1
|
Orsi F, Hamiddin AS, Sattin C, Pizzi C, Varano GM, Della Vigna P, Mauri G, Maiettini D, Bonomo G. Liquid nitrogen-based cryoablation: complication rates for lung, bone, and soft tissue tumors cryoablation. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1863-1869. [PMID: 39226178 PMCID: PMC11491613 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the complication rate during and 24 hours after cryoablation in lung, bone, and soft tissue tumors. METHODS We reviewed complications in a total of 85 consecutive patients who underwent cryoablation using a liquid nitrogen-based system in various lesions between April 2017 and October 2022. There were no liver and renal lesions. Complications were categorized using the Society of Interventional Radiology classification. RESULTS Eighty-five patients were treated for 96 lesions in the bone (36.4%; 35 of 96), lung (18.8%; 18 of 96), and soft tissue (44.8%; 43 of 96). The primary technical success rate was 97.7% (83 of 85). The total grade 2 and 1 complication rates were 5.2% (5/96) and 20.8% (20/96), respectively. Two patients had asymptomatic pulmonary embolisms incidentally noted at the 24-hour follow-up computed tomography (grade 2). The most frequent complications were simple and hemorrhagic pleural effusions (18.7%; 18 of 96). Lung procedures had the highest complication rate, where 13 patients (72.2%; 13 of 18) reported complications, including 2 cases of symptomatic hydropneumothorax requiring drainage (grade 2) and an additional 2 days of hospital stay. Eight patients (24.2%; 8 of 33) with bone lesions and 4 (9.3%; 4 of 43) with soft tissue lesions experienced complications. CONCLUSION Cryoablation using a liquid nitrogen-based system is safe, with only minor complications observed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study provides data on the safety of liquid nitrogen-based percutaneous cryoablation in tumors located in lung, in bones and in soft tissues. Despite using larger diameter cryoprobes than those typically reported with argon-based system, our experience shows that complications are mostly low and comparable in frequency and severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Orsi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
| | - Aida Shazlin Hamiddin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
- Selayang Hospital, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Gianluca Maria Varano
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
| | - Paolo Della Vigna
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
| | - Daniele Maiettini
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
| | - Guido Bonomo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IRCCS), Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milan-20141, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Çevik HB, Ruggieri P, Giannoudis PV. Management of metastatic bone disease of the pelvis: current concepts. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:1277-1294. [PMID: 37934294 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02382-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastatic disease of the pelvis is frequently associated with severe pain and impaired ambulatory function. Depending on the patient's characteristics, primary tumor, and metastatic pelvic disease, the treatment choice may be varied. This study aims to report on the current management options of metastatic pelvic disease. METHODS We comprehensively researched multiple databases and evaluated essential studies about current concepts of managing a metastatic bone disease of the pelvis, focusing on specific indications as well as on the result of treatment. RESULTS Pelvic metastases not in the periacetabular region can be managed with modification of weight-bearing, analgesics, bisphosphonates, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Minimally invasive approaches include radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, embolization, percutaneous osteoplasty, and percutaneous screw placement. Pathological or impending periacetabular fracture, excessive periacetabular bone defect, radioresistant tumor, and persistent debilitating pain despite non-surgical treatment and/or minimally invasive procedures can be managed with different surgical techniques. Overall, treatment can be divided into nonoperative, minimally invasive, and operative based on specific indications, the expectations of the patient and the lesion. CONCLUSION Different treatment modalities exist to manage metastatic pelvic bone disease. Decision-making for the most appropriate treatment should be made with a multidisciplinary approach based on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hüseyin Bilgehan Çevik
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Pietro Ruggieri
- Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Peter V Giannoudis
- Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leporace M, Lancellotta V, Baccolini V, Calabria F, Castrovillari F, Filippiadis DK, Tagliaferri L, Iezzi R. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound versus percutaneous thermal ablation in local control of bone oligometastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:291-306. [PMID: 38302831 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01780-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The percutaneous thermal ablation techniques (pTA) are radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and microwave ablation, suitable for the treatment of bone oligometastases. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive ablation technique. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness and safety of MRgFUS and pTA for treating bone oligometastases and their complications. METHODS Studies were selected with a PICO/PRISMA protocol: pTA or MRgFUS in patients with bone oligometastases; non-exclusive curative treatment. Exclusion criteria were: primary bone tumor; concurrent radiation therapy; palliative therapy; and absence of imaging at follow-up. PubMed, BioMed Central, and Scopus were searched. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed articles quality. For each treatment (pTA and MRgFUS), we conducted two separate random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effectiveness and safety. The effectiveness was assessed by combining the proportions of treated lesions achieving local tumor control (LTC); the safety by combining the complications rates of treated patients. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify any outcome predictor. RESULTS A total of 24 articles were included. Pooled LTC rate for MRgFUS was 84% (N = 7, 95% CI 66-97%, I2 = 74.7%) compared to 65% of pTA (N = 17, 95% CI 51-78%, I2 = 89.3%). Pooled complications rate was similar, respectively, 13% (95% CI 1-32%, I2 = 81.0%) for MRgFUS and 12% (95% CI 8-18%, I2 = 39.9%) for pTA, but major complications were recorded with pTA only. The meta-regression analyses, including technique type, study design, tumor, and follow-up, found no significant predictors. DISCUSSION The effectiveness and safety of the two techniques were found comparable, even though MRgFUS is a noninvasive treatment that did not cause any major complication. Limited data availability on MRgFUS and the lack of direct comparisons with pTA may affect these findings. CONCLUSIONS MRgFUS can be a valid, safe, and noninvasive treatment for bone oligometastases. Direct comparison studies are needed to confirm its promising benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Leporace
