Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Dosimetry of Glass-Based versus Resin-Based Microspheres

Voxel-based dosimetry with integrated Y-90 PET/MRI and prediction of response of primary and metastatic liver tumors to radioembolization with Y-90 glass microspheres

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the response of the primary and metastatic liver tumors to radioembolization with 90Y glass microspheres and investigate its correlations with dosimetric variables calculated with 90Y PET/MRI.

METHODS

In this ambispective study, 44 patients treated with 90Y glass microspheres and imaged with 90Y PET/MRI were included for analysis. Dosimetric analysis was performed for every perfused lesion using dose-volume histograms. Response was assessed by comparing pre-treatment and follow-up total lesion glycolysis (TLG) values derived from 18F-FDG PET imaging. The relationship between ΔTLG and log-transformed dosimetric variables was analyzed with linear mixed effects regression models. ROC analyses were performed to compare discriminatory power of the variables in predicting response and complete response.

RESULTS

Regression and ROC analyses demonstrated that mean tumor dose and almost all D values were statistically significant predictors of treatment response and complete treatment response. Specifically, D60, D70 and D80 values exhibited significantly higher discriminatory power for predicting treatment response compared to the mean dose (Dmean) delivered to tumor. High specificity cut-off values to predict response were determined as 160.75 Gy for Dmean, 95.50 Gy for D60, 89 Gy for D70, and 59.50 Gy for D80. Similarly, high-specificity cut-off values to predict complete response were 262.75 Gy for Dmean, 173 Gy for D70, 140.5 Gy for D80, and 100 Gy for D90.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated that voxel-based dosimetry with post-treatment 90Y PET/MRI can predict response to treatment. D60, D70 and D80 variables also did have greater discriminatory power compared to Dmean in prediction of response. In addition, we present high-specificity cut-offs to predict response (CR + PR) and complete response (CR) for both Dmean and several D variables derived from dose-volume histograms.

Using Voxel-Based Dosimetry to Evaluate Sphere Concentration and Tumor Dose in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy with Glass Microspheres

PURPOSE

To utilize voxel-based dosimetry following radiation segmentectomy (RS) to understand microsphere distribution and validate current literature regarding radiologic and pathologic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (N = 56) treated with yttrium-90 (90Y) RS with glass microspheres (Therasphere; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) from 2020 to 2022 was performed. Posttreatment voxel-based dosimetry was evaluated using Mirada DBx Build 1.2.0 Simplicit90Y software (Boston Scientific) and utilized to calculate sphere concentration to tumor as well as D70 (minimum dose to 70% total tumor volume), D90, and D99. Time to progression (TTP), treatment response, and adverse events were studied.

RESULTS

Fifty-six solitary tumors were analyzed with a median tumor diameter of 3.4 cm (range, 1.2-6.8 cm) and median tumor absorbed dose of 732 Gy (range, 252-1,776 Gy). Median sphere activity (SA) at the time of delivery was 1,446 Bq (range, 417-2,621 Bq). Median tumor sphere concentration was 12,868 spheres/mL (range, 2,655-37,183 spheres/mL). Sphere concentration into tumor and normal tissue was inversely correlated with perfused treatment volume (R2 = 0.21 and R2 = 0.39, respectively). Of the 51 tumors with posttreatment imaging, objective response was noted in 49 patients (96%) and complete response in 42 patients (82%). The median TTP was not reached with a 2-year progression rate of 11%. Fifteen patients underwent liver transplant. Median tumor necrosis was 99% (range, 80%-100%). Lower tumor volumes and higher D99 were associated with complete pathologic necrosis (P < .001 and P = .022, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Voxel-based dosimetry following 90Y radioembolization can be utilized to account for sphere deposition and distribution into tumor. Ablative RS with high SA yields durable radiologic and pathologic outcomes.

MIDOS: a novel stochastic model towards a treatment planning system for microsphere dosimetry in liver tumors

PURPOSE

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) procedures treat liver tumors by injecting radioactive microspheres into the hepatic artery. Currently, there is a critical need to optimize TARE towards a personalized dosimetry approach. To this aim, we present a novel microsphere dosimetry (MIDOS) stochastic model to estimate the activity delivered to the tumor(s), normal liver, and lung.

