Freezing Nodal Disease: Local Control Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Locoregional and Distant Lymph Node Oligometastases: A 10-Year, Single-Center Experience

Neoadjuvant in Situ and Systemic Immunotherapy with Lymph Node Cryoablation in Resectable Stage III Melanoma Metastasis: a Proof-of-Concept Study

PURPOSE

Complete lymph node dissection is the recommended treatment for clinically detectable lymph nodes in stage III melanoma. This surgery is associated with substantial morbidity. We hypothesize that combining percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation of locoregional lymph nodes metastases with neoadjuvant in situ and systemic immunotherapy could allow disease control and evaluate the feasibility of this combination in this proof-of-concept study.

METHODS

We enrolled 15 patients with stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma. Patients were treated as follows: a single 240 mg flat dose infusion of nivolumab on day 1, cryoablation under local anesthesia using CT on day 2, and a single intralesional injection of 10-20 mg of ipilimumab into the lymphadenopathy treated by cryotherapy on day 3. Five-eight weeks after this procedure, complete lymph node dissection was performed according to routine care. The primary outcome measure of this study was feasibility, measured as the number of failures (i.e., inability to complete the entire procedure).

RESULTS

The procedure was carried out successfully in 15 out of 15 patients with an observed number of failures of 0. The Bayesian analysis showed an estimated failure rate of 4.2% [0.2-20.6]. Eight patients (53%) had adverse events secondary to either immunotherapy or cryotherapy. Grade 3/4 events occurred in three patients, but all resolved quickly and patients could proceed to surgery as scheduled. Eight patients (53%) had a pathological complete or near complete response.

CONCLUSION

Combining percutaneous cryotherapy with in situ ipilimumab and systemic nivolumab for stage III resectable melanoma is feasible with tolerable toxicity.

Imaging in interventional oncology, the better you see, the better you treat

Imaging and image processing is the fundamental pillar of interventional oncology in which diagnostic, procedure planning, treatment and follow-up are sustained. Knowing all the possibilities that the different image modalities can offer is capital to select the most appropriate and accurate guidance for interventional procedures. Despite there is a wide variability in physicians preferences and availability of the different image modalities to guide interventional procedures, it is important to recognize the advantages and limitations for each of them. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the most frequently used image guidance modalities for interventional procedures and its typical and future applications including angiography, computed tomography (CT) and spectral CT, magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound and the use of hybrid systems. Finally, we resume the possible role of artificial intelligence related to image in patient selection, treatment and follow-up.

Focal therapy for primary tumor and metastases in de novo or recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer: current standing and future perspectives

PURPOSE

Focal therapy (FT) is gaining increasing acceptance in the management of localized prostate cancer particularly due to its favorable safety. Preliminary evidence suggests advantageous utilization of local treatment in the field of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Since data on the utilization of FT in OMPC are scarce, we sought to summarize available evidence.

METHODS

For this narrative comprehensive review, we employed PubMed®, Web of Science™, Embase®, Scopus®, and clinicaltrial.gov databases and Google web search engine to seek peer-reviewed articles, published abstracts from international congresses, and ongoing trials in the English language using the terms "prostate cancer", "oligometastatic", "hormone-sensitive", "focal therapy", "focal treatment", "cryotherapy", "ablation", "cancer" as well as "metastasis-directed therapy. We focused on relevant publications on FT utilized in OMPC targeting the primary or metastatic sites as well as completed and ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS

Growing evidence points to distinct differences in the biologic behavior and molecular signaling processes of OMPC as compared to polymetastatic disease (PMPC). No established biomarkers are available to accurately identify OMPC yet, while several candidates are currently under investigation. The evolution of molecular imaging is set to aid in selecting patients benefitting most from local management. Differences between OMPC and PMPC should be considered when designing the optimal therapeutic strategy. While efficacy data for FT in comparison to standard care in OMPC are scarce, longer progression-free survival and time to castration resistance have been demonstrated for bone metastatic prostate cancer with the primary tumor treated by cryosurgery followed by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to ADT alone.

CONCLUSION

Ongoing research efforts are eagerly awaited to better characterize OMPC and establish customized strategies for patients with this condition.

Percutaneous Ablation of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: An Insight from the Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Cryoablation and Radiofrequency Ablation

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare efficacy and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous ablation of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) between cryoablation (CA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A bi-central institutional database research identified 28 patients (42 metastatic LNs) who underwent percutaneous CT-guided ablation. RFA group included 18 patients/26 tumors; CA group included 10 patients/16 tumors. Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI was used for post-ablation follow-up. Patient and tumor characteristics, technical and clinical success on a per tumor and a per patient basis and complication rates were recorded, evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Both RFA and CA groups had the same median tumor size (2.00 vs. 2.20 cm, p = 0.257), the same median follow-up time (20.50 vs. 20.00 months, p = 0.923) and the same median length of hospital stay (1.00 vs. 1.00 days, p = 0.283). CA group had a higher median procedure time (110.50 vs. 52.00 min, p = 0.001). On a per lesion basis, the overall complete response post-ablation was 88.46% (23/26 lesions) in the RFA and 93.75% (15/16 lesions) in the CA group; no association was revealed between local tumor control and ablation technique (p = 0.709). No complications were recorded in both Groups. On a per patient basis, CA had a longer disease-free interval (24.00 vs. 14.50, p = 0.012) which, however, did not affect the overall survival between the two techniques (26.0 vs. 22.0, p = 0.099 for CA and RFA respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our limited data suggest that CT-guided RFA and CA are equally effective on terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of metastatic lymph nodes.