Long-Term Survival after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pathologically Proven Renal Cell Carcinoma in 100 Patients

Pulsed electric field ablation as a candidate to enhance the anti-tumor immune response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Cancer ablation with pulsed electric fields (PEFs) involves the delivery of high-voltage, short-duration electrical pulses that destabilize tumor cells, leading to cellular death. Unlike most conventional ablation technologies, PEF ablation is non-thermal, allowing for safe and targeted energy delivery to the tumor without damaging surrounding tissue and critical structures. PEFs allow for specific dosing, predictable treatment zones, and preservation of the extracellular matrix and adjacent vascular tissues. Preclinical and preliminary clinical data suggest that PEF ablation may induce inflammatory changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) that engage host innate and adaptive immune cells, stimulating an anti-tumor response. Specifically, PEF promotes local and systemic anti-tumor immune activation through immunogenic cell death and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and tumor antigens. This tumor-specific immune activation could potentially enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies. Furthermore, PEF ablation induces the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) in the TME, which are predictive biomarkers for responsiveness to ICI across several solid tumors. This combination of effects activates antigen-presenting cells and stimulates the effector T cell response, which is often inhibited in ICI-resistant cancer patients. In this review, the onco-immunological characteristics of PEF ablation are discussed, with special emphasis placed on the clinical potential of PEF ablation to induce anti-cancer immune responses and enhance responsiveness to ICI therapy in ablated and non-ablated (abscopal) tumors.

Technical Feasibility and Safety of Image-Guided Biphasic Monopolar Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Metastatic and Primary Malignancies

PURPOSE

To assess the technical feasibility and safety of image-guided percutaneous biphasic monopolar pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation of primary and metastatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With institutional review board (IRB) approval and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance, this retrospective, single-institution study cohort of 17 patients (mean age, 53.5 years; range, 20-94 years) with overall progressive disease underwent 26 PEF ablation procedures for 30 metastatic (90%) and primary (10%) target lesions in the thorax (n = 20), abdomen (n = 7), and head and neck (n = 3). Concurrent systemic therapy was used in 14 of the 17 patients (82%). Follow-up imaging was scheduled for 1, 3, and 6 months after PEF ablation, and target and off-target lesion sizes were recorded. The overall response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria with imaging immediately before PEF serving as baseline. Adverse events (AEs) were determined by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification.

RESULTS

PEF ablation procedures were well tolerated and technically feasible for all 17 patients. The mean initial sizes of the target and off-target tumors were 2.6 cm (standard deviation [SD] ± 1.5; range, 0.4-6.9 cm) and 2.2 cm (SD ± 1.1; range, 1.0-5.2 cm), respectively. Overall, 15 of the 30 (50%) target lesions and 12 of the 24 (50%) off-target lesions were unchanged or decreased in size at the patient's last follow-up. Eight patients had overall stable disease (47%) at the last follow-up. Of the 26 AEs, there were 9 mild (35%) and 1 moderate (4%) AE.

CONCLUSIONS

All PEF procedures were technically feasible with 1 moderate AE and stable disease for 47% of patients with a median follow-up period of 3 months.

Factors that Affect Outcome of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Masses

The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing the efficacy and safety of the ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors. Between January 2010 and December 2018, 159 patients with renal tumors treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation at our institution were included in this study. Biopsies were performed for histopathological analysis prior to each ablation. Patients underwent computed tomography follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12 months and were subsequently observed on an annual basis. The primary efficacy rate (i.e., residual tumor), local tumor progression, morbidity and mortality, and possible outcome predictors (age, body mass index, gender, tumor size, tumor location, tumor characteristics, ablation temperature, and reported technical problems) were analyzed using binary logistic regression. At the first follow-up, 3 months after ablation, the primary efficacy rate was 79%. Two percent of the tumors showed local tumor progression during the whole follow-up. Tumor proximity to the collecting system and the final temperature in the ablation region were associated with the occurrence of residual tumor (OR = 2.85, p = 0.019 and OR = 4.23, p = 0.006, respectively). A similar trend was shown for tumors larger than 3 cm (p = 0.066). A short distance to the collecting system and the ablation temperature were significantly related to the occurrence of residual tumors after the radiofrequency ablation of small renal masses. The ultrasound guidance used in our study has a lower primary efficacy rate than the computed tomography guidance used in comparable studies.

Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management

The two primary nephron-sparing interventions for treating renal masses such as renal cell carcinoma are surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) and image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation. Nephron-sparing surgery, such as PN, has been the standard of care for treating many localized renal masses. Although uncommon, complications resulting from PN can range from asymptomatic and mild to symptomatic and life-threatening. These complications include vascular injuries such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and/or renal ischemia; injury to the collecting system causing urinary leak; infection; and tumor recurrence. The incidence of complications after any nephron-sparing surgery depends on many factors, such as the proximity of the tumor to blood vessels or the collecting system, the skill or experience of the surgeon, and patient-specific factors. More recently, image-guided percutaneous renal ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for small renal tumors, with comparable oncologic outcomes to those of PN and a low incidence of major complications. Radiologists must be familiar with the imaging findings encountered after these surgical and image-guided procedures, especially those indicative of complications. The authors review cross-sectional imaging characteristics of complications after PN and image-guided thermal ablation of kidney tumors and highlight the respective management strategies, ranging from clinical observation to interventions such as angioembolization or repeat surgery. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Chung and Raman in this issue.

Risk Factors for Renal Function Impairment Following Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumors

Purpose

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Long-term outcomes of image-guided ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcomes and peri-operative outcomes of image-guided ablation (IGA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of localised RCC (T1a/bN0M0) patients undergoing cryoablation (CRYO), radio-frequency ablation (RFA), or LPN at our institution from 2003 to 2016. Oncological outcomes were compared using Cox regression and log-rank analysis. eGFR changes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 296 (238 T1a, 58 T1b) consecutive patients were identified; 103, 100, and 93 patients underwent CRYO, RFA, and LPN, respectively. Median follow-up time was 75, 98, and 71 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, all oncological outcomes were comparable amongst CRYO, RFA, and LPN (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, T1a patients undergoing RFA had improved local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (HR 0.002, 95% CI 0.00-0.11, p = 0.003) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.002, 95% CI 0.00-0.52, p = 0.029) compared to LPN. In T1a and T1b patients combined, both CRYO (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.73, p = 0.026) and RFA (HR 0.04, 95% CI 0.03-0.48, p = 0.011) had improved LRFS rates. Patients undergoing CRYO and RFA had a significantly smaller median decrease in eGFR post-operatively compared to LPN (T1a: p < 0.001; T1b: p = 0.047). Limitations include retrospective design and limited statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

IGA is potentially as good as LPN in oncological durability. IGA preserves kidney function significantly better than LPN. More studies with larger sample size should be performed to establish IGA as a first-line treatment alongside LPN.

KEY POINTS

• Ablative therapies are alternatives to partial nephrectomy for managing small renal cell carcinomas. • This study reports long-term outcomes of image-guided ablation versus partial nephrectomy. • Ablative therapies have comparable oncological durability and better renal function preservation compared to partial nephrectomy.

A multicenter 10-year oncologic outcome of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: will it stand the test of time?

OBJECTIVES

We updated the experience on percutaneous microwave ablation for renal cell carcinoma with five-center data and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent microwave ablation between April 2006 and December 2019. Clinicopathological and procedural data were collected. Technical effectiveness and complications were assessed, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and local neoplastic process analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 323 consecutive patients (mean age, 62.9 years ± 14.0) with 371 biopsy-proved tumors (mean diameter, 2.9 cm ± 1.2) were enrolled, and 42.6% of the tumors were located adjacent to collecting system/bowel and technical effectiveness was achieved in 360 (97.0%) tumors. For 275 cT1a patients, during median follow-up time of 66.0 months (IQR, 58.4-73.6), 10-year local neoplastic processes, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 1.9%, 87.4%, 71.8, and 67.5%, respectively. For 48 cT1b patients, during the median follow-up time of 30.4 months (IQR, 17.7-44.8), 5-year local tumor progression, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 11.3%, 91.4%, 69.1, and 89.2%, respectively. Major complications showed no differences between cT1a (3.5%) and cT1b (6.9%) patients (p = 0.28). A clinical risk stratification system was developed based on multivariable model to predict DFS and CSS with c-indexes of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65-0.90), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With matured follow-up at five institutions, ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is a reliable treatment option for cT1a renal cell carcinoma even in dangerous location and appears to be promising for cT1b tumors.

