Endoscopic management of complications in digestive surgery

Management of benign anastomotic strictures following rectal resection: a systematic review

AIM

Benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgical resection are a commonly under-reported complication in up to 30% of patients, with a significant impact upon quality of life. In this systematic review, we aim to assess the utility of endoscopic techniques in avoiding the need for surgical reintervention.

METHOD

A literature search was performed for published full text articles using the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases. Additional papers were found by scanning the references of relevant papers.

RESULTS

A total of 34 papers were included, focusing upon balloon dilatation, endoscopic stenting, electroincision, stapler stricturoplasty and cortiocosteroids alone and in combination, with success rates varying from 20% to 100%. The most challenging strictures were reported as those with a narrow lumen, frequently observed following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or an anastomotic leak. Endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most commonly used first-line method; however, repeated dilatations were often required and this was associated with an increased risk of perforation. Although initial success rates for stents were good, patients often experienced stent migration and local symptoms. Only a small number of patients experienced endoscopic management failure and progressed to surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Following identification of an anastomotic stricture and exclusion of underlying malignancy, endoscopic management is both safe and feasible as a first-line option, even if multiple treatment exposures or multimodal management is required. Surgical resection or a defunctioning stoma should be reserved for emergency or failed cases. Further research is required into multimodal and novel therapies to improve quality of life for these patients.

Role of endoscopic interventions and electroincision in benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The anastomotic strictures are one of the most common colorectal surgery complications, and various endoscopic techniques have been defined. Balloon dilation is the most well-known and the simplest procedure. In this article, we aimed to present our series of endoscopic interventions and electroincision management for anastomotic strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of 59 patients, who underwent colorectal surgery between January 2010 and September 2017 in our hospital and were diagnosed during the follow-up with anastomotic stricture, were analyzed. The outcomes of endoscopic interventions such as balloon dilation and electroincision were compared and reported.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 59 patients included in the study was 59.5±16.26 years. The primary operative indications were colorectal cancer in 46, inflammatory bowel disease in 7, diverticulum in 5, and penetrating trauma in one patient. Single- or multiple-balloon dilations were successful in 48 patients. Electroincision was performed in 11 patients because of the balloon dilation failure. None of the patients needed a secondary surgery. During the mean 33.75 months of the follow-up, the stricture recurred in seven patients who had undergone balloon dilation. Repeated balloon dilation was successful in these patients without any need for an additional surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Balloon dilation can be performed safely as the primary treatment option, because of its easy access and noninvasive application. Electroincision is also a safe and effective endoscopic technique that can be preferred especially when the balloon dilation fails.

Anastomotic leaks in gastrointestinal surgery and their prevention

Anastomotic leak in the gastrointestinal tract is one of the most important complications of resection. They are the main cause of reoperation, their occurrence worsens the prognosis of the patient, increasing the proportion of direct mortality, as well as being a significant risk factor for recurrence of cancer. The risk of leaks within the gastrointestinal tract is greatly varied, depending on the location and extent of the resection, but also on patient, disease or a surgical procedure, including surgeon. To determine the potential risk of leakage can be significant for introduction some prophylactic actions. Some of them have the character of general recommendations, as proper nutrition of the patient in the perioperative period, while another part is directly connected to the surgical procedure. The second group includes protective stoma, the use of tissue glues, insertion transrectal drain for rectal anastomosis decompression, the use of stents or the use of collagen matrix coated with fibrinogen and thrombin. Important to reduce the proportion of leaks can be more precise and targeted prophylactic recommendations, based on the individualized determination of risk factors leaks. Further research for this purpose are necessary for this purpose, the big hope can be associated with data obtained through mobile applications.

Abdominal surgical emergencies in patients with advanced cancer

Abdominal emergency in an advanced oncologic setting is defined as an acute life-threatening abdominal pathology in a patient with incurable cancer. These include bowel obstruction, infections and, more rarely, hemorrhage. To benefit the patient, surgery should both increase the survival and improve the quality of life. These two goals are of equal importance and must be achieved together. This is difficult because these patients are frail, often malnourished and have a poor performance status. They also have a high risk of post-operative morbidity and mortality, a major risk of symptom recurrence and a limited life expectancy. For patients near the end-of-life, a therapeutic decision for surgical intervention must respect ethical and legal standards. This review reports the surgical outcomes and median survival of these patients, specifies rules that must be known and respected, and presents non-operative interventional alternatives.