Early Prediction of Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy Using a Machine Learning MR Imaging Radiomic Approach

Research progress on machine algorithm prediction of liver cancer prognosis after intervention therapy

The treatment for liver cancer has transitioned from traditional surgical resection to interventional therapies, which have become increasingly popular among patients due to their minimally invasive nature and significant local efficacy. However, with advancements in treatment technologies, accurately assessing patient response and predicting long-term survival has become a crucial research topic. Over the past decade, machine algorithms have made remarkable progress in the medical field, particularly in hepatology and prognosis studies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Machine algorithms, including deep learning and machine learning, can identify prognostic patterns and trends by analyzing vast amounts of clinical data. Despite significant advancements, several issues remain unresolved in the prognosis prediction of liver cancer using machine algorithms. Key challenges and main controversies include effectively integrating multi-source clinical data to improve prediction accuracy, addressing data privacy and ethical concerns, and enhancing the transparency and interpretability of machine algorithm decision-making processes. This paper aims to systematically review and analyze the current applications and potential of machine algorithms in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing interventional therapy for liver cancer, providing theoretical and empirical support for future research and clinical practice.

Radiomics Features Extracted From Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging in Early Prediction of Treatment Response in Patients Undergoing Transarterial Radioembolization of Hepatic Lesions: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Quality Appraisal Study

INTRODUCTION

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the most promising therapeutic options for hepatic masses. Radiomics features, which are quantitative numeric features extracted from medical images, are considered to have potential in predicting treatment response in TARE. This article aims to provide meta-analytic evidence and critically appraise the methodology of radiomics studies published in this regard.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. All relevant articles were retrieved, and the characteristics of the studies were extracted. The Radiomics Quality Score and Checklist for Evaluation of Radiomics Research were used to assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in predicting objective response were determined.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 15 studies. The average Radiomics Quality Score of these studies was 11.4 ± 2.1, and the average Checklist for Evaluation of Radiomics Research score was 33± 6.7. There was a notable correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.73) between the two metrics. Adherence to quality measures differed considerably among the studies and even within different components of the same studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics models in predicting complete or partial response were 83.5% (95% confidence interval 76%-88.9%) and 86.7% (95% confidence interval 78%-92%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics models show great potential in predicting treatment response in TARE of hepatic lesions. However, the heterogeneity seen between the methodologic quality of studies may limit the generalizability of the results. Future initiatives should aim to develop radiomics signatures using multiple external datasets and adhere to quality measures in radiomics methodology.