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theragnostics, "Mariano Santo" Cosenza Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Calabria
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theragnostics, "Mariano Santo" Cosenza Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | | | - Dimitrios K Filippiadis
- Second Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" - Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Istituto Di Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Radiology - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cazzato RL, Garnon J, Jennings JW, Gangi A. Interventional management of malignant bone tumours. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:862-869. [PMID: 37742284 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
In the last few decades, interventional radiology (IR) has significantly increased its role in the management of bone tumours including bone metastases (BM) that represent the most common type of tumour involving the bone. The current IR management of BM is based on the 'palliative-curative' paradigm and relies on the use of consolidative (i.e. osteplasty, osteosynthesis) and/or ablation (i.e. cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, electrochemotherapy) techniques. The present narrative review will overview the current role of IR for the management of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julien Garnon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jack William Jennings
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cazzato RL, Dalili D, De Marini P, Koch G, Autrusseau PA, Weiss J, Auloge P, Garnon J, Gangi A. Bone Consolidation: A Practical Guide for the Interventional Radiologist. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:1458-1468. [PMID: 36539512 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03340-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, interventional radiologists have been increasingly involved in the management of bone fractures resulting from benign (osteoporosis and trauma), as well as malignant (tumor-related impending or pathologic fractures) conditions. Interventional techniques used to fix fractures include image-guided osteoplasty, screw-mediated osteosynthesis, or combinations of both. In the present narrative review, we highlight the most common clinical scenarios that may benefit from such interventional techniques with specific focus on spine, pelvic ring, and long bones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Danoob Dalili
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), Dorking Road, Epsom, London, KT18 7EG, UK
| | - Pierre De Marini
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Guillaume Koch
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Human Anatomy, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Julia Weiss
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre Auloge
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julien Garnon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Strand London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Papalexis N, Savarese LG, Peta G, Errani C, Tuzzato G, Spinnato P, Ponti F, Miceli M, Facchini G. The New Ice Age of Musculoskeletal Intervention: Role of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6744-6770. [PMID: 37504355 PMCID: PMC10377811 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of interventional oncology, minimally invasive methods, including CT-guided cryoablation, play an increasingly important role in tumor treatment, notably in bone and soft tissue cancers. Cryoablation works using compressed gas-filled probes to freeze tumor cells to temperatures below -20 °C, exploiting the Joule-Thompson effect. This cooling causes cell destruction by forming intracellular ice crystals and disrupting blood flow through endothelial cell damage, leading to local ischemia and devascularization. Coupling this with CT technology enables precise tumor targeting, preserving healthy surrounding tissues and decreasing postoperative complications. This review reports the most important literature on CT-guided cryoablation's application in musculoskeletal oncology, including sarcoma, bone metastases, and bone and soft tissue benign primary tumors, reporting on the success rate, recurrence rate, complications, and technical aspects to maximize success for cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Papalexis
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Leonor Garbin Savarese
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-09, Brazil
| | - Giuliano Peta
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Costantino Errani
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Tuzzato
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Spinnato
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Ponti
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Miceli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Facchini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minimally Invasive Interventional Procedures for Metastatic Bone Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4155-4177. [PMID: 35735441 PMCID: PMC9221897 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastases are the main type of malignancy involving bone, which is the third most frequent site of metastatic carcinoma, after lung and liver. Skeletal-related events such as intractable pain, spinal cord compression, and pathologic fractures pose a serious burden on patients’ quality of life. For this reason, mini-invasive treatments for the management of bone metastases were developed with the goal of pain relief and functional status improvement. These techniques include embolization, thermal ablation, electrochemotherapy, cementoplasty, and MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. In order to achieve durable pain palliation and disease control, mini-invasive procedures are combined with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, or analgesics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recently published literature regarding interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases, focusing on the efficacy, complications, local disease control and recurrence rate.
Collapse
|