Intra-arterial therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A meta-analysis

Comparison of systemic treatments for previously treated patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

There is limited evidence of comparative results among different treatments for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who have failed at least one line of previous systemic therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of systemic treatments among these patients through this investigation.

Methods

We collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English up until July 2023, from databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and prominent conference databases, for this Bayesian network meta-analysis. Phase II or III trials that evaluated at least two therapeutic regimens were included. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on metastatic sites. The current systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023420498).

Results

30 RCTs were included, with a total of 13,511 patients. Compared to chemotherapy, multi-targeted therapy (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87) and targeted therapy plus chemotherapy (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91) show significant advantages. Targeted therapy (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54-1.57) and local treatment plus chemotherapy (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.23) had comparable performance. For patients with liver metastases, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, aflibercept plus fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy (CTFU), and bevacizumab plus capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy (CTCA) showed the best outcomes in terms of OS. Bevacizumab plus intensified CTFU, bevacizumab plus CTCA, and HAI followed by single-agent chemotherapy (SingleCT) performed the best regarding PFS. For patients with liver-limited metastases, aflibercept plus CTFU is the optimal choice in OS. For PFS, the best options were HAI followed by SingleCT, aflibercept plus CTFU, and panitumumab plus CTFU. For patients with multiple-site metastases, the best treatments were TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, bevacizumab plus CTCA, bevacizumab plus CTFU, and aflibercept plus CTFU.

Conclusion

Multi-targeted therapy and targeted therapy plus chemotherapy are the best treatment mechanisms. TAS-102 plus bevacizumab is superior in OS, the combination of anti-VEGF drugs like bevacizumab and aflibercept with standard chemotherapy is the preferred option for CRLM patients.

Optimizing Treatment Strategy for Oligometastases/Oligo-Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, and nearly half of CRC patients experience metastases. Oligometastatic CRC represents a distinct clinical state characterized by limited metastatic involvement, demonstrating a less aggressive nature and potentially improved survival with multidisciplinary treatment. However, the varied clinical scenarios giving rise to oligometastases necessitate a precise definition, considering primary tumor status and oncological factors, to optimize treatment strategies. This review delineates the concepts of oligometastatic CRC, encompassing oligo-recurrence, where the primary tumor is under control, resulting in a more favorable prognosis. A comprehensive examination of multidisciplinary treatment with local treatments and systemic therapy is provided. The overarching objective in managing oligometastatic CRC is the complete eradication of metastases, offering prospects of a cure. Essential to this management approach are local treatments, with surgical resection serving as the standard of care. Percutaneous ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy present less invasive alternatives for lesions unsuitable for surgery, demonstrating efficacy in select cases. Perioperative systemic therapy, aiming to control micrometastatic disease and enhance local treatment effectiveness, has shown improvements in progression-free survival through clinical trials. However, the extension of overall survival remains variable. The review emphasizes the need for further prospective trials to establish a cohesive definition and an optimized treatment strategy for oligometastatic CRC.

The Evolving Role of Intra-arterial Chemotherapy in Adult and Pediatric Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

The development of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) was driven by an ambition to mitigate systemic side effects, enhance the bioavailability of drugs, and optimize the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. While the initial research on IAC primarily examined its effectiveness in treating various liver malignancies, the application of this treatment has undergone significant advancements since its introduction. The primary objective of this article is to examine the current range of utilization of IAC, both with and without radiotherapy, while also evaluating the results of relevant clinical trials. Furthermore, this article explores potential future advancements and opportunities in this field. From the scoping review of available articles, it can be concluded that IAC is an effective treatment alternative and, sometimes, a better first-line option, but there is a need for more evidence to make IAC a regular treatment option available for patients.

