent possesses good gelling properties and embolic effects. An in vitro drug release model of the agent conformed to the Weibull model. Cumulative release of the drug over 7 d was ∼90%, consisting of an initial burst followed by sustained release. Cytotoxicity testing showed that each liquid embolic composition is cytocompatible and only mildly cytotoxic. Pharmacokinetic experiments showed that the formulation significantly prolongs the t1/2 of 5-FU (approximately five times that of 5-FU solution) and 5-FU residence time in the body (approximately three times that of 5-FU solution). These results indicate that the liquid embolic agent has embolic capacity and could be used as a potential therapeutic method for TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Fang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China
| | - Aizong Shen
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li N, Jiang Y, Plantefève R, Michaud F, Nosrati Z, Tremblay C, Saatchi K, Häfeli UO, Kadoury S, Moran G, Joly F, Martel S, Soulez G. Magnetic Resonance Navigation for Targeted Embolization in a Two-Level Bifurcation Phantom. Ann Biomed Eng 2019; 47:2402-2415. [PMID: 31290038 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02317-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This work combines a particle injection system with our proposed magnetic resonance navigation (MRN) sequence with the intention of validating MRN in a two-bifurcation phantom for endovascular treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A theoretical physical model used to calculate the most appropriate size of the magnetic drug-eluting bead (MDEB, 200 μm) aggregates was proposed. The aggregates were injected into the phantom by a dedicated particle injector while a trigger signal was automatically sent to the MRI to start MRN which consists of interleaved tracking and steering sequences. When the main branch of the phantom was parallel to B0, the aggregate distribution ratio in the (left-left, left-right, right-left and right-right divisions was obtained with results of 8, 68, 24 and 0% respectively at baseline (no MRN) and increased to 84%, 100, 84 and 92% (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) after implementing our MRN protocol. When the main branch was perpendicular to B0, the right-left branch, having the smallest baseline distribution rate of 0%, reached 80% (p < 0.001) after applying MRN. Moreover, the success rate of MRN was always more than 92% at the 1st bifurcation in the experiments above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Li
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada.,Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Yuting Jiang
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Rosalie Plantefève
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Francois Michaud
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Zeynab Nosrati
- University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Charles Tremblay
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Katayoun Saatchi
- University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Urs O Häfeli
- University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Samuel Kadoury
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada.,Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | | | - Florian Joly
- INRIA Paris, 2 rue Simone Iff, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Martel
- Polytechnique Montréal, Chemin de Polytechnique, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, 28 H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Gilles Soulez
- Laboratory of Clinical Image Processing, Le Centre de recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada. .,Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Université de Montréal, 2900 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|