The future of hemorrhoidal surgery: Towards an “à la carte” choice of minimally invasive techniques?

Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II-III Hemorrhoids: Is it Worth the Use of Doppler Guide in Long-Term Follow-Up?: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Background

Hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) may reduce postoperative pain and complications and shorten patients' recovery when compared to standard hemorrhoidectomy. It is unclear if the Doppler guide (DG) is useful in reducing recurrence risk.

Objective

To compare two groups of patients (treated with DG-HAL or HAL) in terms of recurrence risk and patients' satisfaction grade.

Methods

Between January 1, 2014 and January 31, 2021, 122 patients affected by grade II-III hemorrhoidal prolapse underwent DG-HAL or HAL at Chivasso Hospital, Italy. Mucopexy was routinely performed. After discharge, patients were subjected to 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month clinical assessment. Thereafter, they were interviewed by telephone annually.

Results

Seventy-six (62.3%) DG-HAL and 46 (37.7%) HAL procedures were performed. Median surgical time was 30 (15-45) minutes for DG-HAL versus 25 (15-40) minutes for HAL (P = 0.005). No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative bleeding needing surgery occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients in the DG-HAL group. During a median follow-up of 46 months (6-86), we registered 18 (23.7%) recurrences in the DG-HAL group and 13 (28.3%) in the HAL one (P = 0.574). No cases of incontinence or anal stenosis occurred. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of patients' satisfaction. At multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years resulted a protective factor for recurrence (odds ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.98; P = 0.047).

Conclusions

In our study, the use of DG did not reduce recurrence risk. Operative time was significantly increased in the DG-HAL group.

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A PRISMA-compliant updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) and stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) in the treatment of hemorrhoids by a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing SH with THD were searched for in databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database. Data were independently extracted from each study, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.2 software.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs, including 977 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences were noted between THD and SH in terms of total complications (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.69, 1.25), but a significant differences were noted in terms of bleeding (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.10). The total recurrence rate was higher in THD than in SH on short-term follow-up; however, the recurrence rate was equal in both the THD and SH groups on long-term follow-up. The present study showed that no significant difference between SH and THD in terms of postoperative pain (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, -0.43, 1.29), operative time (OR, -3.12; 95% CI, -7.01, 0.77), hospital time (OR, -0.00; 95% CI, -0.21, 0.20), time before returning to work (OR,-0.50; 95%CI, -4.42,3.43), and reoperation rate (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.93, 3.54).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that THD and SH are equally effective techniques for the treatment of hemorrhoids. However, future studies addressing cost-effectiveness, satisfaction rate, and recurrence rate over a long follow-up period are needed to validate these results.

Transanal anopexy with HemorPex System (HPS) is effective in treating grade II and III hemorrhoids: medium-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease is a common proctologic disorder. The HemorPex System(®) (HPS) (Angiologica, S. Martino Siccomario PV, Italy) is an innovative surgical technique based on muco-hemorrhoidopexy without Doppler guidance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HPS in on the treatment of grade II and III hemorrhoids.

METHODS

One hundred patients with grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease were included in the study and operated on using HPS without Doppler guidance. The procedure consists of a mucopexy carried out by means of a dedicated rotating anoscope in the 6 relatively constant positions of the terminal branches of the superior hemorrhoidal artery. A direct follow-up was carried out on 100 patients for up to 3 months. A late analysis (>12 months postoperatively) was conducted by telephone interview. At follow-up the following parameters were considered: pain, bleeding, prolapse, difficulties with hygiene and patient satisfaction with treatment.

RESULTS

Operative time was 16 ± 5 min. Three-month follow-up showed significant improvement of symptoms: pain was present in 10 (10 %) patients versus 45 (45 %) preoperatively; bleeding in 13 (13 %) of patients versus 57 (57 %) preoperatively; prolapse in 13 (13 %) of patients versus 45 (45 %) preoperatively and difficulties with hygiene in 1 (1 %) versus 24 (24 %) preoperatively (all p < 0.05). At longer follow-up which was available in 67 patients, 5 patients (7.5 %) had recurrence and were reoperated on at 8, 10, 24, 26 and 36 months, respectively after the first procedure. As regards patient satisfaction, complete satisfaction was reported by 95/100 patients (95 %) at 3 months, 62/67 (92.5 %) at 12 months and 8/56 (85.7 %) at 24 months; partial satisfaction was reported by 3/100 patients (3 %) with intermittent bleeding at 3 months, 3/67 (4.4 %) patients at 12 months and 6/56 (10.7 %) patients at 24 months, all with either intermittent bleeding or prolapse. Dissatisfaction with the procedure was reported by in 1/100 (1 %) patient at 3 months, 2/67 (2.9 %) at 12 months and 2/56 (3.6 %) at 24 months including patients who underwent reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

HPS can be used in the treatment of grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Our results show that this simple technique may be an effective but due to the important limitations of this study (loss to follow-up, non-comparative study) further studies are required.