Coil Embolization of Variant Hepatic Arteries During Percutaneous Arterial Port Catheter Placement for Intraarterial Chemotherapy: Analysis of Intrahepatic Perfusion Redistribution and Treatment Efficacy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the intrahepatic perfusion redistribution after embolization of hepatic arterial variants during percutaneous arterial port catheter placement as well as to investigate the treatment efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy in perfusion redistribution-dependent compared to redistribution-independent liver areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 62 patients (67.7% males, mean age of 56 ± 12 years). A replaced left hepatic artery was encountered in 36/62 (58.1%), a replaced right hepatic artery in 19/62 (30.6%) and a replaced left and right hepatic artery in 7/62 of patients (11.3%), respectively. Subjective perfusion analysis was performed on digital subtracted angiography and computed tomography (CT)/cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images evaluating the visibility of the main, segmental and subsegmental branches of the embolized variant hepatic artery, re-perfused from intrahepatic arterial anastomoses. For objective perfusion analysis ROI measurements on CT/CBCT images were taken in the redistribution-dependent and redistribution-independent liver lobe. Response analysis according to RECIST 1.1 was separately calculated for the redistribution-dependent and redistribution-independent liver lobe.

RESULTS

Intrahepatic reperfusion of the embolized variant hepatic artery was observed immediately after embolization with visualization of the subsegmental branches in 95.2% of patients. ROI measurements on CT/CBCT images (right lobe mean 76 ± 30.2 HU, left lobe mean 74.4 ± 30.5, p-value 0.88) did not show any differences. Treatment response after intraarterial chemotherapy did not differ between the redistribution-dependent and redistribution-independent liver lobes.

CONCLUSION

Embolization of hepatic arterial variants during percutaneous arterial port catheter placement results in effective intrahepatic perfusion redistribution and does not compromise treatment efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy in the redistribution-dependent liver lobe.

Multifactorial Analysis of Clinical Prognosis of Liver Metastasis and Vascular Intervention Combined with Ablation in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of deaths in China. The initial stages of colorectal cancer can be treated by surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. However, in the advanced stages, it warrants an application of multimodality treatment. With advances in the medical field, there are applications of new modality of treatment that could possibly provide the appropriate treatment for the advanced stage tumours. The first site of metastasis after colorectal cancer is the liver and the conventional treatment to cure the metastatic lesion involves the administration of chemotherapy. With further advancement, chemotherapy has been directly administered at the thorough transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) which is a vascular intervention. With further advancement, the nonvascular intervention, such as radiofrequency ablations (RFAs), has been administered to the patients. A large amount of data support the use of vascular intervention (TACE) with ablation for hepatic carcinoma; there is no sufficient literature to support the application of the modality in the metastatic liver lesion. In this prospective observational study, we have enrolled 80 patients with metastatic liver lesion from the adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum, treated the patients with a combination of the TACE and ablation therapy, and followed up the patients for a period of 3 years. A multivariate analysis of the various factors that influence the prognosis and outcome has been studied and it has been concluded that the combination therapy is medically beneficial for individuals with aggressive liver lesions, improving overall as well as progression-free life span.

KMSubtraction: reconstruction of unreported subgroup survival data utilizing published Kaplan-Meier survival curves

Background

Data from certain subgroups of clinical interest may not be presented in primary manuscripts or conference abstract presentations. In an effort to enable secondary data analyses, we propose a workflow to retrieve unreported subgroup survival data from published Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots.

Methods

We developed KMSubtraction, an R-package that retrieves patients from unreported subgroups by matching participants on KM plots of the overall cohort to participants on KM plots of a known subgroup with follow-up time. By excluding matched patients, the opposing unreported subgroup may be retrieved. Reproducibility and limits of error of the KMSubtraction workflow were assessed by comparing unmatched patients against the original survival data of subgroups from published datasets and simulations. Monte Carlo simulations were utilized to evaluate the limits of error of KMSubtraction.

Results

The validation exercise found no material systematic error and demonstrates the robustness of KMSubtraction in deriving unreported subgroup survival data. Limits of error were small and negligible on marginal Cox proportional hazard models comparing reconstructed and original survival data of unreported subgroups. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that datasets with high reported subgroup proportion (r = 0.467, p < 0.001), small dataset size (r = − 0.374, p < 0.001) and high proportion of missing data in the unreported subgroup (r = 0.553, p < 0.001) were associated with uncertainty are likely to yield high limits of error with KMSubtraction.

Conclusion

KMSubtraction demonstrates robustness in deriving survival data from unreported subgroups. The limits of error of KMSubtraction derived from converged Monte Carlo simulations may guide the interpretation of reconstructed survival data of unreported subgroups.