METHODS

MIDOS incorporates adult male/female liver computational phantoms with the hepatic arterial, hepatic portal venous, and hepatic venous vascular trees. Tumors can be placed in both models at user discretion. The perfusion of microspheres follows cluster patterns, and a Markov chain approach was applied to microsphere navigation, with the terminal location of microspheres determined to be in either normal hepatic parenchyma, hepatic tumor, or lung. A tumor uptake model was implemented to determine if microspheres get lodged in the tumor, and a probability was included in determining the shunt of microspheres to the lung. A sensitivity analysis of the model parameters was performed, and radiation segmentectomy/lobectomy procedures were simulated over a wide range of activity perfused. Then, the impact of using different microspheres, i.e., SIR-Sphere®, TheraSphere®, and QuiremSphere®, on the tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR), lung shunt fraction (LSF), and mean absorbed dose was analyzed.

RESULTS

Highly vascularized tumors translated into increased TNR. Treatment results (TNR and LSF) were significantly more variable for microspheres with high particle load. In our scenarios with 1.5 GBq perfusion, TNR was maximum for TheraSphere® at calibration time in segmentectomy/lobar technique, for SIR-Sphere® at 1-3 days post-calibration, and regarding QuiremSphere® at 3 days post-calibration.

CONCLUSION

This novel approach is a decisive step towards developing a personalized dosimetry framework for TARE. MIDOS assists in making clinical decisions in TARE treatment planning by assessing various delivery parameters and simulating different tumor uptakes. MIDOS offers evaluation of treatment outcomes, such as TNR and LSF, and quantitative scenario-specific decisions.

Efficacy and Safety of Radiation Segmentectomy with 90Y Resin Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Limited data are available on radiation segmentectomy (RS) for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using yttrium 90 (90Y) resin microsphere doses determined by using a single-compartment medical internal radiation dosimetry (MIRD) model. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RS treatment of HCC with 90Y resin microspheres using a single-compartment MIRD model and correlate posttreatment dose with outcomes. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study included adult patients with HCC who underwent RS with 90Y resin microspheres between July 2014 and December 2022. Posttreatment PET/CT and dosimetry were performed. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Per-lesion and overall response rates (ie, complete response [CR], objective response, disease control, and duration of response) were assessed at imaging using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Among 67 patients (median age, 69 years [IQR, 63-78 years]; 54 male patients) with HCC, median tumor absorbed dose was 232 Gy (IQR, 163-405 Gy). At 3 months, per-lesion and overall (per-patient) CR was achieved in 47 (70%) and 41 (61%) of 67 patients, respectively. At 6 months (n = 46), per-lesion rates of objective response and disease control were both 94%, and per-patient rates were both 78%. A total of 88% (95% CI: 79 99) and 72% (95% CI: 58, 90) of patients had a per-lesion and overall duration of response of 1 year or greater. At 1 month, a grade 3 clinical adverse event (abdominal pain) occurred in one of 67 (1.5%) patients. Median posttreatment OS was 26 months (95% CI: 20, not reached). Disease progression at 2 years was lower in the group that received 300 Gy or more than in the group that received less than 300 Gy (17% vs 61%; P = .047), with no local progression in the former group through the end of follow-up. Conclusion Among patients with HCC who underwent RS with 90Y resin microspheres, 88% and 72% achieved a per-lesion and overall duration of response of 1 year or greater, respectively, with one grade 3 adverse event. In patients whose tumors received 300 Gy or more according to posttreatment dosimetry, a disease progression benefit was noted. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Tumor Size and Watershed Area Correlate with Incomplete Treatment and Tumor Progression after Selective Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify factors of incomplete treatment after segmental transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for treatment-naive and solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 75 consecutive patients (age, 68.5 years [SD ± 8.0]; 25/75 [33.3%] women) with treatment-naive, solitary HCC underwent segmental or subsegmental TARE with glass microspheres (tumor size, 3.8 cm [SD ± 2.2]; administered dose, 222.6 Gy [SD ± 123.9]) at a single institution from November 2015 to June 2022. Radiologic response and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed as per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

Complete treatment was achieved in 48 of 75 (64.0%) patients (mean follow-up, 33.2 months [SD ± 27.4]). Patients with incomplete treatment (27/75, 36%) presented with larger tumor size (5.0 [SD ± 2.5] vs 3.1 [SD ± 1.6] cm; P = .0001), with more tumors located in the watershed zone (81.5% vs 41.7%; P = .001). These patients were less likely to be bridged to transplant or resection (22.2% vs 52.1%; P = .015). Watershed tumors demonstrated worse target tumor PFS (median PFS, 19 months vs not reached; P = .0104) and overall PFS (9.1 months vs not reached; P = .0077). Watershed location was associated with worse PFS among tumors >3 cm in size (8.4 months vs not reached; P = .035) but not in tumors ≤3 cm in size (52.2 months vs not reached; P = .915).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size and watershed location were associated with incomplete treatment after segmental TARE for HCC. Watershed tumors were associated with worse PFS, particularly tumors larger than 3 cm. These tumors may require careful treatment planning and repeated treatments to ensure a durable response.

Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Practical Review of Evidence

Radiation segmentectomy is a versatile, safe, and effective ablative therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Advances in radiation segmentectomy patient selection, procedural technique, and dosimetry have positioned this modality as a curative-intent and guideline-supported treatment for patients with solitary HCC. This review describes key radiation segmentectomy concepts and summarizes the existing literary knowledgebase.

Predictive Dosimetry and Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Yttrium-90 Resin Microsphere Radioembolization: A Retrospective Analysis Using Technetium-99m Macroaggregated Albumin Single Photon Emission CT/CT and Planning Software

PURPOSE

To characterize estimated mean absorbed tumor dose (ADT), objective response (OR), and estimated target dose of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resin microsphere yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization using partition dosimetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, multicompartment dosimetry of index tumors receiving 90Y radioembolization between October 2015 and June 2022 was performed using a commercial software package and pretreatment technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT). In total, 101 patients with HCC underwent 102 treatments of 127 index tumors. Patients underwent imaging every 2-3 months after treatment to determine best response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Best response was defined as the greatest response category per mRECIST and categorized as OR or nonresponse (NR). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the probability of tumor OR and progression-free survival using ADT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 148 days (interquartile range [IQR], 92-273 days). The median ADT of OR was 141.9 Gy (IQR, 89.4-215.8 Gy) compared with the median ADT of NR treatments of 70.8 Gy (IQR, 42.0-135.3 Gy; P < .001). Only ADT was predictive of response (hazard ratio = 2.79 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.44-5.40]; P = .003). At 6 months, an ADT of 157 Gy predicted 90.0% (95% CI: 41.3%-98.3%) probability of OR. At 1 year, an ADT of 157 Gy predicted 91.6% (95% CI: 78.3%-100%) probability of progression-free survival. Partition modeling and delivered activity were predictive of progression (P = .021 and P = .003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For HCC treated with resin microspheres, tumors receiving higher ADT exhibited higher rates of OR. An ADT of 157 Gy predicted 90.0% OR at 6 months.

Vortex-assisted resin y90 delivery via 175 cm Truselect microcatheter: case factors for high residual despite double-flush protocol

PURPOSE

To report efficiency of resin y90 delivery using SIROS via 175 cm TruSelect microcatheter with double-flush protocol (40 ml dextrose total).

METHODS

IRB-approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing SIROS injection of y90 Sir-Spheres via TruSelect from 2019 through 2022 at one quaternary-care academic institution, including medical records.

RESULTS

Included were 48 infusions in 25 patients across 11 cancer histologies. Mean planned, delivered, and residual activities were 28 ± 17, 27 ± 17, 1.1 ± 0.56 mCi respectively (mean residual 4.9% ± 2.8%) across flex-dosing precalibrations including 1-day, 2-day, and 3-day SIROS (4/51, 16/51, and 28/51). Mean liver treatment volume was 483 ± 306 ml with target dose mean of 128 ± 26 Gy in non-segmentectomy cases; Radiation segmentectomy was performed in 15/48 (31%). Arterial stasis was documented in 9/48 (19%) of cases. Use of a 3-day precalibrated SIROS dose, use of activity <10 mCi, treatment of smaller liver volumes (<200 ml) and documentation of stasis were associated with higher residual activity ( P  = 0.025, P  = 0.0007, P  = 0.0177, and P  = 0.049, respectively) were associated with higher residuals.

CONCLUSION

Combining the new technologies of SIROS and the Truselect microcatheter with a double-flush protocol yielded <10% residual in 94% of y90 infusions. Future studies may clarify if the predictors of high residual dose seen here may warrant microcatheter-specific considerations for dosimetry or dose preparation at the Radiopharmacy level.

Surgery and radioembolization of liver tumors

Surgical resection is considered the curative treatment par excellence for patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors. However, less than 40% of them are candidates for surgery, either due to non-modifiable factors (comorbidities, age, liver dysfunction…), or to the invasion or proximity of the tumor to the main vascular requirements, the lack of a future liver remnant (FLR) adequate to maintain postoperative liver function, or criteria of tumor size and number. In these last factors, hepatic radioembolization has been shown to play a role as a presurgical tool, either by hypertrophy of the FLR or by reducing tumor size that manages to reduce tumor staging (term known as "downstaging"). To these is added a third factor, which is its ability to apply the test of time, which makes it possible to identify those patients who present progression of the disease in a short period of time (both locally and at distance), avoiding a unnecessary surgery. This paper aims to review RE as a tool to facilitate liver surgery, both through the experience of our center and the available scientific evidence.