Comparative evaluation of a reverse transcriptase based assay for HIV-1 viral load quantitation in resource limited settings

Quantitative Evaluation of Very Low Levels of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase by a Novel Highly Sensitive RT-qPCR Assay

Based on previous experience in our laboratory, we developed a real-time reverse transcriptase (RT) quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay for the assessment of very low levels of HIV-1 RT activity. The RNA, acting as a template for reverse transcription into cDNA by HIV-1 RT, consisted of a synthetic RNA ad hoc generated by in vitro transcription and included a coding sequence for HSV-1 gD (gD-RNA-synt). Different conditions of variables involved in the RT-qPCR reaction, notably different amounts of gD-RNA-synt, different mixes of the reaction buffer, and different dNTP concentrations, were tested to optimize the assay. The results indicated that the gD-RNA-synt-based RT assay, in its optimized formulation, could detect a specific cDNA reverse transcription even in the presence of 1 × 10^-9 U of HIV RT. This achievement greatly improved the sensitivity of the assay over previous versions. In summary, this constructed RT-qPCR assay may be considered a promising tool for providing accurate information on very low HIV-1 RT activity.

Focus on recently developed assays for detection of resistance/sensitivity to reverse transcriptase inhibitors

The biology of HIV is rather complex due to high rate of replication, frequent recombination, and introduction of mutations. This gives rise to a number of distinct variants referred as quasispecies. In addition, the latency within reservoir allows the periodic reactivation of virus replication. The rapid replication of HIV allows immune response escape and establishment of resistance to therapy that can be acquired through drug selection and/or transmitted among individuals. This prompted, over the years, the development of a range of assays aimed to determine drug resistance and sensitivity, to be used both in clinical practice and in antiviral research. Reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors have an eminent place among the anti-HIV drugs, being constantly present from the beginning until today in the most commonly used antiviral regimens. This mini-review seeks to provide an up-to-date overview of recent efforts in developing even more reliable and simple methods, of both genotypic and phenotypic types, for specifically detecting drug resistance and sensitivity to RT inhibitors.

Can HIV reverse transcriptase activity assay be a low-cost alternative for viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance and cost of an HIV reverse transcriptase-enzyme activity (HIV-RT) assay in comparison to an HIV-1 RNA assay for routine viral load monitoring in resource limited settings.

DESIGN

A cohort-based longitudinal study.

SETTING

Two antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres in Karnataka state, South India, providing treatment under the Indian AIDS control programme.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 327 HIV-1-infected Indian adult patients initiating first-line ART.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Performance and cost of an HIV-RT assay (ExaVir Load V3) in comparison to a gold standard HIV-1 RNA assay (Abbott m2000rt) in a cohort of 327 Indian patients before (WK00) and 4 weeks (WK04) after initiation of first-line therapy.

RESULTS

Plasma viral load was determined by an HIV-1 RNA assay and an HIV-RT assay in 629 samples (302 paired samples and 25 single time point samples at WK00) obtained from 327 patients. Overall, a strong correlation of r=0.96 was observed, with good correlation at WK00 (r=0.84) and at WK04 (r=0.77). Bland-Altman analysis of all samples showed a good level of agreement with a mean difference (bias) of 0.22 log10copies/mL. The performance of ExaVir Load V3 was not negatively affected by a nevirapine/efavirenz based antiretroviral regimen. The per test cost of measuring plasma viral load by the Abbott m2000rt and ExaVir Load V3 assays in a basic lab setting was $36.4 and $16.8, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong correlation between the HIV-RT and HIV-1 RNA assays suggests that the HIV-RT assay can be an affordable alternative option for monitoring patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN79261738.

The performance of reverse transcriptase assay for the estimation of the plasma viral load in HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections

Viral load testing for human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) in resource-poor settings continues to be a challenge. Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) is being made available in developing countries, monitoring of viral load is not being done on a regular basis. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of Cavidi version 3.0, which measures the plasma reverse transcriptase (RT) activity and compare its performance with molecular HIV viral load assays. In all, 125 HIV-1 and 13 HIV-2 positive samples were analyzed. The overall sensitivity of the assay was 86.8% and 94.1% for viral load >1000 copies/ml measured by Qiagen Artus HIV-1 RG RT PCR and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 PCR assays, respectively. Compared with the routine molecular viral load assays, Cavidi version 3.0 is inexpensive, user-friendly, the expenditure on infrastructure is minimal, and it can be used for monitoring of both HIV types.