KEY POINTS

• To our knowledge, this is the first multicenter cohort of long-term oncologic outcomes with percutaneous MWA of cT1 RCC. • The predicting model we developed is accurate to predict the long-term DFS and CSS, which can help to provide a better MWA prognostication over routinely available clinical information. • The available evidence shows that microwave ablation of clinical stage T1 RCC is safe and reliable with promising long-term oncologic outcomes, especially for cT1a RCC with excellent 10-year results.

Percutaneous CT- and MRI-guided Cryoablation of cT1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate- to Long-term Outcomes in 307 Patients

Background Percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains underused, partially because of heterogeneous and limited long-term outcomes data assessing recent cryoablation methods. Purpose To report intermediate- to long-term outcomes of image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 RCC and to compare outcomes for CT versus MRI guidance. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective single-institution study assessed patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation for solitary pathology-proven cT1 RCC between August 2000 and July 2017. Tumors (cT1a, n = 282; cT1b, n = 25; size range, 0.6-6.5 cm; median size, 2.5 cm) underwent cryoablation with CT (n = 155) or MRI (n = 152) guidance. Primary end points of overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), imaging-confirmed disease-free survival (DFS), and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary end points of technique efficacy and adverse event rate were also calculated. Primary and secondary end points for CT and MRI guidance were compared by using univariable regression analysis. Results A total of 307 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 192 men) were evaluated. Median clinical follow-up lasted 95 months (range, 8-219 months), and median imaging follow-up lasted 41 months (range, 0-189 months). Survival metrics at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, included OS of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%, 94%), 86% (95% CI: 82%, 90%), 78% (95% CI: 73%, 84%), and 76% (95% CI: 69%, 83%); DSS of 99.6% (95% CI: 99%, 100%), 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), and 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%); DFS of 94% (95% CI: 92%, 97%), 91% (95% CI: 88%, 96%), 88% (95% CI: 83%, 93%), and 88% (95% CI: 83%, 93%); and LPFS of 97% (95% CI: 94%, 99%), 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), and 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%). Survival did not significantly differ between CT and MRI guidance, with univariable Cox regression analysis hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.67; P = .92) for OS, 0.63 (95% CI: 0.26, 1.52; P = .30) for DFS, and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.26, 2.74; P = .77) for LPFS. Primary and secondary technique efficacy were 96% and 99%, respectively. Overall adverse event rate was 14% (43 of 307), including 11 grade 3 events and three grade 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Conclusion Percutaneous CT- and MRI-guided cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma had similar excellent intermediate- and long-term outcomes. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.

Image-guided thermal ablation of central renal tumors with retrograde cold pyeloperfusion technique: a monocentric experience

Purpose: To evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of image-guided thermal ablations associated with retrograde pyeloperfusion in patients with centrally located renal tumors.Materials and methods: 48 patients (15 women, 33 men, mean age 69.1 ± 11.8) were treated with image-guided thermal ablation associated with pyeloperfusion for 58 centrally located renal tumors (mean diameter 32.3 ± 7.32 mm). 7 patients had a single kidney. Microwave and radiofrequency ablation were used. All treatments were performed with ultrasound, CT, or fusion imaging guidance under general anesthesia and simultaneous retrograde cold pyeloperfusion technique.Results: Procedure was feasible in all cases. Technical success and primary technical efficacy were reached in 51/58 (88%) and 45/54 tumors (83%). With a second ablation performed in 5 tumors, secondary technical efficacy was achieved in 50/50 (100%) tumors. Minor and major complications occurred in 8/58 (13%) and 5/58 (8%) tumors. No significative change in renal function occurred after treatment.During follow-up, 5 recurrences occurred, that were retreated with a second ablation. At last follow up (mean 32.2 ± 22.0 months), 41/48 (85%) treated patients were free from disease. The median TTP and PFS were 27.0 (range, 2.3-80.0) and 26.5 months (range, 2.3-80.0), respectively.Conclusion: Image-guided thermal ablation associated with protective pyeloperfusion is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for patients with central renal tumors with a minimal impact on renal function and relevant potential to avoid nephrectomy.