Optimization and evaluation of a method to detect adenoviruses in river water

Improved virus concentration methods for wash waters from decontamination of permeable and non-permeable surfaces

Surface decontamination is a method of using wash water to decontaminated surfaces preventing transmission of biological contaminants that can pose potential health risks to responders and the public. However, the risks associated with handling used wash water are largely unknown due to the lack of effective methodology to screen for pathogenic microorganisms present in these samples, especially viral pathogens. This study adapted the dead-end hollow-fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF) system to wash waters, including a separate procedure for recovering particle attached viruses. Simulated wash water was created using dechlorinated tap water containing a mild surfactant (0.05 % Tween 80). To determine virus recovery efficiencies, measured amounts of somatic and F+ coliphage were spiked into 2-liter volumes of wash water under the following scenarios: (1) wash water was amended with a measured amount of sterile river sediment with no sediment separation prior to filter concentration; or (2) sediment added to wash water was allowed to settle prior to filter concentrating clarified liquid portions, while precipitated sediment was subjected to viral extraction techniques to recover particle attached virus; and (3) the optimized method was deployed on non-porous and porous surfaces to simulate a decontamination clean-up event. Separation of sediment prior to D-HFUF significantly increased recovery of coliphages, (P = <0.0001) versus filtration of sediment and liquids simultaneously. A tryptic soy broth (TSB) elution solution was significantly more effective (P = ≤0.010) for recovery of both somatic and F+ coliphage, (108 ± 9 % and 92 ± 9 %, respectively), compared to elution buffers containing various surfactants (sodium hexametaphosphate, Tween 80) for recovering particle attached virus. Simulating a biocontaminate clean-up event (using the optimized sediment separation and elution protocol) resulted in coliphage recoveries of 75-96 % (permeable surface) and 71-92 % (non-permeable surface). This procedure can be used to effectively detect viruses in used wash waters aiding in reducing risks to human health during site decontamination.

Assessment of two volumetrically different concentration approaches to improve sensitivities for SARS-CoV-2 detection during wastewater monitoring

Wastewater monitoring for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has highlighted the need for methodologies capable of assessing viral prevalence during periods of low population infection. To address this need, two volumetrically different, methodologically similar concentration approaches were compared for their abilities to detect viral nucleic acid and infectious SARS-CoV-2 signal from primary influent samples. For Method 1, 2 L of SARS-CoV-2 seeded wastewater was evaluated using a dead-end hollow fiber ultrafilter (D-HFUF) for primary concentration, followed by the CP Select™ for secondary concentration. For Method 2, 100 mL of SARS-CoV-2 seeded wastewater was evaluated using the CP Select™ procedure. Following D-HFUF concentration (Method 1), significantly lower levels of infectious SARS-CoV-2 were lost (P value range: 0.0398-0.0027) compared to viral gene copy (GC) levels detected by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) N1 and N2 reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays. Subsamples at different steps in the concentration process were also taken to better characterize the losses of SARS-CoV-2 during the concentration process. During the centrifugation step (prior to CP Select™ concentration), significantly higher losses (P value range: 0.0003 to <0.0001) occurred for SARS-CoV-2 GC levels compared to infectious virus for Method 1, while between the methods, significantly higher infectious viral losses were observed for Method 2 (P = 0.0002). When analyzing overall recovery of endogenous SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples, application of Method 1 improved assay sensitivities (P = <0.0001) compared with Method 2; this was especially evident during periods of lower COVID-19 case rates within the sewershed. This study describes a method which can successfully concentrate infectious SARS-CoV-2 and viral RNA from wastewater. Moreover, we demonstrated that large volume wastewater concentration provides additional sensitivity needed to improve SARS-CoV-2 detection, especially during low levels of community disease prevalence.