Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block during Angioplasty of Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Access: A Prospective, Randomized Single-Center Clinical Trial

Risk factors for thrombosis in dialysis patients: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To identify the factors associated with thrombosis in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is a leading cause of vascular access failure in dialysis patients. Numerous risk factors contribute to thrombosis in this population.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across international databases using standardized keywords. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the STROBE and CONSORT checklists. The findings were summarized in a Garrard table. Meta-analysis was performed using CMA software. The study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

A total of 180 articles were reviewed. The odds ratio for thrombosis in patients with arteriovenous grafts compared to arteriovenous fistulas was 10.93 (95 % CI: 9.35-12.78), demonstrating statistical significance (P = 0.001). Similarly, hemodialysis patients had an odds ratio of thrombosis 3.60 times higher than non-hemodialysis patients (95 % CI: 3.54-4.19), with statistical significance (P = 0.001). Patients undergoing single-stage basilic vein transposition had a 1.89 times higher risk of thrombosis compared to those undergoing two-stage transposition (95 % CI: 1.04-3.46), also demonstrating statistical significance (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombosis in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis was significantly associated with various factors, including graft access, single-stage basilic vein transposition, and hemodialysis. Additional contributing factors to thrombosis included diabetes, elevated homocysteine levels, female gender, age over 50, access location, and low access blood flow velocity. The analysis revealed a higher incidence of thrombosis in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis compared to those not undergoing dialysis, as well as in patients with arteriovenous grafts compared to those with arteriovenous fistulas. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing and managing these risk factors to prevent thrombotic events and enhance patient care within the dialysis setting.

Analysis of Research Trends in Ultrasound-Guided Acupuncture and Dry-Needling: A Scoping Review

Background: This study aimed to summarize the current status of research on ultrasound-guided acupuncture and dry-needling treatment and the specific treatment methods applied to patients. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, surveying three English databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) for studies published up to May 2024. All studies related to ultrasound-guided acupuncture and dry-needling treatment were considered. Literature was selected using selection and exclusion criteria, and extracted and organized using EndNote. Results: A total of 107 eligible studies were included. Among the 107 studies, non-comparative studies accounted for the largest proportion (n = 47, 43.9%), followed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n = 41, 38.3%). Diseases of the musculoskeletal system or connective tissue (15 diseases of the musculoskeletal system or connective tissue) accounted for most (n = 48, 55.8%) of the 86 diseases studied, followed by symptoms, signs, or clinical conditions not otherwise classified (n = 17, 19.8%). Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided acupuncture and dry-needling have been actively studied and applied for the treatment of various diseases. However, higher-quality studies are needed for further applications in research and clinical practice.

Peripheral regional anaesthesia and outcomes: a narrative review of the literature from 2013 to 2023

The use of peripheral regional anaesthesia continues to increase, yet the evidence supporting its use and impact on relevant outcomes often lacks scientific rigour, especially when considering the use of specific blocks for a particular surgical indication. In this narrative review, we consider the relevant literature in a 10-yr period from 2013. We performed a literature search (MEDLINE and EMBASE) for articles reporting randomised controlled trials and other comparative trials of peripheral regional anaesthetic blocks vs systemic analgesia in adult patients undergoing surgery. We evaluated measures of effective treatment and complications. A total of 128 studies met our inclusion criteria. There remains variability in the technical conduct of blocks and the outcomes used to evaluate them. There is a considerable body of evidence to support the use of interscalene blocks for shoulder surgery. Saphenous nerve (motor-sparing) blocks provide satisfactory analgesia after knee surgery and are preferred to femoral nerve blocks which are associated with falls when patients are mobilised early as part of enhanced recovery programmes. There are additional surgical indications where the efficacy of cervical plexus, intercostal nerve, and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks have been demonstrated. In the past 10 yr, there has been a consolidation of the evidence indicating benefit of peripheral nerve blocks for specific indications. There remains great scope for rigorous, multicentre, randomised controlled trials of many peripheral nerve blocks. These would benefit from an agreed set of patient-centred outcomes.

