Microwave Ablation for Inoperable Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Aged ≥70 Years: A Prospective, Single-Center Study

Efficacy and Safety of thermal ablation for Patients With stage I non-small cell lung cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to measure the safety and efficacy of thermal ablation, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases PubMed was searched from inception to November 2023 to identify relevant studies. Statistical analyses were performed with R version 3. 6. 3.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies involving 1400 patients were finally included. According to our study, the incidence of patients with stage I NSCLC who were older than 60 years old was 98 % (95 % CI [94-100 %]); the lesions were mostly located in RUL (Right Upper Lobe) and LUL (Left Upper Lobe), and the incidence of the two sites was 29 % (95 % CI [23-35 %]) and 27 % (95 % CI [21-33 %]), respectively; the types of lung cancers mainly included adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, and large-cell lung cancer, of which adenocarcinoma accounted for the largest proportion of 63 % (95 % CI [56-70 %]); the causes of death were mainly categorized into cancer-related (57 %, 95 %CI[40-74 %]) and noncancer-related (40 %, 95 %CI [23-58 %]); the common complications in the postoperative period were pneumothorax and pain, with the incidence of 33 % (95 %CI[24-44 %]) and 33 % (95 %CI[19-50 %]), and the rate of the postoperative complications in MWA was slightly higher than those in RFA; the local recurrence rate was 23 % (95 %CI[17-29 %]) and the distant recurrence rate was 18 % (95 %CI[7-32 %]); the pooling result showed the rate of 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate were 96 %, 81 %, 68 %, and 42 %, the Cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98 %, 88 %, 75 %, and 58 %, Disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 87 %, 63 %, 57 %, and 42 %, there were no significant differences existed between the RFA group and MWA group in survival rate, CSS and DFS.

CONCLUSION

Ablation therapy is safe and effective for stage I NSCLC patient. MWA and RFA have comparable efficacy, safety, and prognosis, which could be recommended for patients with stageⅠNSCLC, especially for patients who cannot tolerate open surgery.

Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation and its synergistic potential in the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the primary cause of cancer-related mortality globally. In the case of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection, such as lobectomy and sub-lobectomy, continues to be the established standard treatment. However, for patients with insufficient cardiopulmonary function and multiple comorbidities who are unable to undergo surgical resection, nonoperative local therapies, including radiotherapy and thermal ablation, are preferred. In recent years, microwave ablation (MWA) has gained popularity for treating early-stage NSCLC due to its high heating efficiency, good tissue conductance, and heat conduction capabilities. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the current efficacy and safety data regarding MWA for early-stage NSCLC and discusses the potential benefits of combining MWA with other therapies.