Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation for Aldosterone-Producing Adrenal Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Biochemical Parameters

A Prospective Observational Study of Factors Affecting the Change in Quality of Life in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism After Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To explore the changes in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) after standardized treatment and determine the effects of different variables on the change in the HRQoL of patients.

METHODS

A total of 116 patients with PA were prospectively included from November 2020 to March 2022. Data were collected at their initial diagnosis and the follow-up after 12 months of treatment, including demographic and clinical data and the scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The scores of each dimension of SF-36 of patients before and after treatment were compared, and the factors affecting their change in the quality of life were analyzed using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

After standardized treatment, the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (Z = -4.967, P < .001), systolic blood pressure (t = 8.985, P < .001), and diastolic blood pressure (t = 7.233, P < .001) of patients with PA decreased compared with baseline, and hypokalemia was effectively corrected (χ2 = 69.014, P < .001). In terms of quality of life, 6 of 8 dimensions of SF-36 and the total score of SF-36 significantly improved at 1-year follow-up compared with baseline (all P < .05). The results of multiple linear regression showed that the improvement in the HRQoL in patients with PA after standardized treatment was correlated with the change in the blood potassium level (P = .007) and systolic blood pressure (P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Correction of hypokalemia and control of diastolic blood pressure are essential factors contributing to the improvement in the HRQoL in patients with PA regardless of the standardized treatment received.

Minimally invasive techniques in benign and malignant adrenal tumors

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy has become the main treatment modality for most adrenal lesions. Both laparoscopic transabdominal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches are safe and feasible options, each with respective advantages, including better surgical outcomes, fewer complications, and faster recovery over open adrenalectomy. While open surgery remains a valid modality in treatment of adrenocortical cancer in the presence of some findings such as invasion, robotic platforms, and minimally invasive surgery have gained popularity as technology continues to evolve. Organ preservation during adrenalectomy is feasible in some conditions to prevent adrenal insufficiency. Ablative technologies are increasingly utilized in benign and malignant tumors, including the adrenal gland, with various outcomes. A multidisciplinary team, an experienced surgeon, and a high-volume center are recommended for any surgical approaches and management of adrenal lesions. This review article evaluated recent findings and current evidence on minimally invasive adrenalectomy.

Adrenal Ablation Versus Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism for the Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Superselective adrenal arterial embolization (SAAE) is an alternative treatment for patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). This single-center prospective cohort study aimed to compare the efficacy of SAAE with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in treating patients with PA who refused unilateral adrenalectomy.

METHODS

Of the 140 PA patients who were enrolled in the study and completed 12-month follow-up, 74 patients underwent SAAE and 66 received MRA treatment. The clinical and biochemical outcome was compared at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of the patients were similar between groups. Office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure reduction at 1 month after discharge was more pronounced in the SAAE group than MRA group (all P < 0.05) while the blood pressure reduction was comparable between the 2 groups at 6 and 12 months. Patients who underwent SAAE took less antihypertensive medications than the MRA group during 12-month follow-up (P < 0.01). Both SAAE and MRA treatment improved renin suppression, aldosterone-to-renin ratio elevation, and hypokalemia at 6 and 12 months, whereas only SAAE but not MRA reduced plasma aldosterone levels. Moreover, SAAE achieved higher rates of complete clinical and biochemical success than MRA (both P < 0.01). Logistic regression found that complete clinical and biochemical success was only directly associated with diagnosis of unilateral PA in contrast to bilateral PA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides evidence that SAAE is a reasonable choice of treatment in patients with either unilateral or bilateral PA in terms of clinical and biochemical outcomes. This study was registered at Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100045896).

Comparison of the radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for aldosterone-producing adenoma: a meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and safety

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a new treatment for primary aldosteronism owing to aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and safety of RFA and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for patients with APA. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all literatures published from January 2001 to September 2020 to compare RFA with LA for APA. After data extraction and quality assessments, we used Review Manager 5.4.1 and STATA 14.0 to pool the data. Four retrospective studies consisting of 170 patients were obtained. Patients who underwent RFA were associated with shorter operative time (standard mean difference (SMD): -1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.86 to 0.11, P = 0.04), less intraoperative blood loss (SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.26, P = 0.0007), and shorter hospital stay (weight mean difference (WMD): -1.40, 95% CI: -1.71 to -1.10, P < 0.00001) than those who underwent LA. No significant differences were found in the complication rate (odds ratio (OR): 0.67, 95% CI: 0.27-1.68, P = 0.39), the incidence of hypertensive crisis (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 0.36-27.94, P = 0.30), the conversion rate (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.04-4.32, P = 0.48) or the treatment success rate (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.22-2.39, P = 0.59) between the two groups. RFA could achieve clinical outcomes that approach LA for patients with APA but result in shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, RFA does not appear to be able to replace the LA. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to validate these results.

Therapeutic Outcomes with Surgical and Medical Management of Primary Aldosteronism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is significantly under-diagnosed. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can lead to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study is to review the management of PA, with a focus on medical and surgical treatment outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

PA causes cardiovascular dysfunction in excess of degree of hypertension. Adrenalectomy demonstrates a therapeutic advantage over mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) therapy, after controlling for degree of hypertension and subtype of PA. Higher rates of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, and incidence of chronic kidney disease are observed in subjects treated with MRAs than in subjects treated with adrenalectomy. The therapeutic benefit of surgery may reflect definitive resolution of excess aldosterone. Complete mineralocorticoid blockade may achieve similar benefit to adrenalectomy. Adrenalectomy is the most effective treatment for unilateral PA. Biomarkers for MRA therapy might inform optimal medical therapy of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia.

Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation Guidelines for Adrenal Tumor Ablation

Thermal ablation is a good alternative treatment in patients who are unable to undergo adrenalectomy. Even though the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation (ACTA) has been held for many years, adrenal ablation guidelines have not been established. No guidelines for adrenal ablation are established in American and European countries, either. The aim of this review was to introduce the first version of ACTA guidelines for adrenal tumor ablation.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy vs. radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of primary aldosteronism. A single center retrospective cohort analysis adjusted with propensity score

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the gold standard treatment for unilateral primary aldosteronism. However, satisfactory results have also been published with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of this study was to compare LA and RFA for the treatment of primary aldosteronism.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent LA or RFA in a single center was performed. Morbidity and long-term effectiveness (cure rate and blood pressure control) were analyzed. A multivariate analysis with a propensity score was also performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included in the study, 24 in the LA group and 10 in the RFA group. Hypertension had been diagnosed a median of 12 years before the intervention. Hypertension was properly controlled before the intervention in 55.9% of the patients. Hypertensive crisis was more common during RFA (4.2% vs. 70.0%, p < 0.001), although no patient suffered any complication because of these crises. LA was longer (174.6 vs. 105.5 min, p = 0.001) and had a longer length of stay (median 2 vs 1 days, p < 0.001). No severe complications were observed in any of the patients. After a median follow-up of 46.2 months, more patients had hypertension cured and blood pressure controlled in the LA group (29.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.078 and 95.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.006, respectively). Also, patients in the LA group were taking less antihypertensive drugs (1.8 vs. 3.0, p = 0.054) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (41.7% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis adjusted by propensity score showed that LA had an OR = 11.3 (p = 0.138) for hypertension cure and an OR = 55.1 (p = 0.040) for blood pressure control.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RFA was a less invasive procedure than LA, hypertension was cured and blood pressure was properly controlled in more patients from the LA group. Patients who underwent LA were taking less antihypertensive drugs than patients who had undergone RFA.

Update: Selective adrenal venous sampling (AVS) - Indication, technique, and significance

BACKGROUND

 Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common detectable cause of secondary hypertension. The majority of patients have either an adrenal aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) or bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH) demanding different therapeutic approaches. Screening tests and imaging cannot reliably distinguish between a unilateral or bilateral PA.

METHODS

 This review article gives an overview concerning etiology, diagnostics, and therapeutic options of PA, and reviews the indication, the technique, and relevance of selective adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in the context of the current literature and the authors' experience.

RESULTS

 AVS can verify or exclude a unilaterally dominated secretion with a high success rate. Patients with PA and a unilateral APA can be treated curatively by adrenalectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

 AVS is an established diagnostic examination for differentiation of unilateral from bilateral adrenal disease in patients with PA.

KEY POINTS

· Selective adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is a safe, reliable, and minimally invasive method to detect a unilateral or bilateral adrenal adrenal gland disease.. · Verification of lateralization by AVS has direct therapeutic relevance for patients with primary aldosteronism (PA).. · AVS can be performed with low radiation exposure, without contrast medium, and with a high success rate when performed by an experienced interventional radiologist..

CITATION FORMAT

· Loberg C, Antoch G, Stegbauer J et al. Update: Selective adrenal venous sampling (AVS) - Indication, technique, and significance. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 658 - 666.

Percutaneous Adrenal Radiofrequency Ablation: A Short Review for Endocrinologists

Image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for adrenal tumors in patients who are unable to undergo adrenalectomy. Accordingly, this treatment has become more readily available for treating functioning or non-functioning adrenal masses. Thus, endocrinologists need a better understanding of percutaneous RFA of adrenal tumors. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe the basic mechanism of RFA, indications and contraindications, patient preparation prior to RFA, type of complications, how to avoid complications, RFA procedures, and treatment outcomes.

Treatment of primary hyperaldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism is associated with higher cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality than essential hypertension in age- and sex-matched patients with the same degree of blood pressure elevation. Therefore, it is essential to establish a specific treatment to avoid the deleterious effects of aldosterone excess. Although adrenalectomy is generally considered the treatment of choice in cases of primary aldosteronism due to unilateral disease, several aspects and circumstances should be taken into account that may make medical treatment more appropriate. Among them, in this review we mention the limited experience and efficacy, and the potential risks of adrenal vein sampling; the risks and low efficacy of adrenalectomy; the high safety and efficacy of medical treatment and some special situations such as primary aldosteronism during pregnancy, in patients of advanced age or hereditary forms of primary aldosteronism, in which medical treatment is considered especially indicated as the first line therapy. The main studies comparing medical and surgical treatment in primary aldosteronism are also discussed.

"How We Do It" - A Practical Approach to Percutaneous Adrenal Ablation Techniques

Incidental adrenal masses are common and are found in 4% of the CT scans.¹ While clinical history, laboratory results, and imaging characteristics are typically sufficient for diagnosis of an adrenal lesion, a biopsy is sometimes warranted. In some cases, adrenal mass ablation is subsequently indicated. This article serves as a brief but comprehensive review of preprocedural work-up and planning before an adrenal mass ablation, as well as a discussion on ablation techniques, associated challenges and solutions, and management of expected and unexpected outcomes.