Ultrasound-guided genitofemoral nerve block for femoral arterial access gain and closure: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the femoral branch block of the genitofemoral nerve (FBB) versus local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) for femoral arterial access gain and closure.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients (age, 64.8 ± 10.9 years; female, 30.5%) undergoing endovascular procedures using 5-Fr femoral sheath were assigned to either FBB (n = 41) or LIA (n = 41). In both groups, 2% lidocaine HCL with 1:100,000 epinephrine was used as an anesthetic solution. Pain scores during access gain and closure were evaluated using a visual analog scale (score 0-10), patient satisfaction levels with the quality of anesthesia were scored on a 7-point Likert scale, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, pain scores during access closure, was significantly lower in the FBB group than in the LIA group (0.1 ± 0.37 vs 1.73 ± 0.92; p < 0.001). The FBB group also had significantly lower pain scores during access gain compared to the LIA group (0.83 ± 0.83 vs 2.78 ± 1.26; p < 0.001). There was an inverse relationship between pain scores and FBB after adjustment for age, gender, and body mass index (p < 0.001). FBB group reported significantly higher satisfaction with anesthesia quality compared to the LIA group (6.49 ± 0.64 vs 4.05 ± 1.05; p < 0.001). No complications were recognized in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided genitofemoral nerve blocks offered better acute pain relief and higher patient satisfaction than LIA during femoral arterial access gain and closure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, ultrasound-guided genitofemoral nerve blocks offered better acute pain relief than local infiltration anesthesia, resulting in enhanced patient satisfaction.

KEY POINTS

• FBB provided better pain relief during access gain and closure than LIA. • FBB offered higher patient satisfaction with the quality of anesthesia than LIA. • No anesthesia-related or access site complications were recognized in either treatment group.

Anesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided block of the musculocutaneous nerve during endovascular treatment of dysfunctional radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas

BACKGROUND

Delivering requisite and minimal anesthesia for endovascular treatment (EVT) of dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) under the target nerve block can achieve reasonable analgesia. We evaluated the anesthetic efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided selective block of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) during the EVT of runoff venous strictures in the forearm through the radiocephalic (RC)-AVF at the wrist or the anatomical snuff box and analyzed the factors inhibiting the analgesia achieved under the MCN block.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 adult patients undergoing hemodialysis who had received 78 EVT sessions in an outpatient clinic mainly for long and/or multiple outflow-venous strictures in the forearm under US-guided blocks of the MCN, which provides sensory innervation to the anterolateral forearm where the cephalic vein courses. We assessed patients' pain during balloon dilations using the Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale (WBFRS) and evaluated the factors increasing the pain (WBFRS score ⩾4), including patient characteristics, dilated strictures, additional nerve blocks, and types of balloon catheters.

RESULTS

In 25 EVT sessions (32.1%) out of 78 sessions, patients complained of stronger pain (WBFRS score ⩾4), while in the other 53 sessions (67.9%), presented with no pain and slight pain (WBFRS score = 0 or 2). Univariate analysis clarified that dilation of the AVF anastomosis, presence of dilated stenosis >4 cm, and a single block of the MCN or its sensory terminal significantly triggered more pain (p < 0.05). Consequently, multivariate analysis of all the factors with p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis, including multiple dilated stenosis sites, demonstrated that dilation of the AVF anastomosis significantly caused severe pain despite the anesthesia of the MCN block (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

US-guided selective block of the MCN could be a leading anesthetic option for EVT for multiple long stenoses of the cephalic vein draining through the RC-AVF in the wrist or anatomical snuff box.

Brachial plexus block using only 1% lidocaine to reduce pain during the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional arteriovenous access

BACKGROUND

Interventional endovascular treatments of dysfunctional arteriovenous (AV) access for hemodialysis can cause pain and discomfort to the patients. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (BPB) is an alternative regional anesthesia method, but conventional BPB using ropivacaine or bupivacaine may cause long-lasting motor power loss, significantly reducing patient satisfaction. This study aimed to introduce BPB using only 1% lidocaine, which induces sensory loss while minimizing motor block, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on 277 consecutive patients with dysfunctional AV access requiring percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Of these, 174 patients underwent the BPB procedure using 1% lidocaine. Time data were recorded, and the motor strength grade (MRC scale, grade 0-5) was evaluated. Numeric rating pain score (NRPS, grade 0-10) was asked during every PTA, and overall NRPS and satisfaction scores (scale 1-3) were asked after the procedure was completed.

RESULTS

Of the 174 patients who received BPB, the success rate was 100%, and there were no significant complications related to BPB. The MRC scale measured at the time when the complete sensory loss was achieved was 1.99 ± 0.63, and that at the point of sensory recovery when the block effect expired was 3.93 ± 0.62, indicating a good grade of motor strength. The average NRPS during PTA in the BPB group was significantly lower than that of the control group without BPB (1.04 ± 2.04vs 6.30 ± 2.71, p < 0.001). The overall satisfaction score was significantly higher in the BPB group than in the control group (2.79 ± 0.50vs 2.00 ± 0.81, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BPB using only 1% lidocaine can induce a sensory block while minimizing the effect on motor function. It can be applied safely in an outpatient clinic setting with relatively higher satisfaction.

Sedoanalgesia with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for angioplasty of dysfunctional arteriovenous access: A retrospective single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy, such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), stenting, or embolization, is a well-established form of treatment to prolong the lifespan of arteriovenous access. These procedures, especially PTA, can be accompanied with severe pain. We reviewed and analyzed the efficacy, safety, and outcome of sedoanalgesia using intravenous midazolam and fentanyl, for pain relief during these procedures.

METHODS

Two hundred and two consecutive patients with dysfunctional dialysis access that had undergone endovascular procedure in our institute between July and November 2017 were included in this study. The dialysis access profile, procedure complication, and 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. One-year clinical follow-up record was also collected to evaluate arteriovenous access patency and long-term complications.

RESULTS

Among the 202 patients, the mean age was (mean ± SD) 67.0 ± 12.08 years. Dialysis access profile of these patients were 119 (58.9%) native arteriovenous fistula and 162 (74.2%) forearm access. The number of lesions treated were 1.63 ± 0.802.Immediate complications included 11 (5.44%) nausea/vomiting, 24 (11.88%) desaturation (SpO2 < 90%, resolved after pillow removal or jaw trust), 16 (7.9%) hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg, resolved without inotropic agents). There was a low average pain score (1.16 ± 1.594) during the procedure with 136 (67.3%) no pain (VAS 0-1) and 56 (27.7%) mild pain (VAS 2-4). Higher VAS score correlated with overweight patients, longer PTA time and pain after procedure. Six-month primary patency rate was 49.17% and primary assisted patency rate was 93.04%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedoanalgesia with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl is an easy, safe, and effective method for surgeons.

Neurological pain relief interventional radiology procedures

Neurological interventions have taken on a significant role in interventional radiology (IR) practice. Indications fall under three main categories: (1) intraprocedural pain management, (2) cancer pain palliation, and (3) chronic non-cancer pain control. Short-term regional anaesthesia can be achieved with local anaesthetics, while longer-term pain control can be attained with radiofrequency neuromodulation (pulsed or otherwise) or thermal/chemical neurolysis. This review article summarises the therapeutic options, applications, and techniques of commonly used peripheral nerve and plexus interventions in IR.

Clinical Application of Ultrasound Microscopy-Guided Pediatric Brachial Plexus Nerve Block Anesthesia

In order to investigate the anesthetic effect and safety of the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in pediatric upper limb surgery, this study retrospectively analyzed the anesthetic effect of the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in pediatric upper limb surgery. From January 2016 to December 2017, 82 children undergoing upper limb surgery in hospital A were selected and randomly divided into two groups by the coin method, with 41 children in each group. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia and conventional anatomic localization brachial plexus block anesthesia were performed. The anesthetic drug dosage of sensory block at anesthesia completion time and motor block at onset time was compared between the two groups; the one-time puncture success rate and incidence of anesthesia complications were compared between the two groups (local anesthesia poisoning, nerve injury, pneumothorax, hematoma, and phrenic nerve palsy). The results showed that the anesthesia completion time in the study group was slightly longer than that in the control group. The sensory and motor block occurred earlier in the study group than in the control group. Low doses of narcotic drugs are used. The one-time puncture success rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group. The incidence of anesthesia complications was lower than that of the control group. The one-time puncture success rate was 92.8% in the study group and 75.7% in the control group. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia has a significant effect in pediatric upper limb surgery, which can improve the anesthetic effect and reduce the incidence of complications, and is worthy of clinical promotion.